<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ockham Research's Instablog</title>
    <description>Ockham Research (http://www.ockhamresearch.com/) is an independent equity research provider based in Atlanta, Georgia. Security analysis at Ockham Research is based upon the principle known as Ockham's Razor, named for the 14th-century Franciscan friar, William of Ockham. The principle states that a useful theory should utilize as few elements as possible, because efficiency is valuable. In this spirit, our goal is to make the investing environment as simple and understandable as possible, yet no simpler than is necessary.  We utilize this straightforward approach to value over 5500 securities, with key emphasis given to the study of individual securities' price-to-sales, price-to-cash earnings and other historical valuation ranges. Our long term value investing methodology is powered by the teachings of Ben Graham and it has proven to be very adept at identifying stock prices that are out of line with fundamental factors.  Ockham Research provides its research in a variety of forms and products including our company specific reports, portfolio analytics tools, newsletters, and blog posts.  We also offer a white labeling research solution that can give any financial services firm their own research presence without the time and cost associated with building such a robust coverage universe of their own.  Please visit Ockham Research (http://www.ockhamresearch.com/) for more information or sign up for our weekly Enterprising Investor's Guide Newsletter here (http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Member/Registration/).</description>
    <author>
      <name>Ockham Research</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Alcoa's Quarterly Results: A Mixed Bag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/164311-ockham-research/237-alcoa-s-quarterly-results-a-mixed-bag?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">237</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Analysts were expecting a pretty rough quarter from <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">Alcoa</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">AA</a>)  with aluminum prices still low and industrial demand depressed.&nbsp; Alcoa swung to  a loss in the last quarter with at 28 cent per share deficit, and that number  was expected to grow in the first quarter with consensus estimates predicting a  57 cent loss per share.&nbsp; Revenue was expected to slow considerable to $4.08  billion, representing a 44.7% drop from last year.&nbsp; Alcoa&nbsp;fell as much as 5% and  finished the day down 2%&nbsp;for&nbsp;Tuesday's trading as traders feared the results  would be even worse than forecast.<a><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/4/7/164311-123913604502556-Ockham-Research.jpg" align="right" alt="ockham historical valuation AA" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" height="115" /></a></p> <p>The pressure was on Alcoa to deliver in this make or break earnings season.&nbsp;  Revenue actually topped estimates ever so slightly coming in at $4.1 billion.&nbsp;  However, the loss was worse than expected coming in at&nbsp;59 cents per share,  totally $497 million.&nbsp; They will be cutting cap ex by 50%, which totaled $471 in  the first quarter.&nbsp; The results were not all that bad, as <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">Alcoa</a>  was successfully able to raised $1.4 billion in a convertible note offering,  also the company was able to reduce the cost to produce aluminum by 33%.&nbsp; The  stock is trading slightly higher in after hours.&nbsp; But as Fox Business Network  reports, there is still a lot of excess capacity in aluminum and it could be  some time before that ramps up again,</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;One thing we look at the aluminum or metal's business is a utilization rate.  Alcoa is down to a 75% utilization rate at their plant. That speaks to a bigger  issue. When we start to recover, we have so much express capacity that short  term you may make money on Alcoa, but it will be a long time before they are  ramped up again.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>Disclosure: No Positions</p></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:28:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Analysts were expecting a pretty rough quarter from <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">Alcoa</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">AA</a>)  with aluminum prices still low and industrial demand depressed.&nbsp; Alcoa swung to  a loss in the last quarter with at 28 cent per share deficit, and that number  was expected to grow in the first quarter with consensus estimates predicting a  57 cent loss per share.&nbsp; Revenue was expected to slow considerable to $4.08  billion, representing a 44.7% drop from last year.&nbsp; Alcoa&nbsp;fell as much as 5% and  finished the day down 2%&nbsp;for&nbsp;Tuesday's trading as traders feared the results  would be even worse than forecast.<a><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/4/7/164311-123913604502556-Ockham-Research.jpg" align="right" alt="ockham historical valuation AA" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="240" height="115" /></a></p> <p>The pressure was on Alcoa to deliver in this make or break earnings season.&nbsp;  Revenue actually topped estimates ever so slightly coming in at $4.1 billion.&nbsp;  However, the loss was worse than expected coming in at&nbsp;59 cents per share,  totally $497 million.&nbsp; They will be cutting cap ex by 50%, which totaled $471 in  the first quarter.