Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Well I think we know what your answer would be to that. But then again, your opinion is pretty worthless since CMFO is now trading above where it was was before the short attacks began. Lets do some math. Roughly 45 days after the short attacks began, CMFO completely recovers and therefore all you shorts are now losing money on it. Great work there, you really nailed it.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Whether or not there was ever an article there, it sure as heck isn't there now... There is now way that any one would consider good report linking to an article that has been phsyically and intentionally removed from publication. Yet, you not only reference this said removed article but you also somehow have an old PFD copy of it. You say the meat of the article has significant because of the reputation of the publisher, but the publisher itself has removed it! So why do you keep referencing it if its publishing does not want to keep it under its name?
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Wow, I'm impressed. That's some smooth talking. Written like a seasoned short and distort specialist. I call you out on an outright lie about something you wrote, and you respond elegantly by saying that while you did outright lie and your statement is not true, it COULD BE TRUE EVENTUALLY. I mean we've gone from you stating what sounded like a fact, to you providing total speculation.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
" Leading newspapers in China and the U.S. are taking note of the litany of evidence"
Also please elaborate on which "leading" U.S. News Paper has said picked up this story? I will not be accepting your PDF to removed Wall Street Journal articles that you claim were once there.
In all seriousness, which leading U.S. newspaper (as per your post above) is agreeing with your assessment? Or wait, is this just another short and distort tactic where you throw out accusations that sound damning but are totally untrue.
Please list this U.S. newspaper as per your allegation. thanks.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
HAH! " Leading newspapers in China and the U.S. are taking note of the litany of evidence" -- Chinese Company Analyst
Read your own article. You have to link to a PDF that you created because that article was taken down. I cannot believe you would make reference to an article that has been deleted by the publisher. I mean why would they remove it if it's true information?
Your arguments are pathetic at best. Deloitte will probably (in my opinion) clear the allegations and this stock will go up from there. You will go create another alias name and start over.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Waldo also has his own website for anyone interested. He does the same anonymous, with no accountability professional bashing of stocks. He is not some inbiased commenter here. He does the same thing for a living. Check out his website @ waldomushman.com. His disclaimer is crazy.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Oh and then link your evidence in these blogs/articles to another BLOG WEBSITE. I hope all you future short and distort prodigies out there are taking note. This is quality stuff going on here.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Nice Waldo. Short and distort 101. Class is in session. Waldo just said above, "It is also worth noting that the second largest scrap supplier that ONP reports has annual sales in an amount less than what ONP claims to purchase from them."
Sounds eerily familiar to an article I wrote that outlines both of your smoke and mirrors, short and distort methods. A line from my article is below describing how these two clowns go about writing their reports. I recommend reading my article before listening to these two frauds.
"2) Locate a company in China with a similar sounding name as the Target Company’s suppliers.
a. Show that this company reports less sales than the Target company claims to pay its supplier"
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
You're an anonymous blogger with no accountability and no identity. ONP's CEO, ONP's current auditors, Roth, Harbinger and Hudson Securities, Loeb Law Firm and now Deloitte, are all public figures with long standing reputations. They have accountability and identities on the line and have found nothing wrong (Deloitte is the latest which will come soon). You hide behind a computer screen. No one knows who you are, except you and your maker.
Frankly I cannot fathom how any one would take your article here (which links to another blogging website via PDFs that you uploaded yourself), seriously. My opinion is that you are a complete fraud yourself.
If you are so certain about this, given that your opinion differs so drastically from several large firms that have accountability, why don't you make yourself accountable and publish your real name, with a link something that verifies it. Maybe a linkedin.com profile???
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Oh and funny someone should mention something about CSKI. Because it is a 10 bagger in the last 9 years. It was under $1 in 2002. And yes, way to manipulate the data here, it is down a bit from its 2010 SPIKE high, but yea a 10 bagger in 9 years before that. Whoever wrote that about CSKI is a genius.
Short Seller Attack on China Integrated Energy Is Different [View article]
Hey Blue,
You will never get me to agree that one should rely on SAIC filings from credit reports to make investment decisions or to allege fraud.
I recall you saying often that you care little about your own short term performance. I guess when it serves your purpose in attacking others, you would bring up short term peformance.
But since you did, fine, I'll accept my bad investing decisions, but my performance I have showed publicly is not close to insolvent. It is now updated per your point. I had forgotten about it. I apologize.
3 of my positions I have written about are up 20, 41 and 6.5%. Two are down 55 and 45, one of those taking place within several days of today due to a short attack that is still ongoing. Only in Waldo's world and using Wald's math is that insolvent.
