One of Those Market Days That Makes You Scratch Your Head [View article]
When I said the bull trap thing, I wasn't really talking about the fundamentals, or the reactions the markets have had... only prices of securities. I want them to go down so that I can buy more of them at a cheaper price (ZINC for example, has more than doubled).
On Apr 03 10:12 AM Conan the Barbarian wrote:
> Let's revise your quote a tad. Let me substitute Gold for raisins. > > > "Some form of a bull trap", it Is Not Some form of a Bull trap if > you can't define it. Even making the attempt to pigeonhole what has > occurred in the last month as Some kind of Bull trap is nonsense. > > > There is no loud "clang, clang, clang" tossing the Bear into the > ditch. The moves have been worldwide. Bad News is being tossed into > the ditch alongside the Bear. If you don't see the difference, you > haven't seen multiple Bears being hacked around the world. > > CTB
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
do you have any way to find the old article? email me with any info.
thanks,
On Mar 01 10:38 PM Histo wrote:
> I think the shorts are FOOLS! Please keep shorting SHLD. > > This company makes money!!!, and has annual sales of nearly 50 Billion!! > > > I think that makes them relevant in the eyes of consumers. All you > haters will lose your ass. You don't have the "balls" for a war > with Eddie and friends. You will be begging to cover when the crunch > eases even a little bit? > > Suckers
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
do you have any way to find the old article? email me with any info.
thanks,
On Mar 02 05:29 PM sclarksons wrote:
> I was in fact accused of being an anonymous emailer, > > I also replied again to Jeff Macke and "Big Jim" letting them know > that I own or manage several thousand shares of SHLD, and again, > asking Macke to describe the "transfer of 5 Billion from Sears to > his hedge fund" > > My final two comments were very straightforward, kind, and were blocked. > > > Okay, I got a little challenging on the earlier comment, telling > him that he was either short the stock, stupid, or being pimped out > by a shortseller. > > I hold to that scenario. >
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
do you have any way to find the old article? email me with any info.
thanks,
On Mar 03 11:07 AM Kelley wrote:
> That Macke piece was a regurgitation of every other negative commentary > about SHLD out there. Talk about not doing one's homework. > > Sears has done a lot to improve its on-line presence. This is where > big changes can be made for a smaller amount of dollars. No one seems > to give that any attention. Moreover, SHLD recently beat estimates, > and all people can talk about is Eddie's rant in the shareholder > letter. I read the letter, and it didn't seem like a rant to me. > > > Ah, perception. I forgot. Same thing happened when Ackman showed > up at the shareholders meeting last May. Journalists wrote how Ackman > "pressured" and "grilled" Lampert to answer questions relating to > SHLD. Haha. I was there. Ackman stood up, asked his questions and > sat down. It was a non-event. He even stood up a second time and > told Lampert he appreciated the job he was doing. > > My other favorite Eddie bashing? I hear often that he doesn't know > retail. Really, folks? Check out AZO. They just made an historic > high today. > > I cannot guarantee that I won't lose money on my investment in SHLD. > However, I feel confident in the upside. I feel even more confident > when I read recycled and incomplete "analysis." > > Jeffrey, fcharlie and sclarksons - thanks for calling out the Macke > spin!
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
Here is a question for all fellow SHLD lovers.
The original article has been edited so that the points that I make are no longer relevant-as in, Jeffrey Macke changed his writing on Minyanville.com! I am trying to find someone that has a screen shot of the original article, or even knows of a way to access the article before the changes were made, so that I can do a "before and after" write up.
Just take a look at the new article, he changed CEO to Chairman and completely got rid of the $5 billion dollar cash out into Eddie's hedge fund!
It is awesome that a bunch of angry SHLD fans got him to go back on what he said!
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
Being told that my points are retarded means a lot... Especially coming form a guy that doesn't capitalize, use punctuation, or say things like "ur".
I think it is pretty apparent that if a store spends little on capex, that they can pass savings along to the customer-Wal-Mart anyone?
Not that insider selling is a good way to analyze a company's performance, but since you brought it up, let's look at it: A director selling $50 million in stock, or two of the better capital allocators of our time sitting on (and adding to) well over 1/2 of the outstanding shares... hmm... who do I side with?
Regardless, your welcome for the laugh. :-)
On Mar 02 11:10 AM ScroogeMcduck wrote:
> oh and buy the way jeffery ur analogy about getting a better prices > on items becasue the store is dirty is the most retarted thing ive > herd in a while thanks for the laugh
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
So you are the guy he says is an 'anonymous emailer'!
yeah, the guy is a total tool, but as I said in the article, I hope that he can get the price down for me.
at one point in his article commenting, he said something about making a diner bet on SHLD going to the single digits before it doubled-I accepted, and then asked where he got this 5 billion info (because I too have read a ton of filings for SHLD).
No surprise, but I still have no response from him.
On Mar 02 09:59 AM sclarksons wrote:
> I challenged Macke to articulate how the five billion swindle took > place, and what record he had of it. > I did so because I have read every SEC filing on sears and kmart > for the last three years, and most of them for the last ten. > > I asked him via email, and twice on the website where his article > was published. > > He challenged me to do my own homework. > > It must have been journalistic creative interpretation of the facts, > and an unwillingness to admit stretching the truth after being called > out on it. > > Or maybe he's basing his article on some shortseller's rumour.<br/> > >
One of Those Market Days That Makes You Scratch Your Head [View article]
On Apr 03 10:12 AM Conan the Barbarian wrote:
> Let's revise your quote a tad. Let me substitute Gold for raisins.
