<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mark Cifra - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Mark Cifra' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra</link>
    <item>
      <title>Buying ViroPharma Ahead of June 3rd FDA Decision</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/140056-buying-viropharma-ahead-of-june-3rd-fda-decision?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">140056</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does it seem like the good old days of biotech are back? With monster moves from Dendreon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dndn' title='More opinion and analysis of DNDN'>DNDN</a>) and Map Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mapp' title='More opinion and analysis of MAPP'>MAPP</a>) based on positive phase 3 data, buyouts of IDM Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/idmi' title='More opinion and analysis of IDMI'>IDMI</a>) by Takeda and Cougar Biotech (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cgrb' title='More opinion and analysis of CGRB'>CGRB</a>) by <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='More opinion and analysis of JNJ'>JNJ</a> and FDA approvals for Vanda Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vnda' title='More opinion and analysis of VNDA'>VNDA</a>) and United Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uthr' title='More opinion and analysis of UTHR'>UTHR</a>), it looks like a good time to start buying ahead of important news flow.</p><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/28/saupload_vphm.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />One stock that I think has the potential to move higher is ViroPharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vphm' title='More opinion and analysis of VPHM'>VPHM</a>). On June 3, 2009 the FDA is scheduled to make a decision whether or not to approve ViroPharma's orphan drug Cinryze for acute attacks of hereditary angioedema &#40;HAE&#41;.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:50:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Cifra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mark Cifra submits:</strong><p>Is it just me or does it seem like the good old days of biotech are back? With monster moves from Dendreon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dndn' title='More opinion and analysis of DNDN'>DNDN</a>) and Map Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mapp' title='More opinion and analysis of MAPP'>MAPP</a>) based on positive phase 3 data, buyouts of IDM Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/idmi' title='More opinion and analysis of IDMI'>IDMI</a>) by Takeda and Cougar Biotech (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cgrb' title='More opinion and analysis of CGRB'>CGRB</a>) by <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj' title='More opinion and analysis of JNJ'>JNJ</a> and FDA approvals for Vanda Pharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vnda' title='More opinion and analysis of VNDA'>VNDA</a>) and United Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uthr' title='More opinion and analysis of UTHR'>UTHR</a>), it looks like a good time to start buying ahead of important news flow.</p><p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/28/saupload_vphm.png" align="right" hspace="6" vspace="6" />One stock that I think has the potential to move higher is ViroPharma (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vphm' title='More opinion and analysis of VPHM'>VPHM</a>). On June 3, 2009 the FDA is scheduled to make a decision whether or not to approve ViroPharma's orphan drug Cinryze for acute attacks of hereditary angioedema &#40;HAE&#41;.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/140056-buying-viropharma-ahead-of-june-3rd-fda-decision?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vphm">VPHM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra">Mark Cifra</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Q1 2009 Biotech Earnings Roundup: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/139749-q1-2009-biotech-earnings-roundup-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">139749</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Now that first quarter earnings are finally over and all the companies I follow have finally reported their numbers, I decided to breakdown those companies whose reports stood out because of stockprice movement.</p><p><strong>The good: </strong>Large cap biotech giants Gilead Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild' title='More opinion and analysis of GILD'>GILD</a>)  and Amgen (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMGN'>AMGN</a>) reported good numbers and their stock prices responded well, GILD up 2.49 and AMGN up 3.01.   Human Genome Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hgsi' title='More opinion and analysis of HGSI'>HGSI</a>)  rebounded  well from  the March 9th  release of  phase 3  Albuferon data  as HGSI  added .80 or almost 50 percent.  Acorda (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor' title='More opinion and analysis of ACOR'>ACOR</a>) also rebounded well from its March 31 NDA disappointment and soared  3.31, as this time the FDA accepted its NDA. Some others include Biomarin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmrn' title='More opinion and analysis of BMRN'>BMRN</a>) +.83, United Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uthr' title='More opinion and analysis of UTHR'>UTHR</a>) +2.54,  and AMAG Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amag' title='More opinion and analysis of AMAG'>AMAG</a>) +4.15.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:43:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Cifra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mark Cifra submits:</strong><p>Now that first quarter earnings are finally over and all the companies I follow have finally reported their numbers, I decided to breakdown those companies whose reports stood out because of stockprice movement.</p><p><strong>The good: </strong>Large cap biotech giants Gilead Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild' title='More opinion and analysis of GILD'>GILD</a>)  and Amgen (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn' title='More opinion and analysis of AMGN'>AMGN</a>) reported good numbers and their stock prices responded well, GILD up 2.49 and AMGN up 3.01.   Human Genome Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hgsi' title='More opinion and analysis of HGSI'>HGSI</a>)  rebounded  well from  the March 9th  release of  phase 3  Albuferon data  as HGSI  added .80 or almost 50 percent.  