<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mijka Samora - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Mijka Samora' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora</link>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P 500: Who Needs a Hedge Fund?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/81611-s-p-500-who-needs-a-hedge-fund?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Warren <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Buffett</span></span> has entered a bet with the principals of an asset management firm, Protege Partners, that the S&amp;P 500 (SPY) index will outperform a portfolio of funds of hedge funds over a ten year period. Details of the bet can be found <a href="http://www.longbets.org/362">here</a>.</p><p>Before we address the intricacies of this bet, let us emphasize the meaning of 'a portfolio of funds of hedge funds'. A hedge fund is a portfolio of securities. A fund of hedge funds is a portfolio of hedge funds. Therefore a portfolio of funds of hedge funds is a portfolio of portfolios of portfolios of securities. This layered cake of a construction suggests that Protege may not be as confident of the value-added of hedge funds as it should be.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:40:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>Warren <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Buffett</span></span> has entered a bet with the principals of an asset management firm, Protege Partners, that the S&amp;P 500 (SPY) index will outperform a portfolio of funds of hedge funds over a ten year period. Details of the bet can be found <a href="http://www.longbets.org/362">here</a>.</p><p>Before we address the intricacies of this bet, let us emphasize the meaning of 'a portfolio of funds of hedge funds'. A hedge fund is a portfolio of securities. A fund of hedge funds is a portfolio of hedge funds. Therefore a portfolio of funds of hedge funds is a portfolio of portfolios of portfolios of securities. This layered cake of a construction suggests that Protege may not be as confident of the value-added of hedge funds as it should be.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/81611-s-p-500-who-needs-a-hedge-fund?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expecting a PPI Shock </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/77872-expecting-a-ppi-shock?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77872</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>If you look at <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">PPI</span>
(producer price index) inflation in the United States, you can see that
the latest reading for the past 12 months is 6.9%. This number is bad
enough, but the six months to the end of March were even worse, with
inflation running at an annualized rate of 11%. The next two or three
readings are likely to show an acceleration of this number because
crude oil has <em>risen</em> 20% since the end of March.<!--more--></p>
<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">PPI</span>
also includes weightings from agricultural commodities which have been
on a tear in recent months but have somewhat retreated in April. A good
measure of global food prices is an index produced by the <a href="http://www.fao.org/">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</a>. The <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ai465e/ai465e06.htm"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">FAO</span> food price index</a> peaked in March and shows a very modest decline of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7403112.stm">less than 1% in April</a>. Although some food commodities have seen bigger price declines in April, for example <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7404310.stm">rice down 20%</a>, overall food prices are unlikely to offset the surge in energy prices for April and May <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">PPI</span> figures.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:42:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>If you look at <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">PPI</span>
(producer price index) inflation in the United States, you can see that
the latest reading for the past 12 months is 6.9%. This number is bad
enough, but the six months to the end of March were even worse, with
inflation running at an annualized rate of 11%. The next two or three
readings are likely to show an acceleration of this number because
crude oil has <em>risen</em> 20% since the end of March.<!--more--></p>
<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">PPI</span>
also includes weightings from agricultural commodities which have been
on a tear in recent months but have somewhat retreated in April. A good
measure of global food prices is an index produced by the <a href="http://www.fao.org/">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</a>. The <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ai465e/ai465e06.htm"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">FAO</span> food price index</a> peaked in March and shows a very modest decline of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7403112.stm">less than 1% in April</a>. Although some food commodities have seen bigger price declines in April, for example <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7404310.stm">rice down 20%</a>, overall food prices are unlikely to offset the surge in energy prices for April and May <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">PPI</span> figures.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/77872-expecting-a-ppi-shock?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fed's Secret Guests</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/77260-the-fed-s-secret-guests?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77260</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The market rallied 3.6% intraday on the day of the Fed's Wall Street lunch. Coincidence?</em></p>
<p>As reported by <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a_OXZPHcMwlA&refer=home"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Bloomberg</span> news</a></em>, Federal Reserve chairman <strong>Ben <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Bernanke</span></strong>
had a luncheon with a large number of Wall Street bigwigs on March 11,
a few days before the Fed's unprecedented rescue of Bear <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Stearns</span>.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:36:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>The market rallied 3.6% intraday on the day of the Fed's Wall Street lunch. Coincidence?</em></p>
<p>As reported by <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a_OXZPHcMwlA&refer=home"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Bloomberg</span> news</a></em>, Federal Reserve chairman <strong>Ben <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Bernanke</span></strong>
had a luncheon with a large number of Wall Street bigwigs on March 11,
a few days before the Fed's unprecedented rescue of Bear <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Stearns</span>.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/77260-the-fed-s-secret-guests?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The WSJ Is Wrong on the Housing Crisis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/76109-the-wsj-is-wrong-on-the-housing-crisis?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">76109</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> editorial page had a piece yesterday titled <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121003604494869449.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries">'The Housing Crisis is Over'</a>. In my view, this assessment is premature by many years.<!--more--></p>
<p>The
article's main flaws, based on my own research, are its emphasis on
pricing as the key driver of housing demand, and its sole focus on the
inventory of <em>new</em> homes, ignoring <em>existing</em> homes. The
author puts his faith in a rebound based on the issue of affordability:
house prices have come down enough that people can afford them again.
