<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Dividend Inc - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Dividend Inc' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc</link>
    <item>
      <title>Dow Theory: The Transport Triple Top Threat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/174515-dow-theory-the-transport-triple-top-threat?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">174515</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the most challenging chart patterns is now upon the Dow Jones Transportation Index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt' title='More opinion and analysis of IYT'>IYT</a>). That chart pattern is the triple top formation. Triple tops can be considered challenging because they imply a three strikes rule of baseball. If the batter swings and misses three times then they're out for that at bat.</p><p>The triple top usually indicates that investors have, or are about to give up on the particular stock or index. This could be an instance of the market bulls capitulating to whatever forces are at play. One thing is certain, if the downtrend of the Transports continues then we could expect the index to go to the previous low of 3600, which implies a Dow Industrials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia' title='More opinion and analysis of DIA'>DIA</a>) of 9700.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:36:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>One of the most challenging chart patterns is now upon the Dow Jones Transportation Index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt' title='More opinion and analysis of IYT'>IYT</a>). That chart pattern is the triple top formation. Triple tops can be considered challenging because they imply a three strikes rule of baseball. If the batter swings and misses three times then they're out for that at bat.</p><p>The triple top usually indicates that investors have, or are about to give up on the particular stock or index. This could be an instance of the market bulls capitulating to whatever forces are at play. One thing is certain, if the downtrend of the Transports continues then we could expect the index to go to the previous low of 3600, which implies a Dow Industrials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia' title='More opinion and analysis of DIA'>DIA</a>) of 9700.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/174515-dow-theory-the-transport-triple-top-threat?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt">IYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CIT's Pain Is Goldman's Gain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/174203-cit-s-pain-is-goldman-s-gain?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">174203</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>In light of the recent apology that was offered up by Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>), I came across something that highlights Goldman's role in the world of guerrilla investment banking. I pulled the old Value Line for CIT Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cit' title='More opinion and analysis of CIT'>CIT</a>) dated November 24, 2006. I was trying to determine the pre-banking crisis book value of CIT. <p>What caught my eye was the brief historical description of CIT which indicated that the company was established in 1908. In 1915 the company moved from St. Louis, MO to New York City. According to Value Line:</p></div> <div><blockquote class="quote"><p><i>On 11/18/97, J.P. Morgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='More opinion and analysis of JPM'>JPM</a>) and Goldman Sachs jointly led CIT's initial public offering of 36,225,000 shares, priced at $27.00 per share on the NYSE. On 6/1/01, CIT was acquired by TCH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyco Intl., Ltd. On 7/8/02, Tyco sold 100% of CIT's outstanding stock in an IPO, led by Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers &#40;LEH&#41;. Offering was for 200,000,000 shares, priced at $23.00 per share on the NYSE.</i></p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:43:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<div>In light of the recent apology that was offered up by Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>), I came across something that highlights Goldman's role in the world of guerrilla investment banking. I pulled the old Value Line for CIT Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cit' title='More opinion and analysis of CIT'>CIT</a>) dated November 24, 2006. I was trying to determine the pre-banking crisis book value of CIT. <p>What caught my eye was the brief historical description of CIT which indicated that the company was established in 1908. In 1915 the company moved from St. Louis, MO to New York City. According to Value Line:</p></div> <div><blockquote class="quote"><p><i>On 11/18/97, J.P. Morgan (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='More opinion and analysis of JPM'>JPM</a>) and Goldman Sachs jointly led CIT's initial public offering of 36,225,000 shares, priced at $27.00 per share on the NYSE. On 6/1/01, CIT was acquired by TCH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyco Intl., Ltd. On 7/8/02, Tyco sold 100% of CIT's outstanding stock in an IPO, led by Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers &#40;LEH&#41;. Offering was for 200,000,000 shares, priced at $23.00 per share on the NYSE.</i></p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/174203-cit-s-pain-is-goldman-s-gain?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cit">CIT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm">JPM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tyc">TYC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs">GS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs.b">GS.B</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/leh">LEH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/leh.f">LEH.F</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Achievers: How Have They Performed?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173426-dividend-achievers-how-have-they-performed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173426</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/10/dividend-stocks-worth-your-time.html">October  9, 2009</a>, I created a list of ten Dividend Achievers that I felt  were the best investments at the time. After having passed the 1 month period, I  feel that it is necessary to review the performance of the stocks that were on that  list. As with the original article I will show the performance based on those  that were ranked from 1st to 10th (<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pRRW-tfYN54/Sv80WXNJ2iI/AAAAAAAAAc0/D26RS598LPM/s1600-h/Dividend+Inc.bmp">chart</a>).</div> <ol><li><div>Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) up 6.46%</div></li><li><div>Cardinal Health (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah' title='More opinion and analysis of CAH'>CAH</a>) up 14.43%</div></li><li><div>Weyco (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys' title='More opinion and analysis of WEYS'>WEYS</a>) down 0.8%</div></li><li><div>Bard Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr' title='More opinion and analysis of BCR'>BCR</a>) up 3.62%</div></li><li><div>Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>) up  1.01%</div></li><li><div>Piedmont Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pny' title='More opinion and analysis of PNY'>PNY</a>) down  3.67%</div></li><li><div>Becton Dickinson (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdx' title='More opinion and analysis of BDX'>BDX</a>) up  5.77%</div></li><li><div>McCormick &amp; Co. