<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Living4Dividends' Instablog</title>
    <description>Living4Dividends is an individual investor.
</description>
    <author>
      <name>Living4Dividends</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>the average allocation between cash, bonds and stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/36343-the-average-allocation-between-cash-bonds-and-stocks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36343</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Richard Shaw's research based on Federal Reserve data shows that average allocation between cash, bonds and stocks is:<br><br>1945-Present:&nbsp; 10% cash, 40% bonds 50% stocks. (approximately)<br>Past Decade:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 9% cash, 28% bonds, 64% stocks. <br>Present:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 10% cash, 38% bonds, 52% stocks.<br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:51:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Richard Shaw's research based on Federal Reserve data shows that average allocation between cash, bonds and stocks is:<br><br>1945-Present:&nbsp; 10% cash, 40% bonds 50% stocks. (approximately)<br>Past Decade:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 9% cash, 28% bonds, 64% stocks. <br>Present:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 10% cash, 38% bonds, 52% stocks.<br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buffett: Deal with deficit after U.S. economy recovers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/35960-buffett-deal-with-deficit-after-u-s-economy-recovers?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35960</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Buffett: Deal with deficit after U.S. economy recovers<ul><li>By Hibah Yousuf, CNNMoney.com staff reporter</li><li>On 9:10 pm EST, Friday November 13, 2009</li></ul>                              <div><ul><ul><li>        Buzz up! <span>7</span></li><li><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Buffett-Deal-with-deficit-cnnm-3563680643.html/print?x=0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Print</a></li></ul></ul></div>                                                                         <p>Billionaire Warren Buffett offered some advice to Uncle Sam on Friday: Time it right, but tackle the nation's enormous federal deficit.</p>                                                                                                           <div>&nbsp;</div>                          <p>In an interview with Charlie Rose, Buffett said if the United States keeps flooding the world with its debt, countries will eventually notice that U.S. fiscal policies are &quot;out of control&quot; and become &quot;less and less and less enthused&quot; about lending to it.</p><p>But the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway added that though the United States will want to act &quot;fairly soon&quot; to cut the <a href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AoT7lF.kXWm8CwKzupSC8n7lba9_;_ylu=X3oDMTExcTIxdTlyBHBvcwMxBHNlYwNuZXdzQXJ0Qm9keQRzbGsDZGVmaWNpdA--/SIG=12cj6log9/**http%3A//money.cnn.com/2009/10/16/news/economy/treasury_deficit/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">deficit</a>, it has to wait until the economy comes back.</p><p>&quot;We want to put out the fire,&quot; he said. &quot;Then we want to quit squirting water on those buildings. We have to know when the fire's out.&quot;</p><p>And how will we know?</p><p>&quot;Well, it will be retail sales. It'll be automobile sales. It'll be when home construction starts coming back,&quot; Buffett said, adding that the signs might not be recognized until three or four months after the fact. Still, it could happen in the next two years.</p><p>Jobs</p><p>Buffett said that while unemployment might stabilize later, it will also come down to a normal rate.</p><p>&quot;We'll create new jobs,&quot; has assured Rose, explaining that the United States has created millions of jobs since the unemployment rate was last above 10% in the 1980s and it will do the same this time around.</p><p>&quot;Who would have thought that when Paul Allen and Bill Gates were down there in Albuquerque eating pizza and drinking coke at two in the morning, that they were a big part of our future?&quot; Buffett asked. &quot;The American economy will come back. And it won't be tomorrow, and it won't be exactly the same, but in the end, we have not changed the American people and their capacity to innovate or their excitement about becoming more prosperous and coming up with new ideas.&quot;</p><p>And as far as China beating and growing faster than the United States? Buffett said while China's population is four times larger and will thus grow faster, its economy is still much smaller overall.</p><p>&quot;I'll meet some guy on the street today whose net worth will be growing faster than mine on a percentage basis. But if I start with a big enough number, it'll be a while before he catches me,&quot; Buffett said, adding that it's a &quot;long way off&quot; for China's economy to be larger per capita than that of the U.S.</p><p>'I want to make it painful for them'</p><p>While Buffett said Washington came together to respond to the financial meltdown &quot;like they should&quot; have, the government should have been more aggressive in dealing with bank executives at too-big-to-fail institutions that needed government intervention.</p><p>&quot;If you run a financial institution that, in effect, can bring down the system unless the government steps in, I think something very bad should happen to you,&quot; Buffett said. &quot;I want to make it painful for them.&quot;</p><p>Buffett said while he's &quot;not for shooting them,&quot; the executives should not be able to walk away with even 10% of their previous net worth and the directors who hired them should also be punished.</p><br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:33:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Buffett: Deal with deficit after U.S. economy recovers<ul><li>By Hibah Yousuf, CNNMoney.com staff reporter</li><li>On 9:10 pm EST, Friday November 13, 2009</li></ul>                              <div><ul><ul><li>        Buzz up! <span>7</span></li><li><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Buffett-Deal-with-deficit-cnnm-3563680643.html/print?x=0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Print</a></li></ul></ul></div>                                                                         <p>Billionaire Warren Buffett offered some advice to Uncle Sam on Friday: Time it right, but tackle the nation's enormous federal deficit.</p>                                                                                                           <div>&nbsp;</div>                          <p>In an interview with Charlie Rose, Buffett said if the United States keeps flooding the world with its debt, countries will eventually notice that U.S. fiscal policies are &quot;out of control&quot; and become &quot;less and less and less enthused&quot; about lending to it.</p><p>But the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway added that though the United States will want to act &quot;fairly soon&quot; to cut the <a href="http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AoT7lF.kXWm8CwKzupSC8n7lba9_;_ylu=X3oDMTExcTIxdTlyBHBvcwMxBHNlYwNuZXdzQXJ0Qm9keQRzbGsDZGVmaWNpdA--/SIG=12cj6log9/**http%3A//money.cnn.com/2009/10/16/news/economy/treasury_deficit/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">deficit</a>, it has to wait until the economy comes back.</p><p>&quot;We want to put out the fire,&quot; he said. &quot;Then we want to quit squirting water on those buildings. We have to know when the fire's out.&quot;</p><p>And how will we know?</p><p>&quot;Well, it will be retail sales. It'll be automobile sales. It'll be when home construction starts coming back,&quot; Buffett said, adding that the signs might not be recognized until three or four months after the fact. Still, it could happen in the next two years.</p><p>Jobs</p><p>Buffett said that while unemployment might stabilize later, it will also come down to a normal rate.