<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Felix Salmon - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Felix Salmon' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon</link>
    <item>
      <title>Two Safe Havens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173295-two-safe-havens?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173295</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>I got two smart responses to my <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/11/the-end-of-safe-havens/">assertion</a> that there&rsquo;s no safe haven for investors these days. Jared Woodard at <a href="http://www.condoroptions.com/index.php/strategy/how-to-be-risk-averse/">Condor Options</a> responded with 1,500 words on how investors in an S&amp;P index fund can buy put options to protect their downside: &ldquo;any hedging at all is better than none,&rdquo; he writes. Meanwhile, maynardGkeynes left a much shorter <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/11/the-end-of-safe-havens/#comment-8607">comment</a>:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>TIPS are both easy and obvious.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:03:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>I got two smart responses to my <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/11/the-end-of-safe-havens/">assertion</a> that there&rsquo;s no safe haven for investors these days. Jared Woodard at <a href="http://www.condoroptions.com/index.php/strategy/how-to-be-risk-averse/">Condor Options</a> responded with 1,500 words on how investors in an S&amp;P index fund can buy put options to protect their downside: &ldquo;any hedging at all is better than none,&rdquo; he writes. Meanwhile, maynardGkeynes left a much shorter <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/11/11/the-end-of-safe-havens/#comment-8607">comment</a>:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>TIPS are both easy and obvious.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173295-two-safe-havens?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tip">TIP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Micropayments Data Point of the Day</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173172-micropayments-data-point-of-the-day?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173172</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/business-travel/2009/11/11/business-travelers-refuse-to-pay-airlines-for-wifi/index.html">Joe Brancatelli</a> reports on airline fliers&rsquo; stubborn refusal to pay even a nominal sum for wifi:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Passengers &ldquo;want to be connected, [but] they want it to be free,&rdquo; Doug Murri, Southwest Airlines senior manager of technologies, told a group of airline and entertainment executives this past summer. Alaska Airlines, testing the same satellite-based WiFi system as Southwest, reports that passenger usage plummets when it charges a fee. The higher the fee, the faster the decline. &ldquo;Even when we charge $1&mdash;and we did try $1&mdash;we see a drop-off in people willing to pay,&rdquo; Alaska Airlines executive Craig Chase recently told the Wall Street Journal.</p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:24:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/business-travel/2009/11/11/business-travelers-refuse-to-pay-airlines-for-wifi/index.html">Joe Brancatelli</a> reports on airline fliers&rsquo; stubborn refusal to pay even a nominal sum for wifi:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Passengers &ldquo;want to be connected, [but] they want it to be free,&rdquo; Doug Murri, Southwest Airlines senior manager of technologies, told a group of airline and entertainment executives this past summer. Alaska Airlines, testing the same satellite-based WiFi system as Southwest, reports that passenger usage plummets when it charges a fee. The higher the fee, the faster the decline. &ldquo;Even when we charge $1&mdash;and we did try $1&mdash;we see a drop-off in people willing to pay,&rdquo; Alaska Airlines executive Craig Chase recently told the Wall Street Journal.</p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173172-micropayments-data-point-of-the-day?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hhh">HHH</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Question for Sheila Bair</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173170-one-question-for-sheila-bair?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173170</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk/2009/11/ask-the-fdics-sheila-bair-your.html">Paul Solman</a> is taking questions for Sheila Bair. If I could ask her just one question, it would be about her actions taking over WaMu and wiping out all its senior unsecured debt. That&rsquo;s the wholesale interbank market right there, and in the wake of the WaMu collapse, banks pretty much stopped lending to each other, fearful that at any point Bair could step in and wipe out billions of dollars in assets. The ensuing credit crunch was responsible for trillions of dollars in stock and bond-market losses, and Tim Geithner, for one, was furious at Bair for her precipitous decision.</p> <p>So the question is this: was the WaMu intervention a mistake, given the knock-on effects it had on the broader economy? Or, more generally, is there anything Bair would do differently, in hindsight?