CEF Weekly Review: H&Q Health Care Investors [View article]
Erratum:
Highest Focus Stock for the Week:
"The yield is 7.7%. Its discount is 6.1% for an average discount of 5.9% for the 52 week period. There was a slew of selling on Wednesday (284,200) and Thursday and Friday (129,500 and 179,000, respectively). Average is 38.6%".
This should have removed.
It was the "Lowest Spread and Focus Stock for the Week:"
CEF Weekly Review: H&Q Health Care Investors [View article]
pound puppy
Since ROC is a "return on your capital" is doesn't make any sense for your IRA--for both Roth or normal IRA. You must deducted the return of capital you've receive from your holdings basis (share price less return of capital) to calculate gains.
However, in real estate the value of the depreciations (upon the net value) may not extinguished your values at time of your holdings. The value of income properties may typical goes up.
The distributions is usual above net earnings and value may be cash flow beyond the net income.
For example, the net holding of your properties was $1,000,000 on your net assets 10 years ago. So, you be depreciating it for 25 years and the 10 years that you have been holding was $600,000 on your books (20 years).
However, the $1,000,000 has been appreciation for 10 years and in reality it is worth $1,250,000. The depreciation deduction would be a great as the property value and the cash flow is net income plus more that the depreciation.
I have scrolled the new current weekly and the week of 10/28/12 (where I haven't been participating on SeekingAlpha.)
The returns are for 11 Weekly reports. There has been 7 weeks where the returns are predictive. The weeks were negative for -0.2% and predictive for +0.9%--a net benefit of 1.1%.
Returns were somewhat predictive of potential positive return--with a twist.
The negative spreads (PrcNAVSprd) is a calculation between the current “PremDisc” against the historical one (the week I'm using is one week) in comparing the positive or negative spreads between the two.
The positive PrcNAVSprd is an indication that the share price has gone up with the NAV in comparison with the two week average. This may be a negative surprise.
The negative PrcNAVSprd has gone down as share prices to NAV. This may be a positive surprise. Stocks prices have gone-up as negative sentiment as oppose to positive sentiment from the top 10 percent.
The difference is that stocks price momentum may be improving and the stock price is anticipating that the NAV may move-up. Or dividend can increase shareholders attention. Also, unreasonable NAV can cloud the picture.
We feel we have a reasonable hand on the coming and going of the CEFs—but mistaken are made.
EMF has a yield of 2.2% and it has gotten beaten up by EMB over the year. The stock gain for EMF has beaten the EMB for nearly 3 months. EMB has USD emerging market bonds and EMF has equity.
You might want to get a share of EMB into EMF. The shares are 87% equity.
The PCEF was a reasonable investment when I make it a couple of times. While its a nice yield, I'm going to scale out of it now as rates are going up and reducing my position to a sub-nominal rate.
Please be careful because interest rates are rising when the fed cap comes off.
CEF Weekly Review: ING Emerging Markets High Dividend [View article]
Jannari11,
The reports for the weekly comments are usually a 2,500 to 3,500 users apiece.
The reports comments on recent weekly CEFs transaction regarding position, premium and PrcNAVSprd. The high and low regarding the CEFs are weekly offered.
If you don't like the report, please don't use it.
Either my fault or the editors fault for not getting in the full text of what I entered.
"Focus Stock(s) of the Week: Taiwan Fund (http://bit.ly/U2JdG1) is our best pick of the week. The annual dividend will likely be preceded in the month of December and be payable in January. The weekly share price was down 2.2% and the current NAV was up 1.0%. This will take the PrcNAVSprd down about 3.2% (normally good)."
Alan Young, thank for having be back!
The annual distribution level does not need a negative -$0.36. All that may be needed is a distribution level that is annual. There is no distribution level for which a -$0.36 level is mandatory.
By the end of the December month we will see if the annual distribution is available.
S&P 500 Risk Matrix Indicator: What Is The Real Equity Risk? [View article]
http://bit.ly/waHMp7--
S&P 500 Risk Matrix Indicator: What Is The Real Equity Risk? [View article]
Base on 2013 earnings it is for the S&P Index 1711.
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: BlackRock MuniAssets Fund [View article]
Maybe in was the Auction-rate cumulative preferred share which was limited to default debt and the muni terms and other issues that was to replace it.
What's your guess?
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: H&Q Health Care Investors [View article]
Highest Focus Stock for the Week:
"The yield is 7.7%. Its discount is 6.1% for an average discount of 5.9% for the 52 week period. There was a slew of selling on Wednesday (284,200) and Thursday and Friday (129,500 and 179,000, respectively). Average is 38.6%".
