<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Faisal Laljee - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Faisal Laljee' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee</link>
    <item>
      <title>ComScore: 'Our Panel Is Bigger'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/149216-comscore-our-panel-is-bigger?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">149216</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>ComScore (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scor' title='More opinion and analysis of SCOR'>SCOR</a>) and Nielsen are both market research and audience measurement businesses. They have a &quot;panel&quot; of independent internet users whose activities they monitor (with permission of course) and based on the internet usage of this panel, they publish broader internet measures like unique visitors, visits, page views, time spent etc. for most of the highly trafficked web sites on the internet. They also work with top internet companies to sell their portfolio of digital media measurement services that allows their clients to determine how their site is doing, where they get their traffic from, who they lose their traffic to, how their competitors are doing in terms of online traffic and so on.</p><div>Nielsen, in a recent press release titled &ldquo;Nielsen Launches Largest, Most Representative Online Audience Measurement Panel in U.S.&rdquo; stated that their panel of Internet users numbered more than 230,000, bigger than any rival&rsquo;s panel. This sparked a quick reaction from ComScore whose Chief Research Officer Josh Chasin responded that his company's panel was bigger with 300,000 users. &quot;Our panel is larger!&quot;, he claimed. Well, not exactly, but you get my point right?</div><div>As for the stocks, SCOR has been an interesting stock, but I am not a buyer. In fact, I am skeptical of these two companies using a sample size of just 300,000 or so to project the behaviour of 100 million internet users. To me, their sample size is not statistically significant, but unless someone else can measure a broader audience, ComScore remains the official word on internet usage statistics.</div><div>Also, companies like Hitwise and Compete are nipping at the heals of ComScore with their own rival panels and technology, which proves that this business is not a very unique one and has little to no barriers to entry.</div><div><strong><em>Full Disclosure:</em></strong><em> I do not own SCOR but my position can change anytime without notice. </em></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:09:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>ComScore (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scor' title='More opinion and analysis of SCOR'>SCOR</a>) and Nielsen are both market research and audience measurement businesses. They have a &quot;panel&quot; of independent internet users whose activities they monitor (with permission of course) and based on the internet usage of this panel, they publish broader internet measures like unique visitors, visits, page views, time spent etc. for most of the highly trafficked web sites on the internet. They also work with top internet companies to sell their portfolio of digital media measurement services that allows their clients to determine how their site is doing, where they get their traffic from, who they lose their traffic to, how their competitors are doing in terms of online traffic and so on.</p><div>Nielsen, in a recent press release titled &ldquo;Nielsen Launches Largest, Most Representative Online Audience Measurement Panel in U.S.&rdquo; stated that their panel of Internet users numbered more than 230,000, bigger than any rival&rsquo;s panel. This sparked a quick reaction from ComScore whose Chief Research Officer Josh Chasin responded that his company's panel was bigger with 300,000 users. &quot;Our panel is larger!&quot;, he claimed. Well, not exactly, but you get my point right?</div><div>As for the stocks, SCOR has been an interesting stock, but I am not a buyer. In fact, I am skeptical of these two companies using a sample size of just 300,000 or so to project the behaviour of 100 million internet users. To me, their sample size is not statistically significant, but unless someone else can measure a broader audience, ComScore remains the official word on internet usage statistics.</div><div>Also, companies like Hitwise and Compete are nipping at the heals of ComScore with their own rival panels and technology, which proves that this business is not a very unique one and has little to no barriers to entry.</div><div><strong><em>Full Disclosure:</em></strong><em> I do not own SCOR but my position can change anytime without notice. </em></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/149216-comscore-our-panel-is-bigger?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scor">SCOR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Game Over for GameStop</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/141049-game-over-for-gamestop?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">141049</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (MSFT<span>) announced at E3 this week that the Zune Store will be offering video game downloads to the XBox 360 console thereby removing the middle-man (read GameStop (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gme' title='More opinion and analysis of GME'>GME</a>) ). This is bad news for the video game retailer and comes on the heels of the Wal-Mart (WMT<span>) announcement last month, that the giant retailer would be testing video game trade-in kiosks in 77 stores across some key markets in the east. <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/3/saupload_gme.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></p><div><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00166N6SA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=B00166N6SA"><br></a></div><div>GameStop has had its share of woes lately, even amidst a booming video game market, which is one of the few retail segments still showing strength in these tough economic times. Last month, GameStop announced a very weak earnings forecast and trimmed its full-year same-store sales outlook. The company's outlook for the quarter ending in July called for earnings per share of 28 cents to 33 cents, while analysts were expecting for 40 cents, on average. Same-store sales are expected to drop 8 percent to 11 percent, compared with growth of 20 percent in the year-earlier quarter. Already this information hit the stock hard last month as it tumbled 15% in a single session.</div><div> </div><p>With this Microsoft announcement, Gamestop's future looks pretty bleak, and they will now depend on trade-in's even more so than they did in the past. It will be interesting to see how Wal-Mart's plans shape up over the next few months.</p></span></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:23:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Microsoft (MSFT<span>) announced at E3 this week that the Zune Store will be offering video game downloads to the XBox 360 console thereby removing the middle-man (read GameStop (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gme' title='More opinion and analysis of GME'>GME</a>) ). This is bad news for the video game retailer and comes on the heels of the Wal-Mart (WMT<span>) announcement last month, that the giant retailer would be testing video game trade-in kiosks in 77 stores across some key markets in the east. <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/3/saupload_gme.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></p><div><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00166N6SA?