<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ironman at Political Calculations - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>© seekingalpha.com. Use of this feed is limited to personal, non-commercial use and is governed by Seeking Alpha's Terms of Use (http://seekingalpha.com/page/terms-of-use). Publishing this feed for public or commercial use and/or misrepresentation by a third party is prohibited.</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations</link>
    <item>
      <title>Hauser's Law At Work In Spain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439891-hauser-s-law-at-work-in-spain?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1439891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In  2012, after Spain's government had run up an extraordinary budget  deficit in the previous year, the newly elected government of Spain's  new prime minister, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariano_Rajoy" rel="nofollow">Mariano Rajoy</a>, <a href="http://spain.angloinfo.com/money/general-taxes/tax-rises-2012/" rel="nofollow">committed</a>  to both increase the government's revenue and to decrease its spending  to put Spain on a more sound financial footing.  Those changes had  been demanded by the European Central Bank as a requirement for its  continuing to lend money to bail out Spain's fiscally distressed  government, which had been put at risk by its bailout of that nation's  banks following the collapse of the Spanish housing bubble.</p> <p>To help put Spain's fiscal situation going into 2012 into context, we're presenting an updated version of the chart we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2012/05/spain-very-different-fiscal-crisis.html" rel="nofollow">first featured</a> nearly a year ago when we first examined how Spain arrived at that state.  The chart shows the relationship between Spain's <a href="http://knoema.com/pjeqzh/gdp-per-capita-by-country#Spain" rel="nofollow">GDP per capita</a> and its <a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/government_finance_statistics/data/database" rel="nofollow">annual government tax</a></p>                  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:29:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>In  2012, after Spain's government had run up an extraordinary budget  deficit in the previous year, the newly elected government of Spain's  new prime minister, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariano_Rajoy" rel="nofollow">Mariano Rajoy</a>, <a href="http://spain.angloinfo.com/money/general-taxes/tax-rises-2012/" rel="nofollow">committed</a>  to both increase the government's revenue and to decrease its spending  to put Spain on a more sound financial footing.  Those changes had  been demanded by the European Central Bank as a requirement for its  continuing to lend money to bail out Spain's fiscally distressed  government, which had been put at risk by its bailout of that nation's  banks following the collapse of the Spanish housing bubble.</p> <p>To help put Spain's fiscal situation going into 2012 into context, we're presenting an updated version of the chart we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2012/05/spain-very-different-fiscal-crisis.html" rel="nofollow">first featured</a> nearly a year ago when we first examined how Spain arrived at that state.  The chart shows the relationship between Spain's <a href="http://knoema.com/pjeqzh/gdp-per-capita-by-country#Spain" rel="nofollow">GDP per capita</a> and its <a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/government_finance_statistics/data/database" rel="nofollow">annual government tax</a></p>                  <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439891-hauser-s-law-at-work-in-spain?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewp">EWP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clarity And The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1438341-clarity-and-the-s-p-500?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1438341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>And then, suddenly, the future for the S&amp;P 500 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>) snapped into clear focus:</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>It would appear that investors have shifted their forward-looking  focus to 2014-Q1 in setting the pace of change for U.S. stock prices.   Following the period after the fiscal cliff reaction of 15 November  through 20 December 2012, they had been focused mainly on 2013-Q2.</p> <p>Now  that the transition in focus from 2013-Q2 to 2014-Q1 seems assured, we  can expect the recent rapid run-up of stock prices to taper off, as the  change in the growth rate of stock prices will converge with that  expected for the S&amp;P 500's dividends per share in 2014-Q1.  Since  that pace is positive, we can expect stock prices to continue generally  rising, although at a slower pace.</p> <p>However, anything that might shift the focus of investors to the less distant future quarters of 2013-Q3 or Q4 will send</p>   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:21:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>And then, suddenly, the future for the S&amp;P 500 (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>) snapped into clear focus:</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>It would appear that investors have shifted their forward-looking  focus to 2014-Q1 in setting the pace of change for U.S. stock prices.   Following the period after the fiscal cliff reaction of 15 November  through 20 December 2012, they had been focused mainly on 2013-Q2.</p> <p>Now  that the transition in focus from 2013-Q2 to 2014-Q1 seems assured, we  can expect the recent rapid run-up of stock prices to taper off, as the  change in the growth rate of stock prices will converge with that  expected for the S&amp;P 500's dividends per share in 2014-Q1.  Since  that pace is positive, we can expect stock prices to continue generally  rising, although at a slower pace.</p> <p>However, anything that might shift the focus of investors to the less distant future quarters of 2013-Q3 or Q4 will send</p>   <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1438341-clarity-and-the-s-p-500?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Going Fractal With The S&amp;P 500: An After-Action Report</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432521-going-fractal-with-the-s-p-500-an-after-action-report?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1432521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When should you sell your stocks?</p><p>We asked that specific question several weeks ago, before we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">exploited the fractal nature</a> of stock prices in developing an objective statistics-based method for determining when to tell if an upward microtrend for stocks was about to break.</p><p>We then tracked stock prices closely using that method, as it didn't take long before the recent upward microtrend we were tracking would <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">appear to have broken</a>, as stock prices suddenly dropped below the statistically-expected, or "normal", target range:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>But then, <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-verge-of-breakdown-in-order.html" rel="nofollow">one day earlier</a>, we said that maybe that isn't such a good signal to follow in deciding to pull the trigger for selling stocks, explaining the technical reasons why, and then suggesting a more "conservative approach" for deciding when to actually sell:</p><blockquote>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>We should also recognize that since we're using both a power law-based regression analysis and a statistics-based</p>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 06:18:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>When should you sell your stocks?