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mkc' title='More opinion and analysis of MKC'>MKC</a>) up  6.71%</div></li><li><div>Abbott Laboratories (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abt' title='More opinion and analysis of ABT'>ABT</a>) up  5.73%</div></li><li><div>ExxonMobil (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='More opinion and analysis of XOM'>XOM</a>) up  4.62%</div></li></ol> <p>As an investor, I believe that the  performance of these stocks need to be put in perspective. There are three tiers  that I like to categorize my investments:</p> <ol><li><div>As compared to the historical <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cagr.asp">CAGR</a> of  the stock market</div></li><li><div>As compared to the gains in a  single month</div></li><li><div>As compared to if the money was in  government guaranteed alternatives</div></li></ol> <p>In Category 1, I have calculated  the 100 year compound annual growth rate for the S &amp; P 500 (this is being  generous) at 11.57% (<a href="http://www.moneychimp.com/features/market_cagr.htm">Jan. 1, 1908  to Dec. 31, 2008</a>). To me, any investment return greater than 11.57%  in less than a year is considered as a sell candidate.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:01:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<div>On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/10/dividend-stocks-worth-your-time.html">October  9, 2009</a>, I created a list of ten Dividend Achievers that I felt  were the best investments at the time. After having passed the 1 month period, I  feel that it is necessary to review the performance of the stocks that were on that  list. As with the original article I will show the performance based on those  that were ranked from 1st to 10th (<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pRRW-tfYN54/Sv80WXNJ2iI/AAAAAAAAAc0/D26RS598LPM/s1600-h/Dividend+Inc.bmp">chart</a>).</div> <ol><li><div>Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) up 6.46%</div></li><li><div>Cardinal Health (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah' title='More opinion and analysis of CAH'>CAH</a>) up 14.43%</div></li><li><div>Weyco (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys' title='More opinion and analysis of WEYS'>WEYS</a>) down 0.8%</div></li><li><div>Bard Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr' title='More opinion and analysis of BCR'>BCR</a>) up 3.62%</div></li><li><div>Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>) up  1.01%</div></li><li><div>Piedmont Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pny' title='More opinion and analysis of PNY'>PNY</a>) down  3.67%</div></li><li><div>Becton Dickinson (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdx' title='More opinion and analysis of BDX'>BDX</a>) up  5.77%</div></li><li><div>McCormick &amp; Co. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mkc' title='More opinion and analysis of MKC'>MKC</a>) up  6.71%</div></li><li><div>Abbott Laboratories (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abt' title='More opinion and analysis of ABT'>ABT</a>) up  5.73%</div></li><li><div>ExxonMobil (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='More opinion and analysis of XOM'>XOM</a>) up  4.62%</div></li></ol> <p>As an investor, I believe that the  performance of these stocks need to be put in perspective. There are three tiers  that I like to categorize my investments:</p> <ol><li><div>As compared to the historical <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cagr.asp">CAGR</a> of  the stock market</div></li><li><div>As compared to the gains in a  single month</div></li><li><div>As compared to if the money was in  government guaranteed alternatives</div></li></ol> <p>In Category 1, I have calculated  the 100 year compound annual growth rate for the S &amp; P 500 (this is being  generous) at 11.57% (<a href="http://www.moneychimp.com/features/market_cagr.htm">Jan. 1, 1908  to Dec. 31, 2008</a>). To me, any investment return greater than 11.57%  in less than a year is considered as a sell candidate.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173426-dividend-achievers-how-have-they-performed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah">CAH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr">BCR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn">NWN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdx">BDX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mkc">MKC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abt">ABT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pny">PNY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys">WEYS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Monsanto: Within Striking Distance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171159-monsanto-within-striking-distance?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171159</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>According to Google Finance: </div><blockquote class="quote"><p>&quot;Monsanto Company along with its subsidiaries, is a worldwide provider of agricultural products for farmers. The Company&rsquo;s seeds, biotechnology trait products, and herbicides provide farmers with solutions to produce foods for consumers and feed for animals. The Company operates in two segments: Seeds and Genomics, and Agricultural Productivity.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>Although Monsanto (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon' title='More opinion and analysis of MON'>MON</a>) isn't a Dividend Achiever or a member of the Nasdaq 100, the company has a solid history and provides investors with an exceptional opportunity.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:24:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<div>According to Google Finance: </div><blockquote class="quote"><p>&quot;Monsanto Company along with its subsidiaries, is a worldwide provider of agricultural products for farmers. The Company&rsquo;s seeds, biotechnology trait products, and herbicides provide farmers with solutions to produce foods for consumers and feed for animals. The Company operates in two segments: Seeds and Genomics, and Agricultural Productivity.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>Although Monsanto (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon' title='More opinion and analysis of MON'>MON</a>) isn't a Dividend Achiever or a member of the Nasdaq 100, the company has a solid history and provides investors with an exceptional opportunity.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171159-monsanto-within-striking-distance?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mon">MON</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aqua America Is Worth Considering</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171071-aqua-america-is-worth-considering?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today's research recommendation is AquaAmerica (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wtr' title='More opinion and analysis of WTR'>WTR</a>). According to Yahoo! Finance's <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/914.html">water utilities</a> review, WTR is ranked as the second largest water utility based on market capitalization.</p><p>The most important point about this research recommendation is that WTR has fallen to a brand new low during market hours on Friday October 30th. This low may soon match the 2-year low of around $14.50 set in mid-October 2008. This is fascinating because the actual lowest point after the market peak of 2006 at $30 is no longer on our last 52-week radar. However, we will watch to see if the ultimate low of $14.50 is reached.