&nbsp; The results were not all that bad, as <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Basic-Materials/Metals,Mining/Aluminum/AA" target="_blank">Alcoa</a>  was successfully able to raised $1.4 billion in a convertible note offering,  also the company was able to reduce the cost to produce aluminum by 33%.&nbsp; The  stock is trading slightly higher in after hours.&nbsp; But as Fox Business Network  reports, there is still a lot of excess capacity in aluminum and it could be  some time before that ramps up again,</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;One thing we look at the aluminum or metal's business is a utilization rate.  Alcoa is down to a 75% utilization rate at their plant. That speaks to a bigger  issue. When we start to recover, we have so much express capacity that short  term you may make money on Alcoa, but it will be a long time before they are  ramped up again.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>Disclosure: No Positions</p></p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aa/instablogs">aa</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/aluminum">aluminum</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/industrial goods">industrial goods</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/commodities">commodities</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cramer's Favorite Semiconductor: SPIL</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/164311-ockham-research/201-cramer-s-favorite-semiconductor-spil?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On CNBC's Mad Money, Jim Cramer has become more bullish over the last few  weeks, and last week he even proclaimed that the bottom had been set.&nbsp; While  that would be great if he is right, we are not ready to shout from the roof tops  just yet.&nbsp; Last night he talked about his favorite speculative way to play the  recovery.&nbsp; He calls attention to a relatively small Taiwanese semiconductor  company called <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">Siliconware  Precision Industries</a> or <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">SPIL</a>.</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;The numbers here are truly better than expected. Unlike many other stocks  that are simply going higher because The Street has become more bullish about  the market, SPIL's accumulated first quarter sales are now expected to fall.  They're still going to fall 26% but that's much better than the previous  expectations of a 35% and the second quarter analysts think that SPIL sales  could grow by 15% to 20% thanks to resumed orders for everything from handset  chips, you know, semiconductors that go into cell phones, to graphics processors  &hellip;</p><p>The recovery was really not anticipated by anyone, including the companies.  And that's precisely what makes SPIL and the other companies involved in the  semiconductor food chain so attractive right in order to deal with the slowdown  in business SPIL had taken a bunch of actions to cut costs, and these are moves  that should really pay off now that we're seeing a recovery in the semis. SPIL  eliminated overtime pay. That should save roughly 180 million new Taiwan  dollars, that's on top of the head count reduction that the company put through  in the fourth quarter. SPIL has also shut down unused production costs to  minimize fixed costs.</p><p>It's done everything right. Now it's a leaner, meaner company that can  package and test more chips for less money. Then there's the dividend. Got to  love big dividends. SPIL intends to pay out a massive dividend this year, bring  the yield to 8.5%, a payoff I think is marathon man-like as in it will only eat  up about a third of the cash the company has on hand.&quot; <em>CNBC's Mad Money on  Monday, April 06, 2009<a></a> </em></p></blockquote> <p>Cramer is getting pretty bullish off late, but at least he is specifically  stating that this stock is a speculative play on a recovery.&nbsp; At the current  price level, we have an Ockham valuation stance of <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">Fairly  Valued</a>.&nbsp; Our methodology is not built for speculating, rather it is geared  towards investing.&nbsp; The stock is was undervalued by our methodology when the  market was bottoming in early March.&nbsp; Just in the last month the stock has  appreciated 37%, and we no longer consider it Undervalued.&nbsp; The fact that the  company has made very appropriate cost and wage cuts has, in our opinion, has  largely been priced in.&nbsp; Furthermore, the stock is enjoying the &quot;Cramer bounce&quot;  today up 6%, while the market indexes are down.&nbsp; Cramer has many devoted  viewers, and you can often observe that if Cramer spends any length of time on a  stock that normally does not get huge volume, he can literally move the market.&nbsp;  On Tuesday morning, it was the most searched on stock on Google Finance.&nbsp; But be  careful when trying to ride that wave, it often will swing to the other side in  the next few days.</p><p>While the overall sales growth picture for <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">SPIL</a>  is attractive, we think that it is simply too expensive right now.&nbsp; In this  case, we will leave the speculating to those that like to chase momentum.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: no positions</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:20:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>On CNBC's Mad Money, Jim Cramer has become more bullish over the last few  weeks, and last week he even proclaimed that the bottom had been set.&nbsp; While  that would be great if he is right, we are not ready to shout from the roof tops  just yet.&nbsp; Last night he talked about his favorite speculative way to play the  recovery.