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=B00166N6SA"><br></a></div><div>GameStop has had its share of woes lately, even amidst a booming video game market, which is one of the few retail segments still showing strength in these tough economic times. Last month, GameStop announced a very weak earnings forecast and trimmed its full-year same-store sales outlook. The company's outlook for the quarter ending in July called for earnings per share of 28 cents to 33 cents, while analysts were expecting for 40 cents, on average. Same-store sales are expected to drop 8 percent to 11 percent, compared with growth of 20 percent in the year-earlier quarter. Already this information hit the stock hard last month as it tumbled 15% in a single session.</div><div> </div><p>With this Microsoft announcement, Gamestop's future looks pretty bleak, and they will now depend on trade-in's even more so than they did in the past. It will be interesting to see how Wal-Mart's plans shape up over the next few months.</p></span></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/141049-game-over-for-gamestop?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gme">GME</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 ETFs to Watch</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/139013-5-etfs-to-watch?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">139013</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>United States Natural Gas Fund - UNG</strong></p> <p>Natural Gas has been one of the hardest hit areas of the market, getting beaten down even worse than oil, losing 80% of its value since July 2008. Earlier this week, natural gas futures hit their highest point in 3 months, indicating a recovery is in the works. Since hitting a new 52-week low of of under $13 just last month, <strong>United States Natural Gas Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ung' title='More opinion and analysis of UNG'>UNG</a>) </strong>has rallied over 30%. <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10501553/1/natural-gas-etf-draws-heavy-call-trades.html">Pete Najarian of OptionsMonster</a> reports that recent options activity indicates that some serious money is betting on UNG moving up at least 20% in a few months. One might make the inventory argument, but much like oil, this argument is overblown and high inventories still don't justify such low prices. I recommend owning UNG if you want to participate in natural gas without exposure to specific company.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:42:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p><strong>United States Natural Gas Fund - UNG</strong></p> <p>Natural Gas has been one of the hardest hit areas of the market, getting beaten down even worse than oil, losing 80% of its value since July 2008. Earlier this week, natural gas futures hit their highest point in 3 months, indicating a recovery is in the works. Since hitting a new 52-week low of of under $13 just last month, <strong>United States Natural Gas Fund (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ung' title='More opinion and analysis of UNG'>UNG</a>) </strong>has rallied over 30%. <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10501553/1/natural-gas-etf-draws-heavy-call-trades.html">Pete Najarian of OptionsMonster</a> reports that recent options activity indicates that some serious money is betting on UNG moving up at least 20% in a few months. One might make the inventory argument, but much like oil, this argument is overblown and high inventories still don't justify such low prices. I recommend owning UNG if you want to participate in natural gas without exposure to specific company.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/139013-5-etfs-to-watch?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/moo">MOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pho">PHO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ung">UNG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Perfect Storm for Solar Stocks and Clean Energy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/139010-a-perfect-storm-for-solar-stocks-and-clean-energy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">139010</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It wasn't too long ago that oil prices were at $35 a barrel and energy bears were betting on it hitting $20. But as I have pointed out time and again, oil, much like the rest of this market, does not trade rationally. Inventory, supply, demand - all these are a thing of the past. Today, markets don't care about these mundane concepts. They trade on speculation and at the mercy of hedgies and traders. Since that low point of around $35, oil has recovered to $60, up 70%.<br><br><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf" width="390" height="245"><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashvars" value="liveQuote=true&amp;ticker=USO&amp;startDate=20-02-2009&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;endDate=20-05-2009"></object></p></param></param>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:26:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>It wasn't too long ago that oil prices were at $35 a barrel and energy bears were betting on it hitting $20. But as I have pointed out time and again, oil, much like the rest of this market, does not trade rationally. Inventory, supply, demand - all these are a thing of the past. Today, markets don't care about these mundane concepts. They trade on speculation and at the mercy of hedgies and traders. Since that low point of around $35, oil has recovered to $60, up 70%.<br><br><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf" width="390" height="245"><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashvars" value="liveQuote=true&amp;ticker=USO&amp;startDate=20-02-2009&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;endDate=20-05-2009"></object></p></param></param><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/139010-a-perfect-storm-for-solar-stocks-and-clean-energy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pbw">PBW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsl">TSL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google's Android Will Become the Default Mobile Platform</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138400-google-s-android-will-become-the-default-mobile-platform?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138400</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Google's Android OS is the hottest ever OS for mobile devices. In fact, over a handful of Android devices (some say as high as 20) are slated to launch this year alone from HTC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/htc' title='More opinion and analysis of HTC'>HTC</a>), Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>), Samsung and even Garmin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn' title='More opinion and analysis of GRMN'>GRMN</a>). I have said this before but I truly believe that Android will be the single most commonly used platform on mobile devices in 2 years. Even cell phone makers local to China and Japan are developing Android phones.</p><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/19/saupload_htc.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/19/saupload_htc_1.jpg" style="cursor: pointer;" /></a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 05:09:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Google's Android OS is the hottest ever OS for mobile devices. In fact, over a handful of Android devices (some say as high as 20) are slated to launch this year alone from HTC (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/htc' title='More opinion and analysis of HTC'>HTC</a>), Sony (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne' title='More opinion and analysis of SNE'>SNE</a>), Samsung and even Garmin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn' title='More opinion and analysis of GRMN'>GRMN</a>). I have said this before but I truly believe that Android will be the single most commonly used platform on mobile devices in 2 years. Even cell phone makers local to China and Japan are developing Android phones.