<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Glenn McSpadden - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Glenn McSpadden' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden</link>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Bullish on Darden</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/120769-why-i-m-bullish-on-darden?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">120769</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span> <div><div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/16/saupload_0116redlobster.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" alt="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/16/saupload_0116redlobster.jpg"  />There is a new Red Lobster near my house. It's right next to a one year old Olive Garden. I drove by yesterday at 2:00 in the afternoon.  Both had groups of people huddled outside with their little restaurant buzzers waiting on their tables.  Both Olive Garden and Red Lobster are best of breed restaurant brands that have been around forever and are owned by the publicly traded company Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI).  <div><p>So I'm bullish on Darden.  Here's why.</p><p><strong>Fundamental Reasons:</strong></p></p></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:05:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p><span> <div><div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/16/saupload_0116redlobster.jpg" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" alt="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/2/16/saupload_0116redlobster.jpg"  />There is a new Red Lobster near my house. It's right next to a one year old Olive Garden. I drove by yesterday at 2:00 in the afternoon.  Both had groups of people huddled outside with their little restaurant buzzers waiting on their tables.  Both Olive Garden and Red Lobster are best of breed restaurant brands that have been around forever and are owned by the publicly traded company Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI).  <div><p>So I'm bullish on Darden.  Here's why.</p><p><strong>Fundamental Reasons:</strong></p></p></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/120769-why-i-m-bullish-on-darden?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dri">DRI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sh">SH</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama Provides More Tailwinds for LED Lighting Manufacturers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/114225-obama-provides-more-tailwinds-for-led-lighting-manufacturers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">114225</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>One of Barack Obama's points in his stimulus package speech last Thursday was about making 75% of federal government buildings more energy efficient. It was a line that was easy to pass over as high-minded politician-speak but making all those government buildings &quot;more efficient&quot; could be as easy as changing the light bulbs. It reminded me of something that Jon Najarian was talking about a week earlier. See the video <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28435626" target="_blank" >here</a>.  To recap some of the energy efficient and green characteristics of LED (Light Emitting Diode) bulbs....</div> <div> </div> <ul>     <li>They use 40-70% less electricity according to the <a href="http://www.ledcity.org/" target="_blank" >LED City Project</a>.</li>     <li>On average they burn up to 70,000 hours as compared to a life span of only 20,000 hours with more traditional incandescent or fluorescent bulbs.</li>     <li>They put-off less heat and therefore a building's air conditioning system can provide cooling more efficiently while using less electricity.</li> </ul> <div> </div> <div>Obama also should love the idea because LED bulbs are environmentaly friendly for two reasons.</div> <div> </div> <ol>     <li>There are likely to be changed far less often.</li>     <li>Traditional flourescent bulbs contain mercury and are treated as hazardous waste when it comes time to get rid of them. LED bulbs contain no mercury and are thus friendlier to the environment and hazardous disposal fees don't apply.</li> </ol> <div> </div> <p>The two companies that Jon Najarian recommended for a bullish play on the future of LED lighting are Philips Electronics (PHG) and Cree, Inc. (CREE). To show that the market is catching on to the up-side possibilities, PHG and CREE both recently broke above their 50 day moving average.</p> <p>If you have a preference to support American companies, Cree is based in North Carolina while Philips is based in Amsterdam. A recent <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/090106/157183.html" target="_blank" >press release by Cree</a> highlights an upcoming project that will see 4,200 of their LED light fixtures installed in a section of the Pentagon that is undergoing renovation.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:58:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><div>One of Barack Obama's points in his stimulus package speech last Thursday was about making 75% of federal government buildings more energy efficient. It was a line that was easy to pass over as high-minded politician-speak but making all those government buildings &quot;more efficient&quot; could be as easy as changing the light bulbs. It reminded me of something that Jon Najarian was talking about a week earlier. See the video <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28435626" target="_blank" >here</a>.  To recap some of the energy efficient and green characteristics of LED (Light Emitting Diode) bulbs....</div> <div> </div> <ul>     <li>They use 40-70% less electricity according to the <a href="http://www.ledcity.org/" target="_blank" >LED City Project</a>.</li>     <li>On average they burn up to 70,000 hours as compared to a life span of only 20,000 hours with more traditional incandescent or fluorescent bulbs.</li>     <li>They put-off less heat and therefore a building's air conditioning system can provide cooling more efficiently while using less electricity.</li> </ul> <div> </div> <div>Obama also should love the idea because LED bulbs are environmentaly friendly for two reasons.</div> <div> </div> <ol>     <li>There are likely to be changed far less often.