• Markman Advisors
    $PANW The case is going to trial - which is good for Palo Alto
    2/6/14
    Reply (6)
    • Ta0: Why would going to trial be good for PANW? Wouldn't a cessation in trials be better?
      2/6/14
    • Ta0: And I'm not being obnoxious here, I'm just not understanding the reasoning behind your statement.
      2/6/14
    • Andre LaPlume: I have no position, nor do I plan on having one, but I'd feel better if the insiders weren't selling like crazy.
      2/6/14
    • Ta0: If you have no positions, why would you care about PANW when it doesn't affect you at all?
      2/6/14
    • Markman Advisors: $PANW report to follow. There was risk that JNPR's SJ of infringement would be granted. That risk is gone. They can duke it out at trial.
      2/6/14
    • Ta0: I read a little of it. Looks like PANW is eager to prove there's no infringement. Close the case once and for good. Thanks for clarification
      2/7/14