Fair enough but he treats the inventory of homes with a nonchalance
that ignores underlying demographic trends, writing:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> editorial page had a piece yesterday titled <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121003604494869449.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries">'The Housing Crisis is Over'</a>. In my view, this assessment is premature by many years.<!--more--></p>
<p>The
article's main flaws, based on my own research, are its emphasis on
pricing as the key driver of housing demand, and its sole focus on the
inventory of <em>new</em> homes, ignoring <em>existing</em> homes. The
author puts his faith in a rebound based on the issue of affordability:
house prices have come down enough that people can afford them again.
Fair enough but he treats the inventory of homes with a nonchalance
that ignores underlying demographic trends, writing:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/76109-the-wsj-is-wrong-on-the-housing-crisis?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hd">HD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hov">HOV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbh">KBH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/len">LEN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/low">LOW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/phm">PHM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tol">TOL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Fed Bankrupting America?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/74446-is-the-fed-bankrupting-america?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74446</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't be mad, but <em>I told you so!</em></p>
<p>Oh yes, I told you so,
and more than once. Drowned by the robotic one-note din of market
participants clamoring for more and greater Fed rate cuts since August,
I and a few others have argued (for example here one <a href="http://www.mijkasamora.com/2007/09/nanny-capitalism.html">September 4th</a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/48510-bidding-farewell-to-the-dollar">October 1st</a>) that more rate cuts would open a clear road to disaster, a superhighway to the downfall of the American superpower.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:33:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>Don't be mad, but <em>I told you so!</em></p>
<p>Oh yes, I told you so,
and more than once. Drowned by the robotic one-note din of market
participants clamoring for more and greater Fed rate cuts since August,
I and a few others have argued (for example here one <a href="http://www.mijkasamora.com/2007/09/nanny-capitalism.html">September 4th</a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/48510-bidding-farewell-to-the-dollar">October 1st</a>) that more rate cuts would open a clear road to disaster, a superhighway to the downfall of the American superpower.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/74446-is-the-fed-bankrupting-america?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should the Federal Reserve Remain Independent?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/57037-should-the-federal-reserve-remain-independent?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57037</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As the Federal Reserve prepared to slash interest rates again yesterday
afternoon, it seemed a good time to point out that this was a move born out
of either despair or favoritism: despair in the face of an intractable
financial crisis, or favoritism to bail out some choice names among
investment banks.<!--more--></p>

<p>Either way, stepping back and considering the context is useful. So we will simply remind readers of the following:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:49:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>As the Federal Reserve prepared to slash interest rates again yesterday
afternoon, it seemed a good time to point out that this was a move born out
of either despair or favoritism: despair in the face of an intractable
financial crisis, or favoritism to bail out some choice names among
investment banks.<!--more--></p>

<p>Either way, stepping back and considering the context is useful. So we will simply remind readers of the following:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/57037-should-the-federal-reserve-remain-independent?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerging Markets: An Increasingly Poor Bet? </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/55023-emerging-markets-an-increasingly-poor-bet?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">55023</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p> On a recent visit to my dentist's clinic, this honorable man, entrusted
with keeping thousands of teeth in New York City in good repair, asked
me if I had discovered any new countries to invest in.<!--more--> Not stocks, not
mutual funds, not even hedge funds, <em>countries</em>!</p>

<p>Over
the years, this highly successful Doctor Tooth has invested in scores
of companies and funds and has achieved better than respectable
returns. In general, he has tended to invest in stocks of companies