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:55:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Today's research recommendation is AquaAmerica (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wtr' title='More opinion and analysis of WTR'>WTR</a>). According to Yahoo! Finance's <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/914.html">water utilities</a> review, WTR is ranked as the second largest water utility based on market capitalization.</p><p>The most important point about this research recommendation is that WTR has fallen to a brand new low during market hours on Friday October 30th. This low may soon match the 2-year low of around $14.50 set in mid-October 2008. This is fascinating because the actual lowest point after the market peak of 2006 at $30 is no longer on our last 52-week radar. However, we will watch to see if the ultimate low of $14.50 is reached.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171071-aqua-america-is-worth-considering?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wtr">WTR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Demand Deposits Affect the Stock Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/168753-how-demand-deposits-affect-the-stock-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">168753</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has been a while since I last mentioned the Demand Deposits of Commercial Banks. It is necessary for me to review what I said in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/02/convergence-of-extraordinary-forces.html">February 11, 2009</a> posting. At the time, I felt that what I was observing was so important that it deserved the title &quot;Convergence of Extraordinary Forces.&quot; In retrospect, that article seemed prescient considering that only one month later the stock market would embark on one of the most unforgettable rises in history.</p> <p>Let's review what I said back in February of 2009:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:53:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>It has been a while since I last mentioned the Demand Deposits of Commercial Banks. It is necessary for me to review what I said in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/02/convergence-of-extraordinary-forces.html">February 11, 2009</a> posting. At the time, I felt that what I was observing was so important that it deserved the title &quot;Convergence of Extraordinary Forces.&quot; In retrospect, that article seemed prescient considering that only one month later the stock market would embark on one of the most unforgettable rises in history.</p> <p>Let's review what I said back in February of 2009:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/168753-how-demand-deposits-affect-the-stock-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stock Market Projections</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/166954-stock-market-projections?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">166954</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Q: <em>What's your prediction on when a retest of the old lows will happen and what level are you projecting? And what do you mean by capitulation, a term typically associated with market lows, not market highs?</em></p><p>A: First, the word capitulate has been used, in many instances, in the wrong way. According to the <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php">Online Etymology Dictionary</a>, the word <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=capitulation">capitulation</a> originally meant &ldquo;an agreement.&rdquo; Capitulation later morphed into the modern word that means &ldquo;to surrender.&rdquo; In either case, capitulate means that two sides come to terms, reach an agreement or one side surrenders to the other.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:58:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Q: <em>What's your prediction on when a retest of the old lows will happen and what level are you projecting? And what do you mean by capitulation, a term typically associated with market lows, not market highs?</em></p><p>A: First, the word capitulate has been used, in many instances, in the wrong way. According to the <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php">Online Etymology Dictionary</a>, the word <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=capitulation">capitulation</a> originally meant &ldquo;an agreement.&rdquo; Capitulation later morphed into the modern word that means &ldquo;to surrender.&rdquo; In either case, capitulate means that two sides come to terms, reach an agreement or one side surrenders to the other.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/166954-stock-market-projections?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow Theory: Party While It Lasts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/166633-dow-theory-party-while-it-lasts?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">166633</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dow Theory is all about confirmations. What happens in one index should occur for the other index. Without confirmation, the theory says, then all bets are off in terms of the preceding direction of the index. Yesterday's action in the Dow Industrials was impressive, with the index hitting a brand new high since the March 9, 2009 low. Not to be outdone, the Transports were in a mood to go to new highs as well. As a critic of the markets and one who practices Dow Theory, I feel that the new highs are not completely to my liking.</p> <p>First, let's review a little about what Dow Theory has done for us lately. From a literal and practical perspective, Dow Theory has definitely pointed the way to the increase in the market since June 23rd and possibly since my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/03/dow-theory.html">March 20, 2009</a> posting. So far, the March 20th article has been 100% accurate about the direction and extent of this market move upward. It is worth rereading that article to glean the nuances about Dow Theory that is seldom found anywhere else. However, attention to the details of the changes in the Transports and Industrials on March 9th made it possible for me to feel confident about my research recommendation of <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/03/research-rec-helmerich-and-payne-hp-at.html">March 10th</a>.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:06:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Dow Theory is all about confirmations. What happens in one index should occur for the other index. Without confirmation, the theory says, then all bets are off in terms of the preceding direction of the index. Yesterday's action in the Dow Industrials was impressive, with the index hitting a brand new high since the March 9, 2009 low. Not to be outdone, the Transports were in a mood to go to new highs as well. As a critic of the markets and one who practices Dow Theory, I feel that the new highs are not completely to my liking.</p> <p>First, let's review a little about what Dow Theory has done for us lately. From a literal and practical perspective, Dow Theory has definitely pointed the way to the increase in the market since June 23rd and possibly since my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/03/dow-theory.html">March 20, 2009</a> posting. So far, the March 20th article has been 100% accurate about the direction and extent of this market move upward. It is worth rereading that article to glean the nuances about Dow Theory that is seldom found anywhere else. However, attention to the details of the changes in the Transports and Industrials on March 9th made it possible for me to feel confident about my research recommendation of <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/03/research-rec-helmerich-and-payne-hp-at.html">March 10th</a>.