<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Oliver Schwindler - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Oliver Schwindler' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler</link>
    <item>
      <title>Week In Review: Financials In Free Fall, Industrials, Tech In Uptrend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/41893-week-in-review-financials-in-free-fall-industrials-tech-in-uptrend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41893</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last week U.S. stocks had their first weekly decline in a month due to mortgage losses. Treasuries rose most since March on concerns on the subprime crisis as Standard & Poor’s downgraded 75 U.S. collateralized debt obligations [CDOs] made up of subprime mortgages. No wonder that Financial stocks tumbled and the Chicago Board Options Exchange SPX Volatility Index, or VIX, jumped 11%. During the week the Russell 2000 led the way with a -2.3% loss followed by the S&P 500 -1.2%, the Nasdaq  -0.7%, and the Dow -0.4%.<!--more-->

<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were Technology and Industrials with a gain of 1.45% and 1.33% respectively. The poor sector performers were Financials with a loss of 2.50% and Health Care with a decline of 1.06%. Additionally, mid cap and small cap value stocks lost 0.25% and 0.65% against growth stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="week in review" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekinreview_02.jpg" border="0" height="280" alt="week in review" width="421" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Last week U.S. stocks had their first weekly decline in a month due to mortgage losses. Treasuries rose most since March on concerns on the subprime crisis as Standard & Poor’s downgraded 75 U.S. collateralized debt obligations [CDOs] made up of subprime mortgages. No wonder that Financial stocks tumbled and the Chicago Board Options Exchange SPX Volatility Index, or VIX, jumped 11%. During the week the Russell 2000 led the way with a -2.3% loss followed by the S&P 500 -1.2%, the Nasdaq  -0.7%, and the Dow -0.4%.<!--more-->

<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were Technology and Industrials with a gain of 1.45% and 1.33% respectively. The poor sector performers were Financials with a loss of 2.50% and Health Care with a decline of 1.06%. Additionally, mid cap and small cap value stocks lost 0.25% and 0.65% against growth stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="week in review" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekinreview_02.jpg" border="0" height="280" alt="week in review" width="421" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/41893-week-in-review-financials-in-free-fall-industrials-tech-in-uptrend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xli">XLI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlk">XLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy, Materials Sectors On the Rise</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/41166-energy-materials-sectors-on-the-rise?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41166</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[U.S. stocks climbed for a third straight week, sending the S&P 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average to record highs, which was mainly driven by the Energy and Materials Sector.<!--more--> As retail sales in June took their <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/41000">steepest drop in two years</a>, which was steeper than the 0.3% anticipated by economists, stocks from the Consumer Cyclicals Sector got hit last week. And the ongoing subprime mortgage crisis caused Financial stocks to retreat another week. During the last week the Dow climbed 2.2%, followed by the Nasdaq with 1.5%, and the S&P 500 added 1.4%. However, the Russell 2000 was lagging behind with a gain of only 0.4%.

<p>The week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were last weeks best performing sectors Energy and Materials with a gain of 2.12% and 1.88% respectively. The poor sector performers were Consumer Cyclicals with a loss of 1.50% and Financials with a decline of 1.21%. Additionally, large cap stocks gained 0.20% and 0.39% against mid cap and small cap stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="sector weekly performance" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekperformance.jpg" border="0" height="241" alt="sector weekly performance" width="397" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:30:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>U.S. stocks climbed for a third straight week, sending the S&P 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average to record highs, which was mainly driven by the Energy and Materials Sector.<!--more--> As retail sales in June took their <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/41000">steepest drop in two years</a>, which was steeper than the 0.3% anticipated by economists, stocks from the Consumer Cyclicals Sector got hit last week. And the ongoing subprime mortgage crisis caused Financial stocks to retreat another week. During the last week the Dow climbed 2.2%, followed by the Nasdaq with 1.5%, and the S&P 500 added 1.4%. However, the Russell 2000 was lagging behind with a gain of only 0.4%.

<p>The week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were last weeks best performing sectors Energy and Materials with a gain of 2.12% and 1.88% respectively. The poor sector performers were Consumer Cyclicals with a loss of 1.50% and Financials with a decline of 1.21%. Additionally, large cap stocks gained 0.20% and 0.39% against mid cap and small cap stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="sector weekly performance" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekperformance.jpg" border="0" height="241" alt="sector weekly performance" width="397" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/41166-energy-materials-sectors-on-the-rise?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwm">IWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlb">XLB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle">XLE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xly">XLY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oilsands Quest Inc.: Undervalued Canadian Oilsands Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/41077-oilsands-quest-inc-undervalued-canadian-oilsands-play?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41077</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Oilsands Quest Inc. (BQI) (formerly CanWest Petroleum Corporation) is engaged in a variety of projects with an emphasis on oil sands and oil shale exploration in Western Canada. Its lead project is its Axe Lake Discovery, an oil sands deposit the company has identified through exploration drilling success on its permit lands in northwest Saskatchewan.<!--more--> This is the first major oil sands discovery in the province’s history. Thursday management increased its estimated resource potential of the Axe Lake Discovery (area A in figure below) from 1.5 billion barrels (released early April) up to 2.5 billion barrels. 