</p><p>&quot;We'll create new jobs,&quot; has assured Rose, explaining that the United States has created millions of jobs since the unemployment rate was last above 10% in the 1980s and it will do the same this time around.</p><p>&quot;Who would have thought that when Paul Allen and Bill Gates were down there in Albuquerque eating pizza and drinking coke at two in the morning, that they were a big part of our future?&quot; Buffett asked. &quot;The American economy will come back. And it won't be tomorrow, and it won't be exactly the same, but in the end, we have not changed the American people and their capacity to innovate or their excitement about becoming more prosperous and coming up with new ideas.&quot;</p><p>And as far as China beating and growing faster than the United States? Buffett said while China's population is four times larger and will thus grow faster, its economy is still much smaller overall.</p><p>&quot;I'll meet some guy on the street today whose net worth will be growing faster than mine on a percentage basis. But if I start with a big enough number, it'll be a while before he catches me,&quot; Buffett said, adding that it's a &quot;long way off&quot; for China's economy to be larger per capita than that of the U.S.</p><p>'I want to make it painful for them'</p><p>While Buffett said Washington came together to respond to the financial meltdown &quot;like they should&quot; have, the government should have been more aggressive in dealing with bank executives at too-big-to-fail institutions that needed government intervention.</p><p>&quot;If you run a financial institution that, in effect, can bring down the system unless the government steps in, I think something very bad should happen to you,&quot; Buffett said. &quot;I want to make it painful for them.&quot;</p><p>Buffett said while he's &quot;not for shooting them,&quot; the executives should not be able to walk away with even 10% of their previous net worth and the directors who hired them should also be punished.</p><br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed's Massive Secret Wall Street Bailout Still Going Strong</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/33680-fed-s-massive-secret-wall-street-bailout-still-going-strong?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33680</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>Fed's Massive Secret Wall Street Bailout Still Going Strong Posted Oct 30, 2009 08:53am EDT by  Henry Blodget in<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Investing" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Investing</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Banking" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Banking</a><div>Related: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5Edji" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^dji</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5Egspc" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^gspc</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=dia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">dia</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=spy" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">spy</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=qqqq" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">qqqq</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=xlf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">xlf</a></div></div><div><div><p>Remember last fall, when our government explained that the reason we needed to give $800 billion to Wall Street was so the banks could lend it back to us and shock the economy back to life again?</p><p>That was a happy story!</p><p>And we fell for it.</p><p>What happened, of course, was that the banks took the money, stopped lending, and used it to pay themselves and their shareholders through the nose.</p><p>Twelve months later, the banks still aren't lending, and we're still bailing them out hand over fist.</p><p>By lending the banks money at zero interest rates, the FT's Martin Wolf says, the Fed is helping the banks recapitalize themselves.&nbsp; The banks aren't lending because they're still trying to recover from all the lousy loans they made three years ago (and because there aren't all that many folks to lend to).&nbsp; So there's nothing else to do with the money other than hoard it, buy safe Treasuries, and pay huge bonuses.</p><p>It's annoying to watch banks that would have collapsed a year ago now minting money at taxpayer expense.&nbsp; But that's the way monetary stimulus always works.</p><p>Wolf, however, believes the public's outrage over the bailout and bonuses will drive Congress to pass some kind of financial reform.&nbsp; And, in an ideal world, he'd also like to see a windfall tax levied against bank bonus pools, which he says serves &quot;no economic purpose.&quot;</p><p>The important questions for the economy and market now, says Wolf,&nbsp; are whether the Fed will remove the stimulus in time to stave off inflation, and it does, whether the removal will hobble the economy.</p></div></div><br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:50:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>Fed's Massive Secret Wall Street Bailout Still Going Strong Posted Oct 30, 2009 08:53am EDT by  Henry Blodget in<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Investing" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Investing</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Banking" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Banking</a><div>Related: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5Edji" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^dji</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5Egspc" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^gspc</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=dia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">dia</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=spy" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">spy</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=qqqq" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">qqqq</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=xlf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">xlf</a></div></div><div><div><p>Remember last fall, when our government explained that the reason we needed to give $800 billion to Wall Street was so the banks could lend it back to us and shock the economy back to life again?</p><p>That was a happy story!</p><p>And we fell for it.</p><p>What happened, of course, was that the banks took the money, stopped lending, and used it to pay themselves and their shareholders through the nose.</p><p>Twelve months later, the banks still aren't lending, and we're still bailing them out hand over fist.</p><p>By lending the banks money at zero interest rates, the FT's Martin Wolf says, the Fed is helping the banks recapitalize themselves.&nbsp; The banks aren't lending because they're still trying to recover from all the lousy loans they made three years ago (and because there aren't all that many folks to lend to).&nbsp; So there's nothing else to do with the money other than hoard it, buy safe Treasuries, and pay huge bonuses.</p><p>It's annoying to watch banks that would have collapsed a year ago now minting money at taxpayer expense.&nbsp; But that's the way monetary stimulus always works.</p><p>Wolf, however, believes the public's outrage over the bailout and bonuses will drive Congress to pass some kind of financial reform.&nbsp; And, in an ideal world, he'd also like to see a windfall tax levied against bank bonus pools, which he says serves &quot;no economic purpose.&quot;</p><p>The important questions for the economy and market now, says Wolf,&nbsp; are whether the Fed will remove the stimulus in time to stave off inflation, and it does, whether the removal will hobble the economy.</p></div></div><br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dollar Isn't Doomed, FT's Martin Wolf Says: "Big Shock Upwards" Coming! Posted Oct 30, 2009 07:30am EDT by Aaron Task</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/33678-the-dollar-isn-t-doomed-ft-s-martin-wolf-says-big-shock-upwards-coming-posted-oct-30-2009-07-30am-edt-by-aaron-task?