Seeking Alpha

Jack Haddad » Comments » NVO

  • Amylin's Pullback Is Unjustified [View article]
    DocJones, I still do not understand your anger? What's so upsetting about the contents of this article. Why don't you provide me a link to show evidence of how these two molecules have the same mechanism of action.

    Furthermore, you have to understand that Liraglutide got denied based on a weak "methodology and design" clinical trial. The safety and efficacy of the the agent could have been demonstrated and presented in a much improved manner to the FDA.


    On Apr 10 10:24 PM Doc Jones wrote:

    > I am truly upset about this article, there is a lot of speculation
    > here not based on facts. I am a Endo that participated in the the
    > original byetta studies and just recently the liraglutide Lead-3
    > and Lead-6. It should be noted that Liraglutide and Byetta have the
    > exact same mechanism of action. Liraglutide is 97% homologous to
    > endogenous GLP-1 and Byetta is 57% homologous. Both molecules are
    > albumin bound and resist the action of DPP-4. The question about
    > the c-cell tumors came about when a few instances were seen and mice
    > and rats. It is important to note that rats develop c-cell tumors
    > on their own and the mice and rats that developed c-cell tumors on
    > Liraglutide had 36 times the normal human dose. When doses 60 times
    > the normal human dose were used in primates there was no traceable
    > action on calcitonin levels. All 5000+ patients that took also had
    > no change in calcitonin levels. Novo Nordisk knew there could be
    > a link and decided to monitor calcitonin levels unlike Byetta trials.
    >
    > As for the FDA advisory committee, the major concern was cardiovascular
    > risk and Liraglutide passed with an 8 to 5 vote based on the favorable
    > lipid profile and blood pressure data up to 1 year (Lead-3). The
    > question asked about the c-cell tumors was can the occurrence in
    > animals be linked to humans and the first vote was 12 to 1 and after
    > the thyroid expert explained c-cell tumor occurrence and overall
    > physiology the panel voted 6 to 6 with 1 vote abstained. The fact
    > of the matter is there could be a link but in order to study this
    > link studies would have to be done in excess of 10 years due to nature
    > of these type of tumors. If the FDA does accept the NDA for Liraglutide
    > it will likely require more safety data. I have clinical experience
    > with Liraglutide and have seen the benefits and feel that it is a
    > needed drug in diabetology. I suggest you write an article based
    > on facts rather than opinions and fore-drawn conclusions.
    > Doc Jones MD
    Apr 11 00:51 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Amylin's Pullback Is Unjustified [View article]
    Nova, having Carl Ichan as "activist investor is a blessing. We need him to keep riding the executive board until good change is done. I'm very optimistic.

    I will re-enter AMLN this coming Monday; the May strike 10 calls at 1.10 and more are a great premium and a hedge against a downside.


    On Apr 09 10:54 PM nova wrote:

    > Jack,
    >
    > You are correct. Byetta and liraglutide are distinct molecules even
    > they do belong to the same "class."
    >
    > FDA Scientific Advisory Committee concluded that Liraglutide (a diabetes
    > drug made by Novo Nordisk (seekingalpha.com/symbo...)) posed
    > a significant risk in causing thyroid tumors in humans. The vote
    > was 12:1 to support such conclusion.
    >
    > Unfortunately many people on Wall-Street have no clue about a degree
    > of devastation cancer can bring to people and their families. In
    > a case if the FDA give a "green light" to Liraglutide, it will be
    > an incredible travesty to our health care exposing a great number
    > of patients to cancer devastation and consequences.
    >
    > Assuming that, at best for Liraglutide, it approval will be delayed
    > by at least a few years, Byetta with it superior to other diabetic
    > drugs efficacy profile will be able to substantially penetrate the
    > huge diabetic market.
    >
    > The major problem with AMLN is its management: highly incompetent,
    > highly greedy and corrupt. It is of interest that Amylin reminds
    > me ImClone. As soon as ImClone got rid off its old Board and CEO,
    > the company, in spite of Wall-Street insinuations and lies, was able
    > to move forward successfully and be sold later to LLY at a very substantial
    > premium.
    >
    > In my opinion, as soon as Amylin will get a new management and LAR
    > Byetta approved, it can be sold in two years at ~$6B+ or for $50+
    > per share. The present AMLN price below $10 is just ridiculous.
    Apr 11 00:42 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on NVO by Jack Haddad
Comments by Ticker
Jack Haddad's
Comments Stats
97 comments
Rating: 5 (9 - 4 )