<p>Management also released its estimate of resource potential for selected areas outside the Axe Lake Discovery area (areas B and C in figure below) and for the adjacent permits in Alberta (area D in figure below) which is 3.0 billion barrels and 4.5 billion barrels respectively.
</p>
<p><img title="bqi resources potential" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/bqi_resourcepotential.png" border="0" height="480" alt="bqi resources potential" width="348" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:53:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Oilsands Quest Inc. (BQI) (formerly CanWest Petroleum Corporation) is engaged in a variety of projects with an emphasis on oil sands and oil shale exploration in Western Canada. Its lead project is its Axe Lake Discovery, an oil sands deposit the company has identified through exploration drilling success on its permit lands in northwest Saskatchewan.<!--more--> This is the first major oil sands discovery in the province’s history. Thursday management increased its estimated resource potential of the Axe Lake Discovery (area A in figure below) from 1.5 billion barrels (released early April) up to 2.5 billion barrels. 

<p>Management also released its estimate of resource potential for selected areas outside the Axe Lake Discovery area (areas B and C in figure below) and for the adjacent permits in Alberta (area D in figure below) which is 3.0 billion barrels and 4.5 billion barrels respectively.
</p>
<p><img title="bqi resources potential" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/bqi_resourcepotential.png" border="0" height="480" alt="bqi resources potential" width="348" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/41077-oilsands-quest-inc-undervalued-canadian-oilsands-play?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bqi">BQI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week In Review: Consumer Cyclicals Bottom Firmly In Place</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/40480-week-in-review-consumer-cyclicals-bottom-firmly-in-place?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40480</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Despite rising interest rates and climbing oil prices, U.S. stocks advanced during the last week, giving the S&P 500 Index its biggest weekly gain since April.<!--more--> 

<p>To summarize last week's action from a technical perspective: the triple bottom formation in the S&P 500 Index remained intact and the yield on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note broke its downtrend it had formed over the past couple of weeks (see charts below). The main item on this week’s agenda is the start of second quarter earnings season. While the majority of reports really don’t kick in until next week, two big Dow stocks are scheduled to report in the next five trading days. Alcoa (AA) reports after the close on Monday, and General Electric (GE) reports before the open on Friday. 
</p>
<p>During the last week the Nasdaq climbed 2.4%, followed by the Russell 2000 with 2.2. The S&P 500 added 1.8% and he Dow 1.5%.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:47:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Despite rising interest rates and climbing oil prices, U.S. stocks advanced during the last week, giving the S&P 500 Index its biggest weekly gain since April.<!--more--> 

<p>To summarize last week's action from a technical perspective: the triple bottom formation in the S&P 500 Index remained intact and the yield on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note broke its downtrend it had formed over the past couple of weeks (see charts below). The main item on this week’s agenda is the start of second quarter earnings season. While the majority of reports really don’t kick in until next week, two big Dow stocks are scheduled to report in the next five trading days. Alcoa (AA) reports after the close on Monday, and General Electric (GE) reports before the open on Friday. 
</p>
<p>During the last week the Nasdaq climbed 2.4%, followed by the Russell 2000 with 2.2. The S&P 500 added 1.8% and he Dow 1.5%.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/40480-week-in-review-consumer-cyclicals-bottom-firmly-in-place?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/agg">AGG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlb">XLB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xly">XLY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Current Term Structure Hurts Commodity Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/40260-the-current-term-structure-hurts-commodity-returns?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40260</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As Tom Lydon from <a href="http://www.etftrends.com/" target="_blank">ETF Trends</a> recently <a href="http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/33620" target="_blank">pointed out</a> more investor education on contango and backwardation - the two forms of the term structure of commodity futures markets - is necessary.<!--more--> As an investor in commodities you have the choice between buying the physical commodity or a derivative (e.g. a futures contract) on a commodity to profit from the price appreciation of the commodity. 

<p>However, normally investors discard the first choice as they would have to care about warehousing and other costs of carry. Therefore, most investors invest through commodity futures contracts or through exchange traded funds which in turn also normaly hold commodity futures contracts. The return from a collateralized portfolio of commodity futures contracts comes from three main sources:
</p>
<blockquote><p>Total Return = Spot Return + Roll Yield + Collateral Yield<br />
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:14:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>As Tom Lydon from <a href="http://www.etftrends.com/" target="_blank">ETF Trends</a> recently <a href="http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/33620" target="_blank">pointed out</a> more investor education on contango and backwardation - the two forms of the term structure of commodity futures markets - is necessary.<!--more--> As an investor in commodities you have the choice between buying the physical commodity or a derivative (e.g. a futures contract) on a commodity to profit from the price appreciation of the commodity. 

<p>However, normally investors discard the first choice as they would have to care about warehousing and other costs of carry. Therefore, most investors invest through commodity futures contracts or through exchange traded funds which in turn also normaly hold commodity futures contracts. The return from a collateralized portfolio of commodity futures contracts comes from three main sources:
</p>
<blockquote><p>Total Return = Spot Return + Roll Yield + Collateral Yield<br />
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/40260-the-current-term-structure-hurts-commodity-returns?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbc">DBC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dgl">DGL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/djp">DJP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gsg">GSG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gsp">GSP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Week in Review: Financials in Downtrend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/39843-week-in-review-financials-in-downtrend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39843</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[U.S. stock indexes rose in the second quarter of 2007, with the Dow Jones Industrial Index (+8.5%) putting in the best performance since 2003, the S&P 500 Index (+5.8%) having its best quarterly advance since the fourth quarter of last year and the Nasdaq (7.5%) its best since the fourth quarter of 2004.<!--more-->

