The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
market authors
selected for publication
»
Comments
» BAC
You are currently following Dave Wrixon
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following Dave Wrixon
-
5162
)
Supply, Demand and the U.S. Dollar [View article]
On Nov 22 08:55 AM Old Trader wrote:
> "Holding to maturity won't solve anything if inflation has rendered
> your principal, which is denominated in dollars, worthless."
>
> David,
>
> I'm not certain that's true, because if the market anticipates interest
> rate increases, the value of an existing bond will drop to reflect
> the anticipated rate. So it depends at what point the bond is bought.
> If a bond is trading at 93, and is bought and held to maturity, the
> purchaser would receive par, resulting in a 7.53% return in ADDITION
> to the coupon of the bond, which would naturally be a below market
> rate.
>
> As the article points out, this is less likely to happen in a fund,
> since they typically trade securities, rather than holding to maturity.
> The only way a fund can mitigate the damage is moving into the short
> end of the yield curve to take advantage of increasing rates.
Supply, Demand and the U.S. Dollar [View article]
Weak Currencies, Stagnant Economies Weigh on U.S., U.K. Investors [View article]
Profit from Weak U.S. Balance Sheet: Short Government Debt [View article]
U.S Treasuries: Heading for a Rally or an Implosion? [View article]
Real and Fake: A Tale of Two Economies [View article]
Tough Decisions Loom for the Fed [View article]
The last time it did that was when Volker was in charge.
It seems he has just about been silenced.
One Year Since the Banking System Collapsed. Has Anything Really Changed? [View article]
On Sep 08 04:41 PM Mr. Big wrote:
> I know what's changed. Lots have changed:
>
> 1) America is another couple of trillion dollars in debt
> 2) The fiscal deficit is ballooned to epic proportions
> 3) The legs of the USD has been amputated.
> 4) Americans are set to pay a lot more taxes.
> 5) There's only one American car company left.
> 6) More than 5 million additional Americans are out of work.
>
> I'd say that's change....big time.
>
> What hasn't changed:
> 1) The funding of social security and health care in America (or
> more precisely...the lack of funding).
> 2) Energy reform
> 3) Bank executive bonuses.
> 4) American politics
> 4) National security
Four Reasons We're Headed Even Higher [View article]
On Aug 28 06:51 AM Clive Corcoran wrote:
> While I might agree with you that there will be a lot of clairvoyant
> pundits that are likely to be premature in calling the top I think
> you should not be quite so cavalier in the claim that "Financial
> armageddon is in the rear-view mirror"
>
> With a debt/GDP ratio approaching 100% (and that's on a benign view
> of the size of the debt) and with a lackluster recovery at best,
> imho, there are still a lot more twists and turns to the rolling
> financial crisis ahead.
Bernanke Has His Hands Full, Again [View article]
You are kidding? Right?
The Liquidity Canard [View article]
Roubini Is Right: Recovery Will Be Slow [View article]
Today May Be Markets' Turning Point [View article]
Are Financial Stocks Preparing for 'The Fall'? [View article]
If you mean is the market about to collapse? Well, if you didn't already know the answer, you probably wouldn't even ask.
Preview from Europe: Stocks Continue to Defy Gravity...and Logic [View article]
On Aug 14 07:09 AM Maxe Paul wrote:
> So this is where we are at with China and iron ore.
>
> China, not happy to pay a discounted contract price for iron ore
> (which every country bar China is happy about), and certainly not
> happy to pay a market spot price, are now trying their hardest to
> manipulate the price of iron ore by banning further imports and new
> steel mills.
>
> They are also not happy some people are buying at the spot price,
> because they want iron ore now, rather than wait for their (China)
> manipulation to succeed.
>
> Given they (China) are still not happy that this (the manipulation)
> is not working, they, China (one of the most corrupt countries in
> the world), then decide to arrest people from Australia (one of the
> least corrupt countries in the world) alleging corruption! LOL<br/>
>
> Now consider this.
>
> If China demanded a 40% plus discount on buying Gold bullion and
> refused to honour a current generous 35% discount and then tried
> to manipulate the current spot price because it was not happy, and
> then arrest employees of gold companies alleging corruption, how
> would the gold bugs feel?
>
> Mighty bloody pissed off i would think.
>
> This is manipulation people, plain as day, makes the gold manipulation
> theorists sound rather pathetic by comparison.
>
> And we Aussies put up with this farce without a whimper of complaint?