</p><p>We asked that specific question several weeks ago, before we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">exploited the fractal nature</a> of stock prices in developing an objective statistics-based method for determining when to tell if an upward microtrend for stocks was about to break.</p><p>We then tracked stock prices closely using that method, as it didn't take long before the recent upward microtrend we were tracking would <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">appear to have broken</a>, as stock prices suddenly dropped below the statistically-expected, or "normal", target range:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>But then, <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-verge-of-breakdown-in-order.html" rel="nofollow">one day earlier</a>, we said that maybe that isn't such a good signal to follow in deciding to pull the trigger for selling stocks, explaining the technical reasons why, and then suggesting a more "conservative approach" for deciding when to actually sell:</p><blockquote>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>We should also recognize that since we're using both a power law-based regression analysis and a statistics-based</p>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432521-going-fractal-with-the-s-p-500-an-after-action-report?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/voo">VOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rwl">RWL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sfla">SFLA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sso">SSO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/upro">UPRO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sds">SDS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spxu">SPXU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sh">SH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eps">EPS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsp">RSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxub">BXUB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxuc">BXUC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxdb">BXDB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Big Week For The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428691-a-big-week-for-the-s-p-500?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1428691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Going into this week, we're not much closer to knowing for sure if the stock market's climb from its <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">last notable trough</a> on 18 April 2013 is the result of noise, a fundamental shift in investor focus, or the Fed's recent <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/05/playing-s-500s-wild-cards.html" rel="nofollow">indication</a> that it might really amp up its current quantitative easing program as we have <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">previously speculated</a> it might.</p><p>But regardless, even if stock prices stay flat, this will be a big week for the S&amp;P 500, because this is the week that three of the largest companies that compose the <a href="http://www.slickcharts.com/sp500" rel="nofollow">market-cap weighted</a> index <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/snapping-back-investor-focus-to-2013-q2.html" rel="nofollow">will be determining</a> who owns their stock for the purpose of paying out dividends for 2013-Q2!</p><p><em>(click to enlarge)</em> In fact, two of those three companies will be noting their shareholders of record today (Monday, 13 May 2013): <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/04/24/exxon-mobil-raises-dividend-by-11/" rel="nofollow">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) and <a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/04/23/apple-boosts-dividend-by-15-boosts-capital-return-spending-to-100b-through-2015" rel="nofollow">Apple</a> (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>). They</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 06:24:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>Going into this week, we're not much closer to knowing for sure if the stock market's climb from its <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">last notable trough</a> on 18 April 2013 is the result of noise, a fundamental shift in investor focus, or the Fed's recent <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/05/playing-s-500s-wild-cards.html" rel="nofollow">indication</a> that it might really amp up its current quantitative easing program as we have <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">previously speculated</a> it might.</p><p>But regardless, even if stock prices stay flat, this will be a big week for the S&amp;P 500, because this is the week that three of the largest companies that compose the <a href="http://www.slickcharts.com/sp500" rel="nofollow">market-cap weighted</a> index <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/snapping-back-investor-focus-to-2013-q2.html" rel="nofollow">will be determining</a> who owns their stock for the purpose of paying out dividends for 2013-Q2!</p><p><em>(click to enlarge)</em> In fact, two of those three companies will be noting their shareholders of record today (Monday, 13 May 2013): <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/04/24/exxon-mobil-raises-dividend-by-11/" rel="nofollow">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) and <a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/04/23/apple-boosts-dividend-by-15-boosts-capital-return-spending-to-100b-through-2015" rel="nofollow">Apple</a> (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>). They</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428691-a-big-week-for-the-s-p-500?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx">CVX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After The Dividend Cliff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413151-after-the-dividend-cliff?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1413151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As expected, following the end of a record-breaking four-month long period in which publicly-traded U.S. companies incented by the fiscal cliff crisis set all-time records for the number of dividend increases, cuts and special (or extra) dividends paid, April 2013 was somewhat boring by comparison.</p><p>The recent rally in stock prices, beginning after 15 November 2012, is a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/01/what-is-really-behind-rally-in-stock.html" rel="nofollow">direct result</a> of the reaction of these companies' reaction to the fiscal cliff crisis. All in all, there were some 2,946 declarations made by the approximately <a href="http://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/MarketCommentary/2013/3/19/the-consolidation-of-the-u.s.-equities-market-a-potential-plus-for-large-cap-companies" rel="nofollow">3,687 publicly-traded companies</a> in the United States announcing some sort of action related to their companies' dividend policies. Of these, 36 involved companies paying an extra, or special dividend payment to their shareholders and 203 involved dividend increases. These figures are well below the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend.html#.UYm25LWG3K0" rel="nofollow">all-time record levels</a> of 483 extra dividends announced in the month of December 2012 and the 298 dividend increases</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 06:52:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>As expected, following the end of a record-breaking four-month long period in which publicly-traded U.S. companies incented by the fiscal cliff crisis set all-time records for the number of dividend increases, cuts and special (or extra) dividends paid, April 2013 was somewhat boring by comparison.