<p>Despite a roller coaster at the stock market last week, in which the FED decided to hold interest rates steady, the Nasdaq finished the week with a small gain of 0.6% followed by the the Dow with 0.4%, and the S&P 500 with 0.03%. The Russell 2000 posted even a small loss of -0.2%. However, the wild ups and downs in the VIX last week indicate that the market participants are still nervous.
</p>
<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were last weeks poorest performing sector Utilities and Health Care with a gain of 1.56% and 1.37% respectively. The poor sector performers were Materials with a loss of 1.45% and Energy with a decline of 1.32%.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:20:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>U.S. stock indexes rose in the second quarter of 2007, with the Dow Jones Industrial Index (+8.5%) putting in the best performance since 2003, the S&P 500 Index (+5.8%) having its best quarterly advance since the fourth quarter of last year and the Nasdaq (7.5%) its best since the fourth quarter of 2004.<!--more-->

<p>Despite a roller coaster at the stock market last week, in which the FED decided to hold interest rates steady, the Nasdaq finished the week with a small gain of 0.6% followed by the the Dow with 0.4%, and the S&P 500 with 0.03%. The Russell 2000 posted even a small loss of -0.2%. However, the wild ups and downs in the VIX last week indicate that the market participants are still nervous.
</p>
<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were last weeks poorest performing sector Utilities and Health Care with a gain of 1.56% and 1.37% respectively. The poor sector performers were Materials with a loss of 1.45% and Energy with a decline of 1.32%.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/39843-week-in-review-financials-in-downtrend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlb">XLB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Industrials Are On the Rise; Healthcare Still Looking For a Bottom</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/39223-industrials-are-on-the-rise-healthcare-still-looking-for-a-bottom?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39223</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[U.S. stocks dropped and the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index posted its biggest weekly slide since early March on concern that banks will be saddled with losses on mortgage bonds as the 10-month-old High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, run by Bear Stearns senior managing director Ralph Cioffi, has lost about 20 percent this year and faced pressure from its creditors Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America among others.<!--more--> During the week the Dow led the way with a -2.1% loss followed by the S&P 500 -2.0%, the Russell 2000 -1.6%, and the Nasdaq -1.4%. The Chicago Board Options Exchange SPX Volatility Index, or VIX, jumped 13%.

<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were Technology and Industrials with a gain of 0.87% and 0.62% respectively. The poor sector performers were Utilities with a loss of 1.72% and Health Care with a decline of 0.85%. Additionally, mid cap and small cap value stocks lost 0.70% and 0.74% against growth stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="week in review" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekinreview.jpg" border="0" height="251" alt="week in review" width="229" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:45:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>U.S. stocks dropped and the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index posted its biggest weekly slide since early March on concern that banks will be saddled with losses on mortgage bonds as the 10-month-old High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, run by Bear Stearns senior managing director Ralph Cioffi, has lost about 20 percent this year and faced pressure from its creditors Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America among others.<!--more--> During the week the Dow led the way with a -2.1% loss followed by the S&P 500 -2.0%, the Russell 2000 -1.6%, and the Nasdaq -1.4%. The Chicago Board Options Exchange SPX Volatility Index, or VIX, jumped 13%.

<p>This week’s top performing sectors on a relative basis were Technology and Industrials with a gain of 0.87% and 0.62% respectively. The poor sector performers were Utilities with a loss of 1.72% and Health Care with a decline of 0.85%. Additionally, mid cap and small cap value stocks lost 0.70% and 0.74% against growth stocks.
</p>
<p><img title="week in review" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/weekinreview.jpg" border="0" height="251" alt="week in review" width="229" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/39223-industrials-are-on-the-rise-healthcare-still-looking-for-a-bottom?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ivv">IVV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xli">XLI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlv">XLV</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cotton Is the New King of Commodity Investments</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/39082-cotton-is-the-new-king-of-commodity-investments?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39082</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Commodities are still on the run and just under their all-time high as the chart of the Goldman Sachs Commodities Spot Index [GNX] below shows.<!--more--> There are some signs which indicate that the longterm bull-market in commodities is not yet over:
<ul>
<li>A sustained and strong world economy with China and India as its engines,
</li>
<li>Chinas and Indias unsatisfying appetite for natural resources and its result of <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/31164" target="_blank">rising dry freight rates</a>,
</li>
<li>inflation fears which recently caused a <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/38184" target="_blank">bond sell-off around the world</a>,
</li>
<li>and last but not least, huge capital inflows in passiv commoditiy investments.
</li>
</ul>A look at its sub-indices - GSCI Energy [GJX] (weight: 69,66%), GSCI Industrial Metal [GYX] 11,61%, GSCI Agricultural [GKX] 11,4%, GSCI Livestock [GVX] 4,94%, GSCI Precious Metal [GPX] 2,37% - reveals that the agricultural index recently broke out with a strong move to new highs.

<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/commodities_01.png"><img title="commodities" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-commodities_01.png" border="0" height="900" alt="commodities" width="539" /></a>
</p>
<p>Inside the agricultural commodities group, Cotton looks the most promising commodity as it may be at the beginning of a sizable upward move as in the last 6 months Corn already exploded by 100% and Soybeans and Wheat each by 50%. Recently Art Samberg <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118137025769030157.html">in Barron's Midyear Roundtable</a> (2007)  (<em>subscription required</em>) pointed out that:
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:12:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Commodities are still on the run and just under their all-time high as the chart of the Goldman Sachs Commodities Spot Index [GNX] below shows.<!--more--> There are some signs which indicate that the longterm bull-market in commodities is not yet over:
<ul>
<li>A sustained and strong world economy with China and India as its engines,
</li>
<li>Chinas and Indias unsatisfying appetite for natural resources and its result of <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/31164" target="_blank">rising dry freight rates</a>,
</li>
<li>inflation fears which recently caused a <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/38184" target="_blank">bond sell-off around the world</a>,
</li>
<li>and last but not least, huge capital inflows in passiv commoditiy investments.
</li>
</ul>A look at its sub-indices - GSCI Energy [GJX] (weight: 69,66%), GSCI Industrial Metal [GYX] 11,61%, GSCI Agricultural [GKX] 11,4%, GSCI Livestock [GVX] 4,94%, GSCI Precious Metal [GPX] 2,37% - reveals that the agricultural index recently broke out with a strong move to new highs.

