Dennis Byron

SCO vs. Novell: The Last Word Has Yet To Be Said

Thanks for registering, hapmoori.

You don't say what it is that you found odd however? Therefore I am not sure if you are objecting to the judge's opinion (see link in article) or mine. I assume it is the judge's opinion you are arguing with because my only opinion above is that Novell had good lawyers and that Novell shareholders have a stake in this (this is an investment research site after all). There is nothing in my opinion based on anything by McBride, only by the Utah Federal District Court Judge, cited by page and paragraph where required.

Is it possible that somewhere in the past you read the 1995 Novell-SCO agreement but not the Ammendments that came out in 1995 and 1996???

Also according to the judge's ruling in August 2007, it is the non-compete clause and not the asset purchase list that gave SCO grounds to sue Novell. That they didn't is just a continuation of the bad legal advice they have been getting all along.

Either way, like they say, it ain't over til it's over.

Thanks again

Dennis