Seeking Alpha

Dr. Duru's  Instablog

Dr. Duru
  • on Demographics
  • on Forex
Send Message
Dr. Ahanotu is a graduate of Stanford University with over twenty years of experience doing analytic modeling, executing pricing strategies through price optimization, and implementing, developing, and selling enterprise software. He adds to this industry experience another five overlapping... More
My company:
Ahan Analytics, LLC
My blog:
One-Twenty Two
View Dr. Duru's Instablogs on:
  • Vertical Capital Income Fund Offers Attractive Alternative For Investing In Mortgages

    In late January, I made the case for investing in Dynex Capital (NYSE:DX) as one way to bet on a recovery for housing starting that I believe will begin in earnest next year. DX had dipped at the time on news of a stock offering to raise more capital. As anticipated, DX did eventually recover all those losses although it has pulled back a bit again since late February.

    Dynex recovered quickly from stock offering but remains down from early 2011 levels

    Dynex recovered quickly from stock offering but remains down from early 2011 levels

    Source: FreeStockCharts.com

    Soon after my post, I received an interesting message from David Kowal of Kowal Communications on behalf of Vertical Capital Markets Group of Irvine, California. Vertical Capital Markets Group was founded in 2004 to underwrite, monitor, and service home loans that it purchases. Last December, Vertical launched the Vertical Capital Income Fund (VCIF) to provide retail investors the opportunity to diversify their portfolios with investments in home mortgages. VCIF is a continuously offered, diversified, closed-end management investment, also known as an "Interval fund." Vertical buys high quality loans at a steep discount and, when necessary, works with homeowners to restructure their loan as part of their mission to keep people in their homes. From a company press release, Vertical states the following as part of its unique value proposition:

    "…The company's wide network of contacts within the banking industry allows the firm to uncover mortgage loan opportunities that other buyers might not find. As loan servicer, Vertical also has access to information not readily available to most institutional investors."

    Intrigued, I asked Kowal some follow-up questions which eventually led to an interview with Vertical's chairman, Gus Altuzarra. Mr. Altuzarra is a 30-year veteran of the mortgage industry. I enjoyed talking with him and learned a lot more about the way Vertical operates, its investing philosophies, and the dynamics of the current housing market. I provide below an edited transcript from the interview. I encourage you to do your own additional research before deciding to invest in the fund.

    - - -

    Vertical Capital Markets Group sold mortgages until 2007 when the prices of loan sales dropped too much to account for the risk of the loans. For example, Vertical could make 2-3 points on a $1 million loan in the secondary market (or $20,000-30,000). The average person does not take this deal and, moreover, Vertical had to guarantee the loan. Vertical changed its model in December, 2007 and decided to raise money to make loans and keep them. The company raised money from "friends and family." In total, Vertical has raised $27 million for its Vertical U.S. Recovery Fund I and $5 million for its Vertical U.S. Recovery Fund II.

    When the market dropped starting in 2007, raising money became extremely difficult. The lack of sufficient capital held the company back. The 2010-2011 change in the definition of an "accredited investor" diminished the pool of investors further. A retail fund allows Vertical to continue growing and purchasing more discounted loans.

    Vertical is able to get loans at a steep discount because the collateral (the home) has dropped in value. Across the country, homes have depreciated about 40%. Anyone planning to deliver loans into the secondary market before this big decline found themselves holding a large basket of loans that they never intended to keep. Most loan-to-value metrics became negative, forcing these players to sell. Given the low liquidity in the market, these companies also could not sell these loans all at once.

    These companies cannot hire a firm to manage their portfolio of loans because their capital is (unexpectedly) tied up. The drop in property value makes the loans impaired. The companies will realize heavy losses if such loans go into foreclosure. Some of these companies bought too early in the cycle and used too much leverage. The specific motivation for a company to sell distressed loans depends on the capital position.

    This situation represents Vertical's window of opportunity. Vertical buys loans at a price where it can achieve positive equity. Buying loans at 60 cents on the dollar with a 6% coupon generates about a 10% return. The fund is over-collateralized, so foreclosure risk is manageable. Vertical looks for loans with people who have a reason to stay in the house whether for emotional reasons (like amount of time living in the home) or for financial reasons (like a large down payment) or other reasons. For those who require help, they generally face issues of affordability or the loss of hope in ever paying off the house. Vertical will lower payments through a reduction in principal and lower interest rates. This is a non-taxable event for owner-occupied homes. Vertical has made such financing accommodations for about 30% of its loan portfolio.

    Investors in the Vertical Capital Income Fund receive an income stream and capital appreciation. Dividends are paid monthly and automatically re-invested. Shares are priced daily but investors can only tender their shares once a quarter. Vertical can only redeem 20% of its shares per year (5% per quarter); this can increase to 25% if the capital is available. Investors get a pro rata redemption if the limits are hit. Investors can purchase shares any day. Investors own shares in the fund and do not own the mortgages directly.

    The current funds have averaged returns of 10.7%. With fees, the average returns are 7 1/2 to 8%. The Funds that include modified loans started with much higher returns. Removing leverage from the equation, Vertical's funds likely provide similar returns to a mortgage real estate investment trust (REIT) like Dynex Capital.

    The Vertical Capital Income Fund reached $2 million in funds on January 1st and can now purchase its first loan portfolio. Diversification standards for mutual funds extend the time it takes to acquire loans.

    Dynex Capital is a very different financial instrument for investing in mortgages from Vertical Capital Income Fund. DX invests in mortgage-backed securities (MBSs). An MBS provides a rating and maybe some insurance. On the other hand, Vertical intimately knows the assets underlying its investments. Vertical reviews the physical house and analyzes the individual borrowers. Vertical reviews maximum loan-to-value, property types, and payment patterns.