</p><p>The recent rally in stock prices, beginning after 15 November 2012, is a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/01/what-is-really-behind-rally-in-stock.html" rel="nofollow">direct result</a> of the reaction of these companies' reaction to the fiscal cliff crisis. All in all, there were some 2,946 declarations made by the approximately <a href="http://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/MarketCommentary/2013/3/19/the-consolidation-of-the-u.s.-equities-market-a-potential-plus-for-large-cap-companies" rel="nofollow">3,687 publicly-traded companies</a> in the United States announcing some sort of action related to their companies' dividend policies. Of these, 36 involved companies paying an extra, or special dividend payment to their shareholders and 203 involved dividend increases. These figures are well below the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend.html#.UYm25LWG3K0" rel="nofollow">all-time record levels</a> of 483 extra dividends announced in the month of December 2012 and the 298 dividend increases</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413151-after-the-dividend-cliff?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Playing The S&amp;P 500's Wild Cards</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1404801-playing-the-s-p-500-s-wild-cards?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1404801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the past  several weeks, we've identified three potential wild cards that could  affect stock prices in a positive way in the margin of our <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">favorite chart</a>:</p> <ul><li>The Fed could amp up its latest QE program.</li>     <li>Investors might shift their focus to 2014-Q1 in setting stock prices.</li>     <li>"Noise" events.</li> </ul><p>In just the last week, we've seen evidence that all three of  these wild card factors may be coming into play.  Let's take them on in  reverse order:</p> <p>What we call a "noise event" is the stock market's  response to speculative factors, which are most often associated with  new information becoming known to investors.  Things like jobs reports,  economic data releases, and even political events are all things that  can and do affect stock prices on top of the signal sent by the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2008/12/acceleration-amplification-and-shifting.html" rel="nofollow">main driver of stock prices</a>: the sustainable portion of expected future earnings (a.k.a. dividends). Noise is</p>                 ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 07:01:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>Over the past  several weeks, we've identified three potential wild cards that could  affect stock prices in a positive way in the margin of our <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">favorite chart</a>:</p> <ul><li>The Fed could amp up its latest QE program.</li>     <li>Investors might shift their focus to 2014-Q1 in setting stock prices.</li>     <li>"Noise" events.</li> </ul><p>In just the last week, we've seen evidence that all three of  these wild card factors may be coming into play.  Let's take them on in  reverse order:</p> <p>What we call a "noise event" is the stock market's  response to speculative factors, which are most often associated with  new information becoming known to investors.  Things like jobs reports,  economic data releases, and even political events are all things that  can and do affect stock prices on top of the signal sent by the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2008/12/acceleration-amplification-and-shifting.html" rel="nofollow">main driver of stock prices</a>: the sustainable portion of expected future earnings (a.k.a. dividends). Noise is</p>                 <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1404801-playing-the-s-p-500-s-wild-cards?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Preliminary Forecast For Q2's GDP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393231-a-preliminary-forecast-for-q2-s-gdp?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1393231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As expected, the first estimate of GDP for the first quarter of 2013 came in <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/taking-over-for-gdp-in-2013q1.html" rel="nofollow">above the midpoint</a> of our target forecast range, with the Bureau of Economic Analysis reporting that the aggregate national income of the United States was $13,750.1 billion in terms of constant 2005 U.S. dollars.</p><p>The midpoint of our official target range for GDP in 2013-Q1 was $13,724.5 billion in terms of constant 2005 U.S. dollars, about 0.19% below the BEA's initial estimate.</p><p>So where might we reasonably project GDP for the current quarter (2013-Q2) to be when it is first reported three months from now?</p><p>The chart below shows what our inertia-based "<a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/05/forecasting-next-quarters-gdp.html" rel="nofollow">modified limo</a>" forecasting technique anticipates it will be [<em>click to enlarge</em>]:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Using the initial estimate for real GDP in 2013Q1, we can provide the following preliminary odds for 2013Q2 - all GDP figures are given</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 08:15:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>As expected, the first estimate of GDP for the first quarter of 2013 came in <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/taking-over-for-gdp-in-2013q1.html" rel="nofollow">above the midpoint</a> of our target forecast range, with the Bureau of Economic Analysis reporting that the aggregate national income of the United States was $13,750.1 billion in terms of constant 2005 U.S. dollars.</p><p>The midpoint of our official target range for GDP in 2013-Q1 was $13,724.5 billion in terms of constant 2005 U.S. dollars, about 0.19% below the BEA's initial estimate.</p><p>So where might we reasonably project GDP for the current quarter (2013-Q2) to be when it is first reported three months from now?</p><p>The chart below shows what our inertia-based "<a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/05/forecasting-next-quarters-gdp.html" rel="nofollow">modified limo</a>" forecasting technique anticipates it will be [<em>click to enlarge</em>]:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Using the initial estimate for real GDP in 2013Q1, we can provide the following preliminary odds for 2013Q2 - all GDP figures are given</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393231-a-preliminary-forecast-for-q2-s-gdp?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Market Cap Of The U.S. New Home Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1388571-the-market-cap-of-the-u-s-new-home-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1388571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>What is the market capitalization of the U.S. new home market?</p><p>To find out, we first took the U.S. Census Bureau's seasonally-adjusted estimate of the number of <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/soldreg.pdf" rel="nofollow">new home sales</a> for each month from January 2012 through March 2013:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Then we multiplied those seasonally-adjusted values by the <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/uspricemon.pdf" rel="nofollow">average new home sale price</a> recorded by the Census Bureau for each of these months:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>That allows us to arrive at the new home market's equivalent of the stock market's <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp" rel="nofollow">market capitalization</a>!</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>We selected the period from January 2012 through March 2013 so we could focus on the new inflating bubble taking hold in the U.S. housing market. Here are some quick takeaways from what we see in the charts:</p><ul>