</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:21:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk/2009/11/ask-the-fdics-sheila-bair-your.html">Paul Solman</a> is taking questions for Sheila Bair. If I could ask her just one question, it would be about her actions taking over WaMu and wiping out all its senior unsecured debt. That&rsquo;s the wholesale interbank market right there, and in the wake of the WaMu collapse, banks pretty much stopped lending to each other, fearful that at any point Bair could step in and wipe out billions of dollars in assets. The ensuing credit crunch was responsible for trillions of dollars in stock and bond-market losses, and Tim Geithner, for one, was furious at Bair for her precipitous decision.</p> <p>So the question is this: was the WaMu intervention a mistake, given the knock-on effects it had on the broader economy? Or, more generally, is there anything Bair would do differently, in hindsight?</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173170-one-question-for-sheila-bair?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm">JPM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fed Cracks Down on Overdrafts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173169-the-fed-cracks-down-on-overdrafts?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173169</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Go Fed! In a very CFPA-ish move, the Fed has now <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20091112a.htm">announced</a> that effective July 1, no bank can impose overdraft fees on its customers for ATM or debit card transactions, unless and until they explicitly ask for that &ldquo;protection&rdquo;. And they even come with a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/13regulate.html?hp">quote from Ben Bernanke</a> talking about &ldquo;an important step forward in consumer protection&rdquo;, which is not the kind of language we&rsquo;re used to hearing from Fed chairmen.</p> <p>One weird thing, though: in the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20091112a3.pdf">letter</a> the Fed has published as a model for banks to follow, consumers are given two choices at the bottom: the first choice is opting out of overdraft protection on ATM and debit-card transactions, while the second choice is opting in. That&rsquo;s confusing, because opting out is the default option: if you simply ignore the letter and do nothing, you&rsquo;re opted out automatically.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:17:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p>Go Fed! In a very CFPA-ish move, the Fed has now <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20091112a.htm">announced</a> that effective July 1, no bank can impose overdraft fees on its customers for ATM or debit card transactions, unless and until they explicitly ask for that &ldquo;protection&rdquo;. And they even come with a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/13regulate.html?hp">quote from Ben Bernanke</a> talking about &ldquo;an important step forward in consumer protection&rdquo;, which is not the kind of language we&rsquo;re used to hearing from Fed chairmen.</p> <p>One weird thing, though: in the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20091112a3.pdf">letter</a> the Fed has published as a model for banks to follow, consumers are given two choices at the bottom: the first choice is opting out of overdraft protection on ATM and debit-card transactions, while the second choice is opting in. That&rsquo;s confusing, because opting out is the default option: if you simply ignore the letter and do nothing, you&rsquo;re opted out automatically.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173169-the-fed-cracks-down-on-overdrafts?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iat">IAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Happy 10th Birthday, Financial Modernization Bill!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173168-happy-10th-birthday-financial-modernization-bill?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173168</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/ls241.htm">Ten years ago yesterday</a>:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>SEC. SUMMERS: Let me welcome you all here today for the signing of this historic legislation. With this bill, the American financial system takes a major step forward towards the 21st century, one that will benefit American consumers, business, and the national economy for many years to come&hellip;</p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:14:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/ls241.htm">Ten years ago yesterday</a>:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>SEC. SUMMERS: Let me welcome you all here today for the signing of this historic legislation. With this bill, the American financial system takes a major step forward towards the 21st century, one that will benefit American consumers, business, and the national economy for many years to come&hellip;</p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173168-happy-10th-birthday-financial-modernization-bill?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyf">IYF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Goldman Sachs Foundation's Torrid 2008</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173166-the-goldman-sachs-foundation-s-torrid-2008?