</p><p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/19/saupload_htc.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/19/saupload_htc_1.jpg" style="cursor: pointer;" /></a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138400-google-s-android-will-become-the-default-mobile-platform?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grmn">GRMN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/htc">HTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok">NOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sne">SNE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is This Rally Sustainable?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/135304-is-this-rally-sustainable?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">135304</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Isn't that the million dollar question? I mean the market has raced up some 35% since the beginning of March and the S&amp;P is now positive for the year, after having hit 12 year lows less than 50 trading days ago. Here are just a few things to consider:<br> </p><ul><li>This rally could be nothing but shorts covering.</li><li>S&amp;P index, represented by <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='More opinion and analysis of SPY'>SPY</a>, while above its 50 DMA is still below is 200 DMA. Failure of the 50 DMA to overcome the 200 DMA might bring out the technical bears again.</li><li>Summer, and specifically May, marks the beginning of a 2-3 month lull period during which the markets have historically given back some gains.</li></ul><p><br>On the other hand:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:55:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Isn't that the million dollar question? I mean the market has raced up some 35% since the beginning of March and the S&amp;P is now positive for the year, after having hit 12 year lows less than 50 trading days ago. Here are just a few things to consider:<br> </p><ul><li>This rally could be nothing but shorts covering.</li><li>S&amp;P index, represented by <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='More opinion and analysis of SPY'>SPY</a>, while above its 50 DMA is still below is 200 DMA. Failure of the 50 DMA to overcome the 200 DMA might bring out the technical bears again.</li><li>Summer, and specifically May, marks the beginning of a 2-3 month lull period during which the markets have historically given back some gains.</li></ul><p><br>On the other hand:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/135304-is-this-rally-sustainable?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why It's a Good Time to Buy Google</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127249-why-it-s-a-good-time-to-buy-google?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127249</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The economy has affected all sectors of the world economy and there is not a single area that has not felt the pain. Retail, autos, health-care, finance, non-profit, government, manufacturing, services, consumer staples - all have suffered in some form or another. One of the areas hit hardest is Media. <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_goog.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></p><div> </div><div>Anyone affiliated with media agencies, service providers, newspapers, television and radio will tell you that business is down significantly, circulation of newspapers and magazines are staring at an accelerated decline, advertisers have tightened their belts and as a result, a lot of agencies have shut down completely.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>According to the U.S. Local Media Annual Forecast (2008-2013) by BIA Advisory Services and the Kelsey Group, advertising in traditional media such as television, radio, magazines, newspapers, direct mail and print Yellow Pages will decline from $141.3 billion in 2008 to $112.4 billion in 2013, a loss of over 20% in 5 years. In 2009 alone, Newspaper advertising will decline more than any other medium, going from $37.9 billion in 2008 to $31.9 billion in 2009, a drop of almost 16% according to eMarketer. TV ad spending too, will decline by 4.2% in 2009, to $66.9 billion.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Contrast this with digital media - internet, mobile, display ads, search advertising, video ads etc. This segment of the media business is set to increase by 129%, from $14 billion in 2008 to $32.1 billion in 2013. In other words, digital media will jump from being 10% of all media spend in 2008, to 30% of all media spend in 2013.</div><div> </div><p>So why is traditional media suffering when digital media is thriving? The economy, as I mentioned above, is the number one culprit. However, there is another event taking place. More and more people are consuming digital content than ever before, and consuming it for longer hours than they watch television, listen to radio or read newspapers. Whether it is in the form of social networking on Facebook, LinkedIn or MySpace, or in the form of consuming video content on YouTube or Hulu, or simply reading the news on CNN.com or WSJ online, the internet is fast catching up to the current (but not-for-long) champion of media - the Television.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:37:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>The economy has affected all sectors of the world economy and there is not a single area that has not felt the pain. Retail, autos, health-care, finance, non-profit, government, manufacturing, services, consumer staples - all have suffered in some form or another. One of the areas hit hardest is Media. <img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/3/22/saupload_goog.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></p><div> </div><div>Anyone affiliated with media agencies, service providers, newspapers, television and radio will tell you that business is down significantly, circulation of newspapers and magazines are staring at an accelerated decline, advertisers have tightened their belts and as a result, a lot of agencies have shut down completely.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>According to the U.S. Local Media Annual Forecast (2008-2013) by BIA Advisory Services and the Kelsey Group, advertising in traditional media such as television, radio, magazines, newspapers, direct mail and print Yellow Pages will decline from $141.3 billion in 2008 to $112.4 billion in 2013, a loss of over 20% in 5 years. In 2009 alone, Newspaper advertising will decline more than any other medium, going from $37.9 billion in 2008 to $31.9 billion in 2009, a drop of almost 16% according to eMarketer. TV ad spending too, will decline by 4.2% in 2009, to $66.9 billion.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Contrast this with digital media - internet, mobile, display ads, search advertising, video ads etc. This segment of the media business is set to increase by 129%, from $14 billion in 2008 to $32.1 billion in 2013. In other words, digital media will jump from being 10% of all media spend in 2008, to 30% of all media spend in 2013.