  <li>Initially, it only took an additional 1,400-1,500 new home sales each month to launch the bubble.</li>
  <li>After holding steady for several</li>
</ul>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 06:42:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>What is the market capitalization of the U.S. new home market?</p><p>To find out, we first took the U.S. Census Bureau's seasonally-adjusted estimate of the number of <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/soldreg.pdf" rel="nofollow">new home sales</a> for each month from January 2012 through March 2013:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Then we multiplied those seasonally-adjusted values by the <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/uspricemon.pdf" rel="nofollow">average new home sale price</a> recorded by the Census Bureau for each of these months:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>That allows us to arrive at the new home market's equivalent of the stock market's <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp" rel="nofollow">market capitalization</a>!</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>We selected the period from January 2012 through March 2013 so we could focus on the new inflating bubble taking hold in the U.S. housing market. Here are some quick takeaways from what we see in the charts:</p><ul>
  <li>Initially, it only took an additional 1,400-1,500 new home sales each month to launch the bubble.</li>
  <li>After holding steady for several</li>
</ul><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1388571-the-market-cap-of-the-u-s-new-home-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/itb">ITB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pkb">PKB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Second U.S. Housing Bubble Continues To Inflate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383791-the-second-u-s-housing-bubble-continues-to-inflate?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1383791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>After we had first announced that a new housing bubble <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-us-housing-bubble-is-back.html" rel="nofollow">had taken root</a> in the U.S. economy beginning in July 2012, we soon followed up with additional analysis that suggested that it had <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/fuel-oxidizer-and-spark-part-3.html" rel="nofollow">perhaps begun to decelerate</a> to a more sustainable level after December 2012. Recently <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/newressales_201303.pdf" rel="nofollow">revised data</a> from the U.S. Census Bureau for the median sale prices of new homes in the United States through March 2013 now confirms that there has been no slowdown in the rapid inflation of new home sale prices observed since July 2012.</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Since 1967, there is only one period of rapid price escalation that even comes close to matching the current trend for median new home prices in the United States: the initial inflation phase of the first U.S. housing bubble, which ran from November 2001 through September 2005 - approximately the time at which the Federal</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:04:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>After we had first announced that a new housing bubble <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-us-housing-bubble-is-back.html" rel="nofollow">had taken root</a> in the U.S. economy beginning in July 2012, we soon followed up with additional analysis that suggested that it had <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/fuel-oxidizer-and-spark-part-3.html" rel="nofollow">perhaps begun to decelerate</a> to a more sustainable level after December 2012. Recently <a href="http://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/pdf/newressales_201303.pdf" rel="nofollow">revised data</a> from the U.S. Census Bureau for the median sale prices of new homes in the United States through March 2013 now confirms that there has been no slowdown in the rapid inflation of new home sale prices observed since July 2012.</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Since 1967, there is only one period of rapid price escalation that even comes close to matching the current trend for median new home prices in the United States: the initial inflation phase of the first U.S. housing bubble, which ran from November 2001 through September 2005 - approximately the time at which the Federal</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383791-the-second-u-s-housing-bubble-continues-to-inflate?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/itb">ITB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pkb">PKB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snapping Back Investor Focus To Q2 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380741-snapping-back-investor-focus-to-q2-2013?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1380741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are 10 companies that make up over 18% of the value of the <a href="http://www.slickcharts.com/sp500" rel="nofollow">market capitalization-weighted</a> S&amp;P 500 stock market index:</p><ul>
  <li>Exxon Mobil (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>): 2.78%</li>
  <li>Apple (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>): 2.70%</li>
  <li>Microsoft (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corporation'>MSFT</a>): 1.70%</li>
  <li>Johnson &amp; Johnson (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='Johnson & Johnson'>JNJ</a>): 1.68%</li>
  <li>Chevron (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx' title='Chevron Corporation'>CVX</a>): 1.62%</li>
  <li>General Electric (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge' title='General Electric Company'>GE</a>): 1.61%</li>
  <li>Pfizer (NYSE: <a>PFE</a>): 1.53%</li>
  <li>Google (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>): 1.52%</li>
  <li>Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pg' title='Procter & Gamble Co.'>PG</a>): 1.48%</li>
  <li>AT&amp;T (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t' title='AT&T Inc.'>T</a>): 1.44%</li>
</ul><p>In the last two weeks, 5 of these companies, whose combined market capitalization makes up over 10% of the value of the S&amp;P 500 index, have boosted their dividends:</p><ul>
  <li><a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/04/24/exxon-mobil-raises-dividend-by-11/" rel="nofollow">Exxon Mobil</a>: Up 11% to $0.63 per share, payable to shareholders of record on 13 May 2013, to be paid on 10 June 2013.</li>
  <li><a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/04/23/apple-boosts-dividend-by-15-boosts-capital-return-spending-to-100b-through-2015" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>: Up 15% to $3.05 per share, payable to shareholders of record on 13 May 2013, to be paid on 16 May 2013.</li>