This should have removed.
It was the "Lowest Spread and Focus Stock for the Week:"
Sorry.
Joe
CEF Weekly Review: H&Q Health Care Investors [View article]
Since ROC is a "return on your capital" is doesn't make any sense for your IRA--for both Roth or normal IRA. You must deducted the return of capital you've receive from your holdings basis (share price less return of capital) to calculate gains.
However, in real estate the value of the depreciations (upon the net value) may not extinguished your values at time of your holdings. The value of income properties may typical goes up.
The distributions is usual above net earnings and value may be cash flow beyond the net income.
For example, the net holding of your properties was $1,000,000 on your net assets 10 years ago. So, you be depreciating it for 25 years and the 10 years that you have been holding was $600,000 on your books (20 years).
However, the $1,000,000 has been appreciation for 10 years and in reality it is worth $1,250,000. The depreciation deduction would be a great as the property value and the cash flow is net income plus more that the depreciation.
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: Equity On Top [View article]
I have scrolled the new current weekly and the week of 10/28/12 (where I haven't been participating on SeekingAlpha.)
The returns are for 11 Weekly reports. There has been 7 weeks where the returns are predictive. The weeks were negative for -0.2% and predictive for +0.9%--a net benefit of 1.1%.
Returns were somewhat predictive of potential positive return--with a twist.
I'll be reporting it in the upcoming reports.
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: Equity On Top [View article]
The negative spreads (PrcNAVSprd) is a calculation between the current “PremDisc” against the historical one (the week I'm using is one week) in comparing the positive or negative spreads between the two.
The positive PrcNAVSprd is an indication that the share price has gone up with the NAV in comparison with the two week average. This may be a negative surprise.
The negative PrcNAVSprd has gone down as share prices to NAV. This may be a positive surprise. Stocks prices have gone-up as negative sentiment as oppose to positive sentiment from the top 10 percent.
The difference is that stocks price momentum may be improving and the stock price is anticipating that the NAV may move-up. Or dividend can increase shareholders attention. Also, unreasonable NAV can cloud the picture.
We feel we have a reasonable hand on the coming and going of the CEFs—but mistaken are made.
CEF Weekly Review: Templeton Emerging Markets [View article]
EMF has a yield of 2.2% and it has gotten beaten up by EMB over the year. The stock gain for EMF has beaten the EMB for nearly 3 months. EMB has USD emerging market bonds and EMF has equity.
You might want to get a share of EMB into EMF. The shares are 87% equity.
CEF Weekly Review: Templeton Emerging Markets [View article]
The PCEF was a reasonable investment when I make it a couple of times. While its a nice yield, I'm going to scale out of it now as rates are going up and reducing my position to a sub-nominal rate.
Please be careful because interest rates are rising when the fed cap comes off.
CEF Weekly Review: Templeton Emerging Markets [View article]
I didn't buy it because of 14.2% and It seemed to be that REITs have had there share of success.
CEF Weekly Review: ING Emerging Markets High Dividend [View article]
The reports for the weekly comments are usually a 2,500 to 3,500 users apiece.
The reports comments on recent weekly CEFs transaction regarding position, premium and PrcNAVSprd. The high and low regarding the CEFs are weekly offered.
If you don't like the report, please don't use it.
We have others who find it of value.
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: New Germany Fund [View article]
The new website is coming in December/January.
Let me know if your going to be a Beta site?
Joe Eqcome
CEF Weekly Review: Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty [View article]
The Kayne Anderson price was NAV $26.44 for November 16, on XKYNX (http://yhoo.it/S60UYR).
The pricing fell from -1.4% and the NAV fell to -7.2% for a 5.8% updated.
I was using the text that was generated. Your prices may have seen higher as a % changes.
Joe
CEF Weekly Review: Cornerstone Funds Stung By Articles In WSJ, Barron's [View article]
Your last dividends payments cause the stock to goes down 4.5% YTD. That's 7.0% for the industry on average.
Good luck!
Joe
CEF Weekly Review: Taiwan Fund [View article]
"Focus Stock(s) of the Week: Taiwan Fund (http://bit.ly/U2JdG1) is our best pick of the week. The annual dividend will likely be preceded in the month of December and be payable in January. The weekly share price was down 2.2% and the current NAV was up 1.0%. This will take the PrcNAVSprd down about 3.2% (normally good)."
Alan Young, thank for having be back!
The annual distribution level does not need a negative -$0.36. All that may be needed is a distribution level that is annual. There is no distribution level for which a -$0.36 level is mandatory.
By the end of the December month we will see if the annual distribution is available.
Best,
Joe Eqcome