<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/commodities_01.png"><img title="commodities" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-commodities_01.png" border="0" height="900" alt="commodities" width="539" /></a>
</p>
<p>Inside the agricultural commodities group, Cotton looks the most promising commodity as it may be at the beginning of a sizable upward move as in the last 6 months Corn already exploded by 100% and Soybeans and Wheat each by 50%. Recently Art Samberg <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118137025769030157.html">in Barron's Midyear Roundtable</a> (2007)  (<em>subscription required</em>) pointed out that:
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/39082-cotton-is-the-new-king-of-commodity-investments?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Managers See a Soft Landing Followed By Strong Large Cap Growth</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/17772-investment-managers-see-a-soft-landing-followed-by-strong-large-cap-growth?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17772</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<em>Slower growth lies ahead for the United States</em>, say investment managers who responded to <a href="http://www.russell.com/us/Education_Center/Article_Library/Market_Analysis/IMO/Q306IMO.pdf">Russell Investment Group's September quarterly survey</a>, as none of the managers believes that a recession is likely in the U.S.<!--more--> and half believe the U.S. will experience slower growth in the next six months compared to the annual growth rate of 2.9% in the second quarter 2006. However, 10% of the managers believe the U.S. will grow at a stronger rate whereas a little more than 40% of the managers believe the U.S. will grow at a similar rate to the 2.9% at which it grew in the last quarter.

<p>At the same time, more managers view the market as undervalued than at any time since the survey began, although that number still trails those who see it as fairly valued. Those who believe the market to be overvalued has risen slightly, from 8% to 10%.
</p>
<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/russell_valuation.png" border="0" height="378" alt="russel val" width="573" />
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:58:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong><em>Slower growth lies ahead for the United States</em>, say investment managers who responded to <a href="http://www.russell.com/us/Education_Center/Article_Library/Market_Analysis/IMO/Q306IMO.pdf">Russell Investment Group's September quarterly survey</a>, as none of the managers believes that a recession is likely in the U.S.<!--more--> and half believe the U.S. will experience slower growth in the next six months compared to the annual growth rate of 2.9% in the second quarter 2006. However, 10% of the managers believe the U.S. will grow at a stronger rate whereas a little more than 40% of the managers believe the U.S. will grow at a similar rate to the 2.9% at which it grew in the last quarter.

<p>At the same time, more managers view the market as undervalued than at any time since the survey began, although that number still trails those who see it as fairly valued. Those who believe the market to be overvalued has risen slightly, from 8% to 10%.
</p>
<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/russell_valuation.png" border="0" height="378" alt="russel val" width="573" />
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/17772-investment-managers-see-a-soft-landing-followed-by-strong-large-cap-growth?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dvy">DVY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwd">IWD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwf">IWF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwn">IWN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwo">IWO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sinking Ships? Tanker Stocks' Difficult Week and Why They Should Soon Rebound</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/17015-sinking-ships-tanker-stocks-difficult-week-and-why-they-should-soon-rebound?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17015</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Shipping stocks had taken quite a hit through last Thursday, with Frontline (FRO) losing 7%, Nordic American Tanker (NAT) weakening by 9.8% and O M I Corp (OMM) closing 8.7% lower.<!--more--> Even though the <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article_print/SB115706646696751143.html">Bank of America raised</a> it's six-month oil tanker forecasts by 40% and it's targets by 5% supported by steady transport volume, a global trend to maintain high oil storage, and extended interruptions in Alaskan oil production on September 1st:

<blockquote class="quote"><p>* "We believe a 25% increase in tanker equity values since early June versus essentially no change in the Standard & Poor's 500 index reflects shipping strength to date, but has not fully priced in further upside over the next six months."
</p>
<p>    * "We believe the forward six-month outlook could exceed consensus by 40% and support further equity value increases from 10% to 20%."
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:51:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Shipping stocks had taken quite a hit through last Thursday, with Frontline (FRO) losing 7%, Nordic American Tanker (NAT) weakening by 9.8% and O M I Corp (OMM) closing 8.7% lower.<!--more--> Even though the <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article_print/SB115706646696751143.html">Bank of America raised</a> it's six-month oil tanker forecasts by 40% and it's targets by 5% supported by steady transport volume, a global trend to maintain high oil storage, and extended interruptions in Alaskan oil production on September 1st:

<blockquote class="quote"><p>* "We believe a 25% increase in tanker equity values since early June versus essentially no change in the Standard & Poor's 500 index reflects shipping strength to date, but has not fully priced in further upside over the next six months."
</p>
<p>    * "We believe the forward six-month outlook could exceed consensus by 40% and support further equity value increases from 10% to 20%."
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/17015-sinking-ships-tanker-stocks-difficult-week-and-why-they-should-soon-rebound?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fro">FRO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmr">GMR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nat">NAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/omm">OMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osg">OSG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tnp">TNP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vlccf">VLCCF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Housing Crisis: Housing Bubble or Lending Bubble?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/16521-housing-crisis-housing-bubble-or-lending-bubble?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The increase in home prices cannot be explained by fundamental factors, such as rising incomes and population growth.<!--more--> The growth in income over this period has not been especially rapid. The rate of income growth is considerably slower than in the years from 1950 to 1973, when the rise in home prices just kept pace with the overall rate of inflation. The growth in population over this period has not been especially rapid. The most rapid growth in the number of new households actually took place in the 1970s and early 1980s, when the huge baby boom cohort was first forming their own households.