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33678</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>The Dollar Isn't Doomed, FT's Martin Wolf Says: &quot;Big Shock Upwards&quot; Coming! Posted Oct 30, 2009 07:30am EDT by  <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/author/Aaron-Task" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Aaron Task</a> in<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Newsmakers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Newsmakers</a><div>Related: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UDN" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">UDN</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UUP" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">UUP</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TBT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">TBT</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TLT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">TLT</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GLD" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">GLD</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EDJI" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^DJI</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EGSPC" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^GSPC</a></div></div><div><div>The dollar resumed its downward path Thursday, lending credence to the idea any rally in the greenback is doomed to be short-lived. Many believe the dollar is going to lose its reserve status and more extreme observers like Mark Faber say it's on <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/faber-dollar-will-eventually-go-to-value-of-zero/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">an inevitable path to zero</a>.<p><i>Hogwash,</i> says <a href="http://www.ft.com/comment/columnists/martinwolf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Martin Wolf</a>, chief economics commentator at The Financial Times. In fact, Wolf believes there could be a &quot;big shock upwards&quot; for the dollar in the next six months as the Fed takes concrete steps toward tightening (or actually does raise rates.) That, in turn, would prompt an unwind of the dollar carry trade and cause major upheaval in so-called risk assets currently being purchased with borrowed dollars, i.e. stocks, commodities and high-yield bonds.</p><p>This view stems from a belief that Fed policy and interest rate differentials are the main drivers of the dollar strength or weakness, not deficits and government spending.</p><p>As for the mega-bearish views on the dollar's &quot;inevitable&quot; decline, Wolf makes the following observations:</p><ul><li><b>The dollar isn't going into terminal decline</b> because America isn't Zimbabwe or Weimar Germany, Wolf says, adding: &quot;This is not a country with stupendous debt.&quot; (That's heresy to the dollar doomsayers but America's debt-to-GDP is <i>not</i> as high as that of many other industrialized nations, much less Zimbabwe or the like.)</li><li><b>The dollar won't lose its reserve status</b> because there needs to be a viable alternative, Wolf says. Right now, only the euro provides legitimate competition to the dollar and will likely gain a higher share of international reserves over time vs. the current 65% dollars and 25% euros. But the Eurozone has its own problems, he notes, most notably high deficits and debts. (<i>Just like America!</i>)</li></ul><p>&quot;Remember what happened in the crisis [of 2008] -- people bought dollars,&quot; Wolf recalls. &quot;There is no better indication than that of the market's belief [the dollar] is the safe haven, and that hasn't changed.&quot;</p></div></div><br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:25:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>The Dollar Isn't Doomed, FT's Martin Wolf Says: &quot;Big Shock Upwards&quot; Coming! Posted Oct 30, 2009 07:30am EDT by  <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/author/Aaron-Task" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Aaron Task</a> in<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/Newsmakers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Newsmakers</a><div>Related: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UDN" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">UDN</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UUP" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">UUP</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TBT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">TBT</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TLT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">TLT</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GLD" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">GLD</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EDJI" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^DJI</a>, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EGSPC" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">^GSPC</a></div></div><div><div>The dollar resumed its downward path Thursday, lending credence to the idea any rally in the greenback is doomed to be short-lived. Many believe the dollar is going to lose its reserve status and more extreme observers like Mark Faber say it's on <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/10/faber-dollar-will-eventually-go-to-value-of-zero/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">an inevitable path to zero</a>.<p><i>Hogwash,</i> says <a href="http://www.ft.com/comment/columnists/martinwolf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Martin Wolf</a>, chief economics commentator at The Financial Times. In fact, Wolf believes there could be a &quot;big shock upwards&quot; for the dollar in the next six months as the Fed takes concrete steps toward tightening (or actually does raise rates.) That, in turn, would prompt an unwind of the dollar carry trade and cause major upheaval in so-called risk assets currently being purchased with borrowed dollars, i.e. stocks, commodities and high-yield bonds.</p><p>This view stems from a belief that Fed policy and interest rate differentials are the main drivers of the dollar strength or weakness, not deficits and government spending.</p><p>As for the mega-bearish views on the dollar's &quot;inevitable&quot; decline, Wolf makes the following observations:</p><ul><li><b>The dollar isn't going into terminal decline</b> because America isn't Zimbabwe or Weimar Germany, Wolf says, adding: &quot;This is not a country with stupendous debt.&quot; (That's heresy to the dollar doomsayers but America's debt-to-GDP is <i>not</i> as high as that of many other industrialized nations, much less Zimbabwe or the like.)</li><li><b>The dollar won't lose its reserve status</b> because there needs to be a viable alternative, Wolf says. Right now, only the euro provides legitimate competition to the dollar and will likely gain a higher share of international reserves over time vs. the current 65% dollars and 25% euros. But the Eurozone has its own problems, he notes, most notably high deficits and debts. (<i>Just like America!</i>)</li></ul><p>&quot;Remember what happened in the crisis [of 2008] -- people bought dollars,&quot; Wolf recalls. &quot;There is no better indication than that of the market's belief [the dollar] is the safe haven, and that hasn't changed.&quot;</p></div></div><br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mr. Market Miscalculates</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/33380-mr-market-miscalculates?