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/166633-dow-theory-party-while-it-lasts?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt">IYT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spx">SPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyc">NYC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Dividend Stocks to Buy Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/165826-10-dividend-stocks-to-buy-now?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">165826</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Below is my list of the top ten dividend-paying stocks to consider for purchase. Keep in mind that these stocks are not the best, neither are they the greatest companies in the U.S. However, the companies listed below have a proven track record of increasing their dividend over an extended period of time. Dividend increases are the best reflection of management's commitment to the shareholder while attempting to grow the company or increase cashflow.</p><div> </div><div>From bottom to top, my companies are:</div><div>10. Exxon Mobil (<span>XOM</span>): <span>XOM</span> has increased its dividend every year for the past 26 years. Additionally, the company is within 23% of its 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 41%.</div><div> </div><div>9. Abbott Laboratories (<span>ABT</span>): <span>ABT</span> has increased its dividend every year for 36 years in a row. <span>ABT</span> is within 22% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 41%. I previously <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/09/abbott-laboratories-abt-altimeter.html">wrote about <span>ABT</span></a>, displaying the altimeter for <span>ABT</span> on a long term basis.</div><div> </div><div>8. McCormick &amp; Co. (<span>MKC</span>): <span>MKC</span> has increased its dividend every year for 22 years. Also, <span>MKC</span> is within 20% of its 52-week low with dividend payout ratio of 42%.</div><div> </div><div>7. <span>Becton</span> Dickinson (<span>BDX</span>): <span>BDX</span> has increased its dividend every year for 36 years in a row. <span>BDX</span> is within 19% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 27%. I mentioned BDX on May 4, 2009, suggesting that this stock should be bought. On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/08/becton-dickinson-bdx-on-our-radar-first.html">August 19</a>, I reiterated my claim that BDX was worthy of consideration, especially after Warren <span>Buffett</span> himself jumped on board after our earlier posting.</div><div> </div><div>6. Piedmont Natural Gas (<span>PNY</span>): <span>PNY</span> has increased its dividend every year for 29 years in a row. <span>PNY</span> is within 16% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 69%.</div><div> </div><div>5. Northwest Natural Gas (<span>NWN</span>): <span>NWN</span> has increased its dividend every year for 54 years in a row. <span>NWN</span> is within 16% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 59%. <span>I </span>previously mentioned NWN on September 22 and again on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/10/research-recommendation-northwest.html">October 3</a>.</div><div> </div><div>4. Bard Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr' title='More opinion and analysis of BCR'>BCR</a>): BCR has increased its dividend every year for 54 years in a row. BCR is within 14% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 13%. On April 23, I mentioned that BCR has a very low debt level which allows the company to weather further economic declines. On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/08/sell-bard-corp-bcr-at-market.html">August 26</a>, after gaining 10.11% in four months, I recommended selling this stock.</div><div> </div><div>3. Weyco Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys' title='More opinion and analysis of WEYS'>WEYS</a>): WEYS has increased its dividend every year for 28 years in a row. WEYS is within 13% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 54%. Weyco, the maker of Florsheim shoes, was featured on Dividend Inc. on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/research-recommendation-weyco-group.html">July 6</a>. Two negatives for this company are that its payout ratio is so high and the stock is not very liquid.</div><div> </div><div>2. Cardinal Health (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah' title='More opinion and analysis of CAH'>CAH</a>): CAH has increased its dividend every year for 16 years in a row. CAH is within 10% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 32%. CAH was featured on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/research-recommendation-cardinal-health.html">June 4</a> and is considered, in my opinion, to be one of the most underpriced healthcare stocks out there. The current low price of CAH is due to the spinoff of the CareFusion (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cfn' title='More opinion and analysis of CFN'>CFN</a>) unit. However, the upside projections of CAH are, at minimum, in the $40 range.</div><div> </div><div>1. Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>): WMT has increased its dividend every year for 33 years in a row. WMT is within 8% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 30%. WMT was first mentioned on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/values-biding-time.html">June 18</a> when I pointed out the fact that with such an extended range bound price for the stock there has to be value accruing in the stock. A further examination of WMT was offered on September 19 and I determined that, on a price-to-dividend basis, WMT is poised in increase in value. One significant downside for this stock is the large increase in shares outstanding in the last few years.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:48:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Below is my list of the top ten dividend-paying stocks to consider for purchase. Keep in mind that these stocks are not the best, neither are they the greatest companies in the U.S. However, the companies listed below have a proven track record of increasing their dividend over an extended period of time. Dividend increases are the best reflection of management's commitment to the shareholder while attempting to grow the company or increase cashflow.</p><div> </div><div>From bottom to top, my companies are:</div><div>10. Exxon Mobil (<span>XOM</span>): <span>XOM</span> has increased its dividend every year for the past 26 years. Additionally, the company is within 23% of its 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 41%.</div><div> </div><div>9. Abbott Laboratories (<span>ABT</span>): <span>ABT</span> has increased its dividend every year for 36 years in a row. <span>ABT</span> is within 22% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 41%. I previously <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/09/abbott-laboratories-abt-altimeter.html">wrote about <span>ABT</span></a>, displaying the altimeter for <span>ABT</span> on a long term basis.</div><div> </div><div>8. McCormick &amp; Co. (<span>MKC</span>): <span>MKC</span> has increased its dividend every year for 22 years. Also, <span>MKC</span> is within 20% of its 52-week low with dividend payout ratio of 42%.</div><div> </div><div>7. <span>Becton</span> Dickinson (<span>BDX</span>): <span>BDX</span> has increased its dividend every year for 36 years in a row. <span>BDX</span> is within 19% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 27%. I mentioned BDX on May 4, 2009, suggesting that this stock should be bought. On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/08/becton-dickinson-bdx-on-our-radar-first.html">August 19</a>, I reiterated my claim that BDX was worthy of consideration, especially after Warren <span>Buffett</span> himself jumped on board after our earlier posting.