Look, my article is very clear about the scope of the idea it is presenting. It does not claim to be comprehensive. Perhaps the idea is not useful to you; perhaps it is obvious to you already. There are some, however, who may find it helpful. Please have some empathy for readers who may not think identically to you.
Opinions are worth more than facts, because opinions are not already priced into the market. Amateurs trade on facts-this is a fact.
I respect my readers enough to know that they will decide for themselves. I simply point things out. I don't feel it would be worthwhile for me to obsessively spell out my last two points, and I am transparent about this. It is more efficient for the readers to check out such things for themselves.
I presented reasoning in accompaniment with my claim that the comparison is important. You cannot begin an indictment of my claim without beginning an indictment of the reasoning behind it.
It is ironic that you utilize the term "waste" to attack a renewable energy company. Much of your work is good, but you're missing the point, and should error towards agnosticism on anything energy.
I'm just saying, if you want to increase your life expectancy at the cost of your quality of life, there are things you can do like caloric restriction. Most of us aren't going to trade quality of life for life extension.
Pandora Does Something Some Said Couldn't Be Done: Posts A Profit [View article]
The reason they're declining is because they were among first movers who didn't have to deal with much competition. As the competition inevitably increases...
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Looking through the comments you make on Seeking Alpha I can see that you consider the details and the big picture. As you know, the market prices all known information into it and it is virtually impossible to find a risk-free profit (unless you're buying insurance on credit default swaps from GS). I share your view that people can be irrational. I seek out these irrational people so that I can take the other side of their bets. I sincerely believe that betting against dumb ideas is perhaps one of the lowest risk ways of beating the market. The nuclear question is mostly an international one; it's not about new construction in the US. Ultimately people will be forced into rationality by pure supply/demand. Of course, nothing's guaranteed.
Trust me, the Republicans have forgotten about terrorists. Iran doesn't count.
Pandora Media 3Q11 Earnings Preview: Growth And Innovation Amid Competition [View article]
If Pandora and Pandora's competitors are eating radio's lunch, why not short radio, instead of betting on which streaming company will come out of the swamp ahead?
Pandora: Internet Radio's Apple? [View article]
Pandora: Internet Radio's Apple? [View article]
I respect my readers enough to know that they will decide for themselves. I simply point things out. I don't feel it would be worthwhile for me to obsessively spell out my last two points, and I am transparent about this. It is more efficient for the readers to check out such things for themselves.
Pandora: Internet Radio's Apple? [View article]
Pandora Media: Analyzing 3Q Financial Results [View article]
How The U.S. Is Quickly Becoming A Third World Country (Part 1) [View article]
Trading The Not So Super Committee [View article]
Einstein's Hedge [View article]
Pandora Does Something Some Said Couldn't Be Done: Posts A Profit [View article]
Einstein's Hedge [View article]
Pandora Does Something Some Said Couldn't Be Done: Posts A Profit [View article]
Going Short On GameStop [View article]
Einstein's Hedge [View article]
Trust me, the Republicans have forgotten about terrorists. Iran doesn't count.
How The U.S. Is Quickly Becoming A Third World Country (Part 1) [View article]
Pandora Media 3Q11 Earnings Preview: Growth And Innovation Amid Competition [View article]
Einstein's Hedge [View article]