Full index of posts »
StockTalks
-
LAD continues a nice move. Up from mid teens and up in a down market today
Feb 6, 2012
-
TSYS results were better than feared. Nice bounce last couple days with little overhead resistance here
Feb 6, 2012
-
SQNM continues to move. secondary done, early market response to test positive. Up 21% Feb
Feb 6, 2012
Latest Comments
-
Marty Chilberg on Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Lineup Hi Milachka I don't have much information on th...
-
milachka on Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Lineup Marty, would you have any info about the Attose...
-
Marty Chilberg on Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Drives Investment Thesis This was the company's announcement: NEW YORK, ...
-
Marty Chilberg on Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Lineup This post is my working space to accumulate inf...
-
zevulon on Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Drives Investment Thesis seqeunom's technology will not hold up in the u...
Most Commented
- China Mediaexpress (CCME): An Expected Twist? (9 Comments)
- TSYS conference call follow up. (8 Comments)
- Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Lineup (4 Comments)
- Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Drives Investment Thesis (3 Comments)
- Neutral Tandem (TNDM) Q4 review (2 Comments)
Posts by Themes
ABI Research,
advertising,
advertising sector,
Biotechnology,
calls,
cash flow,
China growth stocks,
China investing,
Chinese growth stocks,
covered calls,
defense spending,
Diagnostic testing,
diagnostic testing,
display advertising,
free cash flow,
Frost Sullivan,
GPS,
IDC,
internet advertising,
investing ideas,
LBS,
LDT,
location based advertising,
Location based services,
Mobile advertising,
mobile computing,
Mobile display,
Mobile search,
Networks in Motion,
options,
risk investing,
S,
Securities fraud,
securities fraud,
SMS,
stock compensation,
telematics,
Telmap,
TSYS,
Yield,
yield
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.












View Marty Chilberg's Instablogs on:
Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Lineup
Sequenom (SQNM) has offered quite a lot of information lately about MaterniT21+ for Trisomy 13, 18 and 21. Makes sense given the potential market available for this test. However the company currently offers 4 Lab Developed Tests (LDT's).
SensiGENE Cystic Fibrosis carrier screen (CF)
Sequenom launched this their first LDT in the fall of 2009. The launch press release included this paragraph describing the screen:
Carrier screening tests help identify individuals who may have an increased risk of having a baby with certain genetic conditions. Healthy individuals with no family history of the condition and that already have healthy children, may be carriers of a genetic condition; for example, cystic fibrosis. Approximately 1 in 30 Americans - more than 10 million people - are carriers of a cystic fibrosis gene mutation, making it one of the most common genetic disorders in the United States. Children have cystic fibrosis when they have two mutations in the gene that cause CF - inheriting one mutation from the mother and the other from the father. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the ACMG, cystic fibrosis carrier screening should be offered to all Caucasian couples who are expecting a baby or are considering pregnancy, and further, should be made available to all patients regardless of ethnicity. About 1.1 million cystic fibrosis carrier screening tests are performed each year in the U.S. With an average reimbursement rate of $200-$400 per test; the U.S. market is estimated to be in excess of $300 million per year.
The company processes this test at its' first CAP accredited and CLIA-certified molecular diagnostic laboratory located in Grand Rapids, Mich. During a recent earnings conference call, Sequenom disclosed that they billed a total of 21,000 retinal and prenatal diagnostic tests in 2011. During a recent investor conference, they further disclosed that CF was by far the largest test processed. Without more specific guidance on tests and pricing, this is all educated guesswork. My estimate is that this LDT totaled 15,000 at an average revenue per test of $350 in C11.
SensiGENE Fetal RHD Genotyping (RhD)
Sequenom launched this their second prenatal LDT in February of 2010. The launch release stated:
In the United States, there are approximately 528,000 pregnancies in Rhesus D (RhD) negative women every year, and almost all of these women could benefit from an assessment of the RhD type of the fetus. RhD type can be determined by an invasive procedure, such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS), but both procedures involve risk to the fetus. Currently in the United States, most RhD negative women are managed without knowing the fetal RHD status.
In the Q3-10 conference call the company stated that the early results of this test were disappointing relative to their expectations. In a recent conference, the company referred to the contribution from this test as modest. I've found no pricing information for this test, though considering the relative importance to financial performance, I've admittedly spent little time searching. My estimate is that this LDT only generated 2,000 tests in 2011 at an average price of $300.