<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/homepriceincrease_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-homepriceincrease_01.png" border="0" height="271" alt="oli1" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>Most importantly, there has been no significant increase in rents, which would be expected if the run-up in house prices were explained by the fundamentals of the housing market. Rents and home sale prices have always moved closely together, since families can freely switch between renting and owning depending on the relative prices, and landlords can sell off rental property if home sale prices rise substantially relative to rents. Rents had increased somewhat more rapidly than the overall rate of inflation from 1998 to 2002, and are currently rising again. However, these small increases in rents compared to the large increases in home prices, could indicate that the run-up in house prices is not being driven by fundamental factors in the housing market.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:07:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>The increase in home prices cannot be explained by fundamental factors, such as rising incomes and population growth.<!--more--> The growth in income over this period has not been especially rapid. The rate of income growth is considerably slower than in the years from 1950 to 1973, when the rise in home prices just kept pace with the overall rate of inflation. The growth in population over this period has not been especially rapid. The most rapid growth in the number of new households actually took place in the 1970s and early 1980s, when the huge baby boom cohort was first forming their own households.

<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/homepriceincrease_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-homepriceincrease_01.png" border="0" height="271" alt="oli1" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>Most importantly, there has been no significant increase in rents, which would be expected if the run-up in house prices were explained by the fundamentals of the housing market. Rents and home sale prices have always moved closely together, since families can freely switch between renting and owning depending on the relative prices, and landlords can sell off rental property if home sale prices rise substantially relative to rents. Rents had increased somewhat more rapidly than the overall rate of inflation from 1998 to 2002, and are currently rising again. However, these small increases in rents compared to the large increases in home prices, could indicate that the run-up in house prices is not being driven by fundamental factors in the housing market.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/16521-housing-crisis-housing-bubble-or-lending-bubble?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CECO Evnironmental: A Pollution Control Smallcap Long Pick</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/16331-ceco-evnironmental-a-pollution-control-smallcap-long-pick?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cecoenviro.com/">CECO Environmental Corp.</a> (CECE) is a leading vertically integrated provider of systems and parts to the air pollution control industry.<!--more--> The Company focuses on engineering, designing, building, installing and monitoring systems that eliminate airborne contaminants and control emissions from a variety of industrial facilities. The Company operates through seven subsidiaries which together have in excess of 1,500 active customers in industries including automotive, pharmaceuticals, metal working, foundries, paper, food, and chemicals.

<p><strong>Although the company has incurred a net loss over the past seven years, now it seems to be the right time to invest in this company</strong>. In the last 6 months, CECO Environmental experienced an extraordinary demand of its products and services. Year over year, it´s revenues increased in Q1 by 62% and in by Q2 59%. The strong demand and improvements in it´s operating margin pushed the company into profitability, <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060810/earns_ceco.html?.v=1">as it reported</a> a net income of 0.12 cents a share in Q2.
</p>
<p>Management holds more than 50% of the outstanding common stock of 12,8 Million shares and various hedge funds hold over 70% of the free float of 4.8 Million shares.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:33:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong><a href="http://www.cecoenviro.com/">CECO Environmental Corp.</a> (CECE) is a leading vertically integrated provider of systems and parts to the air pollution control industry.<!--more--> The Company focuses on engineering, designing, building, installing and monitoring systems that eliminate airborne contaminants and control emissions from a variety of industrial facilities. The Company operates through seven subsidiaries which together have in excess of 1,500 active customers in industries including automotive, pharmaceuticals, metal working, foundries, paper, food, and chemicals.

<p><strong>Although the company has incurred a net loss over the past seven years, now it seems to be the right time to invest in this company</strong>. In the last 6 months, CECO Environmental experienced an extraordinary demand of its products and services. Year over year, it´s revenues increased in Q1 by 62% and in by Q2 59%. The strong demand and improvements in it´s operating margin pushed the company into profitability, <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060810/earns_ceco.html?.v=1">as it reported</a> a net income of 0.12 cents a share in Q2.
</p>
<p>Management holds more than 50% of the outstanding common stock of 12,8 Million shares and various hedge funds hold over 70% of the free float of 4.8 Million shares.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/16331-ceco-evnironmental-a-pollution-control-smallcap-long-pick?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cece">CECE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>World's Biggest Emerging Market: Russia</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/16185-world-s-biggest-emerging-market-russia?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16185</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Russian stocks are approaching $1 trillion in value, an emerging-market record, mostly because of the country's oil and gas industry.<!--more--> The Russian Trading System Index [RTSI] has surged 88 percent over the past 12 months. Russia's market capitalization on Aug. 16 reached a record $946.2 billion, <strong>15 percent larger than South Korea, the next biggest emerging market</strong>, at its peak in May, according to data compiled by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=axJNpGtZi90A">Bloomberg</a>.

