Seeking Alpha

Jack Lifton's  Instablog

Jack Lifton
Send Message
Jack Lifton is an Independent consultant and commentator, focusing on the market fundamentals and future end use trends of the rare metals. He specializes in the sourcing of nonferrous strategic metals and on due diligence studies of businesses in that space. His work includes exploration,... More
My company:
Technology Metals Research
My blog:
The Jack Lifton Report
View Jack Lifton's Instablogs on:
  • Molycorp Mired In The Mud: Perhaps A Domestic "American"Total Rare Earth Supply Chain Should Be A Collaborative Project.

    I advise my natural resource production development clients that the best approach to being in the business of natural resource supply is always to plan and build to produce, profitably, less than the market segment available to you demands and to always produce at both the lowest cost per unit output and with the lowest breakeven revenue requirement. Those who fantasize that their particular resource has an endlessly growing market assume that the higher the production the better and that "economies of scale" will allow them to price their output at a lesser price than their equal size competitors. Invariably these "the bigger the better" ventures wind up with such high OPEX that they cannot compete in the real marketplace when prices or demand or both drop. Note that this is exactly what happened to the original Molycorp between 1998 when it shut down new mining and 2002 when it shut down separation of ore concentrates into marketable rare earth chemicals and their mixes. As recently as 1984, 14 years before their first shutdown, Molycorp had been the world's largest rare earth producer and certainly the only large primary rare earth mine on the planet. But by 1998 rare earths co-produced with iron in China's Bayanobo region (Inner Mongolia) had eliminated Molycorp's scale-based price advantage.

    In 2007 Molycorp's assets were acquired by a new group that decided to compete with the by then almost complete Chinese dominance of the rare earth mined material sector by going head-to-head again on volume and hoping to cut costs way back to where they could be competitive. The original Molycorp business revival model (2007) also speculated (and heavily promoted the idea ) that there would be a significant degree of support from the US military both in terms of demand and to insure security of supply.

    In 2011 the US Department of Defense finally admitted that it would only need 150 tons per year of rare earth permanent magnet alloys; this would be 0.2% of annual global rare earth permanent magnet production. By 2012 acquisitions had built a Molycorp that had 81% of its employees in the People's Republic of China and no credible company owned resource of the critical heavy rare earths required for military magnet production. Molycorp had rapidly become a company of little interest to the US DoD.

    Yet the chest thumping promotion of we will be the biggest (EVER!) continues.

    Unfortunately for the above mind-set the natural resource world is swinging back to politically aligned regional self-sufficiency as a goal and away from globalization of the natural resource supply chain. This is not just do to geopolitics; it is also due to the fact that the development to marketability of a natural resource-as an example think of crude oil marketed ultimately as gasoline or as fine chemicals-today is increasingly reliant on a region's technical skill base and its ABILITY to provide and maintain infrastructure, reliability of services, and low costs, and political stability.

    Developing nations and nations with econimes wrecked by socialismor communism have now recognized that domestic engineering and scientific skills are best used in the service of their domestic economies. Nothing is better proof of this than the fact that the KGB's successor, the FSB, is suspected to now be the largest industrial espionage operation in history. China is on the way to technological self-sufficiency and there is no better proof of that than the fact that the Chinese are today OPENLY seeking to acquire engineering and productivity improvement technologies. Just two years ago Chinese official spokesmen vehemently denied that any such help would ever be necessary.

    As a young operations manager/founder of a computer memory manufacturing operation in the early 1970s I worked with an engineer who told me that he had been a tank commander in World War II. To be precise he told me that he had commanded a German Tiger tank equipped unit at the battle of Kursk, the largest tank battle in history fought between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia in the Ukraine.

    He said that in their arrogance the German generals and military technocrats had decided that bigger and more complex was better. Their Tiger tanks had the now legendary 88 mm gun, which was the best of its type ever made, and "Doctor" Porsche (Yes the same one who designed the Volkswagen and whose son brought us the modern Porsche) had also designed a monster tank, as a sort of secret weapon, which the tankers called the Elephant. This beast weighed in at 80 tons and mounted the equivalent of a 6" naval rifle. It was supposed to simply sit in place and destroy the Russian tanks at a range that left the Russians helpless to reply.