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33380</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>James Grant's 'Mr. Market Miscalculates' Is Nothing Short of a Deep Value Investment   <div><span>                by: Miguel Barbosa            </span>     <span>October 13, 2009</span> </div></div><br>I am happy to report back after reading<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mr-Market-Miscalculates-Bubble-Beyond/dp/1604190086/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1255371873&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> Mr. Market Miscalculates</a> by James Grant. Our friend Glenda provided us with a copy to review. We are delighted with the book - so much so- that we venture to call this book a deep value investment. You pay a small sum and receive a priceless collection of essays.   <p>Overall the book is a pleasure to read. Grant, a master wordsmith and investment theorist, manages to educate, preach, and entertain. Unlike most newsletters which are immediately discarded, Grant&rsquo;s essays stand the test of time. To think that you could have read Grant&rsquo;s essays and avoided the subprime crisis, Fannie Mae (FNM), and other financial mishaps is reason alone for reading this book.</p> <p>Rather than present you with my opinion, I have included a collection of quotes from the book. I&rsquo;m confident that once you read Grant's words you will rush to purchase this masterpiece.</p>  <p><span>Here are our favorite quotes (and notes) from the book. All material is cited from &quot;Mr. Market Miscalculates&quot; authored by James Grant. Any mistakes are my own responsibility. </span></p> <p><span><strong>I.  Topics &amp; Relevant Quotes</strong></span></p> <p><strong><span>Grant&rsquo;s Prediction</span></strong><span><span> </span>(P 352)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;My bet is that, come the next bear market in credit, correlations will prove to be shockingly high across the full spectrum of debt instruments. It will turn out that everything was correlated to credit itself &ndash; on the ability to borrow on terms over which posterity will shake its head muttering, what were they thinking&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Booms &amp; Busts </span></strong><span>(P 75)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Aberrations &hellip;.must eventually pass the test of supply and demand&rdquo; &ldquo;New eras are cut short by the financial behavior they reward and condition&rdquo;<span> </span></span></p> <p><strong><span>Mindset of Fellow Bears</span></strong><span> (P 77)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;..Bears believe markets are cyclically inexact, and prone to exaggeration at both extremes&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Alan Greenspan &amp; Deficits</span></strong><span> (P 88)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Greenspan never understood the problem. This defect does not mean he will never hit on the solution. What it does suggest, however, is that he will come to it belatedly and likely for the wrong reasons&rdquo;.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Bonds vs. Real Estate<span> </span></span></strong><span>(P 95)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Which would you prefer? Bonds have no windows to wash, walls to paint, carpets to vacuum, tenants to litigate with or governments to pay property taxes to. On the other hand, the building wouldn&rsquo;t be subject to early call if interest rates fell. Then again each stream of income &ndash; rentals and coupon payments- is denominated in dollars of which the world is very long. And if interest rates and/ or the inflation rate were to climb? Depending on the timing of lease expirations the building's new management could raise rents. Bondholders could reinvest coupon income at higher and higher yields and&hellip;.receive 100 cents on dollar at maturity&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>But&hellip;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Neither building nor bonds provide the margin of safety that value seeking investors demand&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>Inflation and Deflation</span></strong><span> (P 107, 108 109, 302)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What inflation is not we believe, is &ldquo;too many dollars chasing too few goods.&rdquo; Pure and simple, it is &ldquo;too many dollars&rdquo; What the redundant dollars chase is unpredictable&hellip;..On Wall St, such inflationary episodes take the name &ldquo;bull markets&rdquo;. They are always welcome.</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Deflation is not quite the opposite of inflation. We would define deflation as too few dollars chasing too much debt&rdquo; &ldquo;But the world is doing itself no favors by so narrowly defining inflation &amp; by so carelessly crying deflation&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;In relation to income, the stock of debt has been rising for decades,. If the price level reversed course and declined uncounted net debtors would struggle to stay solvent. Falling prices, even if they were not caused by a credit event, could easily provoke one. &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Let the world&rsquo;s central bank define inflation as &ldquo;core CPI&rdquo; no food, no energy, no house prices &ndash; and that arbitrary inflation measure will inevitably lose some of its economic significance. As a central bank is congratulating itself on a brilliant job of inflation containment, house prices go through the roof&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><strong><span>Interest Rates &amp; Real Estate</span></strong><span> (P 110, P 111, P124)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Rising interest rates must sooner or later cause the marginal third home owner to become a two home, or one-home or even a no-home owner. One would spouse that a similar chair reaction is going to take place in other highly leveraged sectors of the U.S. Economy&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The advent of futures and options, of swaps and securitizations has facilitated American borrowing and lined the consumer pockets with several hundred billion dollars over the past few years, particularly with the turning of unsecured credit card debt into asset backed security agreements&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;For ourselves we fault the Fed not so much for resisting the so-called deflationary forces of 2002-2004 as for failing to anticipate that its reflationary acts would have wide ranging consequences, not all of them pleasant.<span> </span>Even today, our monetary masters appear blinkered to the unintended second, third, and Nth order effects of the plunging funds rate&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>The Housing Market </span></strong><span>(P 131, 139)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Insofar as high trading volume characterizes a speculative market, the American house market maybe described as a speculative. If so, it&rsquo;s a thin reed on which to support a bullish GDP forecast&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Those heavily leveraged homeowners, would in car lingo, be upside down, if house prices pulled back by 10%. That is they would owe more on their asset than the asset is worth in the market.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;To draw a bead on US real estate activity,&hellip;.take price times volume: Multiply the number of home sales by the average home price. Now divided that value by the GDP. The answer expresses the intensity of house fever&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What set of national causes could instigate a coast-to-coast bear house market today? We submit three: wild and wooly mortgage finance; the propensity of market-determined prices to revert to the mean, and the tendency of flyaway real estate markets to become the drivers of economic expansion rather than the mere beneficiaries of growth derived from other sources.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>CDOs</span></strong><span> (P 193, 195)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;CDO alchemy is also very much like the kind employed in conventional asset backed securities. In a CDO, as in an ABS mortgage scientists and rating agencies perform a miracle of distillation.