<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/rtsi_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-rtsi_01.png" border="0" height="242" alt="rtsi" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>Russia´s biggest company, OAO Gazprom (not listed in the U.S.), ranks as the world's third-largest company at $276.9 billion in  Marketcap, behind Exxon Mobil (XOM). and General Electric (GE) and ahead of Microsoft (MSFT) and Citigroup (C). Shares of Moscow-based Gazprom, the world's largest natural-gas producer, have jumped 60 percent this year. The country's biggest companies outside the oil and gas industry include OAO Sberbank, Russia's biggest lender; OAO Unified Energy System, the national power utility; OAO GMK Norilsk Nickel, the world's largest nickel miner; OAO Cherkizovo Group, Russia's largest meat producer; and OAO Mobile TeleSystems, eastern Europe's No. 1 mobile-phone operator.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:17:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Russian stocks are approaching $1 trillion in value, an emerging-market record, mostly because of the country's oil and gas industry.<!--more--> The Russian Trading System Index [RTSI] has surged 88 percent over the past 12 months. Russia's market capitalization on Aug. 16 reached a record $946.2 billion, <strong>15 percent larger than South Korea, the next biggest emerging market</strong>, at its peak in May, according to data compiled by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=axJNpGtZi90A">Bloomberg</a>.

<p><em>click to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/rtsi_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-rtsi_01.png" border="0" height="242" alt="rtsi" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>Russia´s biggest company, OAO Gazprom (not listed in the U.S.), ranks as the world's third-largest company at $276.9 billion in  Marketcap, behind Exxon Mobil (XOM). and General Electric (GE) and ahead of Microsoft (MSFT) and Citigroup (C). Shares of Moscow-based Gazprom, the world's largest natural-gas producer, have jumped 60 percent this year. The country's biggest companies outside the oil and gas industry include OAO Sberbank, Russia's biggest lender; OAO Unified Energy System, the national power utility; OAO GMK Norilsk Nickel, the world's largest nickel miner; OAO Cherkizovo Group, Russia's largest meat producer; and OAO Mobile TeleSystems, eastern Europe's No. 1 mobile-phone operator.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/16185-world-s-biggest-emerging-market-russia?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lukoy.pk">LUKOY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mbt">MBT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mtl">MTL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ros">ROS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tnt">TNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vip">VIP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wbd">WBD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change in Investors' Preferences Shows Anticipation of an Economic Slowdown</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15919-change-in-investors-preferences-shows-anticipation-of-an-economic-slowdown?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15919</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The sector performance in the recent weeks shows some interesting points about the change of investors' collective mood.<!--more--> 

<p>As the chart below shows, the latest up-move in the S&P 500 Index, which started on August the 10th and <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15762">could be a bull trap</a>, was led by Technology, Industrial and Consumer Discretionary sectors. This sector performance suggests, that investors anticipated a soft landing at that time.
</p>
<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/secorsbulltrap_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-secorsbulltrap_01.png" border="0" height="263" alt="bt" width="400" /></a>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:21:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>The sector performance in the recent weeks shows some interesting points about the change of investors' collective mood.<!--more--> 

<p>As the chart below shows, the latest up-move in the S&P 500 Index, which started on August the 10th and <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15762">could be a bull trap</a>, was led by Technology, Industrial and Consumer Discretionary sectors. This sector performance suggests, that investors anticipated a soft landing at that time.
</p>
<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/secorsbulltrap_01.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-secorsbulltrap_01.png" border="0" height="263" alt="bt" width="400" /></a>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15919-change-in-investors-preferences-shows-anticipation-of-an-economic-slowdown?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chicago Mercantile Exchange Outpacing its Rival CBOT Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15829-chicago-mercantile-exchange-outpacing-its-rival-cbot-holdings?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15829</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Chicago Board of Trade's parent, CBOT Holdings (BOT), went public on October 9th, 2005 at a price of $54 per share.<!--more--> Yesterday it traded at $118.88 per share, which is above the highest price target at $118, issued by Wall Street´s analysts. The lowest price target is currently at $100 and the median price target is at $105 (Source: Thomson/First Call). 

<p>On August the 15th, analyst Jason Willey of Standard & Poor's Equity Research <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115569111719336845.html">lowered his investment recommendation</a> (<em>sub. req.</em>) on shares of CBOT to "strong sell" from "sell" and put a price target on the stock of $105. Currently 8 analysts have a "Hold", 2 a "Sell" and 1 analyst has a "Strong Sell" recommendation on the stock (Source: Thomson/First Call). However, despite the analysts´ reservation about the growth prospects of CBOT in comparison to it´s biggest rival the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the stock has outperformed CME with an year-to-date return of 26.8 percent.
</p>
<p>On a trailing earnings basis BOT trades currently at an PE of 52 where CME trades at a PE of 45. Regarding this year´s earnings both trade at a PE of 39. On a forward looking basis, BOT trades at a slightly higher PE of 32 in comparison to CME which trades at a forward PE of 31 for 2007 earnings. To justify these high PE ratios, well above the price-earnings ratio of less than 20 on the average S&P 500 stock, both companies should exhibit the same growth prespectives.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:25:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Chicago Board of Trade's parent, CBOT Holdings (BOT), went public on October 9th, 2005 at a price of $54 per share.<!--more--> Yesterday it traded at $118.88 per share, which is above the highest price target at $118, issued by Wall Street´s analysts. The lowest price target is currently at $100 and the median price target is at $105 (Source: Thomson/First Call). 