</div><div> </div><div>6. Piedmont Natural Gas (<span>PNY</span>): <span>PNY</span> has increased its dividend every year for 29 years in a row. <span>PNY</span> is within 16% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 69%.</div><div> </div><div>5. Northwest Natural Gas (<span>NWN</span>): <span>NWN</span> has increased its dividend every year for 54 years in a row. <span>NWN</span> is within 16% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 59%. <span>I </span>previously mentioned NWN on September 22 and again on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/10/research-recommendation-northwest.html">October 3</a>.</div><div> </div><div>4. Bard Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr' title='More opinion and analysis of BCR'>BCR</a>): BCR has increased its dividend every year for 54 years in a row. BCR is within 14% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 13%. On April 23, I mentioned that BCR has a very low debt level which allows the company to weather further economic declines. On <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/08/sell-bard-corp-bcr-at-market.html">August 26</a>, after gaining 10.11% in four months, I recommended selling this stock.</div><div> </div><div>3. Weyco Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys' title='More opinion and analysis of WEYS'>WEYS</a>): WEYS has increased its dividend every year for 28 years in a row. WEYS is within 13% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 54%. Weyco, the maker of Florsheim shoes, was featured on Dividend Inc. on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/research-recommendation-weyco-group.html">July 6</a>. Two negatives for this company are that its payout ratio is so high and the stock is not very liquid.</div><div> </div><div>2. Cardinal Health (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah' title='More opinion and analysis of CAH'>CAH</a>): CAH has increased its dividend every year for 16 years in a row. CAH is within 10% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 32%. CAH was featured on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/research-recommendation-cardinal-health.html">June 4</a> and is considered, in my opinion, to be one of the most underpriced healthcare stocks out there. The current low price of CAH is due to the spinoff of the CareFusion (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cfn' title='More opinion and analysis of CFN'>CFN</a>) unit. However, the upside projections of CAH are, at minimum, in the $40 range.</div><div> </div><div>1. Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>): WMT has increased its dividend every year for 33 years in a row. WMT is within 8% of the 52-week low with a dividend payout ratio of 30%. WMT was first mentioned on <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/values-biding-time.html">June 18</a> when I pointed out the fact that with such an extended range bound price for the stock there has to be value accruing in the stock. A further examination of WMT was offered on September 19 and I determined that, on a price-to-dividend basis, WMT is poised in increase in value. One significant downside for this stock is the large increase in shares outstanding in the last few years.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/165826-10-dividend-stocks-to-buy-now?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abt">ABT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mkc">MKC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdx">BDX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pny">PNY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn">NWN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcr">BCR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/weys">WEYS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cah">CAH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cfn">CFN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Northwest Natural Gas: Worth Considering</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/164640-northwest-natural-gas-worth-considering?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">164640</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As I attempt to gather as much information on Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>) before deciding to actually buy NWN, I found one bit of information that was almost astounding. As I have mentioned before, NWN has increased its dividend every year for 53 years in a row. I have also talked about the fact that NWN will probably do everything in its power to maintain that dividend increasing history. So it is no surprise that the company announced on <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/NW-Natural-Increases-Dividend-bw-1231252598.html?x=0&amp;.v=1"><strong><font>October 1, 2009</font></strong></a> that will be increasing the dividend for the 54th year in a row.<br> <br> In today's research recommendation of NWN, I will cover the issue of cyclicality, the Coppock Curve, natural gas prices, and Dow's theory as it relates to the stock. I have compiled this information as I consider buying NWN. It is hoped that you thoroughly review NWN from all angles before committing any money to this accomplished Dividend Achiever.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:07:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>As I attempt to gather as much information on Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>) before deciding to actually buy NWN, I found one bit of information that was almost astounding. As I have mentioned before, NWN has increased its dividend every year for 53 years in a row. I have also talked about the fact that NWN will probably do everything in its power to maintain that dividend increasing history. So it is no surprise that the company announced on <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/NW-Natural-Increases-Dividend-bw-1231252598.html?x=0&amp;.v=1"><strong><font>October 1, 2009</font></strong></a> that will be increasing the dividend for the 54th year in a row.<br> <br> In today's research recommendation of NWN, I will cover the issue of cyclicality, the Coppock Curve, natural gas prices, and Dow's theory as it relates to the stock. I have compiled this information as I consider buying NWN. It is hoped that you thoroughly review NWN from all angles before committing any money to this accomplished Dividend Achiever.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/164640-northwest-natural-gas-worth-considering?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn">NWN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Northwest Natural Gas: A Challenging Altimeter</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/162761-northwest-natural-gas-a-challenging-altimeter?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">162761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today's altimeter is on Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>), and there is a lot to appreciate when we exam the pattern that has been established so far. NWN has increased its dividend for 53 years in a row. With such a history of dividend increases, I think NWN will do everything it can to avoid cutting or leaving the dividend the same. At the price of $42.29, NWN is within 16% of the 52-week low.</p> <p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/22/saupload_2009_09_22_nwn_altimeter.