  <li><a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/04/25/better-than-expected-djia-dividend-surprise-from-johnson-johnson/" rel="nofollow">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></li>
</ul>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:40:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>There are 10 companies that make up over 18% of the value of the <a href="http://www.slickcharts.com/sp500" rel="nofollow">market capitalization-weighted</a> S&amp;P 500 stock market index:</p><ul>
  <li>Exxon Mobil (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>): 2.78%</li>
  <li>Apple (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>): 2.70%</li>
  <li>Microsoft (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corporation'>MSFT</a>): 1.70%</li>
  <li>Johnson &amp; Johnson (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='Johnson & Johnson'>JNJ</a>): 1.68%</li>
  <li>Chevron (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx' title='Chevron Corporation'>CVX</a>): 1.62%</li>
  <li>General Electric (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge' title='General Electric Company'>GE</a>): 1.61%</li>
  <li>Pfizer (NYSE: <a>PFE</a>): 1.53%</li>
  <li>Google (Nasdaq: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>): 1.52%</li>
  <li>Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pg' title='Procter & Gamble Co.'>PG</a>): 1.48%</li>
  <li>AT&amp;T (NYSE: <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t' title='AT&T Inc.'>T</a>): 1.44%</li>
</ul><p>In the last two weeks, 5 of these companies, whose combined market capitalization makes up over 10% of the value of the S&amp;P 500 index, have boosted their dividends:</p><ul>
  <li><a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/04/24/exxon-mobil-raises-dividend-by-11/" rel="nofollow">Exxon Mobil</a>: Up 11% to $0.63 per share, payable to shareholders of record on 13 May 2013, to be paid on 10 June 2013.</li>
  <li><a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/04/23/apple-boosts-dividend-by-15-boosts-capital-return-spending-to-100b-through-2015" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>: Up 15% to $3.05 per share, payable to shareholders of record on 13 May 2013, to be paid on 16 May 2013.</li>
  <li><a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/04/25/better-than-expected-djia-dividend-surprise-from-johnson-johnson/" rel="nofollow">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></li>
</ul><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380741-snapping-back-investor-focus-to-q2-2013?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Very Weird Day In The Markets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1365231-a-very-weird-day-in-the-markets?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1365231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>What a weird day for the stock market. And the weirdness started early. Pragmatic Capitalism's Cullen Roche <a href="http://pragcap.com/markets-rally-on-terrible-news-is-abenomics-going-global" rel="nofollow">sets the scene</a>:</p><blockquote class="quote">
  <p>Here's a brief rundown of some of the data we saw in the last 12 hours:</p>
  <p>-U.S. Flash PMI came in at 52, weaker than expected and down from 54.6 last month.</p>
  <p>-German Flash PMI hit a six-month low of 48.8.</p>
  <p>-China PMI hit a two-month low of 50.5, down from 51.6 last month.</p>
  <p>-Richmond Fed Manufacturing came in at -6 vs. expectations of a +3 reading.</p>
  <p>-Redbook sales were up just 1.8%, down from 2% last week.</p>
  <p>-New home sales came in at 417K, below estimates of 419K, but up from last month's 411K.</p>
  <p>So, not a great day for data. And yet the equity markets in Europe were up 1-3% and the S&amp;P is up over 1%. No one I've talked to can make a whole lot</p>
</blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:08:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>What a weird day for the stock market. And the weirdness started early. Pragmatic Capitalism's Cullen Roche <a href="http://pragcap.com/markets-rally-on-terrible-news-is-abenomics-going-global" rel="nofollow">sets the scene</a>:</p><blockquote class="quote">
  <p>Here's a brief rundown of some of the data we saw in the last 12 hours:</p>
  <p>-U.S. Flash PMI came in at 52, weaker than expected and down from 54.6 last month.</p>
  <p>-German Flash PMI hit a six-month low of 48.8.</p>
  <p>-China PMI hit a two-month low of 50.5, down from 51.6 last month.</p>
  <p>-Richmond Fed Manufacturing came in at -6 vs. expectations of a +3 reading.</p>
  <p>-Redbook sales were up just 1.8%, down from 2% last week.</p>
  <p>-New home sales came in at 417K, below estimates of 419K, but up from last month's 411K.</p>
  <p>So, not a great day for data. And yet the equity markets in Europe were up 1-3% and the S&amp;P is up over 1%. No one I've talked to can make a whole lot</p>
</blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1365231-a-very-weird-day-in-the-markets?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq">QQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The Rally For The S&amp;P 500 Really Over?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1358181-is-the-rally-for-the-s-p-500-really-over?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1358181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, we declared that order had indeed <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">broken down</a> for the S&amp;P 500, marking the end of the most recent rally for the U.S. stock market. But  is the rally really over?  Well, we can't say that just quite yet, as  it happens. To understand why we would appear to be contradicting  ourselves, let's take a step back and consider just how we've arrived at  this point!</p>  <p>It all started when we decided to address a specific challenge back on 5 April 2013.  We had indicated a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">week earlier</a> that a 150-point plunge in the value of the S&amp;P 500 would be a &quot;clear sell signal,&quot; but we wondered if we could come up with an objective approach that might minimize the downside risk of holding onto stocks too long after they've begun to turn south, while also not missing out on any potential gains that would</p>             ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:32:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>Last Friday, we declared that order had indeed <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-fed-minutes-noise-event.html" rel="nofollow">broken down</a> for the S&amp;P 500, marking the end of the most recent rally for the U.S. stock market. But  is the rally really over?  Well, we can't say that just quite yet, as  it happens. To understand why we would appear to be contradicting  ourselves, let's take a step back and consider just how we've arrived at  this point!</p>  <p>It all started when we decided to address a specific challenge back on 5 April 2013.  We had indicated a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">week earlier</a> that a 150-point plunge in the value of the S&amp;P 500 would be a &quot;clear sell signal,&quot; but we wondered if we could come up with an objective approach that might minimize the downside risk of holding onto stocks too long after they've begun to turn south, while also not missing out on any potential gains that would</p>             <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1358181-is-the-rally-for-the-s-p-500-really-over?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On The Verge Of A Breakdown In Order</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1350741-on-the-verge-of-a-breakdown-in-order?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1350741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>After having <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/a-bad-day.html" rel="nofollow">a bad day</a>  on 15 April 2013, the stock market had a good day on 16 April 2013, as  everything looked up.  Wall St. Cheat Sheet's John Nyaradi <a href="http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/heres-why-stocks-sprung-back-up.html/3/" rel="nofollow">captured the mood</a>:</p> <blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>
