Five Reasons Activision Will Move Higher This Year [View article]
Seasonal trend is very favorable for them - I expect a strong rally through November at the very least - they will guide up regularly throughout the year.
The company is obviously at a slowing stage of its lifecycle.
On Apr 17 06:56 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:
> One more thing - it is quite rare to be able to talk about a growth > company at this phase of its life-cycle on a free cash yield basis. > I urge you and other readers to take a look at the free cash flow > relative to the enterprise value. It's a joke.
If the company is so great - why would you sell the stock?
On Apr 17 06:52 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:
> I don't agree with you either. In addition to the previous comments, > I would point to several facts, including massive 60% procedure growth, > strong international demand, continued innovation (the reason for > the deferrals), steady pricing, great cashflow, continued outside > leasing sources, high repeat purchases on the systems and steady > margin guidance despite uncertainty on volumes. > > When the company was just beginning its growth phase, it suggested > that the maximum any institution would buy would be 3 machines, but > they now have two customers with 5. This technology, a monopoly, > is becoming the gold standard. The company continues to plow its > massive profits back into R&D, and the returns on its investment > continue to be massive. > > I sold my stock earlier this week between 114 and 120. I had hoped > to buy it back before they reported, but the snafu of the early release > got in my way (luckily I think, given the drop in AH). I plan to > be buying the dip this morning. I bought for the first time in years > when they reported in January, but I first became involved in the > name in early 2005 and have nothing but the highest respect for this > management team and their mission.
Will OnLive Kill the Console Gaming Business? [View article]
I agree on the lag issue - my brain cannot comprehend how they get around it. When I was an active PC gamer I would get annoyed if my ping even got close to 100 - and now there's real processing happening on the other side? I'm REALLY eager to see OnLive up close.
On Mar 25 11:33 AM Dryshipbroker wrote:
> I am in the camp of the skeptics on this. To me, if they have that > awesome video compression technology in place. This would be better > served in the Home Video, Streaming Movies segment rather than games. > > > The streaming video, downloading movies market is already there, > and any "tearing" or lag due to delay issues does not affect the > overall product. > > Whereas for games, all you will have are users who will be complaining > because of delays where every second counts in their multiplayer > gaming. > > Still I certainly hope Onlive delivers :-)
Is There a Need for Game Publishers Any More? [View article]
Activision's Modern Warfare 2 and Console Game Pricing [View article]
bit.ly/WqXuu
Activision's Modern Warfare 2 and Console Game Pricing [View article]
Game Sector Update: Ghostbusters Up, Ubisoft Down [View article]
Some Free Advice for Electronic Arts [View article]
U.S. June Video Game Sales Tumble 31% [View article]
www.videogamestocks.ne...
Beneath the Game Sector Hype [View article]
Five Reasons Activision Will Move Higher This Year [View article]
Intuitive Surgical Is Toast [View article]
NPD March Data Shows Video Game Industry Growth Dropping Off [View article]
More details:
www.videogamestocks.ne...
Intuitive Surgical Is Toast [View article]
On Apr 17 06:56 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:
> One more thing - it is quite rare to be able to talk about a growth
> company at this phase of its life-cycle on a free cash yield basis.
> I urge you and other readers to take a look at the free cash flow
> relative to the enterprise value. It's a joke.
Intuitive Surgical Is Toast [View article]
On Apr 17 08:05 AM wobatus wrote:
> Thw writer sounds like a jilted momo investor. I never bought. Was
> tempted when it was below 100. Thinking about it now.
Intuitive Surgical Is Toast [View article]
On Apr 17 06:52 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:
> I don't agree with you either. In addition to the previous comments,
> I would point to several facts, including massive 60% procedure growth,
> strong international demand, continued innovation (the reason for
> the deferrals), steady pricing, great cashflow, continued outside
> leasing sources, high repeat purchases on the systems and steady
> margin guidance despite uncertainty on volumes.
>
> When the company was just beginning its growth phase, it suggested
> that the maximum any institution would buy would be 3 machines, but
> they now have two customers with 5. This technology, a monopoly,
> is becoming the gold standard. The company continues to plow its
> massive profits back into R&D, and the returns on its investment
> continue to be massive.
>
> I sold my stock earlier this week between 114 and 120. I had hoped
> to buy it back before they reported, but the snafu of the early release
> got in my way (luckily I think, given the drop in AH). I plan to
> be buying the dip this morning. I bought for the first time in years
> when they reported in January, but I first became involved in the
> name in early 2005 and have nothing but the highest respect for this
> management team and their mission.
Will OnLive Kill the Console Gaming Business? [View article]
On Mar 25 11:33 AM Dryshipbroker wrote:
> I am in the camp of the skeptics on this. To me, if they have that
> awesome video compression technology in place. This would be better
> served in the Home Video, Streaming Movies segment rather than games.
>
>
> The streaming video, downloading movies market is already there,
> and any "tearing" or lag due to delay issues does not affect the
> overall product.
>
> Whereas for games, all you will have are users who will be complaining
> because of delays where every second counts in their multiplayer
> gaming.
>
> Still I certainly hope Onlive delivers :-)