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/22/saupload_2009_09_22_nwn_altimeter_1.png" /></a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:32:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Today's altimeter is on Northwest Natural Gas (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn' title='More opinion and analysis of NWN'>NWN</a>), and there is a lot to appreciate when we exam the pattern that has been established so far. NWN has increased its dividend for 53 years in a row. With such a history of dividend increases, I think NWN will do everything it can to avoid cutting or leaving the dividend the same. At the price of $42.29, NWN is within 16% of the 52-week low.</p> <p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/22/saupload_2009_09_22_nwn_altimeter.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/22/saupload_2009_09_22_nwn_altimeter_1.png" /></a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/162761-northwest-natural-gas-a-challenging-altimeter?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nwn">NWN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>South African Gold Stocks: No Margin of Safety </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161300-south-african-gold-stocks-no-margin-of-safety?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161300</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>If we're on the brink of a breakout to gold at <a href="http://0-www.ft.com.innopac.up.ac.za/cms/s/0/6c43927c-2456-11de-9a01-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=413b4c2e-b9f8-11dc-abcb-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1"><strong>$9,000 an ounce as UBS claims</strong></a> (source, Financial Times, requires registration after 2 free viewings) then let the party begin. By my own calculations, after halving my worst case scenario, gold could go as high as $9,414.16. Yeah, I know, make an outrageous claim and cement your fame. However, I have a logical explanation for my belief that a run up in gold is possible. <p>Confidence in my math on how gold could plausibly get to $9,000 is actually less important than the wait that we're in for to get to such a level. After all, the rise from $35 an ounce in 1969 to $800 an ounce in 1980 took a lot of twists and turns. I personally believe that we'd see a collapse in the price of gold and other related commodities before we move to the insane levels that I mentioned earlier.</p> <p>There is one thing that is uniquely absent from this run up in gold that was present in 1969. South African gold stocks offering alluring dividend yields. Could you imagine getting paid 14% to invest in gold stocks that were at the early stages of a commodity bull market. In the <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/14/saupload_2009_09_14_sa_gold_stocks.png">table below</a>, published in <a href="http://ww2.dowtheoryletters.com/"><strong>Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letter</strong></a>, you will see the South African gold stocks and the dividend yield that was paid out at that time (yellow column.)</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:36:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<div>If we're on the brink of a breakout to gold at <a href="http://0-www.ft.com.innopac.up.ac.za/cms/s/0/6c43927c-2456-11de-9a01-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=413b4c2e-b9f8-11dc-abcb-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1"><strong>$9,000 an ounce as UBS claims</strong></a> (source, Financial Times, requires registration after 2 free viewings) then let the party begin. By my own calculations, after halving my worst case scenario, gold could go as high as $9,414.16. Yeah, I know, make an outrageous claim and cement your fame. However, I have a logical explanation for my belief that a run up in gold is possible. <p>Confidence in my math on how gold could plausibly get to $9,000 is actually less important than the wait that we're in for to get to such a level. After all, the rise from $35 an ounce in 1969 to $800 an ounce in 1980 took a lot of twists and turns. I personally believe that we'd see a collapse in the price of gold and other related commodities before we move to the insane levels that I mentioned earlier.</p> <p>There is one thing that is uniquely absent from this run up in gold that was present in 1969. South African gold stocks offering alluring dividend yields. Could you imagine getting paid 14% to invest in gold stocks that were at the early stages of a commodity bull market. In the <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/14/saupload_2009_09_14_sa_gold_stocks.png">table below</a>, published in <a href="http://ww2.dowtheoryletters.com/"><strong>Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letter</strong></a>, you will see the South African gold stocks and the dividend yield that was paid out at that time (yellow column.)</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161300-south-african-gold-stocks-no-margin-of-safety?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/au">AU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abx">ABX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/drooy">DROOY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Natural Gas Fund: The Beginning of the ETF Unwinding?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161251-u-s-natural-gas-fund-the-beginning-of-the-etf-unwinding?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In my blog posting on July 3, 2009 titled &quot;<a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/etf-medocrity-with-no-pretense-of-value.html"><span>ETF</span>: Mediocrity with No Pretense of Value</a>,&quot; I said:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>&quot;The structure of a <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2008/12/scheme-by-any-other-name.html">scheme</a> like this [<span>ETFs</span>] only works when the market continues higher or new money floods in.&quot;</span></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:05:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>In my blog posting on July 3, 2009 titled &quot;<a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/etf-medocrity-with-no-pretense-of-value.html"><span>ETF</span>: Mediocrity with No Pretense of Value</a>,&quot; I said:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>&quot;The structure of a <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2008/12/scheme-by-any-other-name.html">scheme</a> like this [<span>ETFs</span>] only works when the market continues higher or new money floods in.&quot;</span></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161251-u-s-natural-gas-fund-the-beginning-of-the-etf-unwinding?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ung">UNG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow Theory's Barely Palatable Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161179-dow-theory-s-barely-palatable-bull-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161179</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On September 10th, we got a renewal of the Dow Theory bull signal when the Dow Industrials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia' title='More opinion and analysis of DIA'>DIA</a>) and Dow Transports (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt' title='More opinion and analysis of IYT'>IYT</a>) both went to a new high since the low of March 9th. Remember, the fact that both indexes turned around from the low of March 9th did not mean we were in a bull market. Instead, the simultaneous move above the June 12th and May 6th high for the Industrials and Transports gave us the bull market indication according to Dow's Theory.</p> <p>In order for any bull market to get initiated we need a market bottoming process to take place. The best illustrated example of the bottoming process is represented in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/05/dow-theory_15.html">May 15, 2009</a> article representing the period from April 1974 to March 1975. However, I do show a less dramatic example in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/dow-theory_24.html">July 24, 2009</a> article representing the period July 2008 to July 2009.