• Macro Investor
    How many $AAPL articles do we need that says the same thing, that it is undervalued while the market disagrees?
    1/11/13
    Reply (13)
    • Tylerdurden7331: By definition, undervalued implies that market disagrees.
      1/11/13
    • Macro Investor: So how many articles do we need?
      1/11/13
    • Tylerdurden7331: None. I don't need any article to know they are undervalued.
      1/11/13
    • Alex Cho: O.O good point Macro people have said the same thing about Apple almost every single day of the week.
      1/11/13
    • Tylerdurden7331: Saying something correct over and over may bore you, but it doesn't make it wrong lol
      1/11/13
    • Macro Investor: I didn't say it is wrong
      1/11/13
    • Ocean Man: If people keep reading them, SA makes money.
      1/12/13
    • Bert Danner: Try this one: http://seekingalpha.com/a/nox1
      1/12/13
    • Macro Investor: Bert, I would have preferred to see a financial analysis than a business analysis. Business analysis doesn't make money for me.
      1/12/13
    • Macro Investor: So what if Apple wins over Google if the stock prices for both the companies suck? That's the kind of analysis that is missing from SA.
      1/12/13
    • Macro Investor: Of course, even if they were present, they wouldn't mean much as no one can predict the future.
      1/12/13
    • Steven Fat: I don't think a stock can be undervalued because of the efficient market theory...
      1/17/13
    • Macro Investor: I agree, but I think we still need 10 more articles to tell us that
      1/17/13
      From other sites