<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nathaniel Munson - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>© seekingalpha.com. Use of this feed is limited to personal, non-commercial use and is governed by Seeking Alpha's Terms of Use (http://seekingalpha.com/page/terms-of-use). Publishing this feed for public or commercial use and/or misrepresentation by a third party is prohibited.</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson</link>
    <item>
      <title>Biotech: Hedging While Speculating</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1308871-biotech-hedging-while-speculating?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1308871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the past, I have been afraid of the biotechnology industry and stayed away from the stocks of its companies, but recently I read an <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/1254581-5-reasons-mannkind-could-be-the-best-performing-stock-of-2013">article about MannKind</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mnkd' title='MannKind Corporation'>MNKD</a>), a company that has developed a drug named Afrezza that functions very similarly to a healthy pancreas. This article informed me about MannKind, but it also got me very interested in the speculative possibilities of biotech stocks in general. I am rather risk averse but have found a method that I think any person can use, no matter what their risk tolerance, to speculate on a stock while still keeping their money relatively safe.</p><p>
  <strong>How a drug comes to market</strong>
</p><p>The path a drug must take to make it to market in the U.S. is both long and expensive, on average taking approximately 12 years and $500 to $800 million to get a drug from development to market. Listed below</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 04:57:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>In the past, I have been afraid of the biotechnology industry and stayed away from the stocks of its companies, but recently I read an <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/1254581-5-reasons-mannkind-could-be-the-best-performing-stock-of-2013">article about MannKind</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mnkd' title='MannKind Corporation'>MNKD</a>), a company that has developed a drug named Afrezza that functions very similarly to a healthy pancreas. This article informed me about MannKind, but it also got me very interested in the speculative possibilities of biotech stocks in general. I am rather risk averse but have found a method that I think any person can use, no matter what their risk tolerance, to speculate on a stock while still keeping their money relatively safe.</p><p>
  <strong>How a drug comes to market</strong>
</p><p>The path a drug must take to make it to market in the U.S. is both long and expensive, on average taking approximately 12 years and $500 to $800 million to get a drug from development to market. Listed below</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1308871-biotech-hedging-while-speculating?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acad">ACAD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/isis">ISIS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mnkd">MNKD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comcast Is Entering The Wonderful World Of Disney</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1250041-comcast-is-entering-the-wonderful-world-of-disney?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1250041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Comcast (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmcsa' title='Comcast Corporation'>CMCSA</a>) has been at the forefront of the minds of many investors for a variety of reasons recently. The stock price has been climbing at an astoundingly fast rate - it has just about doubled over the past fifteen months, from $21 in November 2011 to $41 last week. The long-term price trend is a result of Comcast's overall business, while the recent bump up in the stock price came from Comcast's announcement on February 12th that it would be purchasing the remaining 49% ownership stake of NBCUniversal from General Electric (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge' title='General Electric Company'>GE</a>) well ahead of schedule. According to the <a href="http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/comcast-to-acquire-general-electrics-common-equity-ownership-interest-in-nbcuniversal" rel="nofollow">statement</a> on Comcast's website, this acquisition &quot;solidifies Comcast's position as a leading media and technology company.&quot; It also brings Comcast even farther down the road to being Disney's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis' title='The Walt Disney Company'>DIS</a>) biggest competitor. What does this mean for the company's future and for investors who want to be a part of</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 02:18:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>Comcast (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmcsa' title='Comcast Corporation'>CMCSA</a>) has been at the forefront of the minds of many investors for a variety of reasons recently. The stock price has been climbing at an astoundingly fast rate - it has just about doubled over the past fifteen months, from $21 in November 2011 to $41 last week. The long-term price trend is a result of Comcast's overall business, while the recent bump up in the stock price came from Comcast's announcement on February 12th that it would be purchasing the remaining 49% ownership stake of NBCUniversal from General Electric (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ge' title='General Electric Company'>GE</a>) well ahead of schedule. According to the <a href="http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/comcast-to-acquire-general-electrics-common-equity-ownership-interest-in-nbcuniversal" rel="nofollow">statement</a> on Comcast's website, this acquisition &quot;solidifies Comcast's position as a leading media and technology company.&quot; It also brings Comcast even farther down the road to being Disney's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis' title='The Walt Disney Company'>DIS</a>) biggest competitor. What does this mean for the company's future and for investors who want to be a part of</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1250041-comcast-is-entering-the-wonderful-world-of-disney?