</div><div> </div><p>So why is traditional media suffering when digital media is thriving? The economy, as I mentioned above, is the number one culprit. However, there is another event taking place. More and more people are consuming digital content than ever before, and consuming it for longer hours than they watch television, listen to radio or read newspapers. Whether it is in the form of social networking on Facebook, LinkedIn or MySpace, or in the form of consuming video content on YouTube or Hulu, or simply reading the news on CNN.com or WSJ online, the internet is fast catching up to the current (but not-for-long) champion of media - the Television.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127249-why-it-s-a-good-time-to-buy-google?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ford a Likely Survivor of the Auto Industry Crisis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/120837-ford-a-likely-survivor-of-the-auto-industry-crisis?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">120837</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It is no surprise that Chrysler, GM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>) and Ford (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f' title='More opinion and analysis of F'>F</a>) &ndash; the former Big 3, now the &ldquo;Barely Surviving 3&rdquo;- keep reporting abysmal sales month after month, while mounting their losses into the billions. Their stocks are at levels not seen since the 1970&rsquo;s, and speculation about their survival occupies many headlines across the media spectrum. If one were to bet on one of these three to make it out of this crisis alive, I would put my money on Ford. Here is why:</p> <p>Alan Mulally is a respected and successful CEO, who took over the helm at Ford only a few years ago. Before that, he was at Boeing. He tends to lead from the front. His recent voluntary pay cut to $1 for all of 2009 is a testament to his commitment and leadership. On the other hand, Rick Nardelli has earned the reputation of being greedy from his days at Home Depot. He followed Mulally&rsquo;s lead on not taking a salary in 2009, but I don&rsquo;t think he had a choice, considering the golden parachute he got from Home Depot and the stir it caused. Rick Wagner has been the CEO of GM for a long time and during his tenure, things have gotten progressively worse. Kirk Kerkorian, the famous activist investor took his losses in GM and left because he didn&rsquo;t see a bright future for GM. If the leadership of a company is strong, investors like Kirk Kerkorian stick around for a while.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:36:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>It is no surprise that Chrysler, GM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>) and Ford (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f' title='More opinion and analysis of F'>F</a>) &ndash; the former Big 3, now the &ldquo;Barely Surviving 3&rdquo;- keep reporting abysmal sales month after month, while mounting their losses into the billions. Their stocks are at levels not seen since the 1970&rsquo;s, and speculation about their survival occupies many headlines across the media spectrum. If one were to bet on one of these three to make it out of this crisis alive, I would put my money on Ford. Here is why:</p> <p>Alan Mulally is a respected and successful CEO, who took over the helm at Ford only a few years ago. Before that, he was at Boeing. He tends to lead from the front. His recent voluntary pay cut to $1 for all of 2009 is a testament to his commitment and leadership. On the other hand, Rick Nardelli has earned the reputation of being greedy from his days at Home Depot. He followed Mulally&rsquo;s lead on not taking a salary in 2009, but I don&rsquo;t think he had a choice, considering the golden parachute he got from Home Depot and the stir it caused. Rick Wagner has been the CEO of GM for a long time and during his tenure, things have gotten progressively worse. Kirk Kerkorian, the famous activist investor took his losses in GM and left because he didn&rsquo;t see a bright future for GM. If the leadership of a company is strong, investors like Kirk Kerkorian stick around for a while.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/120837-ford-a-likely-survivor-of-the-auto-industry-crisis?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f">F</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmgmq.pk">GMGMQ.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Stocks to Watch in 2009</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/119606-more-stocks-to-watch-in-2009?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">119606</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The first part of this post was published last month. Please <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2009/01/top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009.html" >click here</a> to see the <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2009/01/top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009.html" >Top Stocks to Buy in 2009 - Part 1</a>. As I said before, these lists are guides for you to do your own research. We are living in a particularly horrible time for stocks, so please do NOT go out and buy these picks blindly. Wait for the market to have a couple of bad days before you buy some and as much as possible, indulge in some dollar cost averaging. <br><br><b>Yen</b> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxy' title='More opinion and analysis of FXY'>FXY</a>) - The Yen has been moving strongly against the US dollar for the last 6<img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=FXY&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />months, climbing some 20%, while the Pound and Euro have declined over 30% each. Having said that, I believe the Yen will continue to improve against the dollar through 2009. Don't get me wrong - the Japanese market has problems of its own, but the US currency will continue to weaken against the Yen in light of the liquidity crisis in the US. Jim Rogers, in his appearance at the Russia Forum last week, spoke about his position on Yen.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:55:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>The first part of this post was published last month. Please <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2009/01/top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009.html" >click here</a> to see the <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2009/01/top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009.html" >Top Stocks to Buy in 2009 - Part 1</a>. As I said before, these lists are guides for you to do your own research. We are living in a particularly horrible time for stocks, so please do NOT go out and buy these picks blindly. Wait for the market to have a couple of bad days before you buy some and as much as possible, indulge in some dollar cost averaging. <br><br><b>Yen</b> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxy' title='More opinion and analysis of FXY'>FXY</a>) - The Yen has been moving strongly against the US dollar for the last 6<img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=FXY&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />months, climbing some 20%, while the Pound and Euro have declined over 30% each. Having said that, I believe the Yen will continue to improve against the dollar through 2009. Don't get me wrong - the Japanese market has problems of its own, but the US currency will continue to weaken against the Yen in light of the liquidity crisis in the US. Jim Rogers, in his appearance at the Russia Forum last week, spoke about his position on Yen.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/119606-more-stocks-to-watch-in-2009?