Seeking Alpha

Dustin Moore

 
View Dustin Moore's StockTalks BY TICKER:
  • Dustin Moore
    If you haven't looked into it yet, $MBLY is a really interesting company in a really interesting market. Researching..
    17 hours ago
    Reply
      • Dustin Moore
        Refreshed rumors. Ramifications for $ETAK ? http://on.wsj.com/1sq9oZZ
        Mon, 1:17 PM
        Reply
          • Dustin Moore
            $MSFT asks USPTO Board for rehearing regarding their refusal to institute IPR for $VHC '135 patent. Yet again aiming at "a complaint" lingo.
            Fri, 4:27 PM
            Reply
              • Dustin Moore
                $VRNG Majority: Scope of the claimed invention is staggering..asserted claims fall outside section 101 because their broad and sweeping..
                Aug 15, 1:43 PM
                Reply (2)
                • Dustin Moore: "...reach is vastly disproportionate to their minimal technological disclosure."
                  Aug 15, 1:44 PM
                • Dustin Moore: THAT argument is much more valid than their main argument. The claims don't recite a natural law on a computer...IMO
                  Aug 15, 1:46 PM
                  • Dustin Moore
                    Majority: "simply recite the use of a generic computer to implement a well-known and widely-practiced technique for organizing information."
                    Aug 15, 1:34 PM
                    Reply
                      • Dustin Moore
                        What was claimed was the combination of elements of 2 evolving systems, not a combination of a known process & a web browser. $VRNG
                        Aug 15, 12:51 PM
                        Reply
                          • Dustin Moore
                            Dissent: .$VRNG patents did not merely combine information technology w/ "the Internet" Rather,..combined 2 known information filtering sys.
                            Aug 15, 12:48 PM
                            Reply
                              • Dustin Moore
                                One last note..$NTIP '930 patent actually leaves ex parte exam w/ 14 newly ADDED claims ( 9 originally). Can u feel the noose tightening?
                                Aug 13, 2:15 PM
                                Reply
                                  • Dustin Moore
                                    $NTIP Infringement was never the question. Validity was only way out & has been removed at this time. Price just went up $HPQ, Dell, $SNE..
                                    Aug 13, 1:47 PM
                                    Reply
                                      • Dustin Moore
                                        $NTIP There are no outstanding PTO challenges to the '930 patent. It is also part of past and future Ethernet standards.
                                        Aug 13, 1:44 PM
                                        Reply
                                          • Dustin Moore
                                            $NTIP Recently received validity ruling in IPR. Today, examiner entered" Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate" in ex parte exam
                                            Aug 13, 1:42 PM
                                            Reply
                                              • Dustin Moore
                                                $NTIP Cisco should now basically be hitting their yearly cap on revenues to $NTIP
                                                Aug 12, 5:40 PM
                                                Reply
                                                  • Dustin Moore
                                                    $NTIP Cisco audit results positive My est were ~$3,129,450 v $3,281,000 actual http://seekingalpha.com/a/1c8z7 http://bit.ly/1r7wDfy
                                                    Aug 12, 5:36 PM
                                                    Reply
                                                      • Dustin Moore
                                                        $CALL report not good...not good at all.
                                                        Aug 11, 4:24 PM
                                                        Reply
                                                          • Dustin Moore
                                                            $VHC Anyone else think the claims constructions weren't that great?
                                                            Aug 11, 2:17 PM
                                                            Reply (2)
                                                            • R.S. Analytics: What in particular were you concerned about?
                                                              Aug 11, 2:21 PM
                                                            • Dustin Moore: '181 claim terms. $VHC lost on several disputes. VPN was left open (that is not so much a big deal tho).
                                                              Aug 11, 2:49 PM
                                                              • Dustin Moore
                                                                $NTIP Ex Parte exam 90/012,401 appears to be a joke. Co aggressively responding after stay lift; asking examiner to ADD claims.
                                                                Aug 5, 11:42 PM
                                                                Reply
                                                                  • Dustin Moore
                                                                    $HPQ $SNE et al to appeal Board's previous finding of validity of $NTIP '930 patent in IPR.
                                                                    Aug 5, 10:09 AM
                                                                    Reply
                                                                      • Dustin Moore
                                                                        $APRI Announces the Launch of Its Topical Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction Vitaros in Sweden by Sandoz http://bit.ly/1lsiSjR
                                                                        Aug 4, 8:55 AM
                                                                        Reply
                                                                          • Dustin Moore
                                                                            The statute prohibits institution...if the petition is filed more than one year after the date petitioner is served with "a" complaint.
                                                                            Jul 23, 1:24 PM
                                                                            Reply
                                                                              • Dustin Moore
                                                                                We decline Petitioner's invitation to amend the statute by inserting either "latest" or "first" (or "third," in this case) into the statute.
                                                                                Jul 23, 12:40 PM
                                                                                Reply