Seeking Alpha
Full index of posts »
Posts by Ticker
Latest Comments
-
Graham and Dodd Investor on Take out speculators may be disappointed by Leap economics Yeah, in some of these situations, speculators ...
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.















Smartphone Pricing Must Fall Under Apple’s Umbrella by TownHall analyst David Eller
The below is from our principal analyst and partner, David Eller
Conclusion
We believe Apple’s iPhone, sets the bar for smartphone pricing. This presents a significant challenge for competitors and carriers alike. We expect accelerating price declines to begin in Q4/2009 and smartphone margin pressure through 2010. Smartphone stocks may not be as "safe" growth investors as many holders expect.
How Apple sets smartphone industry pricing
More »When Apple set the price of the iPhone 3GS at $199 while reducing the price for the iPhone 3G to $99 it forced the handset industry to adapt. The bar is set for not only high-end phones but also the mid tier, limiting the time handsets can prove themselves worthy of a premium. This has implications for handset manufacturers and carriers that are willing to take risks with cutting edge but higher priced features. Going forward, Apple’s pricing structure has implications for mid tier phones such as the CLIQ and the Pixi, which we believe, need to be priced at $99 and $49 in order to reach mass adoption. These prices are considerably below current expectations.
PALM: a PREcarious channel issue
PALM Pre: more than a handful in the channel
Since Palm reported its August quarter losses, we have been perplexed by a disconnect between PALM’s device units sold and our estimates of store level
sell through. According to PALM’s reported sell through, inventory increased by 13k units and since the “vast majority” of both the device units shipped and the device units sold were units of the Pre, there couldn't be an inventory problem. The gap between the two is only 13k. However, since the company recognizes revenue on sell in to the channel and the company defines device units sold as units that have been shipped from Sprint (their primary customer) to either customers or second tier distributors, PALM could offer investors a high number of units shipped but still have a glut of inventory in the channel. We believe that channel inventory is currently about 11 weeks, which we believe will pressure reorder rates and make it more difficult to sell high ASP products going forward.
Sprint’s acts as PALM’s sole distributor in the United States accounting for 85% of revenue. Each of the second tier distributors such as Best Buy or Amazon.com buys inventory from Sprint rather than from PALM. PALM is accounting for this as devices sold. This does not appear to be understood by investors. We polled several of the investors who attended the Boston road show lunch and each was under the impression that sell through translated into customer activations. How can this be? Its documented on page 41 of Palm’s 10-k which states, “VSOE is based on the price determined by management having the relevant authority when the element is not yet sold separately, but is expected to be sold in the marketplace within six months of the initial determination of the price by management.” Of course this brings up two side issues -- how does a phone sitting on a distributors shelf have an economic life AND -- FASB is likely to change subscription accounting rules for Smartphones and PDAs so that Palm will be able to bury this problem with new policies and in restatements.
We believe this means to PALM is that there is a glut of inventory in the channel that will prevent reorders from existing customers in the United States, reduced expectations for future carrier partnerships and if there is price protection or the ability for customers to return merchandise, potentially a large write off coming. At the very least, we believe that break even in 2H10 is in jeopardy.
The profitability turn hinges on PALM’s ability to build relationships with additional carriers. We highlighted the need for the company to raise capital after the 4Q earnings call in order to get more units in the hands of consumers before companies like Acer and Huawei gain a presence in the smartphone market. Companies like Verizon are trying to diversify away from their reliance on RIMM devices (which currently account for 85% of VZ’s smartphone sales) and PALM will be a beneficiary, but the level of carrier support is now in question. Despite the rumors to the contrary, Verizon will sell the Pre in January but the handset price subsidy and the marketing spend provided by the carrier are both up for debate. Verizon could offer to launch the phone at a price point of $129 with a $150 subsidy making the platform unprofitable for PALM.
IT IS MINOR FOR SPRINT
Our best information says Sprint activated a little less than 375,000 Palm Pres as of the end of August. This left about 275,000 or 11 weeks of Palm Pres in “Sprint channels” at the end of August. This is not to say Sprint is carrying 100% of the cost of these phones. Best Buy, Radio Shack, Walmart, Amazon and Lets Talk.com are all likely carrying some of this inventory cost. How much we do not know. What these dealer’s return rights, price protection, rebates or other incentives are we also do not know. These dealer terms and conditions vary greatly with the phones. However, the core economics around the Palm Pre's market are slipping.
Sprint reduced the price by 25% to $149 only 93 days after first shipping the Pre. Amazon is selling it for $99. Walmart and Letstalk.com are both offered "specials" on the Pre for is $79. While undoubtedly some expect lower prices will improve demand, we believe the lower prices are more likely to blunt some competitive impact. There are more smartphone competitors today than at time of announcement. HTC’s Hero, Touch Pro2, and Snap, a reworked Blackberry Tour, and Palm’s Pixi are all recent entries to Sprint’s smartphone line up. Moreover, we do not believe Sprint has announced all of its new smartphones for the Christmas season.