Attractive Valuation for China Integrated Energy [View article]
Unfortunately, in my opinion, you suffer from the same disease as Special K. You are asking questions for which there are no answers. Operating performance drives share prices, not whether the CEO sold shares and why. You and K seem to simply ignore the most important aspect of valuation, and hone in on a number of capital markets/non operating activities, that don't drive the share price.
People sell shares for many different reasons. They wouldn't have decided to list if the CEO didn't want to sell shares to the public and de-privatize the company-- and cash in on premium valuations. It's all part of the listing process. I mean this the single basis for the equity capital markets. If he didn't want to sell shares and raise cash for himself and his company, he wouldn't have listed, nor would any public company in the world.
Want an example?
PCLN officers have been selling shares like clockwork since going public. PCLN share price has gone from 150-450 during the time they have sold shares.
China Ritar Power: New Lows Mean Opportunity [View article]
I concur on this subject. Lead prices hurt margins last quarter, but obviously was still operating profitably. I don't believe that this is causing the recent price performance, however. Many companies use lead as raw materials inputs, notable battery makers-- others are not trading below book value and less than half of annual sales.
Recent Corporate Actions Spell Shareholder Value at China Wind Systems [View article]
Oddly enough, shortly after this correction, CWS announced that Liu has personally invested $125,000 in CWS through its common shares.
"Mr. Liu stated, "I have made this investment in China Wind Systems to reflect my confidence in the Company and my belief that China Wind Systems is well positioned for sustainable long-term growth and profitability in the renewable energy industry."
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
This is great stuff.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Also please elaborate on which "leading" U.S. News Paper has said picked up this story? I will not be accepting your PDF to removed Wall Street Journal articles that you claim were once there.
In all seriousness, which leading U.S. newspaper (as per your post above) is agreeing with your assessment? Or wait, is this just another short and distort tactic where you throw out accusations that sound damning but are totally untrue.
Please list this U.S. newspaper as per your allegation. thanks.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Read your own article. You have to link to a PDF that you created because that article was taken down. I cannot believe you would make reference to an article that has been deleted by the publisher. I mean why would they remove it if it's true information?
Your arguments are pathetic at best. Deloitte will probably (in my opinion) clear the allegations and this stock will go up from there. You will go create another alias name and start over.
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Sounds eerily familiar to an article I wrote that outlines both of your smoke and mirrors, short and distort methods. A line from my article is below describing how these two clowns go about writing their reports. I recommend reading my article before listening to these two frauds.
"2) Locate a company in China with a similar sounding name as the Target Company’s suppliers.
a. Show that this company reports less sales than the Target company claims to pay its supplier"
seekingalpha.com/artic...
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Frankly I cannot fathom how any one would take your article here (which links to another blogging website via PDFs that you uploaded yourself), seriously. My opinion is that you are a complete fraud yourself.
If you are so certain about this, given that your opinion differs so drastically from several large firms that have accountability, why don't you make yourself accountable and publish your real name, with a link something that verifies it. Maybe a linkedin.com profile???
Orient Paper's Top Supplier: An Empty Shell Owned by ONP's CEO [View article]
Short Seller Attack on China Integrated Energy Is Different [View article]
You will never get me to agree that one should rely on SAIC filings from credit reports to make investment decisions or to allege fraud.
I recall you saying often that you care little about your own short term performance. I guess when it serves your purpose in attacking others, you would bring up short term peformance.
But since you did, fine, I'll accept my bad investing decisions, but my performance I have showed publicly is not close to insolvent. It is now updated per your point. I had forgotten about it. I apologize.
3 of my positions I have written about are up 20, 41 and 6.5%. Two are down 55 and 45, one of those taking place within several days of today due to a short attack that is still ongoing. Only in Waldo's world and using Wald's math is that insolvent.
Attractive Valuation for China Integrated Energy [View article]
People sell shares for many different reasons. They wouldn't have decided to list if the CEO didn't want to sell shares to the public and de-privatize the company-- and cash in on premium valuations. It's all part of the listing process. I mean this the single basis for the equity capital markets. If he didn't want to sell shares and raise cash for himself and his company, he wouldn't have listed, nor would any public company in the world.
Want an example?
PCLN officers have been selling shares like clockwork since going public. PCLN share price has gone from 150-450 during the time they have sold shares.
finance.yahoo.com/q/it...
You can focus on non-operating capital markets activities all you want but you're chasing your tail.
China Ritar Power: New Lows Mean Opportunity [View article]
Recent Corporate Actions Spell Shareholder Value at China Wind Systems [View article]
"Mr. Liu stated, "I have made this investment in China Wind Systems to reflect my confidence in the Company and my belief that China Wind Systems is well positioned for sustainable long-term growth and profitability in the renewable energy industry."
www.prnewswire.com/new...
Recent Corporate Actions Spell Shareholder Value at China Wind Systems [View article]