    Two unexpected but entirely discoverable, if anyone had cared to look or think, things happened: 1) The Russian tanks had a new armor, sloped armor, invented by a Ford engineer, and Stalin had literally moved the Soviet armor manufacturing capacity beyond the Urals and so beyond the range of the Luftwaffe. This resulted in swarms of Russian tanks whose sheer numbers and increased effective armor thickness overwhelmed the German superiority in firepower per tank, and 2) The Elephants were so heavy that in the muddy fields the Russians chose for the battle they simply bogged down and became unmovable becoming targets for swarms of smaller Russian tanks that "killed" them piecemeal.

    I am an advocate of vertical integration in the rare earth sector, but it can only work up to a certain degree of manageable complexity, for the simple reason that chemical engineers and metallurgists need skilled and detailed managerial oversight and guidance in their own disciplines and the fact is that those who seek to combine and integrate mining, chemical, and metallurgical engineering management under one umbrella have so far proved unable to do so PROFITABLY.

    The best plan for vertical integration in the rare earth arena outside of China today is that of Great Western Minerals Group, which has 1) A previously operated thorium mine in South Africa that it is converting over to a FREESTANDING rare earths focused mine, 2) An agreement with an experienced financially successful Chinese rare earth refiner to build a solvent extraction plant at the South African mine site to separate the particular rare earths mix found there from each other, 3) An established British sited and operated rare earth magnet alloy producer, which has traditionally operated using Chinese sourced rare earths for the last 20 years and 4) is constructing a new rare earth metals refinery in the UK to produce high purity rare earth metals from the separated high purity rare earth salts to be produced by the SX plant in Africa and which metals so produced will then enhance and ultimately replace Chinese material. The result will be a Western non-Chinese vertically integrated producer of rare earth permanent magnet alloys, which alloys will go to the current European and Japanese, highly experienced, rare earth permanent magnet makers that today already buy such Chinese metal based alloy materials from Great Western's Less Common Metals wholly owned subsidiary. The customers will not know when Chinese feed stocks cease to be used by LCM. In the GW model each technological unit is self-contained and internally managed technically. Only finance functions are directly controlled by the conglomerate's management.

    By contrast I think the Molycorp model seems to have placed or hired less experienced technical management and engineers, who have not produced a profit except in an anomalous period of price spikes, with which they had nothing to do,over the seasoned engineers and managers of the only consistently profitable (majority) western owned, but sited mainly in China, rare earth separation and metal and alloy maker. Molycorp seems to have allocated neither time nor capital for the steep learning curves it would need to surmount and surpass to understand the businesses it decided to buy rather than develop.

    If I were trying today to construct a domestic American total supply chain for producing rare earth based end-user components I would forge the total supply chain from some or all of the following links:

    A. Light and Heavy Rare Earth Process Leach Solutions:

    Rare Element Resources (REE), and

    Ucore Rare Metals (OTCQX:UURAF)

    B. Deradioactivation of, Separation of, and purification of the total spectrum of the rare earths (atomic numbers 57-71) and their commonly associated elements (Scandium and Yttrium)

    Intellimet (Private)

    C. An American Rare Earth Metals' Metals Maker:

    Great Western Technologies, Inc. (A wholly owned American subsidiary of Canada's GWMGF.PK)

    D.An American magnet alloy maker,

    Again this would be Great Western Technologies, Inc. as above,

    E. An American magnet maker (One or all of the many members of the USMMA, the United States Magnet Materials Association), and

    A rare earth metals recycling company.

    I would organize this as Technology Metals Recycling Corporation (private).

    I note that it is my belief that one broad spectrum rare earth separation and refining operation could provide enough capacity for all of America's domestic demand, and I note that the technology to do this with solvent extraction (SX) and Ion Exchange (IEX) already exists in the USA as does solid phase extraction (SPE), which is now in the process of proof of concept validation.

    In order for the USA to become self-sufficient in rare earths it will be necessary for capitalists to make actual production at a profit a goal of equal importance with making quick money in the stock market.

    The most capital needed for a domestic American total supply chain would be to construct the two mines above already in development. This would be around 500 million dollars. ALL of the rest of the supply chain could be put into operation with less than 125 million dollars.

    America could not only be self sufficient in rare earths but be exporting rare earth products competitively for the above investment. America's investment community has already invested many times this amount in unrealistic get-rich-quick dreams.

    The money wasted on Solyndra would have made America self sufficient in rare earths. Washington bureaucrats should stop talking to each other and to those who buy them dinner and a lot of drinks and start looking at the real markets and needs of the American industrial economy.

