Daniel Shvartsman
Daniel Shvartsman
Send Message
Daniel Shvartsman
Stop FollowingDaniel Shvartsman
View as an RSS Feed
COMMENTS STATS
65 Comments
18 Likes

Velti's And Millennial Media's Second Quarters: Good News For Facebook, Pandora [View article]
Velti's And Millennial Media's Second Quarters: Good News For Facebook, Pandora [View article]
Helps isn't the right word. My argument is that both MM and VELT's results show that mobile advertising, when done right, is growing fast and becoming more and more profitable. Research (like the Meeker report) shows other examples of mobile becoming profitable, that mobile usage is booming, and that mobile is not yet as profitable as desktop internet. As advertising dollars go towards mobile - which the research and Velti/MM results both suggest will happen - Pandora and Facebook, as major mobile "destinations" or channels, will become increasingly attractive venues for advertisement if those two companies can find a way to make themselves attractive. Facebook's work on sponsored story news feed is an example of their strategy, Pandora's building out of their local sales teams exemplifies their approach. The fact that Google has had some success with mobile and views this as equivalent to early days of the desktop internet boom also makes clear the opportunity at hand.
Basically, what I'm trying to add to the discussion is that for people following Pandora and Facebook, mobile = bad news. The things I cited above suggest mobile can be a positive, and a big one, considering the head start Pandora and Facebook have in access to users. Whether those two companies can take advantage or not remains to be seen, which is why they're risky and in part why FB has sank like a stone since coming public.
Anyway, hope that makes sense and that the same thesis comes across in the article. I enjoyed your article on Velti today too; looks like we agree that it's the best way to play the space. We'll see how the others do.
Daniel
Parker Hannifin: Growing Amid A Fluid Situation [View article]
That's a good question, and I'm not super sure. I think it's mostly due to the early summer distrust of industrials and Europe, both of which are part of PH's profile. The solid earnings beat and better overall sentiment have driven the stock up 15% since I wrote this, so it looks like I was wrong about this "not being the time to buy". I wouldn't call it criminally cheap any more, but there's a little room still left for the stock to rise.
Plunging Into Cliffs Natural Resources' Share Price Dive [View article]
Thanks for all the comments, lots of interesting ideas to pick through!
After The Falls: Now's The Time To Jump Back Into First Niagara [View article]
What do you (or anyone else) think about earnings?
Post-Hype Sleepers: A Look At An Overlooked Stock Class And Tornier [View article]
Honeywell Vs. Eaton: Picking Among Winners [View article]
Beyond The Earnings Headlines, PNC Still A Top Regional Bank Play [View article]
Also, a note: I wrote this on Sunday night; obviously, PNC crashed through its 200-day MA yesterday. We'll see what that means for the stock short-term, but I'm adding to my position at 55 or 56 if it gets there.
The Slow Crawl: Caterpillar Is Undervalued, But Not An Obvious Buy (Yet) [View article]
I like diversification for sure, but I would do it gradually as Caterpillar's stock rises eventually. Now is not a good time to sell off. You could also buy other stocks with any new money to lessen the CAT concentration.
Anybody else have any thoughts?
Behind The Music (And TV, Video And Games): Rovi's Comeback Story [View article]
Utility Laggards: Time To Consider American Electric Power, Exelon, PPL [View article]
I am actually long NFG, but in a portfolio that I inherited the management of from my partner, so I can't claim much credit or blame for it. I think its fortunes are obviously tied to natural gas prices.
Big Thunder, I understand the move. If you feel you have better options than a high yielder that you can only really trade the position on for a few years, you should go for it. In a diversified portfolio, it has its place.
Yes ETEP, you're right, thanks for the correction.
Thanks for all the comments!
The Slow Crawl: Caterpillar Is Undervalued, But Not An Obvious Buy (Yet) [View article]
I agree, Ray, that the analysts are over pessimistic, but this is a tough environment. Caterpillar, as a powerhouse, should be back into gear by the end of the 3rd quarter I think. We'll see how it goes.
Utility Laggards: Time To Consider American Electric Power, Exelon, PPL [View article]
Thanks for the comments! On Exelon's unchanging dividend vs. PPL, it's a fair point, but I wonder if PPL can keep growing over these next two years. I like both stocks, I had to liquidate my PPL position in one portfolio earlier this year but it's a good stock, and I've written about my support of Exelon elsewhere. Duke is also interesting and definitely still at a discount with the whole CEO scandal. Baseballbill, utilities are for sure not as boring as the business would suggest. I imagine they will continue to provide intrigue, for better or worse. It's one of the shared characteristics among big business of any sort.
Duke Energy High Jinks: Red Flag, Buying Opportunity Or Both? [View article]
Of course, the numbers remain outrageous, but that's how it goes. I think I'm in the same boat as you about the stock - it stinks, but if the price drops, it's hard to ignore the company. Duke is up today so far.
MTMatt, I only used that quote because I thought it appropriate and because it's what came to mind when I thought about writing this article. The next step is to jam wholly inappropriate music quotes into my writing. We'll see how on top of it the editing staff is here.
(That's a joke, SA editing folks. You're very on top of it, and I'm glad for it).
Eaton Is Positioned Well For Years To Come [View article]