Seeking Alpha

New Low Observer's  Instablog

New Low Observer
Send Message
As a contributor to the New Low Observer (http://www.newlowobserver.com/about-this-site), we intend to give new insights on a low risk approach to trading in dividend paying stocks for tax deferred accounts. The New Low Observer (http://www.newlowobserver.com/about-this-site) is not intended for... More
My blog:
New Low Observer
View New Low Observer's Instablogs on:
  • Consequences Of Falling Oil Prices

    Economic events never occur in a vacuum. Usually there is a string of events that leads from one event to another. One big event can lead to an even bigger event that overshadows the prior calamities that triggered "The Big" event. The February 9, 1983 issue of Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letters covers one market event that led to two major crises that happened at different periods in time. The two events are joined at the hip based on the decline of oil prices. This led two separate major bailouts that resulted in the structural shift in the way our brand of capitalism works.

    The first event resulted in the Savings and Loan Crisis (S&L Crisis) and is thought to have begun in 1986 due to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 culminating in the bailout of many banks and the eventual bankruptcy of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [FSLIC].

    The second event resulted in the Mexican Peso Crisis with the outcome that major banking institutions like Citibank (NYSE:C) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) needed to be bailed out. It is important to note that the Peso Crisis is considered to be as a result of the peso devaluation in 1994.

    The true roots of both the S&L Crisis and the Peso Crisis is the decline of oil prices after the inflationary peak in 1980-1981. Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letter Issue 854 highlights the seeds of destruction that were going to be much larger than even Russell could have imagined. However, if anyone wishes to understand how the snowball got rolling then this issue highlights the beginning.

    The very first quote is an amazing insight of the American dependence of the high price of oil, Richard Russell says the following:

    "We're facing a situation (ironically) where the US is all for holding oil prices at a high level. The banks have lent huge sums of money both to private corporations and to oil producing nations-loans based on rising oil prices. If the oil price cracks badly, the banks are going to have major problems. On top of that, the US depends on oil taxes (so called "excess profits" tax) for huge chunks of tax income. If oil prices crack then the profits for the oil companies will dive (which they are already doing) and the tax short-fall will be horrendous. (page 1)"

    This commentary is staggering in the fact that it was so prescient. The cracks in the armor of the American oil industry began in Texas when the easy money stopped raining down on oil dependent cities like Houston and Dallas. In a 1988 issue of Dow Theory Letters, Russell had the following to say:

    "With oil prices caving in, Texas now has more people leaving the state than coming in.( Dow Theory Letters. March 9, 1988. page 6.)"

    The decline in oil prices led to a decline of jobs for that industry which resulted in a decline in real estate prices as people left the state of Texas. Loans made by savings and loan institutions in the southwest U.S., to businesses and real estate investors, all went bad at the same time leading to the Savings and Loan Crisis (S&L Crisis). The S&L Crisis cost several hundreds of billions of dollars and still exist as an off-budget item as part of our national debt.

    The decline in the price of oil also crushed foreign economies dependent on the commodity. The Mexican Peso Crisis, although officially listed as beginning in 1994, had its roots in the early 1980's. The natural outcome of this crisis was the bailout of large banking institutions like Citibank and Goldman Sachs when the government stepped in and bought the bad debt held by the bank's all in gamble.

    Likewise, the current boom in commodity rich countries (although somewhat cooler at present) like Australia, Brazil, Russia, China and India could experience significant shocks to their system depending on the level of loans made as "investments" by foreign banking institutions based on the potential of future growth.

    Few understood or believed the impact and importance of high oil prices to the American economy at the time. Even fewer understood the direct reliance of the U.S. government to high oil prices. Investors should watch for the potential fallout that may arise from the recent precipitous decline in the price of oil. The troubles afflicting Russia and Brazil's Petrobras (NYSE:PBR) may be early indications of where the pain may be felt.

    Tags: C, GS, PBR, Oil
    Jan 13 10:14 AM | Link | 2 Comments
  • Nasdaq 100 Performance Review

    Below is the performance of the seven stocks from the January 10, 2014 Nasdaq 100 watch list compared to the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index in the last year.

    SymbolName20142015% change
    ALTRAltera Corp.31.4736.9617.45%
    SHLDSears Holdings36.7134.3-6.56%
    GOLDRandgold Resources61.5774.9121.67%
    MXIMMaxim Integrated Products28.1532.9917.19%
    CHRWCH Robinson Worldwide57.772.0624.89%
    EBAYeBay Inc.52.1655.636.65%
    FASTFastenal Company47.745.99-3.58%
     Average change  11.10%
         
     Nasdaq 100  18.18%

    As a group, the stocks on our list underperformed the Nasdaq 100 by a wide margin. The first five stocks on our list averaged a gain of +14.92%. Two stocks that we took positions in at the time were Altera (NASDAQ:ALTR) and Randgold (NASDAQ:GOLD).

    Analyst Review

    The chart below is what the analysts suggested the stocks would do…

    (click to enlarge)

    …This is the graphical representation of what actually happened.

    (click to enlarge)

    The observation of the data should be clear, the analysts expected declines for the coming year and the opposite occurred. The projections were that Randgold (GOLD) would decline by nearly -50% and the stock increased by +21.67%. From our perspective, the analysts provide a reasonable sound board for what to anticipate, as has been demonstrated with our Canadian and U.S. Watch Lists.

    Jan 11 2:24 PM | Link | Comment!
  • Scary 1929 Chart Nearly One Year Later

    In February of 2014, a widely publicized chart circulated about the similarity between a 1928-1929 stock chart and a 2012-2013 chart. According to Tom McClellan of the McClellan Market Report:

    "…between now [February 11, 2014] and May 2014, there is plenty of reason for caution."

    Since February 11, 2014, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (NYSEARCA:DIA) has increased +11.06%. In the period from February 11th to May 31st the index gained +4.52%. So far, the scary 1929 chart has not held up to the lofty claim of presaging a bear market or a even a -10% decline. We offered up our own interpretation regarding the chart and said the following:

    "We love a declining stock market as much as the next value investor. However, implying that an -89% decline is in the works because the pattern appears similar to 1929 is ignoring the path to far more achievable downside targets."

    Our preliminary downside targets seemed reasonable at the time but were never achieved. One downside target that we thought was important was the ascending trendline from the 2009 low.

    (click to enlarge)

    We still think that investors should watch the ascending line in the chart above, which currently sits at the 15,780 level. An additional downside target is the Dow Theory 50% Principle level of 12,286.68.

    Tags: DIA
    Jan 09 1:43 PM | Link | 2 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.