    Disclosure: I am long OTCQX:GWMGF.

    Nov 09 9:58 PM | Link | 12 Comments
  • Decoupling The Rare-Earth Junior-Mining Market From Emphasis On Molycorp And Lynas
    There is not a global “rare-earths market.” There are local, regional, markets for individual rare earths in separated. highly refined forms such as chemicals for manufacturing fluid cracking catalysts, and metals for producing alloys to manufacture rare-earth permanent magnets, or nickel-metal-hydride battery electrodes.

    Even if your thinking is that the markets are totally globalized, you will still have to reconcile your belief with the fact that rare-earth prices within China are substantially lower than they are outside of China. China solves the arbitrage problem (buying low and selling high) by strictly limiting export volumes (otherwise they would all flow to the region of higher price, right?). In addition, China strictly limits the imports of rare earths in any form. I have personally been involved with attempts to import both ore and scrap rare-earth permanent magnets into China for processing. Both projects were initiated by Chinese companies looking for supplies for the Chinese market. Both projects were denied licenses by the Chinese government. This experience is why I question those who say that their markets will include mainland China. I do not believe that Chinese companies will be allowed to pay above Chinese market prices. for natural resources that can be produced in China.

    A small number of the total number of rare earths, perhaps five of the 16 naturally occurring rare earths, are critical in their uses. There are no economic substitutes for them giving the same or similar performance. Everyone reading this article will I hope, have previously gone through my colleague Gareth’s definitive Critical Rare Earths Report, available from the TMR web site.

    I predict that very few of the specialty-metal junior miners that could produce the particular heavy rare earths demanded by the current- and near-term market, will ever get into actual production, and of those, only the ones developing deposits containing commercially recoverable heavy rare earths will survive. Commercial in this sense means that they will be able to produce heavy rare earths at the lowest cost and at less than the total market demand.  Keep in mind that ore concentrates are nearly the least valuable forms of the rare-earth supply chain (the raw un-concentrated ore being the least valuable).

    The ore concentrate must be “cracked,” i.e., its metal values must be separated chemically from the minerals, and immediately within the cracking process or just after it the nuisance metals, such as radioactive thorium and uranium, must be removed or left in the tailings (residue). The resulting pregnant leach solution (PLS) must then be separated into the individual rare earths and these must be in as pure a form as possible.

    The purified individual rare-earth chemicals so produced. must then be reduced electrochemically or metallothermically to pure individual metals.

    The metals will then be made into alloys, and the alloys into products such as rare earth permanent magnets, and nickel metal hydride battery electrodes.

    Some of the purified chemical forms will be processed directly into, for example, fluid-cracking catalysts, without going through the metallic form at all.

    The ONLY WAY rare earths become of value, industrially, is by passing through the above supply chain until they have been transformed into a finished useful form. The exact makeup of these useful forms is dictated by the end user. The supplier at every level of the supply chain must conform to, and target, the end users’ requirement. This is why the stockpile discussion is so premature. The real question is: “What is to be stockpiled?” That question can only be answered by a close study of  individual companies and industries and their specific demands.

    The rare-earth part of the junior-mining sector has been for at least the last four years viewed in isolation by mining and financial analysts wearing blinkers.  A myopic vision of this small sector of the natural-resources market, which has vastly overemphasized its importance, has thus been developed and continues to be maintained.  A fantasy of growing and infinite demand and inelastic prices (prices not driven by simple supply and demand) increasing without limit, has placed the most emphasis on those rare-earth juniors who say that they will produce in the near term, from single mines, as much material as the Chinese are now producing from a combination of dozens of mines and refineries constructed and put into operation over a thirty-year period. As one analyst has put it “only the grade and total weight matter” in non-Chinese rare-earth production. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

    The decades and thousands of man-years it has taken the Chinese to achieve their current capacities and capabilities are simply ignored by “investor analysts” who wouldn’t and don’t know the difference between neodymium and salami to start with and think that “the” solvent exchange is on Bay Street in Toronto near the Toronto Stock Exchange.

    One of the positive results of the recent apparent correction (i.e. drop) in rare-earth stated prices is that this has exposed just how foolish the stock market has been in valuing a tiny metals market.  There was never any rational way that the prices for anything could simply increase by a factor 10 in just a few months and hold there and then go up again.  Rare earths have been treated as if they are vaccines when there is a plague among us. No price was considered too high for these “critical” substances. In fact they are critical mostly to lifestyle not life itself, and certainly not to the strength of the US, or any other, military, but rather to the efficiency of its defense technologies.