&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;We say this as nonbelievers in the magic by which a collection of subprime assets can be reconstituted into triple and double A rated liabilities&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Glass-Stegall </span></strong><span>(P 200)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The history of Glass-Stegall teaches many lessons, one of which is that the law of the land is cyclically variable; there is one set of rules for bull markets, another for bear markets&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>The Fed &amp; Greenspan</span></strong><span> (P 242, ,255, 269, 282, 293, 301, 302)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;And now this one man says that he didn&rsquo;t know about the stock market bubble, couldn&rsquo;t&rsquo; have known and , even if he had known, wouldn&rsquo;t have been able to make a move against it. It isn&rsquo;t exactly a great advertisement for a monetary dictatorship.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Only one of the troubles with bubbles is that, after they pop, ultra low interest rates and extraordinary rates of credit expansion lose their stimulative potency.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;..Now the very people who erred in the 90&rsquo;s are prescribing for the 00&rsquo;s. The notions being prescribed are exactly the ones you would not have expected. It&rsquo;s the shock of the down cycle that Greenspan&hellip;is weighing a de facto nationalization of the Treasury yield curve&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It wasn&rsquo;t everyday low prices they feared, but the financial consequences of falling prices in a heavily leveraged economy&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The soundness of a central bank varies invesrsely with the breadth of its mandate. The more it&rsquo;s expected to do , the longer the odds against its success. The Fed&hellip;is expected to deliver the earth (price stability), the moon (full employment) and the sky (a solvent financial system). &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The central banks believe they can control future events. We say that events control the central banks&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;As inflation targeting is inherently forward looking, this means that dozens of central banks have gotten themselves into the stargazing business&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s not that Greenspan can&rsquo;t hit the target&hellip;the problem is that they don&rsquo;t hit the new target that pops up unannounced outside their field of macroeconomic vision.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>LBOs &amp; Private Equity </span></strong><span>(P 339, 340)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The private equity business owes its prosperity to a persistent mispricing of debt&hellip;.cheap debt is the sine quanon of today&rsquo;s deliciously rich, fee resplendent deals.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;If forgiveness is a virtue, the debt markets are going to heaven&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>II. My Favorite Quotes From Mr. Market Miscalculates: </span></strong></p> <p><span>(P<span> </span>96, 208, 210, 216, 223, 229, 259, 265, 304, 307, 309, 316, 348)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Rare is the individual who can imagine a different set of circumstances that those that surround him. Rare still is the organization that can imagine them. &ldquo; </span></p> <p><span><span> </span>&ldquo;As a rule, investors see what they want to see&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It wasn&rsquo;t the lack of rules and regulations that raised the depravity index in American finance. It was the conditioned belief in a new era&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The impetus to reform is only latent in bull markets; it&rsquo;s during bear markets that the rules are changed&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s an investor&rsquo;s bounden duty to take the world as it is, not as it should be or could be. In the world in which we live, the politicians are gaining on the capitalists&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Trusting in American markets &amp; American standards of disclosure &amp; accounting, foreigners have willingly exchanged their merchandise for our securities&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;&hellip;here we encounter the difference between physics and economics. Both use quantitative methods to build predictive models, but physics deals with matter; economics confronts human beings&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The more dependably the Fed fends off disaster the bolder and more leveraged investors become. The bolder investors become, the higher the markets go. And the higher the prices the greater the leverage, the more likely does a financial accident become. &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Mistakes are what come from getting out of bed in the morning&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It would take a nation of saints to resist exploiting the privileges accorded to the owner of the reserve currency franchise. Imagine If this priceless gift were one day settled, out f the blue, on an unsuspecting country.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;To be long gold is, in a grand thematic way, to be short the socialization of risk&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The elixir called liquidity is the most powerful bankruptcy deferral force of all&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;In financial markets the more people write hurricane insurance , the more likely it is that the disaster will happen because the people who know you have sold the insurance can make it happen&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span><strong>III. Most Insightful Stories &amp; Examples From Mr. Market Miscalculates </strong></span></p><p><span>1st Example: The Great Plains 1886 real estate market (P146-154): </span></p>  <p><span>In this market people pushed up western land prices to highs that in real terms, haven&rsquo;t been seen since.<span> </span>Conflicts of the 1880s were similar to those in the 2000s &ndash; Grant says,</span></p> <p><span><span>a.<span> </span></span></span><span>In the 1880&rsquo;s &ldquo;principals in this case the savers wanted safety (and yield), agents in this case lenders wanted commissions. &ldquo; Not for the first or last time in financial history did the agents fared better than principals.<span> </span></span></p> <p><span><span>b.<span> </span></span></span><span>&ldquo;frontier due diligence was no better<span> </span>in 1880&rsquo;s than 120 years later.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span><span>c.<span> </span></span></span><span>Moral of the story, &ldquo; in order to create a really big asset-price bubble, a central bank is neither necessary nor sufficient. A critical mass of human beings is all that&rsquo;s required&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span><span>        </span>2<sup>nd</sup> Example: Private Investor Fournier Buy Protection (P 176)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What I have done&hellip;is put together a portfolio of this stuff (credit protection on tranches of<span> </span>mortgate backed structures) I have 750million of this stuff shorted. My Cost is 1.9% (or 14.25 million a year). My return could be 750million. As risks and rewards go we judge not bad&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>3<sup>rd</sup> Example: Fine Art of Security Analysis (P 389) Suggestions on how to tweak the Graham criteria by Peter Walmsley.</span></p> <p><span><span>1.<span> </span></span></span><span>Quality Of Earnings Test &ndash; Calculate variance between normalized earnings &amp; plain old gaap earnings. Go back every quarter for 10 years. Compare eps on the income statement to eps from continuing operations&rdquo; Variance of more than 15% is a red flag&hellip;this weeds out companies using nonrecurring charges for every quarter.</span></p> <p><span><span>2.