      <em>Among  Tuesday’s three upbeat economic reports was the Federal Reserve  revelation that industrial production rose by twice as much as expected.</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>Economists were expecting the U.S. Federal Reserve to report  that industrial production increased by 0.2 percent in March. Investors  were excited to see that industrial production actually increased by 0.4  percent. The reports on March housing starts and the Consumer Price  Index were also better than expected.</em>
    </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p> </p>
</blockquote>  <p>Beyond that even, all the <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/04/16/it-was-all-about-earnings-today.aspx" rel="nofollow">big earnings news</a> of 16 April 2013 was good:</p> <blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>
      <em>Now that earnings season is in full swing, investors are rightfully focusing the majority of their attention on what really matters: earnings reports. A number of the biggest companies reported today, and</em>
    </p>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>                 ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:30:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>After having <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/a-bad-day.html" rel="nofollow">a bad day</a>  on 15 April 2013, the stock market had a good day on 16 April 2013, as  everything looked up.  Wall St. Cheat Sheet's John Nyaradi <a href="http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/heres-why-stocks-sprung-back-up.html/3/" rel="nofollow">captured the mood</a>:</p> <blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>
      <em>Among  Tuesday’s three upbeat economic reports was the Federal Reserve  revelation that industrial production rose by twice as much as expected.</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>Economists were expecting the U.S. Federal Reserve to report  that industrial production increased by 0.2 percent in March. Investors  were excited to see that industrial production actually increased by 0.4  percent. The reports on March housing starts and the Consumer Price  Index were also better than expected.</em>
    </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p> </p>
</blockquote>  <p>Beyond that even, all the <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/04/16/it-was-all-about-earnings-today.aspx" rel="nofollow">big earnings news</a> of 16 April 2013 was good:</p> <blockquote>
  <p> </p>
  <p/>
  <blockquote class="quote">
    <p>
      <em>Now that earnings season is in full swing, investors are rightfully focusing the majority of their attention on what really matters: earnings reports. A number of the biggest companies reported today, and</em>
    </p>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>                 <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1350741-on-the-verge-of-a-breakdown-in-order?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Bad Day</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1344331-a-bad-day?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1344331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The 15th of April in 2013 was a bad day on many different levels. It was one of those days that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100641943" rel="nofollow">started that way</a>, then <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/16/explosion-reported-near-finish-line-boston-marathon-spokesman-says/" rel="nofollow">only got worse</a>.</p> <p>Let's focus on the stock market. Here's the chart that we know many of you are waiting to see:<br/><br/><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p> <p>On 15 April 2013, the S&amp;P 500 fell 36.49 points to close at a value 1552.36, as our interpolated trailing year dividends per share figure for the day reached $32.31. That's a little over 11 points higher that the value of 1541 that would coincide with our statistically "<a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">not necessarily wrong, but useful</a>" sell signal, which would be triggered if the S&amp;P 500 closed at a value below that level.</p> <p>The market did not close below that level, so an investor who might be using our newly developed method to help decide when to sell would</p>    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:04:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>The 15th of April in 2013 was a bad day on many different levels. It was one of those days that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100641943" rel="nofollow">started that way</a>, then <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/16/explosion-reported-near-finish-line-boston-marathon-spokesman-says/" rel="nofollow">only got worse</a>.</p> <p>Let's focus on the stock market. Here's the chart that we know many of you are waiting to see:<br/><br/><em>(Click to enlarge)</em></p> <p>On 15 April 2013, the S&amp;P 500 fell 36.49 points to close at a value 1552.36, as our interpolated trailing year dividends per share figure for the day reached $32.31. That's a little over 11 points higher that the value of 1541 that would coincide with our statistically "<a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">not necessarily wrong, but useful</a>" sell signal, which would be triggered if the S&amp;P 500 closed at a value below that level.</p> <p>The market did not close below that level, so an investor who might be using our newly developed method to help decide when to sell would</p>    <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1344331-a-bad-day?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New U.S. Housing Bubble Sparks Import Surge From China</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1337761-new-u-s-housing-bubble-sparks-import-surge-from-china?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1337761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>From all appearances, the U.S. economy is now performing much more strongly than China's economy.</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Going by the growth rate of the value of trade between the two  nations, it appears that the U.S. economy turned a corner in August  2012, when it briefly turned negative.  Since then, the relative health  of the U.S. economy appears to have improved, which we see in the form  of a rising demand for imported goods. For the data just released for  February 2013, it appears that pace of economic growth in the U.S. is  outstripping the rate of growth in China.</p> <p>Meanwhile, the pace of  growth of the Chinese economy appears to have rebounded off its slowness  from last year, confirming that nation's economy has likewise improved,  although not at the same rate as the U.S. economy.</p> <p>This period of increased demand for imported goods in the U.S. approximately coincides</p>  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:35:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>From all appearances, the U.S. economy is now performing much more strongly than China's economy.