    I asked myself when the current mania began, that if rare earths are so important, then why did the financiers and industrialists in the USA, in particular, actively push the Chinese into the position of being the sole source of them when ALL of the major discoveries of and advances in the use of the rare earths over the last 30 years have been made in the USA?

    The answer to this question is economics. Economics is also the reason that the prices of the rare earths are rapidly correcting as Chinese intentions become clearer.

    China has grown into a world-class economic power through the extraordinary creation of a huge sustained rate of growth of its GDP, based on the marshaling of its national resources of people, resources, and capital into the largest single-goal-directed economic entity in mankind’s history. The single goal of the Chinese Communist Party, the sole political entity in China, is to raise the standard of living of all Chinese people as much as possible, by any means possible, in the shortest period of time. In China, the political system to achieve this is known as “socialism with Chinese characteristics” and the chosen economic system to achieve this goal as “capitalism with Chinese characteristics.”

    I think that the misunderstanding of “capitalism with Chinese characteristics” by the socialist-capitalists of the West is manifested most clearly in the idea that the goal of Chinese state economic planning is and must be individual “profit”, in exactly the same sense as is the goal of private capitalism outside of China.  Individual profit is allowed at the moment so that wealth can be created rapidly in the service of the goal of the state.

    China has been very lucky to have had a foundational  leader to unify the country, albeit ruthlessly and brutally, who was followed in short order  by a brilliant economic leader such as few countries have ever had.  In a way this is exactly the opposite of the experience of the former Soviet Union, which embarked under Stalin on a dead-end course to state bankruptcy with a goal of nineteenth-century empire building, almost completely overthrowing the ideas of  the Soviet Union’s foundational leader. The Western democracies without even so much as an industrial plan, such as the USA, look economically precarious to the central economic planners of China, who themselves are dismissed as nothing more than the latest iteration of Soviet central planning. China is not following the Soviet model of the path to communism, but China learned from the Soviet failure, and it learned well.

    China, since the reforms of Deng Xiaoping,  has created and nurtured until now an export-driven economy, which has allowed the Chinese to rapidly accumulate large amounts of reserve currencies (principally US dollars and Euros) representing the surplus of the payments they have received from their largest trading partners. China’s currency has not been allowed to become “convertible” in the free market. Its value vis a vis the reserve currencies, is set only by the Chinese government and not by the market. The Chinese store of assets anchored by its hard-currency reserves is the most powerful weapon in the history of economic nationalism.

    It now seems that the Chinese have become aware that the growth of their manufacturing economy is slowing, so that if a high “floor” rate of growth is to be maintained, then it is the time for some structural adjustments.  China has stated as official policy that it now wants to transform itself into a mixed economy, led ultimately by domestic consumption. This means that the types and amounts of resources now allocated to export, will have to be reviewed to see what amounts of them will have to be redirected to support the growth of the domestic consumer economy.

    To bring its particular sub-sector of the domestic natural-resource market into conformity with the new program direction, rare-earth mining has had first of all a cap placed on output and then, just now, an output licensing system put in place so that supply could be accurately measures and prices accurately “discovered.” In this way,  the legal market could become the total market, with taxes calculated and collected on all production, as well as facilitating accurate measurement of supply for state-planning purposes. Just this week it was been announced that of 80 applications for rar-earth production operating licenses received since the reforms began earlier this decade, the Chinese government has selected just 15 that conform to the NEW environmental standards. Production from unlicensed sources will now be a serious felony and the total of the amounts purchased either for use internally or for export will be checked to make sure it matches LICENSED output.

    This has resulted in a price correction that has been described as the deflation of a bubble. In fact the prices were earlier driven up by Chinese speculators and illegal miners trying to manipulate information even as they moved to offload inventory, before it became worthless or dangerous, because it wouldn’t have a necessary license to enable it to be sold in the legal market. The new regulation scheme will stabilize prices, since supply will be able to for the first time to be matched to demand.

    We will also now see a clear differentiation in supply and demand between the light rare-earth elements (LREEs), and the heavy rare-earth elements (HREEs). HREE production is, at best, flat in China, currently the sole producer, even as demand proceeds to grow. This can only result in firm current pricing and a steady increase in prices over the years to come for the HREEs.  Since non-Chinee HREE production will, at best, grow slowly, if even at all, it is likely that HREE supply will not meet demand anytime in this decade.