<span> </span></span></span><span>Substitute the debt to equity for debt to working capital. ..this unmasks companies using big bath accounting to depress book equity to inflate roe</span></p> <p><span>4<sup>th</sup> Example: The Bank of Graham &amp; Dodd &ndash; Conservative Banker Karl Hill Of Monroe County Bank in Georgia</span></p> <p><span><span> </span>*Wonderful story of a successful, smart, and conservative banker. </span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span><strong>IV. Additional Reading Recommendations found in Mr. Market Miscalculates</strong></span></p> <p><span><span>1.<span> </span></span></span><span>Wall Street Under Oath: The story of our modern money changers &ndash; By Ferdinand Pecora</span></p> <p><span><span>2.<span> </span></span></span><span>Fiasco; The inside story of a wall street trader</span></p> <p><span><span>3.<span> </span></span></span><span>BIS paper by Claudio Borio &amp; Philip Lowe</span></p> <p><span><span>4.<span> </span></span></span><span>Banking &amp; The Business Cycle By CA Philips, TF McManus And RW Nelson</span></p> <p><span><span>5.<span> </span></span></span><span><span> </span>&ldquo;Crisis &amp; Cycles&rdquo; By Wilhelm Ropke</span></p> <p><span><span>6.<span> </span></span></span><span>A History of the Federal Reserve By Allan H Meltzer </span></p> <p><span><span>7.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Fed By Martin Mayer</span></p> <p><span><span>8.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Road To Delphi By Michael Woods</span></p> <p><span><span>9.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Anatomy of an International Monetary Regime By Giulio M Gallarotti</span></p> <p><span><span>10.<span> </span></span></span><span>That which is seen &amp; That which is not seen By Frederic Bastiat</span></p> <p><span><span>11.<span> </span></span></span><span>Ubiquity By Mark Buchanan </span></p> <p><span><span>12.<span> </span></span></span><span>A demon of our own design: markets, hedge funds, and the perils of financial innovation by Richard Bookstaber</span></p> <p><span><span>13.<span> </span></span></span><span>My Life As A Quant &ndash; By Emanual Derman</span></p> <p><span><span>14.<span> </span></span></span><span>Schiffs Insurance Observer</span></p><br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:59:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<div>James Grant's 'Mr. Market Miscalculates' Is Nothing Short of a Deep Value Investment   <div><span>                by: Miguel Barbosa            </span>     <span>October 13, 2009</span> </div></div><br>I am happy to report back after reading<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mr-Market-Miscalculates-Bubble-Beyond/dp/1604190086/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1255371873&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> Mr. Market Miscalculates</a> by James Grant. Our friend Glenda provided us with a copy to review. We are delighted with the book - so much so- that we venture to call this book a deep value investment. You pay a small sum and receive a priceless collection of essays.   <p>Overall the book is a pleasure to read. Grant, a master wordsmith and investment theorist, manages to educate, preach, and entertain. Unlike most newsletters which are immediately discarded, Grant&rsquo;s essays stand the test of time. To think that you could have read Grant&rsquo;s essays and avoided the subprime crisis, Fannie Mae (FNM), and other financial mishaps is reason alone for reading this book.</p> <p>Rather than present you with my opinion, I have included a collection of quotes from the book. I&rsquo;m confident that once you read Grant's words you will rush to purchase this masterpiece.</p>  <p><span>Here are our favorite quotes (and notes) from the book. All material is cited from &quot;Mr. Market Miscalculates&quot; authored by James Grant. Any mistakes are my own responsibility. </span></p> <p><span><strong>I.  Topics &amp; Relevant Quotes</strong></span></p> <p><strong><span>Grant&rsquo;s Prediction</span></strong><span><span> </span>(P 352)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;My bet is that, come the next bear market in credit, correlations will prove to be shockingly high across the full spectrum of debt instruments. It will turn out that everything was correlated to credit itself &ndash; on the ability to borrow on terms over which posterity will shake its head muttering, what were they thinking&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Booms &amp; Busts </span></strong><span>(P 75)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Aberrations &hellip;.must eventually pass the test of supply and demand&rdquo; &ldquo;New eras are cut short by the financial behavior they reward and condition&rdquo;<span> </span></span></p> <p><strong><span>Mindset of Fellow Bears</span></strong><span> (P 77)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;..Bears believe markets are cyclically inexact, and prone to exaggeration at both extremes&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Alan Greenspan &amp; Deficits</span></strong><span> (P 88)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Greenspan never understood the problem. This defect does not mean he will never hit on the solution. What it does suggest, however, is that he will come to it belatedly and likely for the wrong reasons&rdquo;.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Bonds vs. Real Estate<span> </span></span></strong><span>(P 95)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Which would you prefer? Bonds have no windows to wash, walls to paint, carpets to vacuum, tenants to litigate with or governments to pay property taxes to. On the other hand, the building wouldn&rsquo;t be subject to early call if interest rates fell. Then again each stream of income &ndash; rentals and coupon payments- is denominated in dollars of which the world is very long. And if interest rates and/ or the inflation rate were to climb? Depending on the timing of lease expirations the building's new management could raise rents. Bondholders could reinvest coupon income at higher and higher yields and&hellip;.receive 100 cents on dollar at maturity&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>But&hellip;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Neither building nor bonds provide the margin of safety that value seeking investors demand&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>Inflation and Deflation</span></strong><span> (P 107, 108 109, 302)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What inflation is not we believe, is &ldquo;too many dollars chasing too few goods.&rdquo; Pure and simple, it is &ldquo;too many dollars&rdquo; What the redundant dollars chase is unpredictable&hellip;..On Wall St, such inflationary episodes take the name &ldquo;bull markets&rdquo;. They are always welcome.</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Deflation is not quite the opposite of inflation. We would define deflation as too few dollars chasing too much debt&rdquo; &ldquo;But the world is doing itself no favors by so narrowly defining inflation &amp; by so carelessly crying deflation&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;In relation to income, the stock of debt has been rising for decades,. If the price level reversed course and declined uncounted net debtors would struggle to stay solvent. Falling prices, even if they were not caused by a credit event, could easily provoke one. &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Let the world&rsquo;s central bank define inflation as &ldquo;core CPI&rdquo; no food, no energy, no house prices &ndash; and that arbitrary inflation measure will inevitably lose some of its economic significance. As a central bank is congratulating itself on a brilliant job of inflation containment, house prices go through the roof&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><strong><span>Interest Rates &amp; Real Estate</span></strong><span> (P 110, P 111, P124)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Rising interest rates must sooner or later cause the marginal third home owner to become a two home, or one-home or even a no-home owner. One would spouse that a similar chair reaction is going to take place in other highly leveraged sectors of the U.S. Economy&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The advent of futures and options, of swaps and securitizations has facilitated American borrowing and lined the consumer pockets with several hundred billion dollars over the past few years, particularly with the turning of unsecured credit card debt into asset backed security agreements&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;For ourselves we fault the Fed not so much for resisting the so-called deflationary forces of 2002-2004 as for failing to anticipate that its reflationary acts would have wide ranging consequences, not all of them pleasant.