<p>On August the 15th, analyst Jason Willey of Standard & Poor's Equity Research <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115569111719336845.html">lowered his investment recommendation</a> (<em>sub. req.</em>) on shares of CBOT to "strong sell" from "sell" and put a price target on the stock of $105. Currently 8 analysts have a "Hold", 2 a "Sell" and 1 analyst has a "Strong Sell" recommendation on the stock (Source: Thomson/First Call). However, despite the analysts´ reservation about the growth prospects of CBOT in comparison to it´s biggest rival the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the stock has outperformed CME with an year-to-date return of 26.8 percent.
</p>
<p>On a trailing earnings basis BOT trades currently at an PE of 52 where CME trades at a PE of 45. Regarding this year´s earnings both trade at a PE of 39. On a forward looking basis, BOT trades at a slightly higher PE of 32 in comparison to CME which trades at a forward PE of 31 for 2007 earnings. To justify these high PE ratios, well above the price-earnings ratio of less than 20 on the average S&P 500 stock, both companies should exhibit the same growth prespectives.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15829-chicago-mercantile-exchange-outpacing-its-rival-cbot-holdings?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bot">BOT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cme">CME</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Classic Bull Trap? Last Week's Bull Run Missing Confirmation of Breakouts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15762-classic-bull-trap-last-week-s-bull-run-missing-confirmation-of-breakouts?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15762</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Although the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial and the Nasdaq experienced "break out" weeks last week, Tate Dwinnell is <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15663">still cautious</a> to call this a raging bull market as the volume remains a bit tepid.<!--more--> Barry Ritholtz also <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2006/08/wanted_volume_p.html">misses confirming volume</a>.

<p>Eddy Elfenbein <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15678">noticed</a> that stock prices still lag behind earnings growth. Therefore, he can´t think of a real bull market as price/earnings ratios decline. And J.D. Steinhilber <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15632">highlights</a> the fact that the S&P 500’s earnings yield is higher than the 10-year Treasury yield.
</p>
<p>A deeper look into the market reveals that the recent break out of the S&P 500 could be <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bulltrap.asp">a bull trap</a> and the S&P 500 could soon resume its downtrend.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:17:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Although the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial and the Nasdaq experienced "break out" weeks last week, Tate Dwinnell is <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15663">still cautious</a> to call this a raging bull market as the volume remains a bit tepid.<!--more--> Barry Ritholtz also <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2006/08/wanted_volume_p.html">misses confirming volume</a>.

<p>Eddy Elfenbein <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15678">noticed</a> that stock prices still lag behind earnings growth. Therefore, he can´t think of a real bull market as price/earnings ratios decline. And J.D. Steinhilber <a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/15632">highlights</a> the fact that the S&P 500’s earnings yield is higher than the 10-year Treasury yield.
</p>
<p>A deeper look into the market reveals that the recent break out of the S&P 500 could be <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bulltrap.asp">a bull trap</a> and the S&P 500 could soon resume its downtrend.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15762-classic-bull-trap-last-week-s-bull-run-missing-confirmation-of-breakouts?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lehman Brothers' New Asian Currency Warrant</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15732-lehman-brothers-new-asian-currency-warrant?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15732</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On August 8th, Lehman Brothers sold to the public 4.9 million warrants that let investors bet on a group of Asian currencies against the greenback.<!--more--> Each Asian Appreciation Basket warrant has an initial notional value of $95 and covers four currencies - the Chinese yuan [CNY], the Japanese yen [JPY], the Singapore dollar [SGD] and the Taiwan dollar [TWD], each makes up a portion of the Basket with a weighting of 25 percent - and will expire on Feb. 13, 2008. 

<p>The warrants, which are cash-settled, trade at the AMEX under the symbol AAB (AAB) and were priced at their "IPO" for $6.23 each. The initial reference currency rates were as follows:
</p>
<blockquote><p>CNY: 7.9740
<br />
    TWD: 32.8300
<br />
    JPY: 115.0400
<br />
    SGD: 1.5739<br />
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:23:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>On August 8th, Lehman Brothers sold to the public 4.9 million warrants that let investors bet on a group of Asian currencies against the greenback.<!--more--> Each Asian Appreciation Basket warrant has an initial notional value of $95 and covers four currencies - the Chinese yuan [CNY], the Japanese yen [JPY], the Singapore dollar [SGD] and the Taiwan dollar [TWD], each makes up a portion of the Basket with a weighting of 25 percent - and will expire on Feb. 13, 2008. 

<p>The warrants, which are cash-settled, trade at the AMEX under the symbol AAB (AAB) and were priced at their "IPO" for $6.23 each. The initial reference currency rates were as follows:
</p>
<blockquote><p>CNY: 7.9740
<br />
    TWD: 32.8300
<br />
    JPY: 115.0400
<br />
    SGD: 1.5739<br />
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15732-lehman-brothers-new-asian-currency-warrant?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aab">AAB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping Stocks Gain Steam as Fundamentals Improve, Other Factors Fall Into Place</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15607-shipping-stocks-gain-steam-as-fundamentals-improve-other-factors-fall-into-place?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15607</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Shipping stocks gained strength over the last few weeks as their fundamentals continue improving.<!--more--> The weekly chart below shows that the leading shipping stocks, Frontline Ltd. Adr (FRO), General Maritime Corp. (GMR), Nordic Amer. Tanker Ship (NAT), OMI Corp. (OMM), Overseas Shipholding Grp. (OSG), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TNP) and Knightsbridge Tankers (VLCCF) have risen both in absolute terms and relative to the S&P 500 over that time. 

