Jack Yetiv

Beware of the Solar Stock Fad

The "logic" of this article escapes me. The author (who does not know what the solar things that sit on a roof are called) posits that because some stocks--none of them solar stocks--are way below their highs (JNPR, CSCO, etc), that means solar stocks constitute a "fad."

If the author's point is that some solar stocks are overpriced, I would agree, but that is hardly a meaningful or useful observation. If the author's point is that NO solar stock is worth owning, he is plainly wrong.

If the author's point is neither of the above, then I must confess I don't know what his point is.

Jack Yetiv