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxy">FXY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pcln">PCLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tif">TIF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top Stocks to Buy in 2009</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/115568-top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">115568</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>2008 was perhaps one of the worst years for most investors in their lifetimes. One can safely look back and be thankful that the year is over. Of course, 2009 might not exactly be a rebound year, but at least one can assume that equity markets don't have much further to fall. I won't waste your time recapping 2008 at this point, well, I already kind of did that in my post titled &quot;<a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/12/top-5-life-changing-events-in-2008-year.html">Top 5 Life Changing Events in 2008</a>&quot;.<br /><br />Before we move to 2009, let me just say that while it sucks to lose money, there is no shame in having 50% of your portfolio shaved off. If you find yourself thinking this game is not for you, I urge you to reconsider. Many of the pundits of the investment and economic world got it wrong last year. T. Boone Pickens thought the year would end with oil at $150, Jim Cramer recommended Wachovia right before it went belly up and Bernanke, Barney Frank and President George Bush were all wrong about the economy and the extent of the financial crisis. So if you lost money, know that most professionals who make a living doing this, lost money too, and lots of it.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:09:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>2008 was perhaps one of the worst years for most investors in their lifetimes. One can safely look back and be thankful that the year is over. Of course, 2009 might not exactly be a rebound year, but at least one can assume that equity markets don't have much further to fall. I won't waste your time recapping 2008 at this point, well, I already kind of did that in my post titled &quot;<a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/12/top-5-life-changing-events-in-2008-year.html">Top 5 Life Changing Events in 2008</a>&quot;.<br /><br />Before we move to 2009, let me just say that while it sucks to lose money, there is no shame in having 50% of your portfolio shaved off. If you find yourself thinking this game is not for you, I urge you to reconsider. Many of the pundits of the investment and economic world got it wrong last year. T. Boone Pickens thought the year would end with oil at $150, Jim Cramer recommended Wachovia right before it went belly up and Bernanke, Barney Frank and President George Bush were all wrong about the economy and the extent of the financial crisis. So if you lost money, know that most professionals who make a living doing this, lost money too, and lots of it.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/115568-top-stocks-to-buy-in-2009?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/anf">ANF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pot">POT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Despite Oil's Slippery Slope, Consider USO </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114478-despite-oil-s-slippery-slope-consider-uso?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114478</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Oil is now at $38 a barrel. It has been trading the $38-$42 range for the last month or so. One can complain about the Dow falling 50% over 12 months, but how about Oil <img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=USO&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />falling 75% in 6 months? It fooled a good many who were betting it would keep going up and maybe rising to $200. It certainly fooled T. Boone Pickens, who many consider to be the best oil trader around. He had predicted oil would end the year at $150.<br><br>Now, 6 months after an all time high, oil sits at under $40 despite the recent events in the Middle-East. Gas prices at the pump hit a low not seen in over 8 years last month. At some point though, the markets will get sane again, and the smoke will clear. At that point, I expect oil to move up to a more normal $60-70 range. Things have already started to even out with prices at the pump now moving higher from their December lows. So with the understanding that there may be some more short-term downside to oil prices, I recommend the start of a (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso' title='More opinion and analysis of USO'>USO</a>) long position at current levels.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:54:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Oil is now at $38 a barrel. It has been trading the $38-$42 range for the last month or so. One can complain about the Dow falling 50% over 12 months, but how about Oil <img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=USO&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />falling 75% in 6 months? It fooled a good many who were betting it would keep going up and maybe rising to $200. It certainly fooled T. Boone Pickens, who many consider to be the best oil trader around. He had predicted oil would end the year at $150.<br><br>Now, 6 months after an all time high, oil sits at under $40 despite the recent events in the Middle-East. Gas prices at the pump hit a low not seen in over 8 years last month. At some point though, the markets will get sane again, and the smoke will clear. At that point, I expect oil to move up to a more normal $60-70 range. Things have already started to even out with prices at the pump now moving higher from their December lows. So with the understanding that there may be some more short-term downside to oil prices, I recommend the start of a (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso' title='More opinion and analysis of USO'>USO</a>) long position at current levels.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114478-despite-oil-s-slippery-slope-consider-uso?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Redefining Search and Search Engines</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/112729-redefining-search-and-search-engines?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">112729</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As internet consumers, we are used to the terms &quot;Google it&quot;, &quot;I will Facebook you&quot; or &quot;Tweet&quot;. But when it comes to search, one immediately thinks of Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>), Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)  and in some rare cases, Ask.com. Indeed when reports of search market share are released each month, Google seems to be gaining the ground with market-share of around 70%, with Yahoo a distant second and Microsoft, an even further third. Together, these 4 engines make up 100% of the  internet search market.<br><br>But with internet users increasingly spending their time on Flickr, Facebook, MySpace, Amazon, iTunes, Netflix and other popular news, media, social networking sites, a search can no longer just be considered a search on one of the 4 engines. In fact, when you search for a person or event on Facebook, a product on Amazon, a song on iTunes or a picture on Flickr, it is more of a &quot;long-tailed&quot; version of the same search that may have been conducted purely on the big 4 just a couple of years ago.