Acorda (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor' title='More opinion and analysis of ACOR'>ACOR</a>) also rebounded well from its March 31 NDA disappointment and soared  3.31, as this time the FDA accepted its NDA. Some others include Biomarin (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmrn' title='More opinion and analysis of BMRN'>BMRN</a>) +.83, United Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uthr' title='More opinion and analysis of UTHR'>UTHR</a>) +2.54,  and AMAG Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amag' title='More opinion and analysis of AMAG'>AMAG</a>) +4.15.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/139749-q1-2009-biotech-earnings-roundup-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor">ACOR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/agn">AGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amag">AMAG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn">AMGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/auxl">AUXL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmrn">BMRN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/celg">CELG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ceph">CEPH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cgrb">CGRB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/genz">GENZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild">GILD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hgsi">HGSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mygn">MYGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osip">OSIP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sqnm">SQNM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uthr">UTHR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra">Mark Cifra</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Q1 2009 Biotech Roundup: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/129093-q1-2009-biotech-roundup-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">129093</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Now that the first quarter of 2009 has ended, I took a look back at some of the news that moved the stocks in the sector, and as usual with the biotech sector, there definitely wasn't a lack of newsflow. I decided to breakdown the newsflow into three categories, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Oh and full disclosure, I'm a big fan of the Clint Eastwood movie with the same title.</p><p>The good: January  6, Indevus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/idev' title='More opinion and analysis of IDEV'>IDEV</a>) up 70 percent on news of a buyout by Endo, January 7, La Jolla (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ljpc' title='More opinion and analysis of LJPC'>LJPC</a>) up 80 percent on news of a partnership with Biomarin, January 13, Targanta (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/targ' title='More opinion and analysis of TARG'>TARG</a>) up 80 percent on news of a buyout by The Medicines and Zymogenetics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/zgen' title='More opinion and analysis of ZGEN'>ZGEN</a>) up 27 percent on the news of a partnership with Bristol Myers, February 3, Intermune (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/itmn' title='More opinion and analysis of ITMN'>ITMN</a>) up 37 percent on positive phase 3 data for Pirfenidone in IPF and OSI pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osip' title='More opinion and analysis of OSIP'>OSIP</a>) up 16 percent on positive Tarceva data, February 24, Acorda (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor' title='More opinion and analysis of ACOR'>ACOR</a>) up 20 percent on buyout rumors, March 6, Genentech (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dna' title='More opinion and analysis of DNA'>DNA</a>) up 11 percent on Roche raising their bid for the company and on March 12, CV Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvtx' title='More opinion and analysis of CVTX'>CVTX</a>) up 31 percent on news of a buyout by Gilead Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild' title='More opinion and analysis of GILD'>GILD</a>).</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:46:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Cifra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mark Cifra submits:</strong><p>Now that the first quarter of 2009 has ended, I took a look back at some of the news that moved the stocks in the sector, and as usual with the biotech sector, there definitely wasn't a lack of newsflow. I decided to breakdown the newsflow into three categories, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Oh and full disclosure, I'm a big fan of the Clint Eastwood movie with the same title.</p><p>The good: January  6, Indevus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/idev' title='More opinion and analysis of IDEV'>IDEV</a>) up 70 percent on news of a buyout by Endo, January 7, La Jolla (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ljpc' title='More opinion and analysis of LJPC'>LJPC</a>) up 80 percent on news of a partnership with Biomarin, January 13, Targanta (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/targ' title='More opinion and analysis of TARG'>TARG</a>) up 80 percent on news of a buyout by The Medicines and Zymogenetics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/zgen' title='More opinion and analysis of ZGEN'>ZGEN</a>) up 27 percent on the news of a partnership with Bristol Myers, February 3, Intermune (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/itmn' title='More opinion and analysis of ITMN'>ITMN</a>) up 37 percent on positive phase 3 data for Pirfenidone in IPF and OSI pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osip' title='More opinion and analysis of OSIP'>OSIP</a>) up 16 percent on positive Tarceva data, February 24, Acorda (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor' title='More opinion and analysis of ACOR'>ACOR</a>) up 20 percent on buyout rumors, March 6, Genentech (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dna' title='More opinion and analysis of DNA'>DNA</a>) up 11 percent on Roche raising their bid for the company and on March 12, CV Therapeutics (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvtx' title='More opinion and analysis of CVTX'>CVTX</a>) up 31 percent on news of a buyout by Gilead Sciences (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild' title='More opinion and analysis of GILD'>GILD</a>).