Seeking Alpha

Jae Jun

View as an RSS Feed
View Jae Jun's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    @gelstretch. Good way to put it. But in addition to prudent investors, if investors have the temperament to simply buy and hold for a couple of years, they will be rewarded.
    Mar 17 04:56 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    @Davidalfred,
    From experience, not having a compelling reason other than just the fact that it is cheap is one of the best reasons to be buying.
    Mar 17 04:54 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    Easy to see who reads vs those just commenting via the title.
    Mar 17 01:45 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    yes. I believe I made it clear throughout the entire article.
    Mar 17 01:44 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    fair value of $690 in my books.
    Mar 17 01:43 PM | 5 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    The article was saying that AAPL is worth more than $530.
    Easy to see who reads vs those just commenting via the title :)
    Mar 17 01:43 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    I hope to writing it too :)
    Mar 17 01:41 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    Yes cheap compared to current earnings and the expectation of negative growth in some areas.
    Mar 17 12:35 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Apple Is Still NOT Worth $530 [View article]
    @Michael,

    I believe you made the mistake of only looking at the title and skimming through the images because the whole idea was to show that AAPL is cheap based on current and negative growth earnings. Not contingent on future earnings.
    Mar 17 12:34 PM | 4 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Your Only Edge With Large Cap Stocks Is Valuation [View article]
    Yes. Sorry but I still can't figure out what your comment means too.
    Mar 10 02:02 PM | 4 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • 4 Years And 1,500% Later With Conn's Inc. [View article]
    Thanks Michael. Plenty of better analysts and articles than this but thanks.
    Mar 5 12:47 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • 4 Years And 1,500% Later With Conn's Inc. [View article]
    While the numbers could be manipulated, I haven't com across many companies that blatantly do it.
    There are some stocks and industries that people can stay away from but for the most part, I tend to trust the numbers and average out the outliers.
    Mar 5 12:46 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • 4 Years And 1,500% Later With Conn's Inc. [View article]
    good insight. I didn't think of it like that. I did know the customers were of low quality credit.
    Mar 5 12:44 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • 4 Years And 1,500% Later With Conn's Inc. [View article]
    Thanks for commenting.
    Overconfidence..... oh how I know thee well.
    Mar 5 12:44 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Special Situations Update: NuPathe Correction [View article]
    It likely isn't scottrade's fault. Just the way these deals are processed. I still haven't been paid out too. Don't know anyone who has who didn't tender their shares. The bright side is that you saved the fee needed to tender the shares.

    With fidelity, it's $40, so I at least saved that..lol
    Mar 5 01:28 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
349 Comments
205 Likes