</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>Going by the growth rate of the value of trade between the two  nations, it appears that the U.S. economy turned a corner in August  2012, when it briefly turned negative.  Since then, the relative health  of the U.S. economy appears to have improved, which we see in the form  of a rising demand for imported goods. For the data just released for  February 2013, it appears that pace of economic growth in the U.S. is  outstripping the rate of growth in China.</p> <p>Meanwhile, the pace of  growth of the Chinese economy appears to have rebounded off its slowness  from last year, confirming that nation's economy has likewise improved,  although not at the same rate as the U.S. economy.</p> <p>This period of increased demand for imported goods in the U.S. approximately coincides</p>  <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1337761-new-u-s-housing-bubble-sparks-import-surge-from-china?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Continuing Extreme Volatility In New Jobless Claims</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1335481-continuing-extreme-volatility-in-new-jobless-claims?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1335481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Twenty-eight weeks ago, on September 23, 2012, a new trend in the seasonally-adjusted  number of new jobless claims filed each week began.  That trend has  been characterized by extreme volatility, affected by such factors  ranging from California's inability to process large numbers of claims  in early October 2012, the impact of Hurricane Sandy from early November  through early December 2012, and a carry-over effect from December 2012's  fiscal cliff event that ran from mid-January through mid-March 2013.   And for March 30, 2013, perhaps a spike from the new seasonal adjustment  factors that were just introduced in the last several weeks!</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p>   <p>Let's get into the fiscal cliff carry-over effect, which we're  considering as a hypothesis for what we observe in the data.  Here, <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend.html" rel="nofollow">approximately 500</a> publicly traded companies issued special or extra dividend payments to benefit their investors, who were seeking to avoid the risk of having</p>                   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:52:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>Twenty-eight weeks ago, on September 23, 2012, a new trend in the seasonally-adjusted  number of new jobless claims filed each week began.  That trend has  been characterized by extreme volatility, affected by such factors  ranging from California's inability to process large numbers of claims  in early October 2012, the impact of Hurricane Sandy from early November  through early December 2012, and a carry-over effect from December 2012's  fiscal cliff event that ran from mid-January through mid-March 2013.   And for March 30, 2013, perhaps a spike from the new seasonal adjustment  factors that were just introduced in the last several weeks!</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p>   <p>Let's get into the fiscal cliff carry-over effect, which we're  considering as a hypothesis for what we observe in the data.  Here, <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend.html" rel="nofollow">approximately 500</a> publicly traded companies issued special or extra dividend payments to benefit their investors, who were seeking to avoid the risk of having</p>                   <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1335481-continuing-extreme-volatility-in-new-jobless-claims?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Current Microtrend In The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326471-the-current-microtrend-in-the-s-p-500?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1326471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Today, we're following up our exploration of the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">fractal nature</a> of the S&amp;P 500 with an updated version of what we'll describe as the current micro-rally in the market, to which we've added some key points of reference:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>On 5 April 2013, the trailing year dividends per share we're projecting based on the available dividend futures for 2013-Q2 was $32.20, with the S&amp;P 500 closing at $1,553.28. At present, the projected trailing year dividends per share for the S&amp;P 500 is increasing at an average rate of $0.0177 per trading day, or $0.088 per 5-day trading week.</p><p>The &quot;sell signal&quot; provided by our power-law, regression and statistical analysis-based method would be found by taking a given trading day's projected value for trailing year dividends per share and plugging it into the power-law formula we've indicated on the chart, then subtracting that result by three times the</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:03:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>Today, we're following up our exploration of the <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/going-fractal-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">fractal nature</a> of the S&amp;P 500 with an updated version of what we'll describe as the current micro-rally in the market, to which we've added some key points of reference:</p><p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p><p>On 5 April 2013, the trailing year dividends per share we're projecting based on the available dividend futures for 2013-Q2 was $32.20, with the S&amp;P 500 closing at $1,553.28. At present, the projected trailing year dividends per share for the S&amp;P 500 is increasing at an average rate of $0.0177 per trading day, or $0.088 per 5-day trading week.</p><p>The &quot;sell signal&quot; provided by our power-law, regression and statistical analysis-based method would be found by taking a given trading day's projected value for trailing year dividends per share and plugging it into the power-law formula we've indicated on the chart, then subtracting that result by three times the</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1326471-the-current-microtrend-in-the-s-p-500?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/voo">VOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rwl">RWL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sfla">SFLA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sso">SSO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/upro">UPRO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sds">SDS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spxu">SPXU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sh">SH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eps">EPS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rsp">RSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxub">BXUB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxuc">BXUC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bxdb">BXDB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Going Fractal With The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1323421-going-fractal-with-the-s-p-500?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1323421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When should you sell your stocks?</p> <p>
  <br/>
  <em>(Click to enlarge)</em>