    This is a far cry from the situation in the LREEs where China is operating at less than one-half of mining capacity ,and possibly at even a lower level of utilization in refining capacity, and there is at the same time a strong possibility that Lynas (ASX:LYC, OTCQX:LYSDY) or Molycorp (NYSE:MCP) or both will come into large-scale production by 2014. This situation will simply maintain the probability of oversupply of the LREEs in the near to mid term. This should stabilize and hold down the prices of the LREEs, as speculation is discouraged internally by new Chinese moves.

    Finally it is obvious that the overwhelming market for the rare earths as raw materials is Southeast Asia, primarily China (60%) and Japan (30%), totaling 90% of the world market. It is incredibly naïve to maintain that as large a production as is predicted for even just Molycorp, could be absorbed by the US market unless you assume the total collapse of the Chinese and Japanese export markets for REEs. The only way that Molycorp could sell its total planned production would be by marketing into China and Japan. This will place Molycorp, at least in China, in direct competition with a mature Chinese mining sector, with much lower costs across the board than have ever been previously achieved, in practice, outside of China. Lynas faces the same marketing problem, but its mix of REEs is perhaps better suited to the world market place. In order to sell anything into China, any supplier must conform to strict Chinese import rules, regarding radiation and other contamination levels. This makes a non-Chinese rare-earth supply chain even more important to potential large-scale and therefore lowest-cost producers, but it is not the mining costs that are determinative – it is the lowest overall cost to the sale point of your rare-earth product that is important.

    First to pass the post is also going to be a very important benchmark for the success of a large LREE venture. If Lynas should succeed in getting the go-ahead from the Malaysian government soon, then it will rapidly thereafter begin producing large quantities of LREEs and some HREEs also from its Australian ores. This fact is a key reason why Molycorp is attempting to accelerate its target date for actual production, from newly mined material. Both Lynas and Molycorp have large fixed costs of operation. Any inability to sell all that they can produce may be fatal to their survival in the face of a market that is not as large as it is held out to be. In fact they are of course competitors with each other. If either is to survive, this will be if and only if, the Chinese do not choose to again ramp up LREE production, targeted for the export market.

    Governments may well buy small quantities of critical metals for security purposes, but the government of Australia needs hardly any such material and the actual needs of the US military are small.  If there is a revival of the total REE supply chain in the USA then a stockpile to protect the INDUSTRIAL supply chain could be enough reason for private industry to fund a Molycorp or a Lynas.

    The key stockpilers of the REEs as rare materials over the next decade are likely to be the nations and industries with the most pressing needs for them. Those would include China, Japan, Korea, India, the EU, and last, and presently least important, the USA.

    Stockpiling may be used as a reason to capitalize security of supply. In other words stockpilers will pay more to ensure domestic supply.

    With regard to HREEs, based on the information that I have about the deposits, management, markets and politics to be served by the potential rare-earth mines that can produce HREEs, I have reduced my interest in the space to the following. I may have missed a good one or included a bad one, but I think that the survivors in 2015 must be in my list today:

    • Avalon Rare Metals (TSX:AVL, AMEX:AVL)
    • Great Western Minerals Group (TSX.V:GWG, OTCBB:GWMGF)
    • Matamec Explorations (TSX.V:MAT, PK:MTCEF)
    • Quest Rare Minerals (TSX.V:QRM, AMEX:QRM)
    • Rare Element Resources (TSX.V:RES, AMEX:REE)
    • Tantalus Rare earths (TEFFF.Pk)
    • Tasman Metals (TSX.V:TSM, PK:TASXF, F:T61)
    • Ucore Rare Metals (TSX.V:UCU, OTCQX:UURAF)

    I believe that REEs can be produced as secondary values / byproducts at the lowest costs, by:

    • AMR Minerals
    • Alkane Resources (ASX:ALK, OTCQX:ANLKY)
    • Orbite Aluminae (TSX.ORT.A)
    • Rare Earth Metals (TSX.V:RA)

    Low-thorium deposits are highly desirable for LREEs and, of course, HREEs but they are few and far between. Owners of such deposits include:

    • Rare Earth Metals (TSX.V:RA)
    • Tasman Metals

    Recycling from industrial process and end-of-life scrap plus REE containing slags and residues, can provide a limited but significant and immediate supply of products at the lowest cost. This is because the energy and cost of originALLY mining and separating them from each other in gross is built into the scrap as intrinsic value.