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:41:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>On September 10th, we got a renewal of the Dow Theory bull signal when the Dow Industrials (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia' title='More opinion and analysis of DIA'>DIA</a>) and Dow Transports (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt' title='More opinion and analysis of IYT'>IYT</a>) both went to a new high since the low of March 9th. Remember, the fact that both indexes turned around from the low of March 9th did not mean we were in a bull market. Instead, the simultaneous move above the June 12th and May 6th high for the Industrials and Transports gave us the bull market indication according to Dow's Theory.</p> <p>In order for any bull market to get initiated we need a market bottoming process to take place. The best illustrated example of the bottoming process is represented in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/05/dow-theory_15.html">May 15, 2009</a> article representing the period from April 1974 to March 1975. However, I do show a less dramatic example in my <a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/07/dow-theory_24.html">July 24, 2009</a> article representing the period July 2008 to July 2009.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161179-dow-theory-s-barely-palatable-bull-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyt">IYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market Upside Exists, Resistance Persists</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160642-market-upside-exists-resistance-persists?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160642</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>When considering where we are, it helps to see where we've been. Implicit in this thought is the idea that we use as many perspectives as possible in order to build context around our view. One such tool that is worth looking at is the Dow Jones Industrials Average Altimeter.  The Altimeter was first described by Edson Gould in <em>Barron's</em> on February 21, 1968.  Gould asserted that the relationship between the price of the Dow Industrials and the dividends paid on that index tell investors of under or overvaluation in the index. <p>Historically, since 1871 (<i>Cowles Commission Expectation of Individual Stocks</i>), the altimeter has indicated that whenever the Dow Industrials went above the 30 range the market was overvalued and whenever the market was below 15 the market was undervalued. As illustrated in the <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter.png"><strong>chart below</strong></a>, since 1920 the Dow Industrials followed this pattern quite well until the breakout above 38.47 on June 13, 1995 (point X).</p></div> <div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter_1.png" /></a> <p>After the January 13, 1950 (point J) buy signal, the altimeter gave numerous sell signals from 1961 (point K) to 1972 (point R). At any point that the sell signals were given, except for 1961 (point K), you would have avoided the major market declines of the late 60's and throughout the 1970s. When the next buy signal was registered on December 13, 1974 (point S) the stock market was off to the races and never looked back.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:25:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<div>When considering where we are, it helps to see where we've been. Implicit in this thought is the idea that we use as many perspectives as possible in order to build context around our view. One such tool that is worth looking at is the Dow Jones Industrials Average Altimeter.  The Altimeter was first described by Edson Gould in <em>Barron's</em> on February 21, 1968.  Gould asserted that the relationship between the price of the Dow Industrials and the dividends paid on that index tell investors of under or overvaluation in the index. <p>Historically, since 1871 (<i>Cowles Commission Expectation of Individual Stocks</i>), the altimeter has indicated that whenever the Dow Industrials went above the 30 range the market was overvalued and whenever the market was below 15 the market was undervalued. As illustrated in the <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter.png"><strong>chart below</strong></a>, since 1920 the Dow Industrials followed this pattern quite well until the breakout above 38.47 on June 13, 1995 (point X).</p></div> <div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/9/saupload_2009_09_07_dow_altimeter_1.png" /></a> <p>After the January 13, 1950 (point J) buy signal, the altimeter gave numerous sell signals from 1961 (point K) to 1972 (point R). At any point that the sell signals were given, except for 1961 (point K), you would have avoided the major market declines of the late 60's and throughout the 1970s. When the next buy signal was registered on December 13, 1974 (point S) the stock market was off to the races and never looked back.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160642-market-upside-exists-resistance-persists?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Silver Beats Gold as a Precious Metals Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160342-why-silver-beats-gold-as-a-precious-metals-play?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160342</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I watch with subsumed glee as <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Finance</a> includes a price quote for gold in the Market Summary section on their home page. After all the financial turmoil that we've been through since the introduction of the internet, when did Yahoo Finance realize that a gold quote was necessary? The obvious answer is, &quot;When the public demands it.&quot;</p><p>Well, when the public finally demands the price quote of gold on their finance homepage, it is probably too late to participate in gold on a level that could be considered meaningful. After all, at nearly $1000 an ounce, there isn't going to be a stock split in the price of gold. Or is there? (I've been pondering this possibility lately) In any event, gold is fast becoming an expensive asset in a world full of correspondingly deflating alternative &quot;assets.&quot; What to do? What to do? Get out there and do your research on silver!</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:55:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>I watch with subsumed glee as <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Finance</a> includes a price quote for gold in the Market Summary section on their home page. After all the financial turmoil that we've been through since the introduction of the internet, when did Yahoo Finance realize that a gold quote was necessary? The obvious answer is, &quot;When the public demands it.&quot;</p><p>Well, when the public finally demands the price quote of gold on their finance homepage, it is probably too late to participate in gold on a level that could be considered meaningful. After all, at nearly $1000 an ounce, there isn't going to be a stock split in the price of gold. Or is there? (I've been pondering this possibility lately) In any event, gold is fast becoming an expensive asset in a world full of correspondingly deflating alternative &quot;assets.&quot; What to do? What to do? Get out there and do your research on silver!</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160342-why-silver-beats-gold-as-a-precious-metals-play?