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173166</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) has provided Reuters with a copy of the Goldman Sachs Foundation&rsquo;s 2008 tax return. Why the NYT didn&rsquo;t just put it online I have no idea, but in any case <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/files/2009/11/2008-990-pf.pdf">here it is</a>, all 297 pages of it.</p> <p>The bottom line is that the Goldman Sachs Foundation did <i>very</i> badly in 2008. Here&rsquo;s the way it&rsquo;s all summed up:</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:54:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p>Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='More opinion and analysis of GS'>GS</a>) has provided Reuters with a copy of the Goldman Sachs Foundation&rsquo;s 2008 tax return. Why the NYT didn&rsquo;t just put it online I have no idea, but in any case <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/files/2009/11/2008-990-pf.pdf">here it is</a>, all 297 pages of it.</p> <p>The bottom line is that the Goldman Sachs Foundation did <i>very</i> badly in 2008. Here&rsquo;s the way it&rsquo;s all summed up:</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173166-the-goldman-sachs-foundation-s-torrid-2008?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs">GS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Small Banks Replicate Big Banks?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173165-will-small-banks-replicate-big-banks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173165</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://www.chumpchanger.com/2009/11/when-banks-fail-they-all-fail-at-once.html">Mark Gimein</a> says that we shouldn&rsquo;t worry too much about the problem of too-big-to-fail, because the alternative to one big bank failing is lots of small banks failing:</p>  <blockquote class="quote"><p>What we&rsquo;ve seen in virtually every crisis is that bank failures and other economic catastrophes are highly correlated, in large part because financial players do not lock themselves up in rooms and gaze at crystal balls. They watch what everyone else is doing and then they do the same thing&hellip; The problem of the giant institution that&rsquo;s an outlier and needs to be bailed out when everyone else is doing fine is one that exists only in theory. What happens in practice is that many banks, large and small, make the same mistakes and fail at the same time. In other words, it tends to be not single banks that need to be bailed out, but big swaths of the whole industry. Breaking up the biggest banks won&rsquo;t change that.</p></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:50:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://www.chumpchanger.com/2009/11/when-banks-fail-they-all-fail-at-once.html">Mark Gimein</a> says that we shouldn&rsquo;t worry too much about the problem of too-big-to-fail, because the alternative to one big bank failing is lots of small banks failing:</p>  <blockquote class="quote"><p>What we&rsquo;ve seen in virtually every crisis is that bank failures and other economic catastrophes are highly correlated, in large part because financial players do not lock themselves up in rooms and gaze at crystal balls. They watch what everyone else is doing and then they do the same thing&hellip; The problem of the giant institution that&rsquo;s an outlier and needs to be bailed out when everyone else is doing fine is one that exists only in theory. What happens in practice is that many banks, large and small, make the same mistakes and fail at the same time. In other words, it tends to be not single banks that need to be bailed out, but big swaths of the whole industry. Breaking up the biggest banks won&rsquo;t change that.</p></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173165-will-small-banks-replicate-big-banks?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iat">IAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbe">KBE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Shipping Industry's $350 Billion Debt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173068-the-shipping-industry-s-350-billion-debt?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173068</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/global/12shipping.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">Landon Thomas</a>&rsquo;s story on dodgy shipping loans has some absolutely astonishing numbers, the biggest of which is simply the size of the market, which he pegs at a whopping $350 billion.</p> <p>The story is pegged to Eastwind Maritime, a shipper which went bust this summer owing $300 million on a fleet of 55 ships. That&rsquo;s about $5.5 million per ship, which isn&rsquo;t very much when the average five-year-old vessel was valued at about $88 million as of June of 2008. But things are different now:</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/global/12shipping.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">Landon Thomas</a>&rsquo;s story on dodgy shipping loans has some absolutely astonishing numbers, the biggest of which is simply the size of the market, which he pegs at a whopping $350 billion.</p> <p>The story is pegged to Eastwind Maritime, a shipper which went bust this summer owing $300 million on a fleet of 55 ships. That&rsquo;s about $5.5 million per ship, which isn&rsquo;t very much when the average five-year-old vessel was valued at about $88 million as of June of 2008. But things are different now:</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173068-the-shipping-industry-s-350-billion-debt?