&nbsp; He calls attention to a relatively small Taiwanese semiconductor  company called <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">Siliconware  Precision Industries</a> or <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">SPIL</a>.</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;The numbers here are truly better than expected. Unlike many other stocks  that are simply going higher because The Street has become more bullish about  the market, SPIL's accumulated first quarter sales are now expected to fall.  They're still going to fall 26% but that's much better than the previous  expectations of a 35% and the second quarter analysts think that SPIL sales  could grow by 15% to 20% thanks to resumed orders for everything from handset  chips, you know, semiconductors that go into cell phones, to graphics processors  &hellip;</p><p>The recovery was really not anticipated by anyone, including the companies.  And that's precisely what makes SPIL and the other companies involved in the  semiconductor food chain so attractive right in order to deal with the slowdown  in business SPIL had taken a bunch of actions to cut costs, and these are moves  that should really pay off now that we're seeing a recovery in the semis. SPIL  eliminated overtime pay. That should save roughly 180 million new Taiwan  dollars, that's on top of the head count reduction that the company put through  in the fourth quarter. SPIL has also shut down unused production costs to  minimize fixed costs.</p><p>It's done everything right. Now it's a leaner, meaner company that can  package and test more chips for less money. Then there's the dividend. Got to  love big dividends. SPIL intends to pay out a massive dividend this year, bring  the yield to 8.5%, a payoff I think is marathon man-like as in it will only eat  up about a third of the cash the company has on hand.&quot; <em>CNBC's Mad Money on  Monday, April 06, 2009<a></a> </em></p></blockquote> <p>Cramer is getting pretty bullish off late, but at least he is specifically  stating that this stock is a speculative play on a recovery.&nbsp; At the current  price level, we have an Ockham valuation stance of <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">Fairly  Valued</a>.&nbsp; Our methodology is not built for speculating, rather it is geared  towards investing.&nbsp; The stock is was undervalued by our methodology when the  market was bottoming in early March.&nbsp; Just in the last month the stock has  appreciated 37%, and we no longer consider it Undervalued.&nbsp; The fact that the  company has made very appropriate cost and wage cuts has, in our opinion, has  largely been priced in.&nbsp; Furthermore, the stock is enjoying the &quot;Cramer bounce&quot;  today up 6%, while the market indexes are down.&nbsp; Cramer has many devoted  viewers, and you can often observe that if Cramer spends any length of time on a  stock that normally does not get huge volume, he can literally move the market.&nbsp;  On Tuesday morning, it was the most searched on stock on Google Finance.&nbsp; But be  careful when trying to ride that wave, it often will swing to the other side in  the next few days.</p><p>While the overall sales growth picture for <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Electronics/Semiconductor-Equipment,Material/SPIL" target="_blank">SPIL</a>  is attractive, we think that it is simply too expensive right now.&nbsp; In this  case, we will leave the speculating to those that like to chase momentum.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: no positions</p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spil/instablogs">spil</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Technology">Technology</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Semiconductor">Semiconductor</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Cramer">Cramer</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Mad Money">Mad Money</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sanderson Farms Looks Over Cooked</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/164311-ockham-research/200-sanderson-farms-looks-over-cooked?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">200</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">SAFM</a>)  is one of the premier poultry producing companies in the United States with  $1.72 billion in sales last year.&nbsp; However, as of this week's report we are  downgrading Sanderson Farms to <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Overvalued</a>.&nbsp;  The stock has enjoyed some significant appreciation recently as the stock is up  nearly 15% in the last month.&nbsp; Much of the recent momentum has centered around  KeyBanc initiating coverage on Sanderson Farms as well as <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/TSN" target="_blank">Tyson  Foods</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/TSN" target="_blank">TSN</a>).&nbsp;  The research note was pretty positive indicating that the analyst believe that  the poultry business is due for a rebound.&nbsp; The Keybanc analyst noted lower feed  costs and a tendency for consumers to eat a home more often both should be  positive for the stock.&nbsp; Coverage of Sanderson Farms was initiated at a Buy  rating, while Tyson was given a Hold.</p> <p>While this analysis may be correct, we think that <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> shares are simply too overbought currently.&nbsp; The poultry industry may  be due for a rebound, but Sanderson Farms is actually trading higher than where  it was a year ago, so there is not a huge downside that it would be rebounding  from.&nbsp; With Pilgrim's Pride declaring bankruptcy and Tyson Foods down more than  35% over the last year, Sanderson's largely avoided the difficulty surrounding  the industry and its two main competitors in the past year.