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>As internet consumers, we are used to the terms &quot;Google it&quot;, &quot;I will Facebook you&quot; or &quot;Tweet&quot;. But when it comes to search, one immediately thinks of Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>), Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)  and in some rare cases, Ask.com. Indeed when reports of search market share are released each month, Google seems to be gaining the ground with market-share of around 70%, with Yahoo a distant second and Microsoft, an even further third. Together, these 4 engines make up 100% of the  internet search market.<br><br>But with internet users increasingly spending their time on Flickr, Facebook, MySpace, Amazon, iTunes, Netflix and other popular news, media, social networking sites, a search can no longer just be considered a search on one of the 4 engines. In fact, when you search for a person or event on Facebook, a product on Amazon, a song on iTunes or a picture on Flickr, it is more of a &quot;long-tailed&quot; version of the same search that may have been conducted purely on the big 4 just a couple of years ago.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/112729-redefining-search-and-search-engines?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple iPhone Hits Wal-Mart</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/110851-apple-iphone-hits-wal-mart?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">110851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg confirmed last week that Walmart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) would be selling two Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)  iPhone models later this month. This suddenly opens up the middle and lower-middle class market to Apple.</p><p>People that don't have a Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='More opinion and analysis of BBY'>BBY</a>)  near, or don't shop there, will now see the iPhones in Walmart stores and will want a piece of the action. Granted the economy is bad, but something tells me that other products will suffer more than the iPhone. One can expect overall retail sales to decline, including auto, apparel, electronics, home and garden etc., but considering that the iPhone is the hottest gadget out there, I expect it will continue to do well.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:49:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Bloomberg confirmed last week that Walmart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) would be selling two Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='More opinion and analysis of AAPL'>AAPL</a>)  iPhone models later this month. This suddenly opens up the middle and lower-middle class market to Apple.</p><p>People that don't have a Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='More opinion and analysis of BBY'>BBY</a>)  near, or don't shop there, will now see the iPhones in Walmart stores and will want a piece of the action. Granted the economy is bad, but something tells me that other products will suffer more than the iPhone. One can expect overall retail sales to decline, including auto, apparel, electronics, home and garden etc., but considering that the iPhone is the hottest gadget out there, I expect it will continue to do well.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/110851-apple-iphone-hits-wal-mart?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Corporate Brands You Can Believe In</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/110553-american-corporate-brands-you-can-believe-in?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">110553</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the current economic and stock market environment, where questions have been raised around business ethics, salaries and layoffs, and tarnished images of once revered American brands like Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>), <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig' title='More opinion and analysis of AIG'>AIG</a>, Ford (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f' title='More opinion and analysis of F'>F</a>), <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>, Countrywide, Lehman Brothers (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lehmq.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of LEHMQ.PK'>LEHMQ.PK</a>), Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='More opinion and analysis of BAC'>BAC</a>), WaMu, Bear Stearns and many more flash across our eyes in one negative context after another, it is good to know that a few good men still remain standing tall, with their integrity intact.<br /><br />Indeed, American brands like Southwest (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/luv' title='More opinion and analysis of LUV'>LUV</a>), FedEx (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fdx' title='More opinion and analysis of FDX'>FDX</a>), Aflac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/afl' title='More opinion and analysis of AFL'>AFL</a>) and Nucor (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nue' title='More opinion and analysis of NUE'>NUE</a>) claim not to have laid off a single person from their staff in over 3 decades? Of course the definition of a lay-off may vary from one company to another, but if this is true, then I truly wonder what these guys are doing right in terms of long-term planning, retention and headcount that they can sustain the right productivity and avoid handing their employees the pink-slip in tough economic conditions. Why can't more of Corporate America be like them?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:25:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>In the current economic and stock market environment, where questions have been raised around business ethics, salaries and layoffs, and tarnished images of once revered American brands like Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='More opinion and analysis of C'>C</a>), <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig' title='More opinion and analysis of AIG'>AIG</a>, Ford (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f' title='More opinion and analysis of F'>F</a>), <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='More opinion and analysis of GM'>GM</a>, Countrywide, Lehman Brothers (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lehmq.pk' title='More opinion and analysis of LEHMQ.PK'>LEHMQ.PK</a>), Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='More opinion and analysis of BAC'>BAC</a>), WaMu, Bear Stearns and many more flash across our eyes in one negative context after another, it is good to know that a few good men still remain standing tall, with their integrity intact.<br /><br />Indeed, American brands like Southwest (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/luv' title='More opinion and analysis of LUV'>LUV</a>), FedEx (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fdx' title='More opinion and analysis of FDX'>FDX</a>), Aflac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/afl' title='More opinion and analysis of AFL'>AFL</a>) and Nucor (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nue' title='More opinion and analysis of NUE'>NUE</a>) claim not to have laid off a single person from their staff in over 3 decades? Of course the definition of a lay-off may vary from one company to another, but if this is true, then I truly wonder what these guys are doing right in terms of long-term planning, retention and headcount that they can sustain the right productivity and avoid handing their employees the pink-slip in tough economic conditions. Why can't more of Corporate America be like them?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/110553-american-corporate-brands-you-can-believe-in?