that he understood well in the dental or health care areas, or
occasionally in the consumer technology sector. For example, he has
done very well with <a href="http://www.nobelbiocare.com/global/en/default.htm?langdetect=en">Nobel <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Biocare</span></a> (NBCHF.PK) and <a href="http://www.stryker.com/myhsp/index.htm"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Stryker</span></a> (SYK) and <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a> (AAPL). In fact, when I think of it, he seems to have done better than most professional money managers that I know.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:48:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p> On a recent visit to my dentist's clinic, this honorable man, entrusted
with keeping thousands of teeth in New York City in good repair, asked
me if I had discovered any new countries to invest in.<!--more--> Not stocks, not
mutual funds, not even hedge funds, <em>countries</em>!</p>

<p>Over
the years, this highly successful Doctor Tooth has invested in scores
of companies and funds and has achieved better than respectable
returns. In general, he has tended to invest in stocks of companies
that he understood well in the dental or health care areas, or
occasionally in the consumer technology sector. For example, he has
done very well with <a href="http://www.nobelbiocare.com/global/en/default.htm?langdetect=en">Nobel <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Biocare</span></a> (NBCHF.PK) and <a href="http://www.stryker.com/myhsp/index.htm"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Stryker</span></a> (SYK) and <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a> (AAPL). In fact, when I think of it, he seems to have done better than most professional money managers that I know.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/55023-emerging-markets-an-increasingly-poor-bet?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adre">ADRE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dgt">DGT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eem">EEM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/efa">EFA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ioo">IOO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vwo">VWO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gisele Bundchen, Currency Trader</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/53162-gisele-bundchen-currency-trader?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53162</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Never has an FX trader looked so good or been this sexy. <!--more-->And never has "buy me some Euro forwards" sounded more enticing.  Top supermodel <a href="http://www.giselebundchen.com.br/gisele_home_padrao_1024.asp">Gisele <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Bundchen</span></a> reportedly wants her new contract with <a href="http://www.pantene.com/jsp/global_splash/index.jsp"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Pantene</span></a> hair products (a <a href="http://www.pg.com/en_US/index.jhtml">Procter & Gamble</a> (PG)
brand) to be paid in a currency other than the US dollar. Gisele deems
promised future dollar payments to be an unsafe store of value. A
million dollars agreed to today but paid next year may be worth less
when measured against other currencies in twelve months.</p>

<p>Leaving
aside the obvious point that Gisele could easily put in place a forward
sale of dollars to neutralize any fluctuations, we observe that asset
revaluations in past cycles have sometimes reversed once a certain
level of group-think absurdity has been reached. It would take a brave
soul to affirm that the dollar has reached its nadir and that it would
start rising from here. However, we live in an interlinked global
economy and an isolated protracted decline of the dollar vs. other
currencies is not a realistic scenario.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:28:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>Never has an FX trader looked so good or been this sexy. <!--more-->And never has "buy me some Euro forwards" sounded more enticing.  Top supermodel <a href="http://www.giselebundchen.com.br/gisele_home_padrao_1024.asp">Gisele <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Bundchen</span></a> reportedly wants her new contract with <a href="http://www.pantene.com/jsp/global_splash/index.jsp"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Pantene</span></a> hair products (a <a href="http://www.pg.com/en_US/index.jhtml">Procter & Gamble</a> (PG)
brand) to be paid in a currency other than the US dollar. Gisele deems
promised future dollar payments to be an unsafe store of value. A
million dollars agreed to today but paid next year may be worth less
when measured against other currencies in twelve months.</p>

<p>Leaving
aside the obvious point that Gisele could easily put in place a forward
sale of dollars to neutralize any fluctuations, we observe that asset
revaluations in past cycles have sometimes reversed once a certain
level of group-think absurdity has been reached. It would take a brave
soul to affirm that the dollar has reached its nadir and that it would