</p> <p>Sanderson does have a balance sheet that is worthy of some adulation, and it  is gaining market share.&nbsp; However, it is a far cry from being Undervalued,  especially in this market environment where so many companies have been beaten  down far worse than Sanderson Farms.&nbsp; The company is expecting revenue to be  flat in the year ahead, and Sanderson recently swung to a loss of 33 cents per  share in the first quarter.&nbsp; Although that was better than some analysts had  expected.&nbsp; At Ockham, we do not like recommending a company that has recently  swung to a loss and is not growing revenues.&nbsp; So, simply stated <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> shares are too expensive given the fundamentals supporting them.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: No Positions</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:18:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">SAFM</a>)  is one of the premier poultry producing companies in the United States with  $1.72 billion in sales last year.&nbsp; However, as of this week's report we are  downgrading Sanderson Farms to <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Overvalued</a>.&nbsp;  The stock has enjoyed some significant appreciation recently as the stock is up  nearly 15% in the last month.&nbsp; Much of the recent momentum has centered around  KeyBanc initiating coverage on Sanderson Farms as well as <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/TSN" target="_blank">Tyson  Foods</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/TSN" target="_blank">TSN</a>).&nbsp;  The research note was pretty positive indicating that the analyst believe that  the poultry business is due for a rebound.&nbsp; The Keybanc analyst noted lower feed  costs and a tendency for consumers to eat a home more often both should be  positive for the stock.&nbsp; Coverage of Sanderson Farms was initiated at a Buy  rating, while Tyson was given a Hold.</p> <p>While this analysis may be correct, we think that <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> shares are simply too overbought currently.&nbsp; The poultry industry may  be due for a rebound, but Sanderson Farms is actually trading higher than where  it was a year ago, so there is not a huge downside that it would be rebounding  from.&nbsp; With Pilgrim's Pride declaring bankruptcy and Tyson Foods down more than  35% over the last year, Sanderson's largely avoided the difficulty surrounding  the industry and its two main competitors in the past year.</p> <p>Sanderson does have a balance sheet that is worthy of some adulation, and it  is gaining market share.&nbsp; However, it is a far cry from being Undervalued,  especially in this market environment where so many companies have been beaten  down far worse than Sanderson Farms.&nbsp; The company is expecting revenue to be  flat in the year ahead, and Sanderson recently swung to a loss of 33 cents per  share in the first quarter.&nbsp; Although that was better than some analysts had  expected.&nbsp; At Ockham, we do not like recommending a company that has recently  swung to a loss and is not growing revenues.&nbsp; So, simply stated <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Consumer-Goods/Food,Beverage/Meat-Products/SAFM" target="_blank">Sanderson  Farms</a> shares are too expensive given the fundamentals supporting them.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: No Positions</p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/safm/instablogs">safm</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tsn/instablogs">tsn</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/food producers">food producers</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/overvalued">overvalued</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sun Micro Need's IBM Not Visa Vera</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/164311-ockham-research/199-sun-micro-need-s-ibm-not-visa-vera?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">199</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>News reports today are saying that talks between <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">Sun  Microsystems</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">JAVA</a>)  and <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>)  have broken down, supposedly not over price.&nbsp; According to the Wall Street  Journal, talks broke down when the Sun board rejected the formal acquisition  offer from IBM and sent notice that they had terminated the exclusivity of talks  only with IBM.&nbsp; Apparently the Sun board is split over whether to do the deal  with the company's Chief Executive wanting to do the deal, but the company's  co-founder and chairman Scott McNealy is opposed.<a></a></p> <p>While price is certainly a concern of both parties, it seems that there is a  difference of opinion on how hard IBM would be willing to push were the deal to  face regulatory challenges.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  states that they are fully committed to the deal, but Sun believes there was too  much wiggle room for IBM to drop the deal if needed.&nbsp; This may be a very valid  concern for Sun that they do not want to be left without a dance partner if the  deal does face push back, but Sun needs to be very careful about how they play  the situation.&nbsp; Should they turn negotiations into a confrontation, they may  find themselves a stand alone business with no one interested in buying them.&nbsp;</p> <p>Sun's decline has been well documented and they began shopping themselves  around last winter.