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sea">SEA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman Sachs' Not-Very-Charitable Foundation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/173064-goldman-sachs-not-very-charitable-foundation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173064</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/12goldman.html?src=sch">Geraldine Fabrikant</a> gets her hands on the 2008 tax filing for the Goldman Sachs Foundation today, and it&rsquo;s pretty astonishing stuff:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The latest tax filing for Goldman Sachs&rsquo;s foundation is as thick as a phone book. The list of trades is more than 200 pages, single spaced. Goldman, it seems, invests like no other, even for its own charity.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:44:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/12goldman.html?src=sch">Geraldine Fabrikant</a> gets her hands on the 2008 tax filing for the Goldman Sachs Foundation today, and it&rsquo;s pretty astonishing stuff:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The latest tax filing for Goldman Sachs&rsquo;s foundation is as thick as a phone book. The list of trades is more than 200 pages, single spaced. Goldman, it seems, invests like no other, even for its own charity.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/173064-goldman-sachs-not-very-charitable-foundation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs">GS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Decline of Credit Cards</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172864-the-decline-of-credit-cards?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172864</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/adverse_selection_in_the_credi.html">Ezra Klein</a>, on what he considers a vicious cycle in credit cards:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The problem is that the people who migrate toward debit cards are the people who have enough money not to need much credit and are responsible enough to not want it. The good risks, in other words. The people left in the credit card market will be disproportionately bad risks, which means rates will go up and standards will tighten, which will in turn drive more people out of the market, starting the cycle over again.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/adverse_selection_in_the_credi.html">Ezra Klein</a>, on what he considers a vicious cycle in credit cards:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The problem is that the people who migrate toward debit cards are the people who have enough money not to need much credit and are responsible enough to not want it. The good risks, in other words. The people left in the credit card market will be disproportionately bad risks, which means rates will go up and standards will tighten, which will in turn drive more people out of the market, starting the cycle over again.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172864-the-decline-of-credit-cards?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cof">COF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ncc">NCC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Right-To-Rent Becomes a Reality</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172822-right-to-rent-becomes-a-reality?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172822</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>Something has happened on the <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/20/right-to-rent-gets-more-traction/">right-to-rent</a> front! It comes from Fannie Mae (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm' title='More opinion and analysis of FNM'>FNM</a>) and it&rsquo;s called <a href="http://www.fanniemae.com/newsreleases/2009/4844.jhtml?p=Media&amp;s=News+Releases">deed-for-lease</a>, and I&rsquo;m basically in full agreement with <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&amp;-columns/op-eds-&amp;-columns/fannie-mae-statement/">Dean Baker</a> on this one: it&rsquo;s a step in the right direction, but it&rsquo;s still a far cry from what <i>should</i> be happening. Not only should the lease be for more than 12 months, but the program should be rolled out to all mortgages, not just those owned by Fannie Mae.</p> <p>In the meantime, it&rsquo;ll be fascinating to see just how popular this program is. Lots of bright ideas get rolled out and fail to gain traction; Fannie Mae should keep a close eye on this one, and make it more attractive if people aren&rsquo;t making use of it. And Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) should in any case try to one-up them, perhaps with a three-year lease. Let&rsquo;s keep the momentum going!</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>Something has happened on the <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/07/20/right-to-rent-gets-more-traction/">right-to-rent</a> front! It comes from Fannie Mae (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm' title='More opinion and analysis of FNM'>FNM</a>) and it&rsquo;s called <a href="http://www.fanniemae.com/newsreleases/2009/4844.jhtml?p=Media&amp;s=News+Releases">deed-for-lease</a>, and I&rsquo;m basically in full agreement with <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&amp;-columns/op-eds-&amp;-columns/fannie-mae-statement/">Dean Baker</a> on this one: it&rsquo;s a step in the right direction, but it&rsquo;s still a far cry from what <i>should</i> be happening. Not only should the lease be for more than 12 months, but the program should be rolled out to all mortgages, not just those owned by Fannie Mae.