start rising from here. However, we live in an interlinked global
economy and an isolated protracted decline of the dollar vs. other
currencies is not a realistic scenario.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/53162-gisele-bundchen-currency-trader?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Bank's November Bonus Advantage </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/53159-investment-bank-s-november-bonus-advantage?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53159</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>If you listen carefully, you can hear the creaking stresses mounting in
investment banks' balance sheets. <!--more-->The iron rivets are holding fast but
is there a risk they will suddenly pop?</p>
<p>Many of the assets held by banks and by asset managers may need to be
priced down to approach more realistic valuation levels after the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">subprime</span>
debacle. There is no compulsory reason to do this repricing before the
end of the current fiscal year and the firms holding these assets may
decide to postpone mark-to-market adjustments until after the end of
the fiscal year, after bonus pools for 2007 have been secured.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:22:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>If you listen carefully, you can hear the creaking stresses mounting in
investment banks' balance sheets. <!--more-->The iron rivets are holding fast but
is there a risk they will suddenly pop?</p>
<p>Many of the assets held by banks and by asset managers may need to be
priced down to approach more realistic valuation levels after the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">subprime</span>
debacle. There is no compulsory reason to do this repricing before the
end of the current fiscal year and the firms holding these assets may
decide to postpone mark-to-market adjustments until after the end of
the fiscal year, after bonus pools for 2007 have been secured.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/53159-investment-bank-s-november-bonus-advantage?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kce">KCE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Factors That Will Help the Next Bull Market </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/51070-factors-that-will-help-the-next-bull-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51070</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The US stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 index, made a bottom at 102 on the 9<span><span>th</span></span> of August 1982. That is a level it reached for the first time on the 9<span><span>th</span></span>
of July 1968, a full fourteen years earlier. <!--more-->Since the low of 1982,
twenty-five years ago, the S&P 500 has risen 1370%. One dollar has
become almost $15, equivalent to an 11.4% <span><span>CAGR</span></span> in 25 years, after a <em>nominal</em> <span><span>CAGR</span></span> of 0% for the preceding 14 years (significantly worse in <em>real</em>
terms). Given the last 25 years and the preceding 14 years, the
continuation of the bull market cannot be taken as a foregone
conclusion, especially since the S&P 500 was already at its current
level seven years ago.</p>
<br/>
<p>
In recent years, a new belief has taken hold among investors that
'there is always a bull market somewhere' and therefore, that it does
not matter what the broader market does in general. This theory may be
true and it has considerable appeal, in particular among individuals
with a high degree of confidence in their stock-picking ability.
However the sectors and stocks that continue to perform while the
broader market is falling get narrower and fewer and only the very best
long investors can expect to come out on top in a severe bear market.
An easier and well-tested way to make money is to be an outstanding
investor in a rising stock market.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:24:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>The US stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 index, made a bottom at 102 on the 9<span><span>th</span></span> of August 1982. That is a level it reached for the first time on the 9<span><span>th</span></span>
of July 1968, a full fourteen years earlier. <!--more-->Since the low of 1982,
twenty-five years ago, the S&P 500 has risen 1370%. One dollar has
become almost $15, equivalent to an 11.4% <span><span>CAGR</span></span> in 25 years, after a <em>nominal</em> <span><span>CAGR</span></span> of 0% for the preceding 14 years (significantly worse in <em>real</em>
terms). Given the last 25 years and the preceding 14 years, the
continuation of the bull market cannot be taken as a foregone
conclusion, especially since the S&P 500 was already at its current
level seven years ago.</p>
<br/>
<p>
In recent years, a new belief has taken hold among investors that
'there is always a bull market somewhere' and therefore, that it does
not matter what the broader market does in general. This theory may be
true and it has considerable appeal, in particular among individuals
with a high degree of confidence in their stock-picking ability.