</li>     <li>Traditional flourescent bulbs contain mercury and are treated as hazardous waste when it comes time to get rid of them. LED bulbs contain no mercury and are thus friendlier to the environment and hazardous disposal fees don't apply.</li> </ol> <div> </div> <p>The two companies that Jon Najarian recommended for a bullish play on the future of LED lighting are Philips Electronics (PHG) and Cree, Inc. (CREE). To show that the market is catching on to the up-side possibilities, PHG and CREE both recently broke above their 50 day moving average.</p> <p>If you have a preference to support American companies, Cree is based in North Carolina while Philips is based in Amsterdam. A recent <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/090106/157183.html" target="_blank" >press release by Cree</a> highlights an upcoming project that will see 4,200 of their LED light fixtures installed in a section of the Pentagon that is undergoing renovation.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/114225-obama-provides-more-tailwinds-for-led-lighting-manufacturers?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cree">CREE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/phg">PHG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And The Winner Is: Family Dollar </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/112929-and-the-winner-is-family-dollar?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">112929</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=FDO&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></strong>It's official. The best performing stock in the S&amp;P 500 for the year 2008 is none other than Family Dollar Stores (FDO), one of the simplest, and lowest cost retailers in the country with just over 6,600 stores. <strong><br></strong></p> <p>FDO was up 38% for the year 2008.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:06:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p><strong><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=FDO&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6"  /></strong>It's official. The best performing stock in the S&amp;P 500 for the year 2008 is none other than Family Dollar Stores (FDO), one of the simplest, and lowest cost retailers in the country with just over 6,600 stores. <strong><br></strong></p> <p>FDO was up 38% for the year 2008.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/112929-and-the-winner-is-family-dollar?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fdo">FDO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dennis Gartman: Go Long Infrastructure, Short Everything Else</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/112403-dennis-gartman-go-long-infrastructure-short-everything-else?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">112403</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Dennis Gartman suggested this week a strategy to go long the infrastructure sector (specifically the steel industry) while shorting the overall stock market. See the video <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=974527312" >here</a>. I like most of Dennis Gartman's ideas and this one is no exception. The logic is that with Obama's promise to spend up to a trillion dollars on roads, bridges, schools and general infrastructure building, together with a likely agreeable congress, it's as much of a sure thing as we will see next year.</p><p>More reasons to be bullish on the steel industry:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:32:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>Dennis Gartman suggested this week a strategy to go long the infrastructure sector (specifically the steel industry) while shorting the overall stock market. See the video <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=974527312" >here</a>. I like most of Dennis Gartman's ideas and this one is no exception. The logic is that with Obama's promise to spend up to a trillion dollars on roads, bridges, schools and general infrastructure building, together with a likely agreeable congress, it's as much of a sure thing as we will see next year.</p><p>More reasons to be bullish on the steel industry:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/112403-dennis-gartman-go-long-infrastructure-short-everything-else?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nue">NUE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sh">SH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slx">SLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get on Base with SPY Covered Calls</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/111840-get-on-base-with-spy-covered-calls?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">111840</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/12/22/saupload_610x.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="117" />David Eckstein is my favorite baseball player. At 5'-7&quot;, the Arizona Diamondback shortstop is one of those methodical hitters who just wear down pitchers by going deep in the count, fouling off balls, and getting base-hits by hitting shots just over the head of second basemen and just beyond the reach of short-stops or sometimes bunting. He only had two home-runs the entire 2008 season but his on-base percentage was one of the best in the league.</p> <p>I've been thinking of a strategy for writing deep in-the-money covered calls on the S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPY) that reminds me of the way David Eckstein approaches hitting. Here's the idea. Buy 100 shares of SPY at around $88 as the underlying for an $8,800 investment. Use the buy-write feature that most retail brokers offer to sell a January 84 call for around $700 at the same time.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/12/22/saupload_610x.jpg" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="150" height="117" />David Eckstein is my favorite baseball player. At 5'-7&quot;, the Arizona Diamondback shortstop is one of those methodical hitters who just wear down pitchers by going deep in the count, fouling off balls, and getting base-hits by hitting shots just over the head of second basemen and just beyond the reach of short-stops or sometimes bunting. He only had two home-runs the entire 2008 season but his on-base percentage was one of the best in the league.</p> <p>I've been thinking of a strategy for writing deep in-the-money covered calls on the S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPY) that reminds me of the way David Eckstein approaches hitting. Here's the idea. Buy 100 shares of SPY at around $88 as the underlying for an $8,800 investment. Use the buy-write feature that most retail brokers offer to sell a January 84 call for around $700 at the same time.