</p> <p>In the meantime, it&rsquo;ll be fascinating to see just how popular this program is. Lots of bright ideas get rolled out and fail to gain traction; Fannie Mae should keep a close eye on this one, and make it more attractive if people aren&rsquo;t making use of it. And Freddie Mac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre' title='More opinion and analysis of FRE'>FRE</a>) should in any case try to one-up them, perhaps with a three-year lease. Let&rsquo;s keep the momentum going!</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172822-right-to-rent-becomes-a-reality?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm">FNM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fre">FRE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unrepentant Bankers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172821-unrepentant-bankers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/business/media/19askthetimes.html?pagewanted=all">Andrew Ross Sorkin</a> confirms what most of us have long suspected:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>One of the frustrating parts of researching my book came when I finally got to ask the question of Wall Street chief executives and board members that you just raised: Do you have any remorse? Are you sorry? The answer, almost unequivocally, was no. (Or they just didn&rsquo;t answer.) They see themselves as just one part of a larger problem, with many constituencies to blame.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:33:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/business/media/19askthetimes.html?pagewanted=all">Andrew Ross Sorkin</a> confirms what most of us have long suspected:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>One of the frustrating parts of researching my book came when I finally got to ask the question of Wall Street chief executives and board members that you just raised: Do you have any remorse? Are you sorry? The answer, almost unequivocally, was no. (Or they just didn&rsquo;t answer.) They see themselves as just one part of a larger problem, with many constituencies to blame.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172821-unrepentant-bankers?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rent-To-Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172820-rent-to-buy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172820</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>If <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/02/renting-mortgage-property-lifestyle-real-estate_rent_to_buy.html">Forbes</a> writes something on rent-to-buy schemes in March and then the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/11/10/if-the-american-dreams-faded-whats-next/">WSJ</a> puts up a blog entry in November along similar lines, even the stretchiest blogger might have difficulty discerning a trend. But that doesn&rsquo;t mean it isn&rsquo;t a good idea. In fact, it would be great if we saw much more of it in this country.</p> <p>Rent-to-buy means lots of different things to different people. Often, it&rsquo;s a simple lease with an embedded option to buy the property at a set price on a set date &mdash; an attempt to give the buyer a bit of time to scare up a downpayment, and to give the seller an income stream. Typically the option is purchased for cash (1% of the purchase price seems to be standard) at the same time that the lease is signed; generally if the option is exercised, the price of the option is deducted from the purchase price.</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:32:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>If <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/02/renting-mortgage-property-lifestyle-real-estate_rent_to_buy.html">Forbes</a> writes something on rent-to-buy schemes in March and then the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/11/10/if-the-american-dreams-faded-whats-next/">WSJ</a> puts up a blog entry in November along similar lines, even the stretchiest blogger might have difficulty discerning a trend. But that doesn&rsquo;t mean it isn&rsquo;t a good idea. In fact, it would be great if we saw much more of it in this country.</p> <p>Rent-to-buy means lots of different things to different people. Often, it&rsquo;s a simple lease with an embedded option to buy the property at a set price on a set date &mdash; an attempt to give the buyer a bit of time to scare up a downpayment, and to give the seller an income stream. Typically the option is purchased for cash (1% of the purchase price seems to be standard) at the same time that the lease is signed; generally if the option is exercised, the price of the option is deducted from the purchase price.</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172820-rent-to-buy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robert Benmosche, Frustrated Civil Servant</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172787-robert-benmosche-frustrated-civil-servant?