Seeking Alpha

John P. Reese's  Instablog

John P. Reese
Send Message
John P. Reese is considered an expert in the systematic investing strategies of legendary investors, including Peter Lynch, Ben Graham, Warren Buffett and others. He has been active in the development of fundamentally-based quantitative models since the mid-90s. His research on Seeking Alpha... More
My company: / Validea Capital Management, LLC.
My blog:
The Guru Investor Blog
My book:
The Guru Investor: How to Beat the Market Using History’s Best Investment Strategies
View John P. Reese's Instablogs on:
  • '08 Plunge Gives Individual Investors Big "Small" Advantage

    One of the many impacts of last year’s market meltdown was the huge shakeup to stocks’ style box classifications. With most stocks losing a quarter to half of their value — and some of the largest companies being decimated — definitions for “large-cap”, “mid-cap”, and “small-cap” were turned on their heads. And, writes Investment News’ Jeff Benjamin, that appears to have given smaller money managers and individual investors an advantage over big investment firms.

    Benjamin says the market plunge “had a unique impact on managers of small-cap stocks because it pushed those stocks that are generally expected to lead a market recovery beyond the range of some big fund managers. … Although smaller-company stocks have led the way in performance since the March 9 stock market low, many of those stocks are only now moving into a market capitalization range that meets the size and liquidity requirements of most large institutional money managers.”

    While some managers have revised their definitions for large-, mid-, andsmall-cap stocks in response to the shakeup, others have not. With that in mind, Ithought it would be a good time to see which small stocks my GuruStrategies are highest on right now. The eight stocks below all have market capsbetween $250 million and $750 million, and all get approval from two of my guru-based approaches:

    Market Cap Between $250m and $750m, Multi-Guru-Strategy Approval

    Disclosure: I'm long all eight of the stocks listed above.


    Sep 28 12:29 PM | Link | 1 Comment
  • How You Can Be Like Buffett

    With his humble mid-west beginnings, plainspoken wisdom and wit, and incredible wealth, it’s no wonder that Warren Buffett has become the most-watched investor in the world. But while the juxtaposition of Buffett’s fortune (Forbes estimated his net worth at $37 billion earlier this year) with his love of simple pleasures (he’s a big fan of Cherry Coke and cheeseburgers) is intriguing, the more important piece of the Buffett puzzle for investors is this: How did he do it?

    The Buffett-based Guru Strategy I use on attempts to answer that question. Based on the approach Buffett reportedly used to build his fortune, it tries to use the same conservative, stringent criteria to choose stocks that the “Oracle of Omaha” has used in evaluating businesses.

    Before we get into exactly how this strategy works, a couple notes about Buffett and my Buffett-based strategy: First, while most of my Guru Strategies are based on published writings of the gurus themselves, Buffett has not publicly disclosed his exact strategy (though he has hinted at pieces of it). My Buffett-inspired model is based on the book Buffettology, written by Mary Buffett, Warren’s ex-daughter-in-law, and David Clark, a Buffett family friend, both of whom worked closely with Buffett.

    Second, while most of my Buffett-based method centers on a company’s fundamentals, there are a few non-statistical criteria to keep in mind. For example, Buffett likes to invest in companies that have very recognizable brand names, to the point that it is difficult for competitors to take away their market share, no matter how much capital they have. One example of a current Berkshire holding that meets this criterion is Coca-Cola, whose name is engrained in the culture of America, as well as other parts of the world.

    In addition, Buffett also likes firms whose products are simple for an investor to understand — food, diapers, razors, to name a few examples.

    In the end, however, for Buffett, it comes down to the numbers — those on a company’s balance sheet and those that represent the price of its stock.

    In terms of the numbers on the balance sheet, one theme of the Buffett approach is solid results over a long period of time. He likes companies that have a lengthy history of steady earnings growth, and, in most cases, the model I base on his philosophy requires companies to have posted increasing earnings per share each year for the past ten years. There are a few exceptions to this, one of which is that a company’s EPS can be negative or be a sharp loss in the most recent year, because that could signal a good buying opportunity (if the rest of the company’s long-term earnings history is solid).

    Another part of Buffett’s conservative approach: targeting companies with manageable debt. My model calls for companies to have the ability to pay off their debt within five years, based on their current earnings. It really likes stocks that could pay off their debts in less than two years.

    Smart Management, and an Advantage

    Two qualities Buffett is known to look for in his buys are strong management and a “durable competitive advantage”. Both of those are qualitative things, but Buffett has used certain quantitative measures to get an idea of whether a firm has those qualities. Two of those measures are return on equity and return on total capital. The model I base on Buffett’s approach likes firms to have posted an average ROE of at least 15% over the past 10 years and the past three years, and an ROTC of at least 12 percent in those time frames.

