Big CMBS Loans Near Default; CMBX Soars, REITs Tank [View article]
My mistake, JPMCC 08-C2 *is* in Series 5. The source I went to wasn't authoritative and that's my error. It is, however, not necessary for my first point.
-DJT
On Nov 19 09:14 AM Dear John Thain wrote:
> Hi, > > First, I find nearly no evidence for your linkage between REIT stocks > and two (technically three) loans in CMBS deals. I also don't even > know how exposed CMBX Series 5 is to these loans since the deal you > mention, JPMCC 08-C2, isn't in series 5. > > Second, you misunderstand DSCR since you erroneously cite it as a > percentage when it is a multiple (the DSCR is 1.25x, not 1.25%). > > > Third, you don't seem to understand the CMBS market when it comes > to underwriting since over a 1.20x DSCR is considered standard and > very safe. > > Lastly, it is entire meaningless to cite IO percentages of a CMBS > pool. I'm not sure you know this, but loans backing CMBS deals, unlike > similar residential deals, are generally 10/30's ... This means that > they are 10 year loans that follow a 30 year amortization schedule > and require a balloon payment (payment in full) after 10 years (unusual > because the loan isn't fully amortizing). > > Please check your facts before drawing conclusions. Sorry.. > > -DJT
-
My mistake, JPMCC 08-C2 *is* in Series 5. The source I went to wasn't authoritative and that's my error. It is, however, not necessary for my first point.
Nov 19 09:31 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by Dear John Thain »Big CMBS Loans Near Default; CMBX Soars, REITs Tank [View article]
-DJT
On Nov 19 09:14 AM Dear John Thain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I find nearly no evidence for your linkage between REIT stocks
> and two (technically three) loans in CMBS deals. I also don't even
> know how exposed CMBX Series 5 is to these loans since the deal you
> mention, JPMCC 08-C2, isn't in series 5.
>
> Second, you misunderstand DSCR since you erroneously cite it as a
> percentage when it is a multiple (the DSCR is 1.25x, not 1.25%).
>
>
> Third, you don't seem to understand the CMBS market when it comes
> to underwriting since over a 1.20x DSCR is considered standard and
> very safe.
>
> Lastly, it is entire meaningless to cite IO percentages of a CMBS
> pool. I'm not sure you know this, but loans backing CMBS deals, unlike
> similar residential deals, are generally 10/30's ... This means that
> they are 10 year loans that follow a 30 year amortization schedule
> and require a balloon payment (payment in full) after 10 years (unusual
> because the loan isn't fully amortizing).
>
> Please check your facts before drawing conclusions. Sorry..
>
> -DJT