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172787</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>I&rsquo;m not at all convinced that any CEO is ever worth a $10 million pay package, but if it wasn&rsquo;t clear when that deal was signed, it <a href="http://./">became obvious</a> very quickly that Robert Benmosche was something of a prima donna. That&rsquo;s far from unusual in people earning 8-figure salaries: indeed, being the recipient of such a massive emolument tends to exacerbate such tendencies in anybody.</p> <p>The real culprit in this story, however, isn&rsquo;t Benmosche, who has been something of a known quantity from day one at AIG (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig' title='More opinion and analysis of AIG'>AIG</a>). Rather, it&rsquo;s the people at Treasury, who are now zero for two in picking AIG CEOs. Maybe it&rsquo;s not as easy as they thought.</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:36:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>I&rsquo;m not at all convinced that any CEO is ever worth a $10 million pay package, but if it wasn&rsquo;t clear when that deal was signed, it <a href="http://./">became obvious</a> very quickly that Robert Benmosche was something of a prima donna. That&rsquo;s far from unusual in people earning 8-figure salaries: indeed, being the recipient of such a massive emolument tends to exacerbate such tendencies in anybody.</p> <p>The real culprit in this story, however, isn&rsquo;t Benmosche, who has been something of a known quantity from day one at AIG (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig' title='More opinion and analysis of AIG'>AIG</a>). Rather, it&rsquo;s the people at Treasury, who are now zero for two in picking AIG CEOs. Maybe it&rsquo;s not as easy as they thought.</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172787-robert-benmosche-frustrated-civil-servant?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig">AIG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of Safe Havens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172648-the-end-of-safe-havens?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172648</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>I&rsquo;m surprised to see this coming from <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2009/11/prepare_for_the_worst.cfm">Ryan Avent</a>:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>If everyone is certain that crises are going to be bigger and more frequent, and if everyone is certain that governments won&rsquo;t be able to afford to bail everyone out the next time around, then shouldn&rsquo;t everyone be busy limiting their exposure to risk? And shouldn&rsquo;t that then <em>reduce</em> the likelihood, frequency, and cost of future crises?</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:20:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>I&rsquo;m surprised to see this coming from <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2009/11/prepare_for_the_worst.cfm">Ryan Avent</a>:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>If everyone is certain that crises are going to be bigger and more frequent, and if everyone is certain that governments won&rsquo;t be able to afford to bail everyone out the next time around, then shouldn&rsquo;t everyone be busy limiting their exposure to risk? And shouldn&rsquo;t that then <em>reduce</em> the likelihood, frequency, and cost of future crises?</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172648-the-end-of-safe-havens?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Executive Perk of the Day, Vonage Edition</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172647-executive-perk-of-the-day-vonage-edition?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172647</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.footnoted.org/my-big-fat-deal/vonage-ceo-racks-up-gulfstream-miles/">Michelle Leder</a> finds one of the weirdest executive perks yet in the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1272830/000119312509227725/dex103.htm">employment contract</a> for Vonage CEO Mark Lefar:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The Company shall also promptly pay, or reimburse the Executive for, the costs of his private air travel from and to the Company&rsquo;s principal offices in Holmdel, New Jersey (subject to the submission of reasonable documentation) in (a) an annual amount up to a maximum of $250,000 in 2008 and $600,000 in 2009 and subsequent calendar years while employed during the Term, plus (b) an amount equal to the cost of commercial air travel for each trip (i.e., the cost of a first-class, fully refundable, direct flight booked one week prior to travel) while employed during the Term.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:19:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p><a href="http://www.footnoted.org/my-big-fat-deal/vonage-ceo-racks-up-gulfstream-miles/">Michelle Leder</a> finds one of the weirdest executive perks yet in the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1272830/000119312509227725/dex103.htm">employment contract</a> for Vonage CEO Mark Lefar:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>The Company shall also promptly pay, or reimburse the Executive for, the costs of his private air travel from and to the Company&rsquo;s principal offices in Holmdel, New Jersey (subject to the submission of reasonable documentation) in (a) an annual amount up to a maximum of $250,000 in 2008 and $600,000 in 2009 and subsequent calendar years while employed during the Term, plus (b) an amount equal to the cost of commercial air travel for each trip (i.e., the cost of a first-class, fully refundable, direct flight booked one week prior to travel) while employed during the Term.