RetnaGENE AMD
Sequenom launched this LDT in May 2011. The launch press release stated the following:
AMD is an insidious progressive eye disorder that starts with relatively harmless tiny yellow deposits on the retina (the light sensitive tissue in the eye) and increases in prevalence and severity with age. Neovascular or 'wet AMD', develops in 10 to 20% of all cases, causes profound loss of central vision and is the leading source of legal blindness in people over age 50 in the developed world. It is caused by abnormal growth of fragile and leaky blood vessels (choroidal neovascularization or 'CNV') in the macula (a small area where vision is keenest at the center of the retina) in response to chronic inflammatory stress.
A predictive test that identifies patients at higher than average risk to develop wet AMD has the potential to improve clinical management by transforming surveillance protocols and improve therapeutic decision-making. A patient's knowledge about being at higher risk also makes it easier to take certain preventative steps such as no longer smoking, and switching to a healthier diet rich in vitamins, antioxidants, certain carotenoids, and omega-3 fatty acids. Smoking and diet are reported to be among the most important modifiable risk factors associated with AMD.
AMD is the most common cause of visual impairment and the leading cause of blindness in the elderly population in the developed world, the prevalence of which increases with advancing age. It is estimated that there are currently 9.1 million patients in the USA with AMD, 1.7 million suffering with the vision-threatening late stage complications of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) or geographic atrophy. Moreover, it is predicted that the number of cases of early AMD will increase to 17.8 million by 2050 and if untreated, cases of late-stage blinding AMD will increase to 3.8 million.
The company stated that this test has a list price of over $2,200. They are recognizing revenues from this test on a cash basis until they have enough history to calculate the reimbursement rate by carriers. Absent further detail, I'm estimating that the company processed 3,000 of these tests in 2011, and that they will eventually received a blended $1,200 per test. This assumes a much higher Medicaid blend. The 23% Medicaid mix for T21 was based upon the hospital birth market. For AMD diagnostics, the average age will likely be in the 60+ range. Though I don't have any specific data to support this, I suspect that this group will have a much higher Medicaid mix driving a reduction in the reimbursement rate.
MaterniT21 Plus
This test was launched in October of 2011. The company disclosed that they processed over 1,000 of these tests in 2011. For additional details on this test, see my blog.
Summary
There is admittedly a lot of guesswork in the above estimates. The following table sums it up and compares it to the income statement.
Disclosure: I am long SQNM.
Sequenom: Diagnostic Testing Drives Investment Thesis
Sequenom (SQNM) is a molecular diagnostic testing and genetics analysis company committed to providing molecular diagnostic testing services, and research use only products, services, applications, and genetic analysis products that translate the results of genomic science into solutions for biomedical research, translational research, molecular medicine applications, and agricultural, livestock, and other areas of research. Their development and commercialization efforts in various diagnostic areas include noninvasive women's health-related and prenatal diagnostics, ophthalmology, and other medical conditions such as oncology, infectious diseases and autoimmunity.
SQNM generates revenues from Genetic Analysis and Molectular Diagnostics. The Genetic Analysis segment is primarily equipment and software sales (i.e. MassARRAY). The Diagnostic Services revenues are fees paid for LDT (Lab Developed Tests). These tests include: MaterniT21 PLUS, RetnaGene AMD (Age-related Macular Degeneration), SensiGene CF (Cystic Fibrosis) and SensiGene RhD (RhesusD) fetal screening.
Investment style: Investment in SQNM falls into a long-term investment and short term trading category. The stock is extremely volatile with a high and active short community, leading to trading opportunities surrounding a core position. The long-term investment thesis is primarily based upon MaterniT21 commercialization. This LDT fetal screens for Trisomy 13,18 and 21 is a noninvasive blood test that uses fetal DNA in a mother's blood. The company misrepresented the results of clinical trials several years ago resulting in investigations by SEC and FBI. These have been settled. Harry Hixson (formerly President of Amgen) was brought in as CEO and has purged all management involved. Company is now overly conservative based upon Hixson's style, along with their desire to establish credibility.
Competition: Verinata Health, Aria Diagnostics, Fluidigm Corp, Natera.
IP: SQNM licenses the patent ('540') that is widely considered the dominant IP in the field. However, it has become clear that this will be a battle in the courts with numerous lawsuits already filed surrounding potential injunctions. Likely a multi-year legal battle.
Capitalization: SQNM has sourced significant capital to provide the base to challenge in the market place, as well as to defend the IP. They had $120m in cash as of Mar-12. They have 114m shares outstanding. They also have 7.8m options outstanding with an average strike price of $7.49.