</p> <p>Not long ago, we indicated that a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-s-500-in-limbo.html" rel="nofollow">150 point decline</a> in the value of the S&amp;P 500 would be a "clear sell signal" for investors.</p> <p>But then, a week later, we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">suggested</a>  that there might be a less clear sell signal, one that could be used to  shrink the amount of a haircut that an investor would have to take when  reacting to a pending break down in stock prices.  After all, given  today's stock prices, a 150-point plunge in the S&amp;P 500's index  value would represent nearly a 10% haircut for an investor.  Isn't there  some way to reduce the size of the hit that would allow an investor to  keep more of the gains in the value of their shares after the stock  market has started to turn south?</p> <p>Well, sure there is! An investor could determine</p>                                      ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:51:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>When should you sell your stocks?</p> <p>
  <br/>
  <em>(Click to enlarge)</em>
</p> <p>Not long ago, we indicated that a <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-s-500-in-limbo.html" rel="nofollow">150 point decline</a> in the value of the S&amp;P 500 would be a "clear sell signal" for investors.</p> <p>But then, a week later, we <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">suggested</a>  that there might be a less clear sell signal, one that could be used to  shrink the amount of a haircut that an investor would have to take when  reacting to a pending break down in stock prices.  After all, given  today's stock prices, a 150-point plunge in the S&amp;P 500's index  value would represent nearly a 10% haircut for an investor.  Isn't there  some way to reduce the size of the hit that would allow an investor to  keep more of the gains in the value of their shares after the stock  market has started to turn south?</p> <p>Well, sure there is! An investor could determine</p>                                      <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1323421-going-fractal-with-the-s-p-500?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Record-Breaking Numbers Of Dividend Increases And Decreases</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1320331-record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend-increases-and-decreases?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1320331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to Standard &amp; Poor's [<a href="http://us.spindices.com/documents/additional-material/divstat-dividend-action-report.xls" rel="nofollow">Excel Spreadsheet</a>],  in March 2013, 73 publicly traded companies in the U.S. acted to cut  their dividends, the most since the all-time record of 93 was set in  December 2012.  To put those numbers in perspective, in a typical month  when the U.S. economy is not being dragged down by recessionary  conditions, fewer than 10 companies will act to cut their dividends.</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p>   <p>But the U.S. economy is <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/taking-over-for-gdp-in-2013q1.html" rel="nofollow">not currently in recession</a>, despite having passed through what we'll describe as a microrecession in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is why the number of dividend cuts was so elevated in the second half of 2012 leading up to December. [By our definition, a microrecession is a period of very slow growth or even outright contraction in an economy that is too limited in scope, severity or duration to qualify as</p>                        ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:02:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>According to Standard &amp; Poor's [<a href="http://us.spindices.com/documents/additional-material/divstat-dividend-action-report.xls" rel="nofollow">Excel Spreadsheet</a>],  in March 2013, 73 publicly traded companies in the U.S. acted to cut  their dividends, the most since the all-time record of 93 was set in  December 2012.  To put those numbers in perspective, in a typical month  when the U.S. economy is not being dragged down by recessionary  conditions, fewer than 10 companies will act to cut their dividends.</p> <p>
  <em>(click to enlarge)</em>
</p>   <p>But the U.S. economy is <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/04/taking-over-for-gdp-in-2013q1.html" rel="nofollow">not currently in recession</a>, despite having passed through what we'll describe as a microrecession in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is why the number of dividend cuts was so elevated in the second half of 2012 leading up to December. [By our definition, a microrecession is a period of very slow growth or even outright contraction in an economy that is too limited in scope, severity or duration to qualify as</p>                        <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1320331-record-breaking-numbers-of-dividend-increases-and-decreases?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zooming Out On The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314231-zooming-out-on-the-s-p-500?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1314231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In playing our <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">"what if" game</a>  with the S&amp;P 500 last week, we announced that the chart we featured  would be "the last updated version of this chart that we'll be  featuring for some time."</p> <p>But then, the S&amp;P 500 set a new  all-time high as measured by the value of the index's daily closing  value, and what better way to mark the occasion than to feature a new  version of that chart, which we will be featuring for some time!</p> <p>Basically,  we've retired the "zoomed-in" version of our chart tracking the change  in the growth rates of trailing year dividends per share, which define  the <a href="http://www.aaii.com/investing-basics/article/earnings-estimates-and-their-impact-on-stock-prices" rel="nofollow">realistic future expectations for earnings</a>, and the daily and 20-day moving average of S&amp;P 500 stock prices and introduced the full &quot;zoomed-out&quot; version of the chart! Now, you can see everything that we currently see when we peer into our crystal ball!</p>            ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:32:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ironman at Political Calculations</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/'>Ironman at Political Calculations</a>: </strong><p>In playing our <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/03/playing-what-if-game-with-s-500.html" rel="nofollow">"what if" game</a>  with the S&amp;P 500 last week, we announced that the chart we featured  would be "the last updated version of this chart that we'll be  featuring for some time."</p> <p>But then, the S&amp;P 500 set a new  all-time high as measured by the value of the index's daily closing  value, and what better way to mark the occasion than to feature a new  version of that chart, which we will be featuring for some time!</p> <p>Basically,  we've retired the "zoomed-in" version of our chart tracking the change  in the growth rates of trailing year dividends per share, which define  the <a href="http://www.aaii.com/investing-basics/article/earnings-estimates-and-their-impact-on-stock-prices" rel="nofollow">realistic future expectations for earnings</a>, and the daily and 20-day moving average of S&amp;P 500 stock prices and introduced the full &quot;zoomed-out&quot; version of the chart! Now, you can see everything that we currently see when we peer into our crystal ball!</p>            <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314231-zooming-out-on-the-s-p-500?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ironman-at-political-calculations">Ironman at Political Calculations</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