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172647-executive-perk-of-the-day-vonage-edition?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vg">VG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dodd Bill: Generally Very Good</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172601-the-dodd-bill-generally-very-good?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>I like a very great deal of Chris Dodd&rsquo;s <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=df7bf893-bb40-6970-cd5f-c75f56d0fb64">proposed regulatory reforms</a>, and overall the Dodd bill is, I think, a significant improvement on <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/17/financial-regulation-the-alphabet-soup-gets-much-worse/">Treasury&rsquo;s proposals</a>. A good place to start is the <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/FinancialReformDiscussionDraft111009.pdf">discussion draft</a>, but there&rsquo;s a great deal going on here (the <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/AYO09D44_xml.pdf">full bill</a> is 1,136 pages), so expect lots more details to emerge in the coming days and weeks. In general I&rsquo;m a fan of it, although I have reservations about the new Agency for Financial Stability, and the reduced powers at the Fed.</p> <p>The heart of the Dodd bill involves setting up three new agencies: the Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration, the Agency for Financial Stability, and the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. The last &mdash; the CFPA &mdash; is if anything a beefed-up version of the agency envisaged in Treasury&rsquo;s proposal, and it&rsquo;s a very good idea. But the first two are new.</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:44:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>I like a very great deal of Chris Dodd&rsquo;s <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=df7bf893-bb40-6970-cd5f-c75f56d0fb64">proposed regulatory reforms</a>, and overall the Dodd bill is, I think, a significant improvement on <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/17/financial-regulation-the-alphabet-soup-gets-much-worse/">Treasury&rsquo;s proposals</a>. A good place to start is the <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/FinancialReformDiscussionDraft111009.pdf">discussion draft</a>, but there&rsquo;s a great deal going on here (the <a href="http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/AYO09D44_xml.pdf">full bill</a> is 1,136 pages), so expect lots more details to emerge in the coming days and weeks. In general I&rsquo;m a fan of it, although I have reservations about the new Agency for Financial Stability, and the reduced powers at the Fed.</p> <p>The heart of the Dodd bill involves setting up three new agencies: the Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration, the Agency for Financial Stability, and the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. The last &mdash; the CFPA &mdash; is if anything a beefed-up version of the agency envisaged in Treasury&rsquo;s proposal, and it&rsquo;s a very good idea. But the first two are new.</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172601-the-dodd-bill-generally-very-good?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Unemployment Only 9.5%?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172564-is-unemployment-only-9-5?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172564</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>You remember Friday&rsquo;s gruesome employment <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">report</a>, right? <a href="http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/did-unemployment-really-rise/">Floyd Norris</a> has taken a second look at it, and found something quite surprising:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Unemployment rates remained steady at 9.5 percent. And the number of jobs actually rose, by 80,000. And the number of jobs for college-educated Americans rose more than in any month in the last six years.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:43:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>You remember Friday&rsquo;s gruesome employment <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">report</a>, right? <a href="http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/did-unemployment-really-rise/">Floyd Norris</a> has taken a second look at it, and found something quite surprising:</p> <blockquote><p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Unemployment rates remained steady at 9.5 percent. And the number of jobs actually rose, by 80,000. And the number of jobs for college-educated Americans rose more than in any month in the last six years.</p></p></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172564-is-unemployment-only-9-5?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Fix the U.S. Financial System</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172563-how-to-fix-the-u-s-financial-system?