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/111840-get-on-base-with-spy-covered-calls?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An ETF Options Strategy To Carry Forward Low Gas Prices</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/110631-an-etf-options-strategy-to-carry-forward-low-gas-prices?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">110631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been thinking alot about Bespoke Investment Group's recent Seeking Alpha article on how to "<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/108375-lock-in-low-gas-prices" >Lock-In Low Gas Prices</a>."  It's an intriguing idea that I want to un-pack with a real strategy that I'm thinking about using based it.</p> <div><p>First, someone had an insightful comment to Bespoke's article that the ETF they proposed using, [[UGA]], traded relatively low volume and therefor was unattractive on that basis.  I would propose using the [[USO]] instead for two reasons.  One, it trades 13,000,000 shares average daily volume compared to only 45,000 shares for UGA.  Second, the USO and UGA charts going back over the last year virtually overlap each other on a percentage gain and loss basis anyway.</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:17:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>I've been thinking alot about Bespoke Investment Group's recent Seeking Alpha article on how to "<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/108375-lock-in-low-gas-prices" >Lock-In Low Gas Prices</a>."  It's an intriguing idea that I want to un-pack with a real strategy that I'm thinking about using based it.</p> <div><p>First, someone had an insightful comment to Bespoke's article that the ETF they proposed using, [[UGA]], traded relatively low volume and therefor was unattractive on that basis.  I would propose using the [[USO]] instead for two reasons.  One, it trades 13,000,000 shares average daily volume compared to only 45,000 shares for UGA.  Second, the USO and UGA charts going back over the last year virtually overlap each other on a percentage gain and loss basis anyway.</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/110631-an-etf-options-strategy-to-carry-forward-low-gas-prices?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uga">UGA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Good to Great' Stocks: Where Are They Now?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/109602-good-to-great-stocks-where-are-they-now?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">109602</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Did you have an experience like me around the beginning of 2002? Did your boss start speaking a whole new dialect of Dilbert-<span>esque</span> management buzzword lingo? Did he declare &quot;We need to be more like hedge-hogs and less like foxes&quot; in the middle of a meeting one day? Was he talking about cave-man era contraptions like fly-wheels and doom-loops? Did he go on and on about getting the right people on the right seats in the bus? Did he stress the importance of &quot;confronting the brutal facts&quot;? If so, you must have had a brown-nosing colleague like I did who gave the boss a copy of Jim Collins' wildly popular management book Good to Great for Christmas just after it was published in October 2001.</p><p>The basis for the book is a gargantuan study that Mr. Collins and his team performed of 1,435 publicly traded companies. They eventually settled on 11 companies that out-performed the market by at least <strong>3 times</strong> over a period of at least <strong>15 years</strong> - a pretty tall order. These were the companies that supposedly went from &quot;Good to Great&quot;.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:24:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>Did you have an experience like me around the beginning of 2002? Did your boss start speaking a whole new dialect of Dilbert-<span>esque</span> management buzzword lingo? Did he declare &quot;We need to be more like hedge-hogs and less like foxes&quot; in the middle of a meeting one day? Was he talking about cave-man era contraptions like fly-wheels and doom-loops? Did he go on and on about getting the right people on the right seats in the bus? Did he stress the importance of &quot;confronting the brutal facts&quot;? If so, you must have had a brown-nosing colleague like I did who gave the boss a copy of Jim Collins' wildly popular management book Good to Great for Christmas just after it was published in October 2001.</p><p>The basis for the book is a gargantuan study that Mr. Collins and his team performed of 1,435 publicly traded companies. They eventually settled on 11 companies that out-performed the market by at least <strong>3 times</strong> over a period of at least <strong>15 years</strong> - a pretty tall order. These were the companies that supposedly went from &quot;Good to Great&quot;.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/109602-good-to-great-stocks-where-are-they-now?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cctyq.pk">CCTYQ.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fnm">FNM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nue">NUE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfc">WFC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get Paid to Go Long Bank of America</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/108509-get-paid-to-go-long-bank-of-america?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">108509</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I like Mark Riddix's recent Seeking Alpha article entitled '<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/108397-three-financial-stocks-worth-holding">Three Financial Stocks Worth Holding</a>'. The three he suggests are Wells Fargo (WFC), JP Morgan (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC). I'm a 10+ year satisfied customer of Bank of America so I will use BAC to build on his idea.