1979 was the date of the second major oil crisis. At the time, US GDP was even more dependent on oil than today because today we have almost 90% in services. The supply shock caused inflation was wrongly dealt with by Paul Volcker using a severe monetary policy(20% plus interest rates) that plunged the American economy into the deepest recession since WWII.
On Jul 16 10:51 AM Brandon211 wrote:
> My favorite is, "So there will not be much inflation in the foreseeable > future because there will not be excessive spending." From 1979 - > 1981 the U.S. saw inflation rates of 11%, 14%, and 10% per annum. > This was in the midst of a major recession, when spending by businesses > and consumers was actually DECREASING. The problem is that the author > seems to think that spending actual paper currency is the only thing > that leads to inflation, while the truth is, the easy availability > of CREDIT is a much more important part of the equation.We don't > produce assets in this country, we monetize assets. The government > doesn't live within its means, it monetizes a massive debt. No, you > cannot spend a treasury note, so does that mean it will never contribute > to inflation?? Look, inflation isn't just a danger, it's the only > possible outcome of this mess, whether or not we have "excessive > spending" now or not.
-
1979 was the date of the second major oil crisis. At the time, US GDP was even more dependent on oil than today because today we have almost 90% in services. The supply shock caused inflation was wrongly dealt with by Paul Volcker using a severe monetary policy(20% plus interest rates) that plunged the American economy into the deepest recession since WWII.
Jul 17 00:32 am
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by Lok Sang Ho »7 Economic Fallacies [View article]
On Jul 16 10:51 AM Brandon211 wrote:
> My favorite is, "So there will not be much inflation in the foreseeable
> future because there will not be excessive spending." From 1979 -
> 1981 the U.S. saw inflation rates of 11%, 14%, and 10% per annum.
> This was in the midst of a major recession, when spending by businesses
> and consumers was actually DECREASING. The problem is that the author
> seems to think that spending actual paper currency is the only thing
> that leads to inflation, while the truth is, the easy availability
> of CREDIT is a much more important part of the equation.We don't
> produce assets in this country, we monetize assets. The government
> doesn't live within its means, it monetizes a massive debt. No, you
> cannot spend a treasury note, so does that mean it will never contribute
> to inflation?? Look, inflation isn't just a danger, it's the only
> possible outcome of this mess, whether or not we have "excessive
> spending" now or not.