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172563</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div><p>I had a very interesting conversation with Bob Pozen yesterday evening; his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Too-Save-U-S-Financial-System/dp/0470499052/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1257868967&amp;sr=8-1">new book</a> is out now, and I highly recommend it. It&rsquo;s the first crisis book to make a detailed series of specific recommendations about what needs to be done going forwards &mdash; or, in the words of the book&rsquo;s subtitle, &ldquo;how to fix the US financial system&rdquo;.</p> <p>These recommendations are sprinkled liberally throughout the book, and are helpfully presented in bold type. Whenever I came across one, I scribbled the page number on the back flap of my copy, in one of four columns. The first column was recommendations I agreed with, or which were at least a step in the right direction; the next two columns were for recommendations I thought didn&rsquo;t make complete sense or were questionable, and the final column was for recommendations I thought were bad ideas. The final tally looked like this:</p></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:40:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><div><div><div><p>I had a very interesting conversation with Bob Pozen yesterday evening; his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Too-Save-U-S-Financial-System/dp/0470499052/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1257868967&amp;sr=8-1">new book</a> is out now, and I highly recommend it. It&rsquo;s the first crisis book to make a detailed series of specific recommendations about what needs to be done going forwards &mdash; or, in the words of the book&rsquo;s subtitle, &ldquo;how to fix the US financial system&rdquo;.</p> <p>These recommendations are sprinkled liberally throughout the book, and are helpfully presented in bold type. Whenever I came across one, I scribbled the page number on the back flap of my copy, in one of four columns. The first column was recommendations I agreed with, or which were at least a step in the right direction; the next two columns were for recommendations I thought didn&rsquo;t make complete sense or were questionable, and the final column was for recommendations I thought were bad ideas. The final tally looked like this:</p></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172563-how-to-fix-the-u-s-financial-system?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wal-Mart Does Not Save Families $3,100 a Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/172512-wal-mart-does-not-save-families-3-100-a-year?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">172512</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p><a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/impressions/2009/11/09/cnbc-we-re-not-pro-slavery-except-camera?page=full">Jim Ledbetter</a>, it&rsquo;s very easy to avoid getting into idiotic arguments with Dennis Kneale on CNBC: just stop going on CNBC. But at the same time, it&rsquo;s worth pushing back much more on the ludicrous claim that Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) saves the average American family $3,100 a year:</p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>Beginning in 2005, Wal-Mart commissioned the research firm Global Insight to produce a report measuring the impact of Wal-Mart on the overall American economy. Its methodology is, of course, open to debate, but the study tested 26 markets and measured the impact of a variety of economic factors on prices, going back to 1985. Not surprisingly, the study found that the widespread existence of Wal-Mart dating back to 1985 has resulted in about a 3 percent reduction of prices (3.6 percent in the most recent study, which is where the $3,100 figure comes from).</p></blockquote></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:20:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Felix Salmon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/">Felix Salmon</a> submits: </strong><div><p><a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/impressions/2009/11/09/cnbc-we-re-not-pro-slavery-except-camera?page=full">Jim Ledbetter</a>, it&rsquo;s very easy to avoid getting into idiotic arguments with Dennis Kneale on CNBC: just stop going on CNBC. But at the same time, it&rsquo;s worth pushing back much more on the ludicrous claim that Wal-Mart (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt' title='More opinion and analysis of WMT'>WMT</a>) saves the average American family $3,100 a year:</p> <blockquote><blockquote class="quote"><p>Beginning in 2005, Wal-Mart commissioned the research firm Global Insight to produce a report measuring the impact of Wal-Mart on the overall American economy. Its methodology is, of course, open to debate, but the study tested 26 markets and measured the impact of a variety of economic factors on prices, going back to 1985. Not surprisingly, the study found that the widespread existence of Wal-Mart dating back to 1985 has resulted in about a 3 percent reduction of prices (3.6 percent in the most recent study, which is where the $3,100 figure comes from).</p></blockquote></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/172512-wal-mart-does-not-save-families-3-100-a-year?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/felix-salmon">Felix Salmon</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
