Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
Dear BuyersStrikeWP, what YONG reports is not the point of my article. What I am saying is that Mr. Roe's method does not work. Not on truthful numbers, not on false numbers. The whole article is about a method, not about any particular set of numbers.
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
Did I tout about how great a company Yongye is? I am truly sorry if that is what you got out of my writing. I thought that I was just pointing out some mathematical impossibilities. And I would have done that if the subject of Mr. Roe's article would have been Apple Inc, which I do consider to be a great company.
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
Richard,
You are avoiding the facts, it does not make any difference for 2007 sales numbers which way I call the company. Concentrate your efforts in providing at least one of the following:
1. Source proving your claim that none of the big 5 customers had sales in Inner-Mongolia during 2007. Your head does not qualify.
2. Mathematical proof that you can deduct actual sales distribution from Sales by Customer and Sales by Province tables. That would get you Lasker price, also.
3. Proof that at least 13 distributors moved from Inner-Mongolia to Xinjiang between years 2007 and 2008. Distributors going bankrupt and new distributors do qualify, but you need to provide proof.
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
what YONG reports is not the point of my article. What I am saying is that Mr. Roe's method does not work. Not on truthful numbers, not on false numbers. The whole article is about a method, not about any particular set of numbers.
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
47 % is the correction you made in your article. I agreed.
Yongye International: A Victim of Bad Logic and Misleading Math [View article]
You are avoiding the facts, it does not make any difference for 2007 sales numbers which way I call the company. Concentrate your efforts in providing at least one of the following:
1. Source proving your claim that none of the big 5 customers had sales in Inner-Mongolia during 2007. Your head does not qualify.
2. Mathematical proof that you can deduct actual sales distribution from Sales by Customer and Sales by Province tables. That would get you Lasker price, also.
3. Proof that at least 13 distributors moved from Inner-Mongolia to Xinjiang between years 2007 and 2008. Distributors going bankrupt and new distributors do qualify, but you need to provide proof.