Launch revenue recognition: SQNM is recognizing revenues on a cash basis for all diagnostic testing. This is because the ultimate reimbursement of these tests is not determinable until they have more reimbursement experience with carriers. As a result, it is challenging to get a fix on their eventual margins, as all costs are being expensed as incurred. The March quarterly revenues were disclosed to be primarily from tests done in their first release quarter (Dec-2011). Conversion to accrual basis for revenue recognition is expected in Q4-12 or Q1-13. The quarter in which conversion to accrual occurs, there will be a significant jump in revenues.
Short thesis: The short community has been very involved in this company, since the prior management mismanaged the clinical trial results of MaterniT21. Other issues driving the volatility include: Patent dispute uncertainty, lower-priced competition, FDA could decide LDT's require an arduous approval process in future.
Commercial launch: MaterniT21 was the first to market in Oct-2011 and has distanced itself from competitors through it's' CMM (Center for Molecular Medicine). This wholly owned subsidiary includes the labs that processes the diagnostic tests. They have a facility in San Diego that just increased their capacity to 200k tests per year. They also are building additional capacity that will be online later this year. The company has provided data about the ramp of tests being processed. In Dec-2011 quarter they received approximately 1,000 samples for T21 testing and had a total of 21k diagnostic tests for prenatal and retinal tests billed for the year. They announced that they have seen the weekly receipt of test samples increase consistently in 2012. They announced the annualized rate of sample received for T21 was 10k at end of 2011, 20k on Mar 3 2012, 30k for last week in March at 45k at the end of April. The number of tests processed for T21 during march-2012 quarter exceeded 4,900. Company has stated its' internal goal has been increased to at least 40k tests for C12.
Insurance carriers: Apr 19-2012 announced that MultiPlan signed up to provide coverage. They have a provider network of 900k with estimated covered lives of 57m. May 9-2012 announced that Coventry PPO network signed to provide coverage. They are the 7th largest carrier with 5k hospitals, 500k providers and 2.2m members. Obtaining coverage appears to be gaining momentum, primarily because this is non-invasive and priced less than Amniocentesis.
Estimated pricing: The company has not guided to their anticipated revenue per test for T21 but has provided enough information for an educated guess. The list price is $2,900. They have said they will likely see their mix parallel total hospital births, or 69% private coverage, 23% Medicaid and 8% uninsured. Uninsured has been priced at $1,900 per test. The copay has been capped at $235 per the company for private insured. They have hinted at a likely reimbursement rate by private insurers at around 65% of list in conference call Q&A. No info on Medicaid. My estimate of the ultimate price per test is $1,850. Using the company stated internal goal of at least 40k tests for T21 this year, that would drive $74m in billed revenues. My estimate is that this will exceed $100m given the current ramp. Competition is lagging substantially in making their test available. It appears that all the combined competition will generate a small fraction of the T21 revenues generated by SQNM this year.
TAM (Total Available Market): The initial TAM driving the investment thesis is high-risk pregnancies. The company has stated that there are approximately 4.3m births per year with 750k of these at high risk of aneuploidy. Using the estimated pricing, the TAM for the high-risk market amounts to $1.4B per year. Using projected $100m in CY-12 billed revenues, that would result in about 6.75% penetration into the high risk pregnancies market. The company recently announced clinical trials for non high-risk pregnancies which could grow this TAM by a factor of 4-6x, depending upon pricing assumptions. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01597063?term=sequenom&rank=12
Disclosure: I am long SQNM.
TSYS revenues: Breaking it down
Responding to some questions from followers, here is my look at TSYS revenues, Let me say up front that I sold my position back in July based upon several factors including this analysis. However, I've started rebuilding my position on the recent weakness and intend to complete my investment once the overall market becomes more stable. I believe the pullback of around 40% from my exit point is overdone and coming as the company appears to be poised for more positive results going forward.
Note 2) SMS licenses impact per company: C08 $24m, C09 $28m, C10 $13m, C11 none.
Note 3) Core growth rate adjusted to exclude impact of NIM in C10 and SMS license revenues in C10-11.
Note 2) Nov-09 purchased Sidereal SatCom business. C09 revenue reported approx $3m. C10 estimated at $24m (guidance $6m per quarter).
Note 3) Feb-11 closed Trident space, defense, SatCom business. No C10 revenues included. C11 guidance $40m for 11 months. Used 8/11 YTD.
Note 4) Core growth after backing out impact of acq'd revenues shows declines in C10 and C11 consensus forecast.
Summary of the above tables:
Core growth The growth that is commonly attributed to TSYS in press releases or company presentations is misleading, driven by purchased revenues rather than organic growth.
