I used the same logic for First Solar when FSLR was 300 + in May of 2008.
.. I guess what's desperately missing is human capital.
On Oct 26 07:36 AM logicalthought wrote:
> AMZN has continued to amaze me in that it has nothing truly proprietary > (not even the Kindle) and is essentially just an extremely well-designed > web site backed by fulfillment warehouses. In theory, one could replicate > the entire company (currently valued at around $50 billion) for, > say, $3 billion, consisting of $1 billion to replicate the web site > and warehouses and $2 billion for an absolutely ubiquitous ad campaign > to build instant name recognition. Requiring, then, a return on just > $3 billion of invested capital (vs. AMZN's $50 billion valuation), > one could then theoretically underprice AMZN on just about everything, > and therefore massively steal its market share. I don't understand > why no one has ever done this, so meanwhile, lol, I continue to shop > at Amazon.
How to Value Amazon? [View article]
.. I guess what's desperately missing is human capital.
On Oct 26 07:36 AM logicalthought wrote:
> AMZN has continued to amaze me in that it has nothing truly proprietary
> (not even the Kindle) and is essentially just an extremely well-designed
> web site backed by fulfillment warehouses. In theory, one could replicate
> the entire company (currently valued at around $50 billion) for,
> say, $3 billion, consisting of $1 billion to replicate the web site
> and warehouses and $2 billion for an absolutely ubiquitous ad campaign
> to build instant name recognition. Requiring, then, a return on just
> $3 billion of invested capital (vs. AMZN's $50 billion valuation),
> one could then theoretically underprice AMZN on just about everything,
> and therefore massively steal its market share. I don't understand
> why no one has ever done this, so meanwhile, lol, I continue to shop
> at Amazon.