>
>
> "Some form of a bull trap", it Is Not Some form of a Bull trap if
> you can't define it. Even making the attempt to pigeonhole what has
> occurred in the last month as Some kind of Bull trap is nonsense.
>
>
> There is no loud "clang, clang, clang" tossing the Bear into the
> ditch. The moves have been worldwide. Bad News is being tossed into
> the ditch alongside the Bear. If you don't see the difference, you
> haven't seen multiple Bears being hacked around the world.
>
> CTB
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
ragnarisapirate.blogsp...
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
thanks,
On Mar 01 10:38 PM Histo wrote:
> I think the shorts are FOOLS! Please keep shorting SHLD.
>
> This company makes money!!!, and has annual sales of nearly 50 Billion!!
>
>
> I think that makes them relevant in the eyes of consumers. All you
> haters will lose your ass. You don't have the "balls" for a war
> with Eddie and friends. You will be begging to cover when the crunch
> eases even a little bit?
>
> Suckers
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
thanks,
On Mar 02 05:29 PM sclarksons wrote:
> I was in fact accused of being an anonymous emailer,
>
> I also replied again to Jeff Macke and "Big Jim" letting them know
> that I own or manage several thousand shares of SHLD, and again,
> asking Macke to describe the "transfer of 5 Billion from Sears to
> his hedge fund"
>
> My final two comments were very straightforward, kind, and were blocked.
>
>
> Okay, I got a little challenging on the earlier comment, telling
> him that he was either short the stock, stupid, or being pimped out
> by a shortseller.
>
> I hold to that scenario.
>
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
thanks,
On Mar 03 11:07 AM Kelley wrote:
> That Macke piece was a regurgitation of every other negative commentary
> about SHLD out there. Talk about not doing one's homework.
>
> Sears has done a lot to improve its on-line presence. This is where
> big changes can be made for a smaller amount of dollars. No one seems
> to give that any attention. Moreover, SHLD recently beat estimates,
> and all people can talk about is Eddie's rant in the shareholder
> letter. I read the letter, and it didn't seem like a rant to me.
>
>
> Ah, perception. I forgot. Same thing happened when Ackman showed
> up at the shareholders meeting last May. Journalists wrote how Ackman
> "pressured" and "grilled" Lampert to answer questions relating to
> SHLD. Haha. I was there. Ackman stood up, asked his questions and
> sat down. It was a non-event. He even stood up a second time and
> told Lampert he appreciated the job he was doing.
>
> My other favorite Eddie bashing? I hear often that he doesn't know
> retail. Really, folks? Check out AZO. They just made an historic
> high today.
>
> I cannot guarantee that I won't lose money on my investment in SHLD.
> However, I feel confident in the upside. I feel even more confident
> when I read recycled and incomplete "analysis."
>
> Jeffrey, fcharlie and sclarksons - thanks for calling out the Macke
> spin!
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
thanks,
On Mar 02 10:17 AM fcharlie wrote:
> I emailed Macke as well, asking the same question.... No response.
>
>
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
The original article has been edited so that the points that I make are no longer relevant-as in, Jeffrey Macke changed his writing on Minyanville.com! I am trying to find someone that has a screen shot of the original article, or even knows of a way to access the article before the changes were made, so that I can do a "before and after" write up.
Just take a look at the new article, he changed CEO to Chairman and completely got rid of the $5 billion dollar cash out into Eddie's hedge fund!
It is awesome that a bunch of angry SHLD fans got him to go back on what he said!
thanks in advance.
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
I think it is pretty apparent that if a store spends little on capex, that they can pass savings along to the customer-Wal-Mart anyone?
Not that insider selling is a good way to analyze a company's performance, but since you brought it up, let's look at it: A director selling $50 million in stock, or two of the better capital allocators of our time sitting on (and adding to) well over 1/2 of the outstanding shares... hmm... who do I side with?
Regardless, your welcome for the laugh. :-)
On Mar 02 11:10 AM ScroogeMcduck wrote:
> oh and buy the way jeffery ur analogy about getting a better prices
> on items becasue the store is dirty is the most retarted thing ive
> herd in a while thanks for the laugh
Hoping Shorts Will Drive Sears Down for Me [View article]
yeah, the guy is a total tool, but as I said in the article, I hope that he can get the price down for me.
at one point in his article commenting, he said something about making a diner bet on SHLD going to the single digits before it doubled-I accepted, and then asked where he got this 5 billion info (because I too have read a ton of filings for SHLD).
No surprise, but I still have no response from him.
On Mar 02 09:59 AM sclarksons wrote:
> I challenged Macke to articulate how the five billion swindle took
> place, and what record he had of it.
> I did so because I have read every SEC filing on sears and kmart
> for the last three years, and most of them for the last ten.
>
> I asked him via email, and twice on the website where his article
> was published.
>
> He challenged me to do my own homework.
>
> It must have been journalistic creative interpretation of the facts,
> and an unwillingness to admit stretching the truth after being called
> out on it.
>
> Or maybe he's basing his article on some shortseller's rumour.<br/>
>
>