bbzz24: if i agreed with washington's viewpoint as you accuse, then why doesn't washington adopt a real long-term strategic energy policy? if i agreed with washington, then why would i have pointed out that the "star wars" strategy wrt russia was stupid? i'd rather know and use one language correctly then know 3 and not understand any of them.
bbzzz24: wrt the article you reference, do you really believe russia could not have taken out the pipeline if they wanted to? jeez man, THINK. they are sending a message. they are saying that they COULD take out the pipeline any time they wanted to.
bbzz24: i never blamed the pipeline outage on russia, that was your interpretation. what i AM saying is that russian troops are on the ground in georgia and have the POTENTIAL to control the pipeline any time they want. there is a difference, but apparently geopolitical nuances are not your specialty.
-
bbzz24: if i agreed with washington's viewpoint as you accuse, then why doesn't washington adopt a real long-term strategic energy policy? if i agreed with washington, then why would i have pointed out that the "star wars" strategy wrt russia was stupid? i'd rather know and use one language correctly then know 3 and not understand any of them.
Aug 13 08:21 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by Michael Fitzsimmons »Oil Will Only Fall So Far [View article]
bbzzz24: wrt the article you reference, do you really believe russia could not have taken out the pipeline if they wanted to? jeez man, THINK. they are sending a message. they are saying that they COULD take out the pipeline any time they wanted to.
bbzz24: i never blamed the pipeline outage on russia, that was your interpretation. what i AM saying is that russian troops are on the ground in georgia and have the POTENTIAL to control the pipeline any time they want. there is a difference, but apparently geopolitical nuances are not your specialty.