    Another way Buffett examines a firm’s management is by looking at how the it spends the company’s retained earnings — that is, the earnings a company keeps rather than paying out in dividends. My Buffett-based model takes the amount a company’s earnings per share have increased in the past decade and divides it by the total amount of retained earnings over that time. The result shows how much profit the company has generated using the money it has reinvested in itself — in other words, how well management is using retained earnings to increase shareholders’ wealth.

    The Buffett method requires a firm to have generated a return of 15 percent or more on its retained earnings over the past decade.

    One more area Buffett examines: capital expenditures. He doesn’t like to invest in companies that must spend a lot of money on major facility or equipment upgrades, or that need to spend a lot of money on research and development to stay competitive. My Buffett-based model thus looks for companies that have positive free cash flows, an indication that the company is generating more cash than it is consuming.

    The Price: Is It Right?

    The criteria we’ve covered so far all are used to identify "Buffett-type" stocks. But there’s a second critical part to Buffett’s analysis: price — can he get the stock of a quality company at a good price?

    One way my Buffett-based model answers this question is by comparing a company’s initial expected yield to the long-term treasury yield. (If it’s not going to earn you more than a nice, safe T-Bill, why take the risk involved in a stock?)

    To predict where a stock will be in the future, Buffett uses not just one, but two different methods to estimate what the company’s earnings and stock’s rate of return will be 10 years from now. One method involves using the firm’s historical return on equity figures, while another uses earnings per share data. (You can find details on these methods by viewing an individual stock’s scores on the Buffett model on, or in my new book, The Guru Investor.)

    This notion of predicting what a company’s earnings will be in 10 years may seem to run counter to Buffett’s nonspeculative ways. But while using these methods to predict a company’s earnings for the next 10 years in her book, Mary Buffett notes: “In most situations this would be an act of insanity. However, as Warren has found, if the company is one of sufficient earning power and earns high rates of return on shareholders’ equity, created by some kind of consumer monopoly, chances are good that accurate long-term projections of earnings can be made.”

    A Strong Rebounder

    My Buffett-based 10-stock portfolio is well ahead of the S&P 500 since its December 2003 inception. Where the model has really excelled, however, is coming out of downturns. In 2004, as we were emerging from the lengthy recession associated with the tech stock bust, the Buffett portfolio surged 37.3%, more than quadrupling the S&P’s 9% gain. In addition, after struggling in 2007 and 2008 amid the latest recession and bear market, the portfolio has bounced back strong this year as things have begun to turn around. The portfolio is up 16.8% in 2009 — including 30.7% in the past three months — while the S&P is up 0.4% for the year. It’s no surprise given Buffett’s penchant for pouncing on good, beaten down stocks, which usually abound during tough times as investors let fear get the best of them. (One of Buffett’s mantras is that investors “should try to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful.”)

    These stocks are not the kind of sexy, flavor-of-the-month picks that catch most investors’ eyes; instead, they are proven businesses selling at good prices. That approach, combined with a long-term perspective, tremendous discipline, and an ability to keep emotions at bay, is how Buffett has become the world’s greatest investor. Whatever the size of your portfolio, those qualities are worth emulating.

    The Picks

    So what good buys is my Buffett model seeing now? Here’s a handful of its favorites:

    China Mobil Ltd. (NYSE:CHL): Chinese cellular giant has increased EPS in each year of the past decade, has enough annual earnings to pay off all its debt in a little over a month, and has an average 10-year return on equity of 23.1%.

    Garmin Ltd. (NASDAQ:GRMN): GPS specialist has upped earnings in eight of the past ten years, has no long-term debt, and has generated a 26.3% average annual return on retained earnings in the past ten years.

    ITT Educational Services (NYSE:ESI): Tech-focused private college program has averaged a whopping 39.5% return on equity over the past ten years. It also has increased EPS in every year of the past decade, and has debt of $150 million compared to annual earnings of $221.5 million.

    Imperial Oil Limited (NYSEMKT:IMO): Canadian energy firm has upped EPS in nine of the past ten years, with the last dip coming eight years ago. Its annual earnings ($3.1 billion) dwarf its debt ($30.6 million), and it has generated a 28.4% average annual return on total capital over the past decade.

    Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST): Industrial fastener specialist has no long-term debt, has increased EPS in nine of the past ten years (with the most recent dip eight years ago), and has generated average annual returns on equity and total capital of 20.1% over the past decade.

    At the time of publication, John Reese was long on CHL, GRMN, ESI, IMO, and FAST.

    May 29 12:44 PM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.