</p><p>BAC is currently trading around $16 but it has been down below $11 recently. It will probably re-test this low at some point. Here is the idea. Make sure you have at least $1,250 in your brokerage reserve account. Sell a December $12.50 put. You should get around a $50 premium for this. If BAC re-tests the lows before the 3rd Friday in December, your option contract will most likely be exercised and you will find yourself long BAC with 100 shares at $12.50. Not a bad starting point for a BAC position at all.<img height="150" align="right" width="284" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=BAC&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" alt="" /></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:10:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>I like Mark Riddix's recent Seeking Alpha article entitled '<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/108397-three-financial-stocks-worth-holding">Three Financial Stocks Worth Holding</a>'. The three he suggests are Wells Fargo (WFC), JP Morgan (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC). I'm a 10+ year satisfied customer of Bank of America so I will use BAC to build on his idea.</p><p>BAC is currently trading around $16 but it has been down below $11 recently. It will probably re-test this low at some point. Here is the idea. Make sure you have at least $1,250 in your brokerage reserve account. Sell a December $12.50 put. You should get around a $50 premium for this. If BAC re-tests the lows before the 3rd Friday in December, your option contract will most likely be exercised and you will find yourself long BAC with 100 shares at $12.50. Not a bad starting point for a BAC position at all.<img height="150" align="right" width="284" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=BAC&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" alt="" /></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/108509-get-paid-to-go-long-bank-of-america?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leverage Obama's First 100 Days with Covered Calls on GE</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/108139-leverage-obama-s-first-100-days-with-covered-calls-on-ge?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">108139</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Here&rsquo;s an idea to play a blue chip stock leveraged by two Obama initiatives likely to be pitched during his first 100 days in office. Buy 100 shares of General Electric (GE) at around $15.50 and sell a March $17.50 covered call at $1.50. By selling the covered call at $2 above the current stock price, it&rsquo;s really like entering a long position on GE at only $14. </p><p>Here&rsquo;s the added sweetener &ndash; General Electric&rsquo;s quarterly dividend payments traditionally go ex-div in December and February. The likely pay-out will be $.31/share. By holding the shares through the 3rd Friday of March, you will meet the requirements to receive these two dividend payments. This lowers your net entry point to $13.38 per share. Until the last few weeks, GE hasn&rsquo;t even been below $20 since the late 90&rsquo;s.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:41:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>Here&rsquo;s an idea to play a blue chip stock leveraged by two Obama initiatives likely to be pitched during his first 100 days in office. Buy 100 shares of General Electric (GE) at around $15.50 and sell a March $17.50 covered call at $1.50. By selling the covered call at $2 above the current stock price, it&rsquo;s really like entering a long position on GE at only $14. </p><p>Here&rsquo;s the added sweetener &ndash; General Electric&rsquo;s quarterly dividend payments traditionally go ex-div in December and February. The likely pay-out will be $.31/share. By holding the shares through the 3rd Friday of March, you will meet the requirements to receive these two dividend payments. This lowers your net entry point to $13.38 per share. Until the last few weeks, GE hasn&rsquo;t even been below $20 since the late 90&rsquo;s.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/108139-leverage-obama-s-first-100-days-with-covered-calls-on-ge?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge">GE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building on Home Depot Covered Calls</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/107481-building-on-home-depot-covered-calls?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">107481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Here&rsquo;s an idea for a quick profit at the end of rough trading year.  Buy 100 shares of Home Depot (HD) at around $19 and sell a January $20 covered call at $2.  By selling the covered call at $1 above the current stock price, it&rsquo;s really like entering a long position on Home Depot at only $17.</p><p><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=HD&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />  Here&rsquo;s the added sweetener &ndash; Home Depot&rsquo;s quarterly dividend goes ex-div on December 2.  The declared dividend is $.22/share.  By holding the shares through the 3rd Friday of January, you will meet the requirements to receive this dividend payment.  This lowers your net entry point to $16.78.  Until the last few weeks, HD hasn&rsquo;t even been below $20 since the late 90s.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:24:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn McSpadden</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Glenn McSpadden submits:</strong><p>Here&rsquo;s an idea for a quick profit at the end of rough trading year.  Buy 100 shares of Home Depot (HD) at around $19 and sell a January $20 covered call at $2.  By selling the covered call at $1 above the current stock price, it&rsquo;s really like entering a long position on Home Depot at only $17.</p><p><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=HD&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right"  />  Here&rsquo;s the added sweetener &ndash; Home Depot&rsquo;s quarterly dividend goes ex-div on December 2.  The declared dividend is $.22/share.  By holding the shares through the 3rd Friday of January, you will meet the requirements to receive this dividend payment.  This lowers your net entry point to $16.78.  Until the last few weeks, HD hasn&rsquo;t even been below $20 since the late 90s.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/107481-building-on-home-depot-covered-calls?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hd">HD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/glenn-mcspadden">Glenn McSpadden</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