    - - -

    If you want to learn more about the Vertical Income Fund I highly recommend you take the time to review Vertical's website and the detailed information about the fund. Over the coming weeks, I intend to do my own additional review, and I anticipate investing in the fund as another alternative for investing in the recovery of the housing market.

    Be careful out there!

    Disclosure: I am long DX.

    Tags: DX, real-estate
    Mar 12 12:46 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Molycorp CEO Mark Smith responds to stock's post-earnings drop in price
    Molycorp CEO Mark Smith posted a kind of defense of hs company's earnings report. In this blog, he explains how to properly compare MCP resulst with analyst estimates. He also goes after speculation and what he deems misinterpretations in the marketplace regarding MCP's business. I am OK with Smith providing additional color on earnings results, but I do not think he should answer the market's potential misinterpretation of actual versus analysts estimates because 1) analysts on the conference call did not take him to task on it, 2) an article on CNBC already addressed this issue, 3) it gives the appearance that MCP has operationalized the meet/beat the estimates game. The focus should always be on the real business and building shareholder value. The rest will take care of itself.

    See www.molycorp.com/News/ElementallyGreenBl...

    My post-earnings commentary is here: seekingalpha.com/article/307558-molycorp...
    Nov 14 11:52 AM | Link | Comment!
  • Protective Puts Versus Puts for Profit
    (Originally appeared on One-Twenty Two)

    A friend and I have actively discussed how best to position ourselves for the near-term, bearish risks in the market. As my favorite technical indicator, T2108 – the percentage of stocks trading above their 40-day moving average (DMA), hit oversold territory, he asked my opinion about adding to his SSO put spread. Puts on SSO have formed the core of my own bearish bets, but given the oversold technical conditions, it did not make sense to me to buy fresh puts unless they are used for downside protection and not to make money.

    My astute friend quickly challenged me on the notion of buying puts for protection versus for profit. After all, we trade to make money, right? I provide below the explanation that makes sense to me:

    SUMMARY

    Puts purchased for protection are out-of-the money with as short a duration as needed to cover the perceived risks. Minimization of cost is important given these costs eat into the eventual profits one expects to make on the underlying shares. If the feared risks never materialize, the overall position makes money from the underlying shares while the puts go to zero. Thus, the best outcome is a bullish one.

    Puts purchased for profit have strikes that are closer to the current stock price. Costs are finely tuned to the perceived profit potential (risk/reward) and leverage applied to the trade. All risk is packaged within the puts given there is no underlying to protect. If the feared risks never materialize, the overall position loses money (likely everything). Thus, the best outcome is a bearish one.

    I find it easiest to define “puts for protection”:
    Identify the specific risk factors that cause concern and buy just enough puts for just the amount of time the risks appear greatest. Puts should expire shortly after the feared event. Buying for a longer period of time does not make sense because of the extra time and risk premium this will cost. Since the position will include the underlying shares, a trader or investor assumes that the eventual (or longer-term) prospects are bullish. Otherwise, immediately sell the underlying position.

    The puts are out-of-the-money because it is only the out-sized and unexpectedly negative reaction that could cause enough loss to force the trader or investor to deviate from the overall plan. In other words, the puts are positioned such that the overall risk in the underlying is capped at a “manageable” level, and the puts are selected to minimize overall cost.

    If the perceived risk is at the macro-level, like a new bear market, then clearly the time horizons on the puts have to extend further. The trader or investor will also have to create a strategy for rolling the protection periodically since the timing of such a large event will always have a wide band of uncertainty.

    I find defining “puts for profit” to be a lot more squishy:
    The clearest component of this strategy is the lack of underlying shares (hedging strategies are a big exception). Moreover, the trader or investor requires the perceived risks to materialize to avoid losing money.

    For example, what happens if a trader expects the market to sell-off in the next three months? The trader can choose to sit out the market to wait for the risks to play out over this time, or the trader can transform this risk into an opportunity by buying puts now. To make money, the trader needs to cover the uncertainty of time and depth. The chosen puts must expire a little later than the duration of the perceived risk. The chosen puts should also not be out-of-the-money so that profits can accrue even if the correction is not as deep as expected (nothing worse than being directionally correct with nothing to show for it). If the correction gets steeper, the trader can always lock in profits on the original puts, and apply those profits to puts with lower strikes (and start riding on the “house’s money.”)

    The further the expiration goes in time, the more likely a put spread becomes the trader’s best choice. While it tightly caps overall profits, it also greatly reduces the cost of time premium which can destroy the profit potential of a trade if the puts are far out in time. The trader achieves good risk/reward by selecting a strike price for the short side of the spread around the downside target generated by the perceived risk.

    For example, if on expiration day, the underlying hits the strike price of the short side of the put spread, the trader realizes the full potential profit of the spread. This scenario is the best case. The short side of the spread goes to zero, and the end result is the same as having bought just the long side of the put – with much less risk. A trader can also choose to cover the short side if the market moves strongly against the position on the way to the downside; this strategy increases the profit potential with a small extra cost.

    To learn more details about trading options, I strongly recommend perusing Schaeffer’s Research. Bernie Schaeffer founded this site and is the author of the most well-read book on options: The Option Advisor: Wealth-Building Techniques Using Equity & Index Options (A Marketplace Book). One of my favorite books on options strategy is Options as a Strategic Investment. It is the most comprehensive book I have read on the subject of options trading.

    Be careful out there!

    Full disclosure: Long SSO puts


    Tags: SSO, SPY, options, calls, puts
    Jun 20 6:08 PM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.