> I do agree with you, greedcanbegood, that there is a big difference > between investment banking as conducted by Citi and JPMorganChase > and plain vanilla banking such as USB and PNC. But the market isn't > taking the time to differentiate . > I have great faith in the "good banks" but they stood in line to > get the TARP and I don't see them refuting the excesses that are > attributed to the others. > > There is no doubt in my mind that the repeal of the Glass-Steagle > act in 1997 was the ignition point for this debacle. It took ten > more years of unabated greed supported by the total lack of supervision > and enforcement to get us here. > So, any bank that takes TARP money and reduces its dividend and still > reporting large reserves for bad debt, is probably hiding some shenanigans > in its balance sheet. And... Yes, the management should bear responsibility, > either by resigning or by reducing its bloated pay scales. As to > stock options, for what? Pray tell, for what? Why should we the stockholders > have to suffer dilution of our equity (be it ever so small) at the > expense of mismanagement.? I stand pat with my demands and would > like to add that there ought to be some indictments coming soon or > there may well be an unwelcome surge in "other" crimes in this country > as the population reacts to injustice.
-
Excellent Points.
Mar 09 00:31 am
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by Mark Riddix »Dividend Cuts: Who's Next? [View article]
On Mar 05 06:25 PM philipmax wrote:
> I do agree with you, greedcanbegood, that there is a big difference
> between investment banking as conducted by Citi and JPMorganChase
> and plain vanilla banking such as USB and PNC. But the market isn't
> taking the time to differentiate .
> I have great faith in the "good banks" but they stood in line to
> get the TARP and I don't see them refuting the excesses that are
> attributed to the others.
>
> There is no doubt in my mind that the repeal of the Glass-Steagle
> act in 1997 was the ignition point for this debacle. It took ten
> more years of unabated greed supported by the total lack of supervision
> and enforcement to get us here.
> So, any bank that takes TARP money and reduces its dividend and still
> reporting large reserves for bad debt, is probably hiding some shenanigans
> in its balance sheet. And... Yes, the management should bear responsibility,
> either by resigning or by reducing its bloated pay scales. As to
> stock options, for what? Pray tell, for what? Why should we the stockholders
> have to suffer dilution of our equity (be it ever so small) at the
> expense of mismanagement.? I stand pat with my demands and would
> like to add that there ought to be some indictments coming soon or
> there may well be an unwelcome surge in "other" crimes in this country
> as the population reacts to injustice.