</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/129093-q1-2009-biotech-roundup-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acor">ACOR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arna">ARNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvtx">CVTX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dna">DNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild">GILD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hgsi">HGSI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/idev">IDEV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/itmn">ITMN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ljpc">LJPC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mapp">MAPP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orex">OREX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osip">OSIP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osir">OSIR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/snta">SNTA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/targ">TARG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vphm">VPHM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/zgen">ZGEN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra">Mark Cifra</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arena's Financing Deal with Azimuth Is a Healthy Move</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/127704-arena-s-financing-deal-with-azimuth-is-a-healthy-move?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">127704</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Secondaries and convertibles are pretty common stuff to most biotech investors. That is why when I first read the news that Arena Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arna' title='More opinion and analysis of ARNA'>ARNA</a>) signed an equity financing commitment deal for 50 million dollars, I figured it was the same old biotech secondary. Until I caught the name of the company that was buying Arena's stock, Azimuth Opportunity Ltd.</p><p>Back in 2006, Azimuth did a similar financing deal with Onyx Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/onxx' title='More opinion and analysis of ONXX'>ONXX</a>), and once again right in front of very important data. On September 29, 2006, with ONXX trading at 17.29, Onyx announced an equity financing commitment from Azimuth for 150 million dollars, Wall Street was expecting important phase 3 data for Onyx's lead cancer drug Nexavar in melanoma and liver cancers. On December 4, 2006, Onyx announced their phase 3 trial for Nexavar in melanoma failed to hit it's primary endpoint, ONXX shares slide to the 11 dollar range.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:15:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Cifra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mark Cifra submits:</strong><p>Secondaries and convertibles are pretty common stuff to most biotech investors. That is why when I first read the news that Arena Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arna' title='More opinion and analysis of ARNA'>ARNA</a>) signed an equity financing commitment deal for 50 million dollars, I figured it was the same old biotech secondary. Until I caught the name of the company that was buying Arena's stock, Azimuth Opportunity Ltd.</p><p>Back in 2006, Azimuth did a similar financing deal with Onyx Pharmaceuticals (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/onxx' title='More opinion and analysis of ONXX'>ONXX</a>), and once again right in front of very important data. On September 29, 2006, with ONXX trading at 17.29, Onyx announced an equity financing commitment from Azimuth for 150 million dollars, Wall Street was expecting important phase 3 data for Onyx's lead cancer drug Nexavar in melanoma and liver cancers. On December 4, 2006, Onyx announced their phase 3 trial for Nexavar in melanoma failed to hit it's primary endpoint, ONXX shares slide to the 11 dollar range.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/127704-arena-s-financing-deal-with-azimuth-is-a-healthy-move?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/arna">ARNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/onxx">ONXX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra">Mark Cifra</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Merck and Pfizer Need to Follow Abbott's Lead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/126379-merck-and-pfizer-need-to-follow-abbott-s-lead?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">126379</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Let me disclose this right upfront: I'm not a fan of big mergers. I don't think they work for shareholders and I can't find examples to make me think differently. Pfizer (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe' title='More opinion and analysis of PFE'>PFE</a>), for instance, has already merged with Warner Lambert and Pharmacia, yet the stock of Pfizer has been trading at or near multi year lows. What makes Pfizer management think another large merger, in this case Wyeth (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wye' title='More opinion and analysis of WYE'>WYE</a>), will work? I personally don't see their logic.</p><p>Merck (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk' title='More opinion and analysis of MRK'>MRK</a>), on the other hand, has only managed a few small buyouts  over the last few years. With Merck stock at or near multi year lows, maybe a Schering Plough (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sgp' title='More opinion and analysis of SGP'>SGP</a>) buyout will work for shareholders, but I am taking a wait and see attitude on this deal.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:23:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Cifra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mark Cifra submits:</strong><p>Let me disclose this right upfront: I'm not a fan of big mergers. I don't think they work for shareholders and I can't find examples to make me think differently. Pfizer (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe' title='More opinion and analysis of PFE'>PFE</a>), for instance, has already merged with Warner Lambert and Pharmacia, yet the stock of Pfizer has been trading at or near multi year lows. What makes Pfizer management think another large merger, in this case Wyeth (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wye' title='More opinion and analysis of WYE'>WYE</a>), will work? I personally don't see their logic.</p><p>Merck (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk' title='More opinion and analysis of MRK'>MRK</a>), on the other hand, has only managed a few small buyouts  over the last few years. With Merck stock at or near multi year lows, maybe a Schering Plough (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sgp' title='More opinion and analysis of SGP'>SGP</a>) buyout will work for shareholders, but I am taking a wait and see attitude on this deal.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/126379-merck-and-pfizer-need-to-follow-abbott-s-lead?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abt">ABT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk">MRK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sgp">SGP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wye">WYE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mark-cifra">Mark Cifra</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