However the sectors and stocks that continue to perform while the
broader market is falling get narrower and fewer and only the very best
long investors can expect to come out on top in a severe bear market.
An easier and well-tested way to make money is to be an outstanding
investor in a rising stock market.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/51070-factors-that-will-help-the-next-bull-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ericsson's Outstanding Value: Patience is Key</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/49697-ericsson-s-outstanding-value-patience-is-key?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49697</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>There was a time in the late 1990s when Nokia (NOK) and Ericsson (ERIC) stocks moved
in lockstep. <!--more-->Much has changed since then and Nokia has become primarily
a mobile <em>handset</em> company, while Ericsson has consolidated its position as the world leader in mobile <em>infrastructure</em>.
This divergence in strategic focus explains the different recent
performance of the two stocks. Nokia is up 75% this year, while
Ericsson is about flat. (Nokia trades in Finland while Ericsson trades
in Sweden, but both have US-listed ADRs.)</p>
<p> In addition, analysts
are falling over themselves pushing Nokia to new heights, while
consigning Ericsson to the shame and neglect of a Hold recommendation,
proving once again that analysts are more adept at reinforcing a trend
(can you say momentum investor?) than they are at identifying
outstanding value. And outstanding value is exactly what Ericsson
offers at SEK27 per share ($1 = SEK6.4) or $42 per US-traded ADR.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:57:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>There was a time in the late 1990s when Nokia (NOK) and Ericsson (ERIC) stocks moved
in lockstep. <!--more-->Much has changed since then and Nokia has become primarily
a mobile <em>handset</em> company, while Ericsson has consolidated its position as the world leader in mobile <em>infrastructure</em>.
This divergence in strategic focus explains the different recent
performance of the two stocks. Nokia is up 75% this year, while
Ericsson is about flat. (Nokia trades in Finland while Ericsson trades
in Sweden, but both have US-listed ADRs.)</p>
<p> In addition, analysts
are falling over themselves pushing Nokia to new heights, while
consigning Ericsson to the shame and neglect of a Hold recommendation,
proving once again that analysts are more adept at reinforcing a trend
(can you say momentum investor?) than they are at identifying
outstanding value. And outstanding value is exactly what Ericsson
offers at SEK27 per share ($1 = SEK6.4) or $42 per US-traded ADR.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/49697-ericsson-s-outstanding-value-patience-is-key?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eric">ERIC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who's Running the Fed?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/49072-who-s-running-the-fed?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49072</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The news media reported Wednesday that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had
spoken on the phone with former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin after
the Fed's decision to keep interest rates unchanged in August.<!--more--> Mr.
Bernanke also had conversations with Lewis Ranieri, founder of Hyperion
Capital Management, and Raymond Dalio, president of Bridgewater
Associates. </p>
<p>Mr. Rubin had a long career at Goldman Sachs and is
now chairman of the executive committee and a director of Citigroup.
Mr. Ranieri, according to Bloomberg News, is a former vice-chairman of
Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup) and is 'a pioneer in the
mortgage-backed securities market'. Bridgewater is the fourth largest
US hedge fund with assets under management of $32 billion, according to
HedgeFund Intelligence's Absolute Return magazine.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>The news media reported Wednesday that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had
spoken on the phone with former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin after
the Fed's decision to keep interest rates unchanged in August.<!--more--> Mr.
Bernanke also had conversations with Lewis Ranieri, founder of Hyperion
Capital Management, and Raymond Dalio, president of Bridgewater
Associates. </p>
<p>Mr. Rubin had a long career at Goldman Sachs and is
now chairman of the executive committee and a director of Citigroup.