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis">DIS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cmcsa">CMCSA</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dell Dilemma</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1183521-the-dell-dilemma?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1183521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>By now, most investors know about the <strong>Dell</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) LBO, but let's quickly recap. On February 6th, Dell filed a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/d480506d8k.htm" rel="nofollow">Form 8-K</a> to announce that it had entered into an agreement to be acquired by Michael Dell, founder of Dell, and Silver Lake Partners, a California based private equity firm. The deal values Dell at $24.4 billion with a per share price of $13.65, a 25% premium over the close of $11.83 on January 11th, the day before the rumors leaked. The deal is set to close in the second quarter of 2014-that is, if shareholders are convinced that it's in their best interest. So far, a lot of the larger shareholders don't feel that it is.</p><p>Most notably showing its concern is Southeastern Asset Management, an 8.5% beneficial owner of the company. Southeastern said in a <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/southeastern-asset-management-opposes-current-transaction-for-dell-190423511.html" rel="nofollow">letter</a> to Dell's Board of Directors on February 8th that</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:01:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>By now, most investors know about the <strong>Dell</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) LBO, but let's quickly recap. On February 6th, Dell filed a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/d480506d8k.htm" rel="nofollow">Form 8-K</a> to announce that it had entered into an agreement to be acquired by Michael Dell, founder of Dell, and Silver Lake Partners, a California based private equity firm. The deal values Dell at $24.4 billion with a per share price of $13.65, a 25% premium over the close of $11.83 on January 11th, the day before the rumors leaked. The deal is set to close in the second quarter of 2014-that is, if shareholders are convinced that it's in their best interest. So far, a lot of the larger shareholders don't feel that it is.</p><p>Most notably showing its concern is Southeastern Asset Management, an 8.5% beneficial owner of the company. Southeastern said in a <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/southeastern-asset-management-opposes-current-transaction-for-dell-190423511.html" rel="nofollow">letter</a> to Dell's Board of Directors on February 8th that</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1183521-the-dell-dilemma?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell">DELL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: The $200 Billion Question</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171251-apple-the-200-billion-question?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1171251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>How did Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) market cap drop from $656 billion to $446 billion in less than five months? Is the company really worth $200 billion less now than it was on September 19th? Were $200 billion worth of Apple assets destroyed in some sort of unseen natural disaster? Highly unlikely. Then what happened? Many attribute it to the iPhone 5, which has been called an evolution rather than a revolution. This could be, but is the price tag of innovation really $200 billion? Is innovation at Apple no more? Or is there still hope for this company that just last year made Exxon Mobil's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) market cap look like Monopoly money? Will Apple ever again have a market share of more than $600 billion? These many questions comprise <em>the</em> $200 billion question. This article will look at three things: <em><strong>where</strong></em> the money went, <em><strong>why</strong></em> it went there,</p>                    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:38:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>How did Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) market cap drop from $656 billion to $446 billion in less than five months? Is the company really worth $200 billion less now than it was on September 19th? Were $200 billion worth of Apple assets destroyed in some sort of unseen natural disaster? Highly unlikely. Then what happened? Many attribute it to the iPhone 5, which has been called an evolution rather than a revolution. This could be, but is the price tag of innovation really $200 billion? Is innovation at Apple no more? Or is there still hope for this company that just last year made Exxon Mobil's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) market cap look like Monopoly money? Will Apple ever again have a market share of more than $600 billion? These many questions comprise <em>the</em> $200 billion question. This article will look at three things: <em><strong>where</strong></em> the money went, <em><strong>why</strong></em> it went there,</p>                    <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171251-apple-the-200-billion-question?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Disney: The Force Is Strong With This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1152791-disney-the-force-is-strong-with-this-one?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1152791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Unless you live in a galaxy far, far away, you probably know by now that Disney (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis' title='The Walt Disney Company'>DIS</a>) has acquired the rights to most of the Star Wars franchise through the purchase of LucasArts, Lucasfilms, Industrial Light &amp; Magic, and Skywalker Sound. You may have also heard that the White House has rejected a petition to begin construction on the Death Star, which, unfortunately for Disney, means they won't be able to sell the plans to the federal government for big bucks. Fear not though, unlike the Death Star, Disney cannot be destroyed by a statement from the White House nor a Jedi in an X-Wing. They may have paid $4.05 billion in shares and cash to acquire the company and the franchise, but the price does not matter, it's the return that matters. Disney clearly had the capital to pull this off with relative ease, now the question is whether</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:21:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>Unless