Transition to Service The company has dramatically shifted the mix of service and systems revenues. Service in 2008 was 46% and has grown to 67% in 2010. The current year-to-date service share has grown to 74%. Service revenues are recurring and more predictable going forward.
Revenue guidance has been terrible The poor performance in share price should come as no surprise to anyone following this company. They have consistently missed the street on the top line. The company doesn't provide quarterly guidance focusing rather on calendar year. It clearly isn't working. The company has stated that they see 25% organic growth for CY11-13 based upon a recent bottoms up analysis. I do not believe they will come anywhere close to achieving this. The street consensus for C12 is currently indicating 11% growth which will be challenging given the deficit issues and overall economic slowdown.
Government slowdown is real Government spending caused by deficit concerns has clearly had a significant impact once you eliminate the impact of acquired companies. Acquiring Trident, Solvern and Sidereal has exacerbated this issue, minimizing the shift toward a higher commercial revenue mix.
Commercial segment growth is anemic Commercial revenue growth is weak even after eliminating the impact of SMS licensing which has commonly been mentioned by management as the underlying issue.
Despite the trends depicted above I'll now go into the reasons why I'm building a position in the stock.
Earnings performance has been much better Despite missing the revenue expectations over the past few quarters, earnings has been a different story. The consensus expectation for adjusted eps for Jun-11 quarter was $.08 per share. which the company beat reporting $.12 per share. Mar-11 was similar with the consensus expectation at $.02 per share compared to the reported $.12 per share. It appears they have made significant progress controlling pricing and spending and have build a fair cushion into the guidance provided.
Signs that revenue guidance is more accurate
Note 2) The amount of backlog disclosed as recognizable over next 12 months per 10Q has jumped to 61% at 6/30/11 indicating a much higher probability of achieving consensus.
Note 3) The combination of total backlog and deferred revenues per the balance sheet as a pct of future revenues has also significantly increased at 6/30/11.
Order activity in September quarter was outstanding The company issues a press release disclosing government business awarded. During the September quarter a total of $137.7m in new funding and $146.9m in new orders has been reported. The majority of this incremental funding is for delivery through Aug-12. Comparing this performance to the $36.3m in new funding and $60.3m in new orders in the year ago Sep-10 quarter indicates a much stronger order flow. Even more impressive is that this $135m when added to the govt backlog at 6/30 of $156m brings the total to $300m for government business. This compares to trailing 6 months government revenues of $95m.
Acquisitions should be fully integrated Most significant acquisitions take 6-12 months to fully integrate. Having 3 virtually simultaneous acquisitions in the Dec-09 quarter had to take a huge toll on the company. These should now be fully integrated. Also, the Trident acquisition was effective at end of Jan-11 with the disruptive impact now mostly gone.
Market cap looks cheap The company has disappointed investors enough that they are now a "show me" stock. The current market cap is approx $185m. This compares to end of quarter market caps ranging from $208m (Sep-10) to $508m (Dec-09). The stock is currently selling at a 20% discount to book value. The forward PE is around 6.4x compared to a consensus secular growth rate of 10.8%. If it turns out that the company has indeed bottomed out operationally this could turn out to be a nice value investment.
Before I close this blog post, there are a couple of issues worth addressing per requests I've heard.
Ownership control by Maurice Tose Numerous references have been made to the ownership control of CEO Maurice Tose. It is true that Mr Tose has a significant ownership position. At August 31st the Form 4 filing reports that Mr Tose controls 5.492m shares of Class B stock and 442k shares of Class A. That equates to an ownership position of 10.4% of the o/s shares reported per the Jun-11 10Q. The Class B stock has 3x voting rights which brings his voting control to 24.7%. While this position is substantial, providing minimal ability for individual shareholders to exert any control over the company, suggesting this is a primary driver for the recent drop in share price is unfounded. This ownership control has been the structure since the company went public. As an example on 12/31/08 Mr Tose had 15.7% ownership resulting in 35.3% voting control. So in effect the last 3 years has seen a continual reduction in control.
Recent insider selling is a bearish signal Like many investors I watch insider transactions as a potential "tell". However TSYS has it's management team under a 10b5-1 plan that takes away the requisite intent to sell needed to consider this a bearish signal. As an example, Mr Tose has sold 100k shares of his stock every August for the past 3 years. I've seen no indication that there is anything to be learned from insider selling at TSYS. It's also interesting to note that many of the same people that claim Mr Tose has too much stock also claim it's a bearish sign every time he sells any.
Please be aware that while I try to review my analysis for errors, it's always possible that some still exist. Please do your own due diligence and review all information provided before making any investment decisions.