Mike Stathis

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Yes well Pax, as you can see I don't publish on Seeking Alpha much anymore...not because 99% of the readers and authors are clueless (although they are), but because Seeking Alpha censors me. When they do publish my pieces they deemphasize them so they won't get many reads. It's easy to see their tricks.

But the facts speak for themselves. The fact is that I'm in a much different league than the authors of SA and a completely different universe than most of the readers. I serve institutions. All of the other authors on SA and elsewhere herd sheep. I thought I could lead these sheep on the path towards investment wisdom, but it's a lost cause.

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Response to Simple Simon: Very well said! You get it Simon. And yes, for some reason I seemed to have made some people upset. All I was trying to do is relate some big picture trends to investment themes.

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Response to Economics Teacher: Your last response was much preferred. Although I disagree, at least you explained your views. It is appreciated. However, let me first say this; I agree with you about the auto industry in the '80s, but only in the early '80s. By the late '80s it had to have been clear to management that foreign imports would only increase. So yes, they were fighting the unions. I apologize if I did not make that clear.

As for trade, I certainly agree that it's good for all involved. However, the fact is that under our current economic system, America has entered a system of unfair trade with the rest of the world. As a result, the only beneficiaries are corporations and foreign workers. And we are seeing the results of this job transfer - no real wage growth since 1999, a weak dollar, and soaring inflation for basic necessities.

How can America expect to have fair trade with nations that manipulate their currency (China) with no ability to counteract (due to the control by WTO), nations whose corporations do not face the costs of EPA and OSHA standards, and whose governments cover the costs of the fastest growing expense in cororate America today - healthcare? U.S. companies simply cannot compete with this and that is precisely why millions of jobs have been sent overseas. As well, most large corporations have moved operations to Asia, taking jobs along with them.

Also note that America has been unintentionally transferring its innovation secrets to its trade partners. I won't go into the details here but as an example, India now produces F-16s under contract. This has catalyzed the growth of its own airline industry. You can check he Dallas Federal Reserve website for an excellent article on this topic.

And yes, I do fault the auto makers for jumping on the consumer finance bandwagon. In fact, I actually use that as a benchmark for companies that have achieved the limits of growth. When companies shift their focus from making cars to makig interest, I think that paints a dim picture for U.S. manufacturing. The fact that many large U.S. companies now have huge consumer finance divisions tells the story of the U.S. economy. And now we are seeing the effects of excess consumption.

Finally, I never claimed to be an "investment guru" and I'm certainly not perfect. I welcome all comments and criticisms. The only thing I ask is that people provide me with the same respect they deserve so we can all mutually exchange our ideas and viewpoints.

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Response to Bhakta: I agree – Washington is responsible for the current problems. I could also argue that our badly damaged free market system is responsible for many of our economic problems, but that does not mean that we should scrap it. Accountability is key, and right now very little exists. The government has a role in resolving many of the problems if voters demand it. They must be held accountable for their actions. But as it stands today, most Americans are kept in the dark with the help of the media so they really do not understand what is going on. All they see are higher prices and lower quality jobs. And when they listen to the radio or watch TV, they are told these problems are due to the democrats or republicans. In reality, the problems are due to both parties. Like it or not, the government will always be involved. We must accept this fact and focus on making sure their involvement is beneficial to Americans. That is their responsibility.

Response to Cicero: If you think I am advocating socialism then you have misinterpreted my article. Government involvement does not necessarily imply socialism. It’s not about WHETHER the government is or should be involved because they are. What is more important is to define their role and make sure they do what they are supposed, no more, no less. I agree that corruption is part of human nature. But that does not mean we cannot strive to minimize it. Arguably, the level of corruption seen today is unprecedented in U.S. history.

For those of you who have concluded that I am a socialist or liberal, you are way off base. I can only conclude that those who would label me as such do not understand the complexity of the problems in America. Once again, my work experience celebrates capitalism at its highest reach. I am an entrepreneur at heart and I have always been compensated via merit-based performance, which is consistent with capitalism at it purest form. Capitalism is the best system, but only if it is functional. That said, I urge you to reconsider my views because they come from someone who supports capitalism as the only path for America. But it has many problems that must be fixed.

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Response to keltorttruth: Actually, I am very far from being a liberal. All I want is for more equity in America. We have given the oil industry many chances to deliver. And all it has managed to do is deliver record profits. Meanwhile, OPEC nations now enjoy enormous trade surpluses due to oil export revenues. What are they doing with all of this cash lying around? They are buying up U.S. assets, mainly hard assets – real estate, factories, and banks. Combined with the effects of free trade, America is selling off its most vital assets in exchange for oil and consumer goods which used to be made in America. The current system isn’t getting the job done. There is a much better way. I am not so naïve as to think that blanket regulation would solve the problems. The government needs to be held more accountable. Clearly, we need to commit to a formidable alternative energy policy. Why is that you think Exxon refuses to invest a single penny into alternative energy? Because they have a monopoly. If you want to play the “liberal vs. republican” game that tells me you have let the media brainwash you. The fact is that both parties are essentially the same. America’s economic problems are not party-centric, they are Washington-centric. This is why Washington makes it extremely difficult for a third party candidate to run. They don't want anyone to spoil their party. It’s all about big money. And unless you are part of that boys club, you stand to suffer, along with the rest of us.

Industries to Avoid, Industries to Buy

Response to Economics Teacher: For you to make such a rash ascertain tells me you are of the school of traditional economic thought in America – the same school of thought that advocates the Federal Reserve’s destruction of our currency; the same school of thought that believes that a 2-decade plus period of overconsumption is somehow good for the U.S. economy; the same school of thought that promised free trade would bring better jobs to Americans. Look at the effects of this reckless economic policy. America is mortgaging off its wealth to foreign nations. And the weakness of the dollar is a reflection of this reality. Finally, my investment track record speaks for itself. Back in 2006, when virtually every U.S. economist glamorized the strength of the economy, I uncovered the realities of the illusion created by Greenspan and predicted the events we see today. I also provided numerous investment ideas such as shorting the mortgage, homebuilder, bank stocks, buying gold, oil, etc. I suppose you think GDP, inflation, and employment numbers, as reported, are not manipulated. Finally, if economists really understand the things that enable one to provide valuable investment advice, why is it that I have never heard of an economist who has become wealthy from investing? With all due respect, if in fact you possess a superior understanding of the topics you mention that are critical for investments, perhaps you should exchange your teaching career for an advisory role with a hedge fund.