you live in a galaxy far, far away, you probably know by now that Disney (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis' title='The Walt Disney Company'>DIS</a>) has acquired the rights to most of the Star Wars franchise through the purchase of LucasArts, Lucasfilms, Industrial Light &amp; Magic, and Skywalker Sound. You may have also heard that the White House has rejected a petition to begin construction on the Death Star, which, unfortunately for Disney, means they won't be able to sell the plans to the federal government for big bucks. Fear not though, unlike the Death Star, Disney cannot be destroyed by a statement from the White House nor a Jedi in an X-Wing. They may have paid $4.05 billion in shares and cash to acquire the company and the franchise, but the price does not matter, it's the return that matters. Disney clearly had the capital to pull this off with relative ease, now the question is whether</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1152791-disney-the-force-is-strong-with-this-one?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis">DIS</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank Of America: Still Too Big To Fail?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1134811-bank-of-america-still-too-big-to-fail?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1134811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Ever since Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy in 2008, people have become increasingly <span>wary</span> of big banks. Some have acted on this fear by taking to the streets and protesting, hence the Occupy Wall Street movement. The small banks have already shown that they know how to use the public's anxiety to their benefit with bumper stickers that say things like "Don't blame me, I bank locally" and ads that poke fun at Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) for their <span>exorbitant</span> fees and lack of personalized customer service. </p><p>An example that comes to mind is United Financial Bancorp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ubnk' title='United Financial Bancorp, Inc.'>UBNK</a>), who, in 2009, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW-fPC2eSTE" rel="nofollow">marketed their employees as "personal bankers</a>&quot; to help customers feel more comfortable about banking with them. As the general public grows more and more anxious, they vote into office representatives who share their opinion and can act on it. We have already seen Bank of America and</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:11:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>Ever since Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy in 2008, people have become increasingly <span>wary</span> of big banks. Some have acted on this fear by taking to the streets and protesting, hence the Occupy Wall Street movement. The small banks have already shown that they know how to use the public's anxiety to their benefit with bumper stickers that say things like "Don't blame me, I bank locally" and ads that poke fun at Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) for their <span>exorbitant</span> fees and lack of personalized customer service. </p><p>An example that comes to mind is United Financial Bancorp (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ubnk' title='United Financial Bancorp, Inc.'>UBNK</a>), who, in 2009, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW-fPC2eSTE" rel="nofollow">marketed their employees as "personal bankers</a>&quot; to help customers feel more comfortable about banking with them. As the general public grows more and more anxious, they vote into office representatives who share their opinion and can act on it. We have already seen Bank of America and</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1134811-bank-of-america-still-too-big-to-fail?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J.C. Penney: Bargain Or Bust?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110471-j-c-penney-bargain-or-bust?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1110471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The biggest question in every investor's mind when they see a stock with an uncharacteristically low price is just that, "bargain or bust?" You want to buy it because it looks dirt cheap, but you want your dirt to turn into gold, not dust. In our economy today, many companies out there have stock that places you in just this position. J. C. Penney (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jcp' title='J.C. Penney Company Inc.'>JCP</a>), closing at just over $18 per share on Friday, is definitely one of those companies.</p><p>CEO Ron Johnson has been vilified and applauded for his plan to turn J.C. Penney into every American's favorite store. His plan basically involves changing everything Americans have known about J.C. Penney and indeed most stores in general. We as Americans love sales, we love seeing the price we're actually paying next to the price it would have cost us had we paid full price. Mr. Johnson wants to simplify</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:26:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Nathaniel Munson</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By<ahref='http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson/'>Nathaniel Munson</a>:</strong><p>The biggest question in every investor's mind when they see a stock with an uncharacteristically low price is just that, "bargain or bust?" You want to buy it because it looks dirt cheap, but you want your dirt to turn into gold, not dust. In our economy today, many companies out there have stock that places you in just this position. J. C. Penney (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jcp' title='J.C. Penney Company Inc.'>JCP</a>), closing at just over $18 per share on Friday, is definitely one of those companies.</p><p>CEO Ron Johnson has been vilified and applauded for his plan to turn J.C. Penney into every American's favorite store. His plan basically involves changing everything Americans have known about J.C. Penney and indeed most stores in general. We as Americans love sales, we love seeing the price we're actually paying next to the price it would have cost us had we paid full price. Mr. Johnson wants to simplify</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110471-j-c-penney-bargain-or-bust?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jcp">JCP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/nathaniel-munson">Nathaniel Munson</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