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hl">HL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ssri">SSRI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cde">CDE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slv">SLV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fannie and Freddie: Sticking it to the Taxpayers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160120-fannie-and-freddie-sticking-it-to-the-taxpayers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160120</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In my article titled &quot;<a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/02/delisting-of-gses-looms-large.html">Delisting of GSEs Looms Large</a>&quot; published on February 21, 2009, I discussed the fact that as Fannie Mae (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm' title='More opinion and analysis of FNM'>FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) remained under $1, the prospects were that we'd either see the companies delisted from the NYSE or that the price would skyrocket. Not long after writing the article, the stocks of FNM and FRE fell as low as $0.35 on March 9th. In that February article, I said the following:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>Look for a boosting of the share price to ridiculous levels (anything above $1) or go literally to zero in the next delisting notification process.</span></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:54:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>In my article titled &quot;<a href="http://dividendinc.blogspot.com/2009/02/delisting-of-gses-looms-large.html">Delisting of GSEs Looms Large</a>&quot; published on February 21, 2009, I discussed the fact that as Fannie Mae (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm' title='More opinion and analysis of FNM'>FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) remained under $1, the prospects were that we'd either see the companies delisted from the NYSE or that the price would skyrocket. Not long after writing the article, the stocks of FNM and FRE fell as low as $0.35 on March 9th. In that February article, I said the following:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p><span>Look for a boosting of the share price to ridiculous levels (anything above $1) or go literally to zero in the next delisting notification process.</span></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160120-fannie-and-freddie-sticking-it-to-the-taxpayers?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm">FNM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre">FRE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Double Tops, Double Bottoms: Dow Was Right </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/159821-double-tops-double-bottoms-dow-was-right?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">159821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In reading <i>The Stock Market Barometer</i> by William Peter Hamilton, I find that there is significant contribution to the topic of Dow Theory. It is Hamilton&rsquo;s book that led to the even better <i>The Dow Theory</i> and <i>Dow&rsquo;s Theory Applied to Business and Banking</i> by Robert Rhea. One area of contention is my belief that Charles H. Dow was absolutely right about double tops and double bottoms.</p><p>Hamilton, in reference to double tops and double bottoms, writes (<em><span></em><span>page 32.)</span>:</p></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:50:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>In reading <i>The Stock Market Barometer</i> by William Peter Hamilton, I find that there is significant contribution to the topic of Dow Theory. It is Hamilton&rsquo;s book that led to the even better <i>The Dow Theory</i> and <i>Dow&rsquo;s Theory Applied to Business and Banking</i> by Robert Rhea. One area of contention is my belief that Charles H. Dow was absolutely right about double tops and double bottoms.</p><p>Hamilton, in reference to double tops and double bottoms, writes (<em><span></em><span>page 32.)</span>:</p></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/159821-double-tops-double-bottoms-dow-was-right?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coppock Curve, Dow Theory and Industrial Production Point Higher</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/159319-coppock-curve-dow-theory-and-industrial-production-point-higher?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">159319</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>&quot;Too much too soon.&quot; Those are the words of E.S.C. Coppock in describing the emotional state of the uninitiated investors response to the ups and downs of the stock market. The purpose of the Coppock Curve is to measure the emotional overreaction to the movement of the stock market.</p> <p>Mr. Coppock observed that investors tend to ignore the fact that earnings are stable or rising and instead sell off a stock which is thought to be in trouble. Therefore, the monthly averaging of an index like the Dow Jones Industrials allows for better clarification of the what the price action is telling us.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:59:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>&quot;Too much too soon.&quot; Those are the words of E.S.C. Coppock in describing the emotional state of the uninitiated investors response to the ups and downs of the stock market. The purpose of the Coppock Curve is to measure the emotional overreaction to the movement of the stock market.</p> <p>Mr. Coppock observed that investors tend to ignore the fact that earnings are stable or rising and instead sell off a stock which is thought to be in trouble. Therefore, the monthly averaging of an index like the Dow Jones Industrials allows for better clarification of the what the price action is telling us.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/159319-coppock-curve-dow-theory-and-industrial-production-point-higher?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will the Real Mr. Buffett Please Stand Up?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/158152-will-the-real-mr-buffett-please-stand-up?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">158152</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As an investor who has to take responsibility for my actions, I seek out as much information as I can. Although I am willing to take in as much information as possible, I attempt to discern quality from the junk, critically analyze the information and questioning my assumption along with the author that I&rsquo;m reading.</p> <p>For this reason it did not go unnoticed when I read the October 16, 2008 <em>New York Times</em> op-ed piece written by Warren Buffett titled &ldquo;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html?_r=2"><strong>Buy American. I Am</strong></a>.&rdquo;</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Dividend Inc</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.dividendinc.blogspot.com/'>Dividend Inc.</a> submits: </strong>
<p>As an investor who has to take responsibility for my actions, I seek out as much information as I can. Although I am willing to take in as much information as possible, I attempt to discern quality from the junk, critically analyze the information and questioning my assumption along with the author that I&rsquo;m reading.</p> <p>For this reason it did not go unnoticed when I read the October 16, 2008 <em>New York Times</em> op-ed piece written by Warren Buffett titled &ldquo;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html?_r=2"><strong>Buy American. I Am</strong></a>.&rdquo;</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/158152-will-the-real-mr-buffett-please-stand-up?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/dividend-inc">Dividend Inc</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