&nbsp; Sun management needs to think long and hard before it  leaves a deal on the table that would pay a 100% premium to the pre acquisition  price.&nbsp; Perhaps IBM rival <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/HPQ" target="_blank">Hewlett-Packard</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/HPQ" target="_blank">HPQ</a>)  could be interested but there has been nothing more than rumor to support that.&nbsp;  After all, IBM was the only company that stepped to the plate when Sun began  shopping itself around.</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;Sun down 25% but up more than 100% year to date. There's been a lot of talk  on the street that if it's not going to be IBM, who is going to buy Sun  Microsystems? It is the number one target in the tech industry right now.&quot;  <em>Fox Business Network 4/6/2009</em></p></blockquote><p>Not surprisingly, Sun stock tanked 22.5% on Monday.&nbsp; After having an  Undervalued stance on Sun for more than a year, we are reaffirming our <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">Fairly  Valued</a> valuation on post merger announcement price levels.&nbsp; Fundamentally,  Sun has been able to grow revenues steadily over the past few years but the  company swung to a loss last summer.&nbsp; The fact remains, that Sun Micro needs IBM  far more than IBM needs Sun.&nbsp; At this point the talks are &quot;fluid&quot; but it seems  that <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  has all of the power in this situation.&nbsp; We do not know exactly what has been  going on in negotiations but Sun management should tread carefully because there  will be a lot of angry shareholders should the deal eventually die.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: No positions</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:15:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>News reports today are saying that talks between <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">Sun  Microsystems</a> (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">JAVA</a>)  and <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>)  have broken down, supposedly not over price.&nbsp; According to the Wall Street  Journal, talks broke down when the Sun board rejected the formal acquisition  offer from IBM and sent notice that they had terminated the exclusivity of talks  only with IBM.&nbsp; Apparently the Sun board is split over whether to do the deal  with the company's Chief Executive wanting to do the deal, but the company's  co-founder and chairman Scott McNealy is opposed.<a></a></p> <p>While price is certainly a concern of both parties, it seems that there is a  difference of opinion on how hard IBM would be willing to push were the deal to  face regulatory challenges.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  states that they are fully committed to the deal, but Sun believes there was too  much wiggle room for IBM to drop the deal if needed.&nbsp; This may be a very valid  concern for Sun that they do not want to be left without a dance partner if the  deal does face push back, but Sun needs to be very careful about how they play  the situation.&nbsp; Should they turn negotiations into a confrontation, they may  find themselves a stand alone business with no one interested in buying them.&nbsp;</p> <p>Sun's decline has been well documented and they began shopping themselves  around last winter.&nbsp; Sun management needs to think long and hard before it  leaves a deal on the table that would pay a 100% premium to the pre acquisition  price.&nbsp; Perhaps IBM rival <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/HPQ" target="_blank">Hewlett-Packard</a>  (<a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/HPQ" target="_blank">HPQ</a>)  could be interested but there has been nothing more than rumor to support that.&nbsp;  After all, IBM was the only company that stepped to the plate when Sun began  shopping itself around.</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;Sun down 25% but up more than 100% year to date. There's been a lot of talk  on the street that if it's not going to be IBM, who is going to buy Sun  Microsystems? It is the number one target in the tech industry right now.&quot;  <em>Fox Business Network 4/6/2009</em></p></blockquote><p>Not surprisingly, Sun stock tanked 22.5% on Monday.&nbsp; After having an  Undervalued stance on Sun for more than a year, we are reaffirming our <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/JAVA" target="_blank">Fairly  Valued</a> valuation on post merger announcement price levels.&nbsp; Fundamentally,  Sun has been able to grow revenues steadily over the past few years but the  company swung to a loss last summer.&nbsp; The fact remains, that Sun Micro needs IBM  far more than IBM needs Sun.&nbsp; At this point the talks are &quot;fluid&quot; but it seems  that <a href="http://www.ockhamresearch.com/Technology/Computer-Hardware/Diversified-Computer-System/IBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>  has all of the power in this situation.&nbsp; We do not know exactly what has been  going on in negotiations but Sun management should tread carefully because there  will be a lot of angry shareholders should the deal eventually die.&nbsp;</p><p>Disclosure: No positions</p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm/instablogs">ibm</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java/instablogs">java</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq/instablogs">hpq</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/merger">merger</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/technology">technology</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/servers">servers</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