<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/shippingstocks060815.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-shippingstocks060815.png" border="0" height="291" alt="shipping stocks" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>The Baltic Dirty Tanker Index [BDTI] and the Baltic Clean Tanker Index [BCTI] which measure the dayrates for tankers have been rising since June 2006. The BDTI index, which measures the costs of hiring ships able to transport crude, rose 10.2 per cent last week, and is 42.8 per cent higher than last year. The index is up by an even sharper 51 per cent from April lows. The BCTI has been rising since April and is currently 45 per cent higher than last year and 68 per cent above March lows.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:37:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Shipping stocks gained strength over the last few weeks as their fundamentals continue improving.<!--more--> The weekly chart below shows that the leading shipping stocks, Frontline Ltd. Adr (FRO), General Maritime Corp. (GMR), Nordic Amer. Tanker Ship (NAT), OMI Corp. (OMM), Overseas Shipholding Grp. (OSG), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TNP) and Knightsbridge Tankers (VLCCF) have risen both in absolute terms and relative to the S&P 500 over that time. 

<p><em>click charts to enlarge</em>
<br />
<a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/shippingstocks060815.png"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-shippingstocks060815.png" border="0" height="291" alt="shipping stocks" width="400" /></a>
</p>
<p>The Baltic Dirty Tanker Index [BDTI] and the Baltic Clean Tanker Index [BCTI] which measure the dayrates for tankers have been rising since June 2006. The BDTI index, which measures the costs of hiring ships able to transport crude, rose 10.2 per cent last week, and is 42.8 per cent higher than last year. The index is up by an even sharper 51 per cent from April lows. The BCTI has been rising since April and is currently 45 per cent higher than last year and 68 per cent above March lows.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15607-shipping-stocks-gain-steam-as-fundamentals-improve-other-factors-fall-into-place?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bp">BP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fro">FRO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gmr">GMR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nat">NAT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/omm">OMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/osg">OSG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tnp">TNP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vlccf">VLCCF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Large Cap Stocks Provide More Safety than Small Caps in the Current Environment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15124-large-cap-stocks-provide-more-safety-than-small-caps-in-the-current-environment?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15124</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Large cap stocks should outperform small cap stocks in the coming months based on the changes in the interest environment.<!--more--> William Hester from Hussman Funds <a href="http://www.hussmanfunds.com/rsi/relativevalue.htm">recently pointed out</a> that current valuations also indicate that "in terms of relative performance, there may be better days ahead for large-cap companies" (if not gaining more than small caps, then maybe at least falling less).

<p>The S&P 500 (SPY) currently has a P/E ratio of 16.9 whereas the Russell 2000´s (IWM) P/E ratio is currently at 33, almost twice that of the S&P 500. Bloomberg estimates that the earnings of the S&P 500 companies will grow in the next 12 months at 14.8 percent whereas the Russell 2000 companies' earnings should increase by 42.9 percent, almost three times that of the S&P 500.
</p>
<p><strong>SPY-IWM 1-yr comparison chart</strong>:
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:33:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>Large cap stocks should outperform small cap stocks in the coming months based on the changes in the interest environment.<!--more--> William Hester from Hussman Funds <a href="http://www.hussmanfunds.com/rsi/relativevalue.htm">recently pointed out</a> that current valuations also indicate that "in terms of relative performance, there may be better days ahead for large-cap companies" (if not gaining more than small caps, then maybe at least falling less).

<p>The S&P 500 (SPY) currently has a P/E ratio of 16.9 whereas the Russell 2000´s (IWM) P/E ratio is currently at 33, almost twice that of the S&P 500. Bloomberg estimates that the earnings of the S&P 500 companies will grow in the next 12 months at 14.8 percent whereas the Russell 2000 companies' earnings should increase by 42.9 percent, almost three times that of the S&P 500.
</p>
<p><strong>SPY-IWM 1-yr comparison chart</strong>:
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15124-large-cap-stocks-provide-more-safety-than-small-caps-in-the-current-environment?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iwm">IWM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are We Entering Into a Recession? Check These 4 Market Indicators to Find Out</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15094-are-we-entering-into-a-recession-check-these-4-market-indicators-to-find-out?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15094</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As the controversy about a possible U.S. recession taking place has been gaining strength in the last months, it would be vital for investors to spot emerging danger signs of a coming recession.<!--more-->

<p><a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/14564">John Hussmann pointed out</a> in his weekly newsletter on July 31th:
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>Investors are tenuously sticking to the first story line – moderating growth with no risk of recession, moderating inflation, beliefs that stocks are reasonably valued, and hopes for an end to the tightening cycle. Yet the data are actually consistent with a second story line – emerging (though not imminent) recession risks, persistent “structural” inflation, rich valuations, probable contraction of profit margins, and an incoherent Fed policy that is likely to become even more incoherent in attempting to battle weaker economic growth and persistent inflation simultaneously (not that I believe Fed actions will be effective in any event).<br />
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:32:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Oliver Schwindler</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Oliver Schwindler (<a href="http://www.relativemarketview.de/blog/">Relative Market View</a>) (<a href="http://investingthemes.blogspot.com/">Investing Themes</a>) submits: </strong>As the controversy about a possible U.S. recession taking place has been gaining strength in the last months, it would be vital for investors to spot emerging danger signs of a coming recession.<!--more-->

<p><a href="http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/14564">John Hussmann pointed out</a> in his weekly newsletter on July 31th:
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>Investors are tenuously sticking to the first story line – moderating growth with no risk of recession, moderating inflation, beliefs that stocks are reasonably valued, and hopes for an end to the tightening cycle. Yet the data are actually consistent with a second story line – emerging (though not imminent) recession risks, persistent “structural” inflation, rich valuations, probable contraction of profit margins, and an incoherent Fed policy that is likely to become even more incoherent in attempting to battle weaker economic growth and persistent inflation simultaneously (not that I believe Fed actions will be effective in any event).<br />
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15094-are-we-entering-into-a-recession-check-these-4-market-indicators-to-find-out?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/oliver-schwindler">Oliver Schwindler</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
