Seeking Alpha
Full index of posts »
Posts by Ticker
Latest Comments
-
Michael Clark on Could the Climate Reparations cause U.S. Bankruptcy? This will lead to a revolution in America and t...
-
Graham and Dodd Investor on EPA is Knee-Deep in Climategate "There is nothing in the hacked e-mails th...
-
Graham and Dodd Investor on Voluntary Climate Agreement taking shape in Copenhagen "Policy first,"then reasons." Or...
-
Craig Pirrong on Prediction Failures of AGW Models Nice article, Howard. It seems, based on your d...
-
Michael Clark on EPA is Knee-Deep in Climategate Global Warming and Global Cooling are part of E...
Posts by Themes
Afghanistan,
Asia,
auto parts,
China,
climate,
climate change,
computer games,
corporate income tax,
currencies,
currency values,
dollar,
dollar crash,
economic policy,
economy,
economy. energy,
employment,
energy,
Energy sector,
EPA,
exchange rates,
exports,
FairTax,
foreign aid,
G-20,
gold,
government policy,
house construction,
house prices,
housing sector,
illegal drugs,
interest rates,
manufacturing,
manufacturing sector,
poultry,
solar energy,
tax policy,
The Economy,
trade,
trade deficit,
windmills
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.















Could the Climate Reparations cause U.S. Bankruptcy?
Specifically, the Washington Post reported on December 17 that Europe has offered that the developed countries (United States, Europe, Japan, etc.) would pay the developing countries (China, India, Africa, etc.) $100 billion per year by 2020 and that the developing countries have agreed to accept that offer:
Meanwhile, on December 17 Secretary of State Clinton told reporters that the U.S. has offered to pay $10 billion of the $30 billion per year being offered by 2012. If the 1/3 ratio continues, the Obama administration is offering that the U.S. will pay $33 billion per year by 2020.It is not clear how the United States would be able to afford to pay such sizable reparations. The United States is currently running chronic trade deficits, and reparations either have to come out of exports or be borrowed from abroad.
President Obama is aware of the danger of an American government bankruptcy. ABC News reported on December 16:
Maybe, just maybe, this might not be the best time to saddle the U.S. government with a huge new debt.Disclosure: No positions
Border Adjustments are a Key Remaining Issue in Copenhagen
But the most important issue that remains on the table is whether developed countries will be permitted to enact border adjustments to prevent the agreement from shipping their remaining and future energy-requiring industries to the developing countries.
The basic outline of the agreement has already been determined. Developed countries (including the U.S.) would be required to reduce their CO2 emissions while developing countries (including China) would be permitted to increase their CO2 emissions, though at a reduced pace.
The predictable result of this difference would be that energy costs in the developed countries would rise relative to energy costs in the developing countries. The only way that developed countries could be able to keep their energy-requiring industries competitive would be by imposing border adjustments (tariffs and export subsidies) to equalize energy costs.
But China is insisting that the Copenhagen agreement prohibit border adjustments. World leaders will negotiate this issue on Thursday and Friday this week (December 17 and 18), according to a November 16 report from Bloomberg.com:
This issue is key to the future of the United States economy. Without border adjustments (both tariffs and export subsidies) American industry would become less and less competitive. The U.S. trade balance would continue to deteriorate, and an eventual dollar crash would impoverish the American people and force an American retreat from the world stage.On the other hand, this issue is also key to the future of China. If border adjustments are prohibited, the Communist government of China would come to dominate the world stage allowing them to support tyranny worldwide, just as they already support it in North Korea, Sudan, and Burma. They would no longer be challenged by the western democracies who would have proved, by their deteriorating economies, that they were unable to elect competent leadership.
The world's future is at stake. If the developed countries go along with this Chinese demand, totalitarianism could dominate the world's future. If they do not, then China could veto the Copenhagen agreement and momentum for reducing CO2 emissions, already weakened by a decade without global warming, could be lost.
Disclosure: No Positions
Voluntary Climate Agreement taking shape in Copenhagen
Well, nowadays, you don't need a weatherman to understand that the earth is not warming at the moment. All you have to do is look at a nearby thermometer. According to the What's Up with That website, 304 new record low temperatures were set in the United States last week!
But that has not daunted the delegates to the UN's Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. A voluntary agreement to fight global warming has just started to take its final shape in the form of a draft text revealed Sunday by an Ad Hoc Working Group. Although many details remain to be negotiated, something very much like this draft will probably be initialed by world leaders when the conference ends on Friday. Here are the two key passages:
To summarize: the U.S., Europe, Japan, and the other developed countries will agree to give away their remaining industries by reducing their carbon dioxide emissions.In return, the developing countries (China, India, Africa, etc.) will agree to accept those industries by slowing the increase of their carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, they will accept financial aid and those energy-efficient technologies invented by the developed countries.
The leaders of the developed countries are all enjoying how warm it feels to pledge away their children's futures. But you don't have to be a weatherman to know that when these leaders return home with this agreement, they will get a chilly reception from their own legislatures.
Disclosure: No positions