<span> </span>Even today, our monetary masters appear blinkered to the unintended second, third, and Nth order effects of the plunging funds rate&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>The Housing Market </span></strong><span>(P 131, 139)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Insofar as high trading volume characterizes a speculative market, the American house market maybe described as a speculative. If so, it&rsquo;s a thin reed on which to support a bullish GDP forecast&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Those heavily leveraged homeowners, would in car lingo, be upside down, if house prices pulled back by 10%. That is they would owe more on their asset than the asset is worth in the market.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;To draw a bead on US real estate activity,&hellip;.take price times volume: Multiply the number of home sales by the average home price. Now divided that value by the GDP. The answer expresses the intensity of house fever&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What set of national causes could instigate a coast-to-coast bear house market today? We submit three: wild and wooly mortgage finance; the propensity of market-determined prices to revert to the mean, and the tendency of flyaway real estate markets to become the drivers of economic expansion rather than the mere beneficiaries of growth derived from other sources.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>CDOs</span></strong><span> (P 193, 195)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;CDO alchemy is also very much like the kind employed in conventional asset backed securities. In a CDO, as in an ABS mortgage scientists and rating agencies perform a miracle of distillation.&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;We say this as nonbelievers in the magic by which a collection of subprime assets can be reconstituted into triple and double A rated liabilities&rdquo; </span></p> <p><strong><span>Glass-Stegall </span></strong><span>(P 200)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The history of Glass-Stegall teaches many lessons, one of which is that the law of the land is cyclically variable; there is one set of rules for bull markets, another for bear markets&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>The Fed &amp; Greenspan</span></strong><span> (P 242, ,255, 269, 282, 293, 301, 302)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;And now this one man says that he didn&rsquo;t know about the stock market bubble, couldn&rsquo;t&rsquo; have known and , even if he had known, wouldn&rsquo;t have been able to make a move against it. It isn&rsquo;t exactly a great advertisement for a monetary dictatorship.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Only one of the troubles with bubbles is that, after they pop, ultra low interest rates and extraordinary rates of credit expansion lose their stimulative potency.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;..Now the very people who erred in the 90&rsquo;s are prescribing for the 00&rsquo;s. The notions being prescribed are exactly the ones you would not have expected. It&rsquo;s the shock of the down cycle that Greenspan&hellip;is weighing a de facto nationalization of the Treasury yield curve&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It wasn&rsquo;t everyday low prices they feared, but the financial consequences of falling prices in a heavily leveraged economy&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The soundness of a central bank varies invesrsely with the breadth of its mandate. The more it&rsquo;s expected to do , the longer the odds against its success. The Fed&hellip;is expected to deliver the earth (price stability), the moon (full employment) and the sky (a solvent financial system). &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The central banks believe they can control future events. We say that events control the central banks&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;As inflation targeting is inherently forward looking, this means that dozens of central banks have gotten themselves into the stargazing business&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s not that Greenspan can&rsquo;t hit the target&hellip;the problem is that they don&rsquo;t hit the new target that pops up unannounced outside their field of macroeconomic vision.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>LBOs &amp; Private Equity </span></strong><span>(P 339, 340)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The private equity business owes its prosperity to a persistent mispricing of debt&hellip;.cheap debt is the sine quanon of today&rsquo;s deliciously rich, fee resplendent deals.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;If forgiveness is a virtue, the debt markets are going to heaven&rdquo;</span></p> <p><strong><span>II. My Favorite Quotes From Mr. Market Miscalculates: </span></strong></p> <p><span>(P<span> </span>96, 208, 210, 216, 223, 229, 259, 265, 304, 307, 309, 316, 348)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Rare is the individual who can imagine a different set of circumstances that those that surround him. Rare still is the organization that can imagine them. &ldquo; </span></p> <p><span><span> </span>&ldquo;As a rule, investors see what they want to see&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It wasn&rsquo;t the lack of rules and regulations that raised the depravity index in American finance. It was the conditioned belief in a new era&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The impetus to reform is only latent in bull markets; it&rsquo;s during bear markets that the rules are changed&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s an investor&rsquo;s bounden duty to take the world as it is, not as it should be or could be. In the world in which we live, the politicians are gaining on the capitalists&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Trusting in American markets &amp; American standards of disclosure &amp; accounting, foreigners have willingly exchanged their merchandise for our securities&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;&hellip;here we encounter the difference between physics and economics. Both use quantitative methods to build predictive models, but physics deals with matter; economics confronts human beings&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The more dependably the Fed fends off disaster the bolder and more leveraged investors become. The bolder investors become, the higher the markets go. And the higher the prices the greater the leverage, the more likely does a financial accident become. &ldquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;Mistakes are what come from getting out of bed in the morning&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;It would take a nation of saints to resist exploiting the privileges accorded to the owner of the reserve currency franchise. Imagine If this priceless gift were one day settled, out f the blue, on an unsuspecting country.