Seeking Alpha

Heisenberg Principle

 
View as an RSS Feed
View Heisenberg Principle's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    Shorts are burning at the stake.

    I want to thank them in advance for their margin-call-forced purchases.
    Jan 10 08:17 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    It keeps crashing my iPad so I'll have to check later though I don't at ridiculous figure is "realistic" as the only studies I found that low either were not for unresectable hcc and/or they included transplants or follow-up RFA, neither which would qualify for the HEAT trial. It came as no surprise to me that virtually every study matched the company guidance of 50% at 12 months so you'd gap have to go out on a limb the size of Kansas to call 25% realistic. And that's without even considering the stats are on a per tumor basis meaning a HEAT trial patient with 3 tumors has triple the odds of local recurrence.
    Jan 10 08:14 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    That's a huge collection of links, unless it's just not loading properly. Do you have a single specific one for unresectable hcc 3cm or greater at 25%? 25% seems ridiculously low but does match stats for overall local tumors of all sizes.
    Jan 10 07:39 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    Just as I figured. http://bit.ly/VNp2Pg

    AEZS "math" was phase 2 data. Math using only phase 2 data is dangerous. I prefer math on phase 3 data with CLSN. We have an unusual amount of valuable data already available to us -- in fact right underneath your nose -- to know that TDOX is indeed working in the Phase 3 trial. Comparing it to a subset of AEZS phase 2 is a joke. A bad joke.
    Jan 10 07:21 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    You got a link to 25% for 3cm or greater?

    I highly doubt it.
    Jan 10 07:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    Maybe the people who did the math on AEZS made an error or you simply dont know what you're talking about as AEZS didn't have this type of data.

    I'm guessing it's the latter.
    Jan 10 07:03 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    LOL it's not an opinion it's an irrefutable fact. By eliminating the stats for distant the PFS takes longer to achieve. See part one of my article for stats that include distant.

    The data remains underneath your nose, but you have to actually know what you're talking about to read it. Obviously you don't have the first clue.
    Jan 10 06:33 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    Why would you use 25%? That's ridiculously low.

    CLSN mgmt has faith in models using biostatiscians. I guess it is more than "faith" for them.

    There's no reason after a median (not mean) 18 months that 2 out of 3 patients haven't had any sort of PFS event except for TDOX working exceedingly well. You simply can't possibly get numbers like this for large tumor RFA-only.
    Jan 10 05:32 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    Incorrect. By using the stats for local only, the control group is expected to have a delayed time to event which then artificially inflates the ThermoDox group even higher. Less criteria = more conservative. Putting in a figure for distant recurrence yet having so few events makes ThermoDox look more effective not less. Sorry Trysson, but you're backwards.
    Jan 10 05:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose - Part 2 [View article]
    I realized that. The 219 PFS figure came later than 9/1/2011 and was with 613 enrollees. 9/1/2011 is an estimate on when the 190 events which the company said would happen around the same time as 600 enrollees.
    Jan 10 04:09 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's HEAT Study: A Far From Certain Outcome - Part 2 [View article]
    It specifically says safety data and without even comparing them to the control arm.
    Jan 10 12:39 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose [View article]
    lol what drug approval? you don't have a clue what CLSN is, do you?

    Good luck to you anyway. lol
    Jan 9 03:52 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose [View article]
    ARNA already had a FDA advisory panel vote very favorably in favor of them. That's why it ran from $2 to $12. The approval was a formality at that point. The FDA advisory panel was the pivotal binary event.

    ARNA serves as a counter-example to the point you tried to make (which was baseless in the first place)
    Jan 9 02:24 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose [View article]
    =incre enrollment - (incre. enrollment * prob. of local recurrence-free * prob. of distant recurrence-free)
    Jan 9 09:38 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Celsion's Phase III Blockbuster Data Revealed And It's Been Right Underneath Your Nose [View article]
    Charts are meaningless going into a binary biotech event.
    Jan 9 01:32 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
387 Comments
274 Likes