Seeking Alpha

One Eyed Guide's  Instablog

The One Eyed Guide (http://www.oneeyedguide.com) is Bob Small who: solo traveled to 25 countries by age 21, has a degree in Economics, an MBA from Columbia University in Marketing and Finance, has been a brand manager, was a licensed stock and options broker during the 87 crash, ran a $450... More
My blog:
One Eyed Guide
  • Did Cash for Clunkers Cost Too Much? (MBAish)
    October US Census sales estimates are in so a better analysis of Cash for Clunkers can be done. Popular estimates have ranged from $24,000 per vehicle done by the economists of Edmunds to $4,600 by the economists at NADA.   The Edmunds analysis means that only 18% of vehicles were incremental while the NADA estimate means that 92% were incremental.
    This analysis, which is done like an irritating MBA brand manager would do, arrives at an estimated cost per vehicle of $7,924 which is offset by average gas savings of up to $15,000 over the life of the vehicle.
    While it’s understandable that the National Automobile Dealers Association would want to lowball the cost, it’s a mystery why Edmonds would think it’s in the best interest of their readers and industry to overestimate the cost. 
    More »
    Nov 18 03:27 pm | Link | Comment!
  • Edmunds Hurting Auto Industry with Unrealistic Forecasts

    Edmunds.com economists have come out with an evaluation of the Cash For Clunkers programs that states only an additional 125,000 vehicles were sold at a cost of $24,000 per incremental vehicle. To arrive at this number Edmonds’ economists made forecasts of sales with and without Cash For Clunkers.  While the reasons for doing this analysis are unclear (their conclusion hurts the chances of the auto industry getting additional stimulus) it is clear that the forecasts they made are either too high or too low.

    In general, most people do a poor job of forecasting sales (95% of new products fail) but it is easy to track obvious bias in forecasts if you have ever had your bonus dependant on their accuracy.   As a brand manager, I was carefully beaten about the head and shoulders by management to make sure I knew about forecasting errors and applied this learning to my subordinates when it was my turn.  Let’s see how good Edmunds’ economists are at forecasting.

    Here’s how they forecast sales would be with and without Cash For Clunkers.  

    More »
    Nov 04 10:53 am | Link | Comment!
  • Is Better Economic Reporting Killing the Market?
    In my previous article,5 Reasons Why This Market Still Has Upside Potential , I commented that the S&P500 had reached a PE of 26 based on 10 year average earns during the 1930 rally so there was significant upside (potentially 1350) in the market even though it is overvalued.  At that time I pulled off my leveraged market shorts to stay out of the way of any sudden break upwards as the baked in earnings surprises were revealed.
    All the news has been as positive as it could be with 80% of companies exceeding earning estimates and revenue losses coming in at only (!!!) -17.5% instead the   -24.8% that had been projected on October 1 (Thomson Reuters) but the market has gone down instead of up and technicians are worried that negative technical signals are forming.  The market drop instead of a gain so far today with GDP at 3.5% instead of 3.2%, positive Chicago PMI and positive (somewhat) consumer sentiment makes me think that the market is not going to move much higher even if earnings get better.
    A big difference from the Great Depression is that we have lots of economic reports that did not exist in 1930.  Many reports, such as GDP and Personal Income, started in 1929 so there was little history and trust in the reports so valuations continued upward until they reach very high levels.
    Today, most of the data out there supports the fact that the market is overvalued at current levels.  Even bulls seem to think that a 15% pullback is expected.
    Based on the inability of the market to go higher on what is really pretty good news, I am going aggressively short again.   I expect that the market will decline a bit more, stage a small rally to form a classic head and shoulders technical pattern and then head for the floor.  If this happens before xmas, it could get ugly as funds look to lock in profits. 

    Of course, it might start to go up fast but unless something unexpected happens I'm going to keep my positions on and ride out the "pain of the short".  There is a  lot more downside than upside from here.

    Disclosure:  Short Market
    Oct 30 12:52 pm | Link | Comment!
  • Housing Litmus Tests: Good News, Bad News and a Black Swan

    The combination of dropping prices and rising sales in the National Assocation of Realtors existing home data makes it difficult to figure out if the news for housing is really good or bad.  You have to look at more that the topline data to figure out if there is any good news and how bad the bad news is.
    First the Good news:  Existing home sales are no longer a bleeding wound in the economy. The total dollar sales from existing houses were final positive, at 0.8% ($0.8 billion) above September 2008 versus -7.8% (-$9.3 billon) in August.  Total dollar sales is Average Price times number of houses sold and shows the total revenue generated by housing sales. This is an indicator that the housing economy is growing. Here’s how it look by region:
    Existing Homes $ Sales 2006 to 9_2009
    In some ways, celebrating this is like the survivors of the Black Death celebrating being alive. Sales levels are 70% of what they were in 2006 as shown below.
    Existing Housing-Annual $ Sales
    Still, for the economy this is good news and show expansion, at least temporarily and, like during the Black Death, the real estate left vacant by the decline is an opportunity for the survivors.
    Now the bad news. Where do I start? Let’s get personal.