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;To be long gold is, in a grand thematic way, to be short the socialization of risk&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;The elixir called liquidity is the most powerful bankruptcy deferral force of all&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;In financial markets the more people write hurricane insurance , the more likely it is that the disaster will happen because the people who know you have sold the insurance can make it happen&rdquo; </span></p> <p><span><strong>III. Most Insightful Stories &amp; Examples From Mr. Market Miscalculates </strong></span></p><p><span>1st Example: The Great Plains 1886 real estate market (P146-154): </span></p>  <p><span>In this market people pushed up western land prices to highs that in real terms, haven&rsquo;t been seen since.<span> </span>Conflicts of the 1880s were similar to those in the 2000s &ndash; Grant says,</span></p> <p><span><span>a.<span> </span></span></span><span>In the 1880&rsquo;s &ldquo;principals in this case the savers wanted safety (and yield), agents in this case lenders wanted commissions. &ldquo; Not for the first or last time in financial history did the agents fared better than principals.<span> </span></span></p> <p><span><span>b.<span> </span></span></span><span>&ldquo;frontier due diligence was no better<span> </span>in 1880&rsquo;s than 120 years later.&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span><span>c.<span> </span></span></span><span>Moral of the story, &ldquo; in order to create a really big asset-price bubble, a central bank is neither necessary nor sufficient. A critical mass of human beings is all that&rsquo;s required&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span><span>        </span>2<sup>nd</sup> Example: Private Investor Fournier Buy Protection (P 176)</span></p> <p><span>&ldquo;What I have done&hellip;is put together a portfolio of this stuff (credit protection on tranches of<span> </span>mortgate backed structures) I have 750million of this stuff shorted. My Cost is 1.9% (or 14.25 million a year). My return could be 750million. As risks and rewards go we judge not bad&rdquo;</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>3<sup>rd</sup> Example: Fine Art of Security Analysis (P 389) Suggestions on how to tweak the Graham criteria by Peter Walmsley.</span></p> <p><span><span>1.<span> </span></span></span><span>Quality Of Earnings Test &ndash; Calculate variance between normalized earnings &amp; plain old gaap earnings. Go back every quarter for 10 years. Compare eps on the income statement to eps from continuing operations&rdquo; Variance of more than 15% is a red flag&hellip;this weeds out companies using nonrecurring charges for every quarter.</span></p> <p><span><span>2.<span> </span></span></span><span>Substitute the debt to equity for debt to working capital. ..this unmasks companies using big bath accounting to depress book equity to inflate roe</span></p> <p><span>4<sup>th</sup> Example: The Bank of Graham &amp; Dodd &ndash; Conservative Banker Karl Hill Of Monroe County Bank in Georgia</span></p> <p><span><span> </span>*Wonderful story of a successful, smart, and conservative banker. </span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span><strong>IV. Additional Reading Recommendations found in Mr. Market Miscalculates</strong></span></p> <p><span><span>1.<span> </span></span></span><span>Wall Street Under Oath: The story of our modern money changers &ndash; By Ferdinand Pecora</span></p> <p><span><span>2.<span> </span></span></span><span>Fiasco; The inside story of a wall street trader</span></p> <p><span><span>3.<span> </span></span></span><span>BIS paper by Claudio Borio &amp; Philip Lowe</span></p> <p><span><span>4.<span> </span></span></span><span>Banking &amp; The Business Cycle By CA Philips, TF McManus And RW Nelson</span></p> <p><span><span>5.<span> </span></span></span><span><span> </span>&ldquo;Crisis &amp; Cycles&rdquo; By Wilhelm Ropke</span></p> <p><span><span>6.<span> </span></span></span><span>A History of the Federal Reserve By Allan H Meltzer </span></p> <p><span><span>7.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Fed By Martin Mayer</span></p> <p><span><span>8.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Road To Delphi By Michael Woods</span></p> <p><span><span>9.<span> </span></span></span><span>The Anatomy of an International Monetary Regime By Giulio M Gallarotti</span></p> <p><span><span>10.<span> </span></span></span><span>That which is seen &amp; That which is not seen By Frederic Bastiat</span></p> <p><span><span>11.<span> </span></span></span><span>Ubiquity By Mark Buchanan </span></p> <p><span><span>12.<span> </span></span></span><span>A demon of our own design: markets, hedge funds, and the perils of financial innovation by Richard Bookstaber</span></p> <p><span><span>13.<span> </span></span></span><span>My Life As A Quant &ndash; By Emanual Derman</span></p> <p><span><span>14.<span> </span></span></span><span>Schiffs Insurance Observer</span></p><br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Euro Stocks With Rising Dividends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/296964-living4dividends/33377-3-euro-stocks-with-rising-dividends?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33377</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Screens  <span>by   Jack Hough</a>  (<a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/search/?searchterm=Jack%20Hough&amp;searchtype=author" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Author Archive</a>)  </span> 3 Euro Stocks With Rising Dividends   <div><p><span>To secure healthy</span> <span><span><span>dividend yields</span></span></span> and sidestep the ailing U.S. dollar, look to European aristocracy. I refer not to Windsors and Borb&oacute;ns but to Nestle and Novartis, and to the 38 other members of the <span><span><span>S&amp;P</span></span></span> Europe 350 Dividend Aristocrats.</p></div><div><div><div>  </a> </div></div><p>Index members are decided at the start of each year by selecting those members of S&amp;P&rsquo;s Europe 350 index that have increased their dividends annually for at least a decade. If more than 40 companies turn up, S&amp;P chooses the 40 with the highest dividend yields. If fewer than 40 are found, it eases the requirement to seven years of rising dividends.</p></div><div><p>This year through Friday, the 40 Euro-Dividend Aristocrats have returned 36%, besting the broader Europe 350 by 12 percentage points and America&rsquo;s Dividend Aristocrats by 16 percentage points. Below are highlighted three Euro-Dividend Aristocrats. A full list may be found <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_eurodai/2,3,2,5,0,0,0,0,0,2,3,0,0,0,0,0.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p></div>&lt;snip&gt;<br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:45:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Screens  <span>by   Jack Hough</a>  (<a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/search/?searchterm=Jack%20Hough&amp;searchtype=author" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Author Archive</a>)  </span> 3 Euro Stocks With Rising Dividends   <div><p><span>To secure healthy</span> <span><span><span>dividend yields</span></span></span> and sidestep the ailing U.S. dollar, look to European aristocracy. I refer not to Windsors and Borb&oacute;ns but to Nestle and Novartis, and to the 38 other members of the <span><span><span>S&amp;P</span></span></span> Europe 350 Dividend Aristocrats.</p></div><div><div><div>  </a> </div></div><p>Index members are decided at the start of each year by selecting those members of S&amp;P&rsquo;s Europe 350 index that have increased their dividends annually for at least a decade. If more than 40 companies turn up, S&amp;P chooses the 40 with the highest dividend yields. If fewer than 40 are found, it eases the requirement to seven years of rising dividends.</p></div><div><p>This year through Friday, the 40 Euro-Dividend Aristocrats have returned 36%, besting the broader Europe 350 by 12 percentage points and America&rsquo;s Dividend Aristocrats by 16 percentage points. Below are highlighted three Euro-Dividend Aristocrats. A full list may be found <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_eurodai/2,3,2,5,0,0,0,0,0,2,3,0,0,0,0,0.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p></div>&lt;snip&gt;<br>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
