What Apple Is Doing Wrong and Why It Means Trouble [View article]
Apple has a lot of things it didn't have the last time the company almost dissolved. For one, iTunes is a massive lock-in mechanism, and even though it's moving to all MP3, it's still only accessible from Apple hardware. Secondly, the iPhone is a closed platform that has the potential to dominate much like Windows on PCs. Once a substantial investment is made in games, apps, music, movies, contacts, etc., a user is less likely to abandon the platform unless something else is significantly better. These lock-in benefits also drive demand for Mac computers, as they most easily integrate with iPods and iPhones.
Apple's computers fill the "BMW" niche - they are generally cache, but even an objective viewer would generally consider the build quality and experience superior to the Dell's and Acer's of the world. While this is not really a sustainable competitive advantage, it is a current one.
Jobs leaving, if it turns out to be permanent, it certainly a long term concern, but he's built a company that can sustain itself for many years without him. The bench here is strong too - Cook is a solid ops guy, Ive and Forestall are top notch hardware and software guys, respectively, and Schiller has overseen a very successful marketing operation. I wouldn't worry about Apple, especially at these prices.
Dell didn't dump resources into a retail division under Rollins - Dell himself started that initiative. And it's a necessary one if Dell wants to capture consumers instead of just business and government dollars. Also, Dell was never about technology. The company's edge was low cost manufacturing, allowing them to win business by being the low cost producer. Another faux pas here is equating market share to success. Less market share at better profitability leads to better profits and a higher stock price. A lot of misconceptions in this article.
What Apple Is Doing Wrong and Why It Means Trouble [View article]
Apple's computers fill the "BMW" niche - they are generally cache, but even an objective viewer would generally consider the build quality and experience superior to the Dell's and Acer's of the world. While this is not really a sustainable competitive advantage, it is a current one.
Jobs leaving, if it turns out to be permanent, it certainly a long term concern, but he's built a company that can sustain itself for many years without him. The bench here is strong too - Cook is a solid ops guy, Ive and Forestall are top notch hardware and software guys, respectively, and Schiller has overseen a very successful marketing operation. I wouldn't worry about Apple, especially at these prices.
Dell: No Angles Left? [View article]
Steve
magicdiligence.com