    In 1976, China exported for the entire year the dollar value of its current (2011) daily exports! But, what exactly does China export? Two things: Labor content and the least quality to make a product competitive. What exactly does China import? Two things: Intellectual property (often as in the case of the American OEM automotive industry at NO COST) and raw materials.

    Let’s focus on raw materials.

    The best investment possible is to supply a growing demand for a material that is scarce to begin with. The LREEs are not rare nor even hard to get at; they are just currently too expensive to produce against the Chinese supply chain. On the other hand, the HREEs are scarce even in China, and also even in China their production costs are high due to the low grades that are worked.

    Thus, it turns out that deposits containing the highest ratios of HREEs to total REEs, where they can be worked so as to produce a product that is saleable competitively with the Chinese production costs, can be sold into China itself as well as into Japan.

    In the case of the HREEs, it is even possible to try to undercut Chinese prices to gain market share. If the production is price competitive, or even a little higher than that of China, then capitalizing the security of supply or national security issues can level the price differential at least for a critical quantity.

    The idea that it is the highest-grade, largest-volume deposit that is most likely to have commercial success is I believe, confused and naïve in the extreme; it equates market capitalization & share-price maintenance, promotion and manipulation with the probability of actual commercial, competitive, production in the real world markets.

     


    Disclosure: I am long OTCQX:GWMGF.
    Dec 03 1:51 PM | Link | 5 Comments
  • JP Morgan and Decoupling the Molycorp (MCP)engine from the Rare Earth Sector
     

    JP Morgan today, Sept 20, 2011, downgraded Molycorp (MCP) from overweight to neutral. The market reacted by selling off one billion dollars of MCP’s market capitalization as the share price lost 20% of its value in just one day. The other two rare earth juniors listed along with MCP on the AMEX, Avalon Rare Metals (AVL) and Rare Element Resources (REE) each lost around 10% of their market capitalization in the same blood bath.

    JP Morgan’s (JPM’s) analyst further pronounced that ”We continue to believe that most announced rare earth supply projects beyond Molycorp and Lynas (OTCPK:LYSCF) will not enter the market on schedule or if ever due to financing and permitting hurdles.”

    JPM is wrong about “most announced rare earth supply projects beyond Molycorp and Lynas” not entering the market, if ever, on schedule due to financing and permitting hurdles. The right sized mines with proven metallurgies and the best mix of critical rare earths will enter the market on schedule. JPM has been using its client, Molycorp, as a benchmark all along and this has blinded the financial institution to the realities of the rare earth market and to the requirements for an ideal producer, which are the lowest costs, the best mix of critical rare earths, and the right size-a size small enough to be able to supply the market and remain profitable even with reduced production (It’s called having a low overhead and a low breakeven in case those who have never run a business don’t know).

    JPM is basically saying that even though it has downgraded Molycorp to neutral it, Molycorp, is still the only game in town and you can still buy it but don’t expect it to go over $66/share. Thus sayeth the same JPM that was a major player in bringing both MCP and LYSCF to the market and reaping more than $50,000,000 in fees without any real risk to itself.

    The great fear among the rare earth juniors was that Molycorp would crash and burn taking them down with it. This crashing and burning now seems underway but only to those rare earth juniors that sought out listings on the AMEX have really suffered anything that cannot be attributed to generally lousy overall market conditions.

    I urge everyone to decouple Molycorp from the rare earth junior sector in their portfolios for the reasons that JPM and I give below.

    I have been told that the JPM mining analyst who issued JPM’s coverage of MCP today is a nice guy. Be that as it may his job is to advise JPM’s trading clients not to spin for Molycorp. He is doing his job by pointing out that:

    1.       JPM’s analysts and Molycorp’s planners overall have analyzed recent rare earth price increases poorly, or not at all, as to their root causes, which now seem to JPM to be primarily due to the hoarding for speculation of rare earth materials within China rather than the massive supply deficits spun by Molycorp from a widely used “chart” that supports the Molycorp story. This is correct; the prices of the rare earths in China are much lower than those quoted by Metal-Pages and used by JPM and Molycorp,

     

    2.       Molycorp’s business model must now, as it always should have, be judged by performance to objective. This requires that not only consistent objectives but also a timeline and benchmarks for reaching those objectives be established and, if a benchmark is missed, it, the miss, must be clearly due only to a reasonably unforeseeable consequence and, at the same time, missing the benchmark must not place the company in a loss making position, which will continue even if it recovers adherence to the timeline.