We estimate Sprint on average, is paying Palm about $450 per unit during its September quarter. If Sprint has 100,000 too many units, the cost to it and its channel is about 45 million dollars. While this may be enough to limit Sprint’s short term financial flexibility and restructuring we must view it in the context of a company with more than $1.0B of quarterly operating cash flow.
More »Disclosure: Gerard is long Sprint bonds.
Deutsche Telecom Buying Sprint Rumor - more likely that DT wants in on Sprint's wireline business and not the whole thing
Opinion:
We believe Sprint’s share price does not reflect the company’s underlying value. This is the overriding reason management is pursuing its “slow liquidation” strategy. In total this liquidation will likely realize at least $12 per Sprint share. We suspect this deal may be about DT or T-Mobile forming a JV with Sprint and possible Level3 for backhaul than DT buying the company.
The question becomes, is it a good value for Deutsche Telecom?
More »Sprint's new plans: nice but not particularly significant
Sprint adds a feature
Sprint’s price action is not dramatic, it simply adds a nice feature to current plans.
Sprint has consistently undercut both Verizon and AT&T on plan prices. Despite having a quantifiably better network than Verizon and AT&T, Sprint continues to lose customers. We believe one problem was that Sprint offered no “special features.” AT&T has “rollover minutes” which accrues minutes to be used in future months. Verizon added “family and friends” which eliminates charges for five designated numbers. Sprint now offers “any mobile, anytime” or free calling to any mobile phone on any network as its special features.
More »TiVo’s IP is well beyond DISH/SATS
DISH and ECHOSTAR are fighting yesterday’s war
The ongoing battle between TiVo and DISH/EchoStar is primarily of financial interest. Yes, it looks like DISH/EchoStar will have to hand TiVo large piles of cash, but we believe investors need to pay attention to TiVo’s large and growing intellectual property portfolio. To be sure, the company’s original “Time Warp” patents, which are at the center of the battle, are important, but the big asset looks like subsequent patents. Currently the US Patent Office is re-examining a number of TiVo’s claims that DISH had not previously challenged. This re-examination could well be a material event for investors. At present TownHall makes no forecast as to its outcome, however we point out that Rethink expects a positive ruling for TiVo. We also point out that TiVo recently filed suit against AT&T and Verizon for patent infringement in UVerse and FIOS respectively.
In Friday’s ruling that awarded TiVo $200MM for contempt from Dish, the court established a royalty rate of $1.25 per subscriber per month and an additional $1.00 per month as a sanction. Interestingly the court based this ruling on its perception that Dish charges $5.98 per month for DVR service. According to its website though, Dish’s current DVR pricing is $20 per month. In its ruling, the Texas court said, “If, however, EchoStar is unsuccessful on appeal and nevertheless continues to disregard this Court’s orders, the Court will seriously entertain the award of enhanced sanctions.
More »Take out speculators may be disappointed by Leap economics
Earlier today, we heard a rumor that AT&T was considering purchasing Leap Wireless at a very hopeful $30.00 per share. We think economics argues against such a deal and even at Leap's current share price of $17.51 the economics would be challenging. Making a deal less likely is that LEAP has a CDMA network while AT&T's runs on GSM.
Leap's cost per gross addition was $201 in the June, 2009 quarter. For comparison purposes we remind readers Sprint paid less than $140 per customer for Virgin Mobile. We believe cost per gross addition is a reasonable benchmark to use when valuing prepaid carriers.
In the unlikely event that LEAP's acquirer spent only enough money to maintain the current subscribers on the current network and based on last quarter's results, we would value each subscriber at roughly $620. If this was truly strategic and complementary to a buyer, this price might become relevant. However, with churn at 4.4%, the average life of a customer is short, less than 2 years. Making it hard for anyone thinking longer term.
At $30 per share: with about 78 million fully diluted shares outstanding and about $2.1B in net debt the company's enterprise value is $4.3 Billion. Assuming the company's spectrum is worth what it cost (reasonable) that would have AT&T paying about high $770 per customer. if the spectrum is worth twice what the company paid for it (aggressive) that would have AT&T paying a still high $620 per customer.
At $17.51 per share (the current stock price) the economics are still tough. Factoring spectrum at cost puts the price at $570 per customer, using our aggressive spectrum value shows a still high $421 per customer price.
With respect to LEAP's AWS spectrum we do not see AT&T as a natural buyer. We would expect T-Mobile or Verizon to be willing to pay a higher price than AT&T as both T-Mobile and Verizon hold similar AWS spectrum.
No positions in any of these stocks.