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/afl">AFL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a">BRK.A</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fdx">FDX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/luv">LUV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nue">NUE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government Saves Beloved Banks, Shuns Automakers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/107505-government-saves-beloved-banks-shuns-automakers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">107505</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has now been well over a month since the $700 billion package was approved and the government came to the aid of the US banks with the hopes that it would trickle down to the consumer. However, the general feeling out there is that banks are shoring up their reserves with this money and the liquidity that the Fed was looking to inject in the market is not exactly flowing through our economy.<br /><br />What should the government have done with the $700 billion? Was giving it to the banks the right move? I think it is too soon to tell but here is how it would have served the right purpose.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:34:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>It has now been well over a month since the $700 billion package was approved and the government came to the aid of the US banks with the hopes that it would trickle down to the consumer. However, the general feeling out there is that banks are shoring up their reserves with this money and the liquidity that the Fed was looking to inject in the market is not exactly flowing through our economy.<br /><br />What should the government have done with the $700 billion? Was giving it to the banks the right move? I think it is too soon to tell but here is how it would have served the right purpose.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/107505-government-saves-beloved-banks-shuns-automakers?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/f">F</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmgmq.pk">GMGMQ.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yahoo is a Buy on Yang's Departure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/106508-yahoo-is-a-buy-on-yang-s-departure?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">106508</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As you may have heard, Jerry Yang has been sacked by the Board of Directors at Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) from his position as CEO. Ok so maybe the official verdict is that he &quot;stepped down&quot;. Regardless, he hurt Yahoo more than he helped it. During his 18 month run as CEO, he turned down a lucrative Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) bid for $32 per share, and could not forge a deal with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>). Shares of Yahoo now languish at around $10, struggling to stay in double digits.</p> <p><br /> <script src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/wikichart/javascript/scripts.php" type="text/javascript"></script><object id="30BD9CD9-C0A1-F776-AA48-ADBA554AF24E" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab#9,0,28" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" height="245" width="390"><param name="movie" value="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashvars" value="ticker=YHOO&amp;startDate=&amp;endDate=&amp;rollingDate=1 year&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;liveQuote=true"><embed src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="ticker=YHOO&amp;startDate=&amp;endDate=&amp;rollingDate=1 year&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;liveQuote=true" height="245" width="390"></object></p></param></param></param>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:04:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>As you may have heard, Jerry Yang has been sacked by the Board of Directors at Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) from his position as CEO. Ok so maybe the official verdict is that he &quot;stepped down&quot;. Regardless, he hurt Yahoo more than he helped it. During his 18 month run as CEO, he turned down a lucrative Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) bid for $32 per share, and could not forge a deal with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>). Shares of Yahoo now languish at around $10, struggling to stay in double digits.</p> <p><br /> <script src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/wikichart/javascript/scripts.php" type="text/javascript"></script><object id="30BD9CD9-C0A1-F776-AA48-ADBA554AF24E" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab#9,0,28" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" height="245" width="390"><param name="movie" value="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashvars" value="ticker=YHOO&amp;startDate=&amp;endDate=&amp;rollingDate=1 year&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;liveQuote=true"><embed src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="ticker=YHOO&amp;startDate=&amp;endDate=&amp;rollingDate=1 year&amp;showAnnotations=true&amp;liveQuote=true" height="245" width="390"></object></p></param></param></param><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/106508-yahoo-is-a-buy-on-yang-s-departure?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo">YHOO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jim Rogers Still Bullish on Commodities, Bearish on the Fed</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/105764-jim-rogers-still-bullish-on-commodities-bearish-on-the-fed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">105764</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Jim Rogers, famed author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812973712?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0812973712">Hot Commodities: How Anyone Can Invest Profitably in the World's Best Market</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=stocksadvice-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0812973712" alt="" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812968719?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0812968719">Investment Biker: Around the World with Jim Rogers</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=stocksadvice-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0812968719" alt="" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px;" />, and chairman of Rogers Holdings is still bullish on commodities. The original bull on commodities has long been a staunch believer in commodities including metals, agriculture and energy and has recently launched a verbal offensive against the Federal Reserve Bank and the US Treasury for injecting so much liquidity into the market, which is often followed by higher inflation.<br /><br />In an interview with Bloomberg on October 24, Jim Rogers reiterated that gold, agriculture and other commodities will continue to go up once the markets settle. Click on the video below to see his full interview.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:41:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>Jim Rogers, famed author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812973712?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0812973712">Hot Commodities: How Anyone Can Invest Profitably in the World's Best Market</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=stocksadvice-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0812973712" alt="" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812968719?