Seeking Alpha

Jeremy Needham » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • WisdomTree to Reshape Dividend ETFs to Exclude Financials [View article]
    WisdomTree Total Dividend (DTD) will continue to have exposure to financials.
    Feb 26 16:19 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Turning Japanese: The Audacity of Reality (Part 3 of 3) [View article]



    On Jan 30 09:13 AM BS Detector wrote:

    > "...the National Debt will reach 100% of GDP during the Obama administration.
    > When Argentina’s economy collapsed in 1998, their National Debt as
    > a percentage of GDP was 65%."
    >
    > But the U.S. national debt as a percentage of GDP was more than 120%
    > at the end of WWII. Not fair to compare the U.S. today with the U.S.
    > then? Certainly more appropriate than comparing us with Argentina
    > in 1998.

    I don’t think either post-WWII United States or 98-01 Argentina are necessarily excellent comparables to our situation today. However, I do think the Argentina scenario is more related to the United States today. For starters, post-WWII U.S. had the majority of the world’s financial reserves and industrial capacity. Moreover, we had the financial strength, bargaining power and trading partners to produce our public debt down fairly quickly (that and the concept of today’s Household Debt at 100% to GDP and Financial-Sector Debt at 120% to GDP was a completely foreign concept). Argentina had many similarities to the United States, albeit on a much smaller scale. Between 1992 and 1997, Argentina ran over $20 billion of cumulative trade deficits which was fueled by cheap imports, much like one facet of the United States’ recent trade deficits. Annual deficits topped out at 2.5% of GDP (much less than what the United States is looking at this year) in 1999-2001 before something as small as the finance minister’s debt swap caused massive capital flight and shorting of sovereign debt. I would argue that the United States is in a roughly parallel situation today (albeit in relative terms we are in much worse shape) with our ‘advantage’ being the arguably misguided trust that treasury debt holders have in our solvency. If we weren’t so deeply entrenched in the international financial system, our creditors would have pulled the plug on Uncle Sam quite some time ago. That brings me back to Jim’s quote: “The Great Deniers say we are not Argentina. They say we are safe because the U.S. dollar is the reserve currency of the world. This is like jumping off a 20 story building and as you pass the 10th floor someone yells out the window asking how you are doing. You answer, ‘Good, so far’.” I hope I’m wrong about all of this. Perhaps if we can perform financial triage and bring our zombie banks into receivership a la Sweden, we might be able to mitigate the worst of this impending crash. If not, at least this time around Sweden is bailing out Volvo; we’ll need something to keep us safe.
    Jan 31 03:45 am |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • The Case for Domestic Automakers [View article]
    GM and Ford are actually profitable in Europe and make some of the best-selling automobiles on the continent. Besides, Europe as a whole has a much more level playing field in the auto market than the US. It's like comparing apples and oranges.


    On Nov 19 04:42 AM from Holland wrote:

    > In Europe the markets are open to any, Asian and US, automaker. Still
    > the US cars did not sell well. Why? Because the quality sucks, the
    > technical performance is poor, the design does not appeal. The only
    > good thing I can think of it the price is low. But since we Europeans
    > know that you get what you pay for the low price is more a warning
    > than an attraction.
    >
    > US automakers face the truth. Your shoddy goods cannot compete in
    > a global market. Succes [relative] in your local market hid that
    > for a while but now anymore. I would put my money in succesfull industries.
    > Not in the dinosaurs (unless you prefer living in the past).
    Nov 19 15:29 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • General Electric: Genuine Risk of Collapse? [View article]
    'Also like the comment above about Welch... It's easy to do well in
    bull market and leav e the cleanup to the next guy... Sounds kindof like our present Presidential election, doesn't it?'

    Clinton's people had more to do with the financial crisis than Bush's (remember when Summers, Rubin and Greenspan threw Brooksley Born and the CFTC under the bus?) Don't get me wrong, there is a lot of blame to go around, and taking everything besides the financial crisis into consideration, Bush was more of a royal screw-up. I just wanted to put that into context to level the partisanship of said poster..
    Nov 19 15:08 pm |Rating: 0 -2 |Link to Comment
  • 'The Shallowest Generation': A Rebuttal  [View article]
    These generational warfare concepts are really 'interesting' ways of looking at our problems. This is no different than the sickening class warfare arguments that perpetuate during election cycles to take focus off of the problems that really matter. The Baby Boomers are not the 'shallowest generation.' That is a completely subjective argument, and I'm sure many Baby Boomers think this way about my generation, Generation Y. But that is beside the point. My generation has to deal with growing authoritarian regimes a la China and Russia, the decimation of our auto industry, a massive problem of people underwater on their mortgages with no serious impelementation of any solutions in sight, an opaque credit default swap market that requires banks to hoard capital to safeguard against losses, crumbling education, infrastructure and expensive and inefficient health care programs. Guess what, every generation of Americans has to deal with these issues. If a couple of people want to make tit-for-tat arguments on generational warfare when it actively takes focus off of very major problems we ALL have to deal with, I suppose they are entitled to do that. Just don't expect much respect from me for doing so.
    Nov 08 18:16 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Detroit's Hail Mary: Saving the Automakers [View article]
    You may have a point that GM, Ford or Chrysler could continue to operate through a bankruptcy in some way, shape or form. However, it is highly speculative to imagine how that might pan out. One thing that worries me is that automobiles are a big-ticket durable goods item, which I would imagine requires a little more faith than purchasing an airline ticket. The research on this point is not very encouraging, so forgive me if I may have depicted a bit of a worst-case scenario:

    www.trucktrend.com/fea...

    On Nov 03 11:52 AM sumosama wrote:

    > don't confuse bankruptcy with going out of business as the author
    > does. there are many bankrupt companies still in operation. highly
    > unlikely gm will shutter if it files for bkp.
    Nov 03 12:30 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
Jeremy Needham's
Comments Stats
6 comments
Rating: 2 (4 - 2 )