    Judged in this way, which is how lenders and corporate bond buyers judge any company seeking strategic or credit line financing, Solyndra, for example, never would have received taxpayer guarantees. Molycorp also doesn’t qualify by the performance to objective metric (as I discuss below), and

    3.       MCP has key personnel the departure of any of which would derail MCP’s business model says JPM’s analysis.

    What the JPM analyst has not pointed to are:

    1.       MCP’s sharp recent deviations from its original business model, as delineated in its IPO filing with the SEC. These changes included most prominently taking on the ownership and management of a company with 550 employees in a foreign country that is running a business with an output that MCP had stated that it, Molycorp, could and would produce with less than 10% of that number of workers. Note that Molycorp has even announced that it will ship ore concentrates to Estonia for processing. Besides not asking why material must be shipped 7,000 miles from Mountain Pass to Tallinn, Estonia, for processing that we were assured was best understood by Molycorp from its direct experience with its own world class facility now being enlarged and improved to a planned enormous (largest in the world) capacity JPM also forgot to ask how that shipping could be done economically and legally without extracting the metal values from the ore concentrate and removing thorium and uranium from them until a level was reached that would allow intra-California shipping, export from the US, traversing of the Panama canal and import into Estonia. I might point out that Chinese processors who are short feed stock are just as close to Mountain Pass as is Estonia and that they are scouring the world for feedstock, but that feedstock cannot be imported into China unless it meets Chinese standards for radiation levels,

     

    2.       JPM also didn’t touch on the repudiation by Hitachi, announced as a suspension of negotiations, of Molycorp’s spin on a Hitachi-Molycorp magnet producing joint venture, which from the very beginning was a low level supplier – manufacturer relationship from Hitachi’s perspective not a merger of equals as Molycorp and its backers such as JPM spun it, and

     

    3.       JPM barely touched on the termination of an investment offer in Molycorp by Sumitomo, which Molycorp spun that it no longer needed anyway since high prices insured profitability and in any case it was fully funded! Yet the fully funded Molycorp continues to seek Dept. of Energy loan guarantees.

    The JPM coverage today got one thing very wrong. There are rare earth junior mining companies that have very advanced projects with regard to financing and permitting and many of these are well into the completion of their metallurgies and of their marketing of their production to end users.

    Additionally there are two new groups of rare earth juniors:

    1.       Polymetallic deposits where rare earth concentrates can be produced at very low cost as byproducts of other profitable production, and

    2.       Deposits resembling China’s absorption clays where rare earth values can be extracted very simply and in which like the Chinese deposits heavy rare earths are significant components of the deposits.

    I wrote about most of the best of the juniors that are on time and on target last week in a piece published by The Gold report at www.theaureport.com/pub/na/10875 as “Jack Lifton; Profit From Really Critical Rare Earth Elements.” I stand by my selections in that article.

    I do think that if Lynas can overcome the political issues in Malaysia it will come on line as the first large scale producer of high quality light rare earth forms, and I do think that Great Western will be producing a mix of critical rare earths for its own magnet alloy operations according to its published time table. However Great Western cannot with present resources provide enough dysprosium or terbium to the market to fuflfill current or projected demand.

    Some of the juniors I mention in my Gold Report Interview will come into prodcution to fill the gaps in demand for neodymium, europium, terbium, dysprosium, and yttrium that exist already or will shortly.

    The key missing component in the non-Chinese supply is the lack of separation and refining facilites for the rare earths outside of China. Until there are such facilities producers without them or without access to them  can only providing feed stock for Chinese refiners.

    Molycorp could fool all of us and accelerate the construction of a separation and refining complex in California and easily construct it in a modular fashion in order to separate and refine rare earth ores as a jobber as well as a producer. That would have been a great and profitable business and would have been my choice for the property.

     

     



    Disclosure: I am long OTCQX:GWMGF.
    Sep 21 12:10 AM | Link | 6 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • The US Congress uses the trick of saying that the rate of growth of its spending is declining to announce "positive news." $MCP "loses less"
    Mar 4, 2014
  • Fuel Cell Vehicles And Critical Metals: Supply And Demand http://seekingalpha.com/a/188y7
    Mar 3, 2014
More »
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.