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=stocksadvice-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0812968719">Investment Biker: Around the World with Jim Rogers</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=stocksadvice-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0812968719" alt="" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px;" />, and chairman of Rogers Holdings is still bullish on commodities. The original bull on commodities has long been a staunch believer in commodities including metals, agriculture and energy and has recently launched a verbal offensive against the Federal Reserve Bank and the US Treasury for injecting so much liquidity into the market, which is often followed by higher inflation.<br /><br />In an interview with Bloomberg on October 24, Jim Rogers reiterated that gold, agriculture and other commodities will continue to go up once the markets settle. Click on the video below to see his full interview.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/105764-jim-rogers-still-bullish-on-commodities-bearish-on-the-fed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbc">DBC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/djp">DJP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gcc">GCC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Calling the Bottom for the S&amp;P at 800</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/102038-calling-the-bottom-for-the-s-p-at-800?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">102038</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The S&amp;P 500 index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='More opinion and analysis of SPY'>SPY</a>) fell another 8% last week and now sits near 6 year lows. But unlike the last market crash from 2000-02, this market is not expensive. The heavy selling has nothing to do with lofty valuations, instead, a weak economy, slowing growth, and fears of a recession are  <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/10/top-10-reasons-market-is-down.html" title="Top 10 Reasons the Market is Down">what's driving investor psychology</a>. <br /> <br /> However, I can't emphasize enough how good of an opportunity this is to buy stocks. As Warren Buffett says, &quot;be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful&quot;. The S&amp;P 500 index has found the 825 level to be a good level of support looking back over the last 10 years. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:47:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>The S&amp;P 500 index (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='More opinion and analysis of SPY'>SPY</a>) fell another 8% last week and now sits near 6 year lows. But unlike the last market crash from 2000-02, this market is not expensive. The heavy selling has nothing to do with lofty valuations, instead, a weak economy, slowing growth, and fears of a recession are  <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/10/top-10-reasons-market-is-down.html" title="Top 10 Reasons the Market is Down">what's driving investor psychology</a>. <br /> <br /> However, I can't emphasize enough how good of an opportunity this is to buy stocks. As Warren Buffett says, &quot;be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful&quot;. The S&amp;P 500 index has found the 825 level to be a good level of support looking back over the last 10 years. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/102038-calling-the-bottom-for-the-s-p-at-800?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good News For Google Investors: YouTube Click-To-Buy Feature </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/99519-good-news-for-google-investors-youtube-click-to-buy-feature?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99519</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>YouTube recently launched a click-to-buy a program, which allows users to purchase music, movies and games from Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) , iTunes or Electronic Arts (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erts' title='More opinion and analysis of ERTS'>ERTS</a>) via links on the video page.<img align="right" alt="" src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=GOOG&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" /><br /><br />Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) has been at the receiving end of some criticism regarding its lack of monetization strategy on YouTube, so this is welcome news for Google investors.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:41:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>YouTube recently launched a click-to-buy a program, which allows users to purchase music, movies and games from Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMZN'>AMZN</a>) , iTunes or Electronic Arts (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erts' title='More opinion and analysis of ERTS'>ERTS</a>) via links on the video page.<img align="right" alt="" src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=GOOG&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" /><br /><br />Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) has been at the receiving end of some criticism regarding its lack of monetization strategy on YouTube, so this is welcome news for Google investors.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/99519-good-news-for-google-investors-youtube-click-to-buy-feature?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/erts">ERTS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Stocks That Are Begging To Be Bought</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/98539-3-stocks-that-are-begging-to-be-bought?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98539</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>This market is really fickle and the bailout package seems to have done nothing to appease the market. Last week, while the market was waiting for the House to approve the new bailout plan, the Dow rallied 250 points. Once it was approved, it turned negative within minutes. We are definitely not out of the woods, but certain stocks are just begging to be bought.<br /><br />Now before you go out and buy these stocks, know that as I mentioned <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/09/hedge-your-longs-using-bounce-today.html" title="Hedge Your Longs Using the Bounce Today">earlier last week</a>, no one knows which way the market is headed. So if you don't have a stomach for risk, it's better to steer clear of the market until the fog lifts.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:26:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Faisal Laljee</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Faisallaljee100px.jpg" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border="1" width="70" /><strong><a href="http://stocksandblogs.com">Faisal Laljee</a> submits: </strong><p>This market is really fickle and the bailout package seems to have done nothing to appease the market. Last week, while the market was waiting for the House to approve the new bailout plan, the Dow rallied 250 points. Once it was approved, it turned negative within minutes. We are definitely not out of the woods, but certain stocks are just begging to be bought.<br /><br />Now before you go out and buy these stocks, know that as I mentioned <a href="http://stocksandblogs.com/2008/09/hedge-your-longs-using-bounce-today.html" title="Hedge Your Longs Using the Bounce Today">earlier last week</a>, no one knows which way the market is headed. So if you don't have a stomach for risk, it's better to steer clear of the market until the fog lifts.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/98539-3-stocks-that-are-begging-to-be-bought?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pcln">PCLN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/faisal-laljee">Faisal Laljee</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
