Atossa Genetics - Will Investors Be Holding The Bag? [View article]
FDA: ************* Our inspection, and subsequent review of your websites http://bit.ly/WVLTey and http://www.nrlbh.com determined that your devices are misbranded under Section 502(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 352(a)] and within the meaning of 21 CFR 807.97, in that your websites contain statements that create an impression of official approval of a device due to clearance of a premarket notification submission.
Specifically,
“. . . Using our patented, FDA-approved Mammary Aspirate Specimen Cytology Test (MASCT) System . . ..” “. . . FDA has determined, based on clinical trial data, that the MASCT System can be used in the determination and/or differentiation of normal versus premalignant versus malignant cells . . .”
Any representation that creates an impression of official approval of a device due to compliance with the premarket notification regulations is misleading. Your devices were not approved by the FDA, but were determined to be substantially equivalent within the meaning of Section 513(i)(1)(A) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)(1)(A).
In addition, your ForeCYTE test is misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 352(a)] in that its labeling is false or misleading. Specifically, its labeling contains the following statement:
“. . . FDA Cleared, clinically proven, and peer reviewed, the ForeCYTE test provides women aged 18 to 65 objective and actionable information to improve their breast health . . .”
Your ForeCYTE test was not cleared by FDA. ***********
Medical Marijuana: It's Just A Pump And Dump [View article]
Thanks Alan. Wonder if it's true. But as you suggested, it can't be illegal for outsiders to share publically available facts, tips or research before going long or short.
But if one accepts Eassa's point that this is a classic Pump and Dump then it also makes sense for a pump-and-dump hunter like Sykes to come across the same target as another short-hunter ... coincidence? ... could go either way.
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
Steven,
1. "I have reported you to SA and would suggest that any others that have been damaged or insulted by Matt’s actions, file a complaint with SA as well. You also might add some harsh words to SA for aiding and abetting a stock manipulation scheme."
What? You're saying that you reported me to those who were "aiding and abetting" me??? Who would do that? (If I thought you had committed a crime why would I report you to your accomplice?)
2. " Not word one about me accusing you of being a blatant stock manipulator. Interesting."
I did respond Steven. I'll say it again -- with different words.
The one who is influencing the price -- up or down -- WITH FALSE INFORMATION is guilty of manipulation.
I'm not making this up. "Injecting inaccurate information" is the distinguishing feature in legal prosecutions/defenses of stock manipulation.
The one who is providing the corrected information is in fact doing the market a service.
3. "I do not care who invented ECC."
You can't have an invention without an inventor -- even if, as you say, you "don't care."
Critical Question: Who invented Clearsign's ECC technology?
4. You say "ECC technology" as if you are aware of something new and unique to Clearsign. What would that be?
5. "I just know it works."
The knowledge that electric fields influence flames is not new and unique to Clearsign's ECC technology. Of course "it" works. "It's" worked for over 50 years and there are many patents already in existence. http://bit.ly/UFnuVu ....
Atossa Genetics - Will Investors Be Holding The Bag? [View article]
And competitor: http://bit.ly/ZpGVmK
Atossa Genetics - Will Investors Be Holding The Bag? [View article]
*************
Our inspection, and subsequent review of your websites http://bit.ly/WVLTey and http://www.nrlbh.com determined that your devices are misbranded under Section 502(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 352(a)] and within the meaning of 21 CFR 807.97, in that your websites contain statements that create an impression of official approval of a device due to clearance of a premarket notification submission.
Specifically,
“. . . Using our patented, FDA-approved Mammary Aspirate Specimen Cytology Test (MASCT) System . . ..”
“. . . FDA has determined, based on clinical trial data, that the MASCT System can be used in the determination and/or differentiation of normal versus premalignant versus malignant cells . . .”
Any representation that creates an impression of official approval of a device due to compliance with the premarket notification regulations is misleading. Your devices were not approved by the FDA, but were determined to be substantially equivalent within the meaning of Section 513(i)(1)(A) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)(1)(A).
In addition, your ForeCYTE test is misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 352(a)] in that its labeling is false or misleading. Specifically, its labeling contains the following statement:
“. . . FDA Cleared, clinically proven, and peer reviewed, the ForeCYTE test provides women aged 18 to 65 objective and actionable information to improve their breast health . . .”
Your ForeCYTE test was not cleared by FDA.
***********
http://1.usa.gov/15TVLWZ
ClearSign Combustion Corporation's CEO Discusses Q4 2012 Results - Earnings Call Transcript [View article]
Chronically Criminal: Shielding The Public From Medical Marijuana [View article]
"This is not the only one I have been dealing with." ~ Steven
Here's another one he's been "dealing with" ... by yours truly ... and another accusation of "short and distort."
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' http://bit.ly/15DF7xk
Steven, manipulation is on the side that injects false information.
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
Medical Marijuana: It's Just A Pump And Dump [View article]
I agree. Disclosure should always be there.
Chronically Criminal: Shielding The Public From Medical Marijuana [View article]
Sykes shorts penny stocks (and sells videos, subscriptions, etc):
website: http://bit.ly/u6o8UM
wiki: http://bit.ly/Zc5g1Z
Medical Marijuana: It's Just A Pump And Dump [View article]
But if one accepts Eassa's point that this is a classic Pump and Dump then it also makes sense for a pump-and-dump hunter like Sykes to come across the same target as another short-hunter ... coincidence? ... could go either way.
Medical Marijuana: It's Just A Pump And Dump [View article]
Nice piece Eassa
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
1. "I have reported you to SA and would suggest that any others that have been damaged or insulted by Matt’s actions, file a complaint with SA as well. You also might add some harsh words to SA for aiding and abetting a stock manipulation scheme."
What? You're saying that you reported me to those who were "aiding and abetting" me??? Who would do that? (If I thought you had committed a crime why would I report you to your accomplice?)
2. " Not word one about me accusing you of being a blatant stock manipulator. Interesting."
I did respond Steven. I'll say it again -- with different words.
The one who is influencing the price -- up or down -- WITH FALSE INFORMATION is guilty of manipulation.
I'm not making this up. "Injecting inaccurate information" is the distinguishing feature in legal prosecutions/defenses of stock manipulation.
The one who is providing the corrected information is in fact doing the market a service.
3. "I do not care who invented ECC."
You can't have an invention without an inventor -- even if, as you say, you "don't care."
Critical Question: Who invented Clearsign's ECC technology?
4. You say "ECC technology" as if you are aware of something new and unique to Clearsign. What would that be?
5. "I just know it works."
The knowledge that electric fields influence flames is not new and unique to Clearsign's ECC technology. Of course "it" works. "It's" worked for over 50 years and there are many patents already in existence. http://bit.ly/UFnuVu ....
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
It's very simple. Who invented Clearsign's ECC technology?
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
[My comments were either deleted or there was a technical glitch. Here is a shorter post]
Clearsign is based on experimental fact -- 60 years old. http://bit.ly/UFnuVu
I present facts, and they speak for themselves. John Rivera was convicted in federal court of running a technology scam: http://sdrv.ms/Wk8dhO
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
Clearsign is based on experimental fact -- 60 years old. http://bit.ly/UFnuVu
I present facts, and they speak for themselves. John Rivera was convicted in federal court of running a technology scam: http://sdrv.ms/Wk8dhO
Clearsign's Lies, Omissions, And One 'Bad Actor' [View article]
Clearsign is based on experimental fact -- 60 years old. http://seekingalpha.co...
I present facts, and they speak for themselves. John Rivera was convicted in federal court of running a technology scam: http://sdrv.ms/Wk8dhO