Mr. Ranieri, according to Bloomberg News, is a former vice-chairman of
Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup) and is 'a pioneer in the
mortgage-backed securities market'. Bridgewater is the fourth largest
US hedge fund with assets under management of $32 billion, according to
HedgeFund Intelligence's Absolute Return magazine.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/49072-who-s-running-the-fed?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Wal-Mart Era 'Drawing to a Close'?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/49011-is-the-wal-mart-era-drawing-to-a-close?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A front page article in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> Wednesday argues that the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Wal</span>-Mart (WMT) era is 'drawing to a close'. The evidence <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">diligently</span> provided by the author of the piece is anecdotal and not entirely convincing. Since the stock has undergone a massive <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">derating</span>, we can perhaps count the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">WSJ</span>
story as part of the magazine indicator, which states that by the time
a trend makes it on the cover of a major publication, that trend itself
is about to reverse.<!--more--> Paraphrased below are some of the arguments
presented in the WSJ article and our comments:<br/>
<br /><strong><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">WSJ</span>:</strong> Many shoppers are avoiding <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Wal</span>-Mart
because they are looking 'for greater convenience, more selection,
higher quality, or better service'. Americans have grown richer and
they are looking for more than just the lowest prices. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Wal</span>-Mart's focus on scale has turned from being its major <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">strength</span> to being a weakness. Consumers want more choice, freshness and service. <em>Our
comment: True for now, many people may prefer to shop at smaller more
specialized stores, whereas years ago they could only afford to shop at
<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Wal</span>-Mart.
But let us see what happens at the next recession, when a large segment
of consumers will have to move downscale again, and refocus exclusively
on price. It is risky to interpret what may be a cyclical development
as a secular change in consumer habits.</em></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 05:48:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>A front page article in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> Wednesday argues that the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Wal</span>-Mart (WMT) era is 'drawing to a close'. The evidence <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">diligently</span> provided by the author of the piece is anecdotal and not entirely convincing. Since the stock has undergone a massive <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">derating</span>, we can perhaps count the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">WSJ</span>
story as part of the magazine indicator, which states that by the time
a trend makes it on the cover of a major publication, that trend itself
is about to reverse.<!--more--> Paraphrased below are some of the arguments
presented in the WSJ article and our comments:<br/>
<br /><strong><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">WSJ</span>:</strong> Many shoppers are avoiding <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Wal</span>-Mart
because they are looking 'for greater convenience, more selection,
higher quality, or better service'. Americans have grown richer and
they are looking for more than just the lowest prices. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Wal</span>-Mart's focus on scale has turned from being its major <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">strength</span> to being a weakness. Consumers want more choice, freshness and service. <em>Our
comment: True for now, many people may prefer to shop at smaller more
specialized stores, whereas years ago they could only afford to shop at
<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">Wal</span>-Mart.
But let us see what happens at the next recession, when a large segment
of consumers will have to move downscale again, and refocus exclusively
on price. It is risky to interpret what may be a cyclical development
as a secular change in consumer habits.</em></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/49011-is-the-wal-mart-era-drawing-to-a-close?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wmt">WMT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bidding Farewell to the Dollar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/48510-bidding-farewell-to-the-dollar?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48510</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The fleecing of Main Street by Wall Street, it was declared last Tuesday, can go on unabated as the Federal Reserve voted unanimously to cut the fed fund rate and the discount rate by 50 basis points each.<!--more--> Consensus opinion had expected the Fed to cut only the fed fund rate and only by 25 basis points. The dual action therefore was bold and dramatic, and it received an equally bold and dramatic response from the community of paper millionaires around the world (otherwise known as financiers, bankers and hedge fund managers) who bid up global stock markets by 3% or more in less than 24 hours.<br/>
<br /><strong>Going for the SuperPut</strong></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Mijka Samora</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Mijka Samora submits:<strong><p>The fleecing of Main Street by Wall Street, it was declared last Tuesday, can go on unabated as the Federal Reserve voted unanimously to cut the fed fund rate and the discount rate by 50 basis points each.<!--more--> Consensus opinion had expected the Fed to cut only the fed fund rate and only by 25 basis points. The dual action therefore was bold and dramatic, and it received an equally bold and dramatic response from the community of paper millionaires around the world (otherwise known as financiers, bankers and hedge fund managers) who bid up global stock markets by 3% or more in less than 24 hours.<br/>
<br /><strong>Going for the SuperPut</strong></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/48510-bidding-farewell-to-the-dollar?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/mijka-samora">Mijka Samora</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
