Seeking Alpha
Full index of posts »
Posts by Ticker
Latest Comments
-
Gerry Sullivan on Why GM stock is trading above $1.00 I think you are referring to the offer that was...
-
JCC on Why GM stock is trading above $1.00 Gerry - Thanks for the reply!The original conve...
-
Gerry Sullivan on Why GM stock is trading above $1.00 The $25 par GM bonds are trading around $3.50 a...
-
JCC on Market Outlook Next 2 Weeks Gerry - In June after reading your articles, I ...
-
JCC on Why GM stock is trading above $1.00 Gerry - In June after reading your articles, I ...
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.


















Why This Time May Be Different
I did some buying yesterday on the decline, but I am not as enthusiastic this time. I write this with the Dow Jones Industrials up 160 points around 1 PM Eastern Time.
The reason I am not as enthusiastic is I see the Dow outperforming the other indices, particularly the Russell 2000 index. Another big factor is that tomorrow(Friday Oct 30) is the day when most mutual funds close their year. This creates noise as fund managers are trying to boost their performance, dressing up at year end with winners like AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, GS, etc.
Disclosure: Long 90 stocks; short SPX calls.
What Investors (and Traders) Should Do Right Now
These investors have these common traits:
1) They are underinvested in equities.
2) They see the economy improving both in the statistics they read and from what they see every day.
3) Their credit balances in brokerage accounts, bank savings accounts, short term CDs, money market funds, just aren't earning a satisfactory yield.
These investors are nibbling on stocks. They are causing the market to go up when you think it should be going down.
Now, I am going way back in time and putting on my broker hat. I am going to present an idea to a client who has money in the money market fund earning 0.10%. I am going to suggest that he buy stocks with that money. Solid companies that he knows and companies that pay good dividends.
You can make up your own list, but I am going to recommend:
Chevron (CVX) 4% yield;
Johnson and Johnson (JNJ) 3.2% yield:
Procter and Gamble (PG) 3.3% yield:
Coca Cola (KO) 3.3% yield;
Pennsylvania Power & Light (PPL) 4.7% yield:
Microsoft (MSFT) 2.2% yield;
Deere (DE) 2.5% yield;
AT&T (T) 6.4% yield.
You don't need my list, you can make your own, but these are all well known companies with good dividends.
You might note that I am purposely avoiding financials and raw materials companies. They have made big moves off the March lows. This investor is looking to pick up laggards with good yields.
If this is what he is going to buy, this is what you should buy. Well known, solid companies with long term track records and good dividends.
Disclosure: long CVX, JNJ, PG, KO,T, and 84 other stocks/ETFs.
Market Topping or Not?
We are at SPX resistance 1015-1018. One might certainly expect a pullback as we are up 52% from the 666 intraday low. I find it interesting to note that at the Oct 1974 low the SPX was at 63 and rallied to 96 in July 1975. That is also a 52% gain. 3 1/2 years later at the beginning of 1979, the SPX was again at 96. It rose no higher than 108 during that 3+ years.
So, I am leaning to the downside, but ready to move if the market shows me that I am wrong. I am 30% net long, so I am participating, but not as much as I could be.
Disclosure: long stocks, short SPX calls
Bearish Here, But Not a Perma Bear
Of course, I wish I had been 100% net long from March 9, 2009 until today, but that is not consistant with my cautious but positive style.
The reason for my caution is both objective and subjective. Objective because many technical measures are at or approaching bullish extremes (see Bill Luby's comments on the SPX at 15% above its 200 day simple moving average for the first time since 1999, or David Fry's charts.) Objective because the 2nd Qtr earnings reports mostly beat reduced estimates but were short on revenues.
Subjective because many commentators who were non-believers in the rally (especially the last 100 SPX points) are now talking about how quickly the SPX could move from 1000 to 1100 because there was so little trading
between those two levels on the way down.
Now the SPX could indeed make a quick move to 1100. If it does, I will profit from it, but I will also be mostly hedged against a decline. At this point it is more important to me to protect capital from loss than it is to maximize gain.
Disclosure: long 80+ stocks, short SPX calls, 26% net long.
Buy Citigroup
The spread between the new Citi shares being issued (symbol C.wd) and the regular Citi shares has dropped to a range of 4-5 cents. Likewise, the synthetic Citi that could be created by shorting puts and buying calls is a similar 4-5 cents cheaper than regular Citi. The arbitrage should no longer put much downward pressure on Citi common.
I am aware of all the issues. The number or shares outstanding has mushroomed from under 6 billion to over 20 billion shares. Citi may still lose money this year and a profit next year is far from certain. There are articles about an energy trader who is apparently entitled to a $100 million bonus.
Make no mistake, this is a valuable franchise. Citi will readjust to its new reality, and you can make money buying the stock. Citi trades below tangible book value and a lot of the assets on the books may be worth more. The Smith Barney sale to Morgan Stanley looks good and Citi should receive additional payments.
Last fall I was in Russia and I had a Citi debit card. I saw a Citibank and went in with my debit card and got 5000 Rubles in cash (about $175). I did not see any other branches of US banks. Just anecdotal evidence, but an indicator of the value in the Citi franchise.
I was waiting for the arb pressure to abate, and I think it has. I plan to buy Citi.
Disclosure: no position in C at this time.
Analysis of 3 Bank Preferreds: BAC, WFC, C
Looking at the convertible preferred stocks of 3 large banks tells us a lot about the banks themselves. Bank of America and Wells Fargo have very similar $1000 par convertible, non-cumulative preferreds trading at similar prices.
BAC.pr.L is $1000 par and has a 7.25% stated yield. The shares closed Friday at 800 for a 9.06% current yield. The conversion into BAC common is $50, so that isn't much of a factor in the price. Some institutional owners of this preferred were offered an exchange into BAC common back in May. This preferred was not part of the most recent exchange offer.
WFC.pr.L began life as a Wachovia Bank preferred. It closed Friday at 765 and has a 7.5% stated yield. The current yield is 9.8%. The preferred can be converted into 6.38 shares of WFC common, so again conversion is not much of a factor in the price, even less of a factor than for BAC. Wells Fargo has not made an exchange offer for any of its outstanding preferred securities.
More »