The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
You are currently following Julian Ivan-Alexander
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following Julian Ivan-Alexander
-
75
)
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedIs Apple's Stock Headed for a Reversal? [View article]
RSI had also dipped concurrent with this pullback from that dash to $208 to levels from which it also usually stages a strong rebound.
Lo and behold, when the stock Wednesay broke through the 20-DMA it then went on to tag the uptrend just about $190, and bounce hard to close at $196.35.
This potentially clears the decks for the stock to now attract new money after all the profit takind drovw the stock down almost $20 from its high post-earnings, as the inevitablity of an absolutely blow-out quarter of mind-bending magnitude sinks in to even the most skeptical investor.
Sure if the market tanks, AAPL will pull back, but with the comnpany increasing manufacturing orders for iPhones by 20% only a week or two ago, there's no reason to doubt that this company is totally recession proof any more. Its performace over the last year is testament to that.
And then there's that China launch, which wil add several million sales this quarter.
And the impending reporting of earnings without the deferred revenue/subscription accounting method under-reporting true EPS by 30-40% every quarter, which I think will be first introduced in Q2 10, with guidance for Q2 given during the Q1 report in January given by the company using this new approach. Q1 earnings don't need boosting by changing accounting methodology, but considering AAPL always gets hammered by appaling and consistently 20-30% low guidance for Q2 off the back of the usual blowhards and bears, by changning accounting to a non-subscrition-based method for Q2, they will be able to "beat 'em and raise 'em" through the roof.
This January could see the opposite of the usual AAPL trade - an incredible eye-watering rally - if the company chooses to use the folloowing Q2 as its changeover quarter for its accounting methodology. The guidance for Q2 would be simply staggering.
So yes, you could have a point and caution is merited, but an analysis of AAPL's TA actually presents a case to be bullish, not bearish, *providing the broader market doesn't pull back sharply as so many expect*.
If you're bullish on the market, you should be in AAPL up to your neck.
If you're worried the market has topped, get out, now. In fact you should have gotten out when it spiked over $200. This is a market call, nothing to do with AAPL. Lets keep that in mind when analysing a stock shall we?
Google Should Make Apple Beg for Maps Navigation [View article]
Acquisitions don't happen out of the blue, especially for a company like Apple, so this move, and Apple's reassuring forsight to stay ahead of the game by outflanking Google with its own purchase of a mapping solution, shows just how forward thinking Apple's management is.
Screw Google - Apple doesn't need them.
Why Apple Is Worth $80 [View article]
I'm laughing myself all the way to the bank. Sorry fellow-contributor, I know I shouldn't be rude, but you deserve a slap round the face for publishing such tripe on a site like this. If I was SeekingAlpha I'd be embarassed to see in published under my banner.
Apple May Find Itself at Risk in Legacy Core Business [View article]
The Case for Shorting Apple [View article]
Should Apple Spin Off Its App Store? [View article]
Why SHOULD Apple spin off the App Store? Its one of the most compelling reasons for buying and sticking with the iPhone and its successors. Its a unique selling point. It makes the iPhone the most compelling device to write software for. It singlehandledly slays all other competitors.
Sure, go write ahead (pun intended).. knock yourself out. Can't wait for the next piece of insightful AAPL analysis.
Bye Bye Apple [View article]
Apple: Great Products = Great Investment? [View article]
There is a lack of visibility in this article about taking cues from a company's past behaviour to predict its future. Apple innovates. Its in its DNA. The iPod? Written off as a failure. The Apple Stores? Written off as a retail "lights will be out in two years failure." The iPhone? Written off as an overpriced toy which would only ever enjoy a niche product status. The iTunes store? Oh "it doesn't make a profit so what's the point." The App Store? "Oh it'll never be a big deal - discount it, its meaningless."
The cost of a share of AAPL right now? $137
The value of innovation? Priceless
The price to Apple of its relentless refusal to please writers and analysts by giving them what they think their readers want instead of what their customers really want? Boneheaded analysis and a share price 50% too low.
If You Think Steve Jobs' Health Is Not a Material Event... [View article]
No. Its a sign of media obsession and writers whoring for hits.
Apple: Is the iPhone OS Upgrade Too Good? [View article]
And the same goes for the rest of the world.
Here's a really scary thought though: what happens when journalists type before they think? Oops.
Apple Sours: Analysts Doubtful of iPhone's Prospects [View article]
Naysay naysay naysay. Weren't Apple Stores due to "shut off all the lights after 2 years," and the "iPod be an overpriced flop" when they were launched? Analysts: Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Morons.
Palm Pre vs. iPhone: The Gmail Advantage [View article]
New iPhone 'Evolutionary', Not 'Revolutionary' - RBC [View article]
New Microsoft Ad Targets High Cost of Macs [View article]
But unlike the scenario above what if feature for feature, the BWM and the Skoda were the same price once you've chosen the optional extras?
That's the real argument here. This price comparison is as daft as the Mghz myth wars of the Pentium 4 versus G5 PowerPC.
Apple: Eight iPhone Annoyances [View article]