    If you own a house, you have lost 21% of the value since 2006 on average. Averages are deceptive but there is no way this is good.  Below is the change by region.
    Median Existing Home Values Change 2006 to 2009
    The increase is all due to the first time buyer stimulus, though there are signs of life in higher priced houses in some areas. Looking at sales by price point, the growth is mostly in low end housing, just like August. The table below shows that there is some growth in the Midwest that might not be attributable to the stimulus. However, the Northeast, South and West would almost certainly be negative without the stimulus. The 16.6% increase in $100000-$250000 houses in the Northeast may indicate a shortage of low-end housing.
    Existing Single Family Home Sales -September 2009
    The Midwest housing market has been depressed for longer than the rest of the country and the strength in houses up to $750,000 is probably due to these being fairly priced. I’m not sure this is the case for the rest of the country.
    More »
    Oct 24 02:31 pm | Link | Comment!
  • The Most Likely Scenario (Somebody has to say it)

    Almost everyone understands that the stock markets are highly valued right now but there seems to be little understanding of what is going to happen when it rolls over. 

    Bulls feel any correction will be minor and quickly resolve itself as higher earnings are announced (the best case scenario.)  This is the same thinking that resulted in the recent $11 Trillion (or whatever other large number you agree with) reduction in America’s net worth.

    The bears think that earnings estimates are not achievable and bad news will drive down the markets until everybody despairs that it will ever go up.  The bottom for the bears tracking the history of the S&P500 is 460 or lower.  Many bears predict a worst case scenerio of both the “Greater Depression” from the economic collapse and hyper inflation from money printing.    There is no economic theory that ends up with both of these within the next year or two.  To get hyper inflation without runaway economic activity, you have to first destroy the economy (Germany at the end of WWI or Zimbabwe’s farm takeovers) then print money.  While what Obama is doing may not be exactly right, no one can argue it rises to the destruction of Mugabe and it may actually help. The concern about printing money causing a Depression is unfathomable:  This either starts growth (eliminating the possibility of a Greater Depression) leading to (maybe hyper) inflation or does not affect growth/inflation as money goes into a liquidity trap.

    The most likely scenario is much different than these two stock market scenarios.   Sometime in the next 6 months the stock markets will be substantially lower at the end of a month than it was at that the beginning because of the natural ebb and flow of the markets.  Even if this starts as a minor correction to a liquidity driven market, this will almost certainly trigger a decline in the Conference Board Leading Economic Indicators because:

    1.       Reversing the recent stock market gains by itself would eliminate most of the positive trend.  August LEI were up by 0.62, of which 0.30 was from stock gains.  Just reversing August gains would move the index -0.6

    2.       A falling stock market will probably reduce consumer expectations below whatever level it is at.  As this was one of the August LEI positives reversing it will be enough to put the LEI in negative territory. 

    There is unlikely to be any offsetting increase in manufacturing activity to maintain a positive LEI .  In fact, at the same time that the stock market can be expected to have a correction, manufacturing will probably have its own correction which will push the leading indicators very negative because:

    1.       The end of the Cash for Clunkers has brought auto sales back to trend so a reduction in manufacturing activity is to be expected after autos restock.

    2.       Some of the recent manufacturing increases were due to inventory rebalancing, not rebuilding. Manufacturing inventories at 1.38 months remain above the 1.2 month level that was typical from 2002 to 2007.  Once rebalancing is complete, we can expect further decreases in manufacturing as inventories are drawn down. 

    3.       Retail inventories are low for this time of year which raises the possibility that there will be out of stocks at xmas time, further depressing retail sales.  Alternatively, there could be a sudden rush to stock up before Xmas (unlikely with retails sales down 8.8% for the first 9 months of the year.)

    The drop in the LEI will cause a panic that we are in the dread “double dip” recession.  Fear of this will accelerate the drop in the market until it reaches some sort of normal valuation from the current levels.  You can pick your own level of fair valuation but a 15 PE on trailing 10 year earnings seems reasonable given the amount of liquidity being put in the system and the almost 100% certainty the there will be another stimulus bill if the “W” starts to appear in the recession profile.  This gives a bottom around 640 on the S&P500 using current projections into 2010.  Traditional market bottoms using PE’s of 5 or 8 don’t seem very likely given the amount of money that will be pumped into the system.

    There is a chance that there will be a quick drop if the market has a pullback prior to December 31 which causes a rush for the exits by money managers who need to lock in profits before year end.  This is ugly but there is a lot of support until Dec 31 as basically everybody is going to do everything they can to make their yearend bonus.  Earnings surprises with poor sales results like J&J seem to be the norm and the market should be able to shrug these off.

    If you look at history, we will not have a double dip recession unless the problems in banking (forecasts of up to 1000 banks failing) prevent lending for smaller firms from opening back up when there is actually demand for lending.  This was an issue with both the Recession of 1937 and the Recession of 1895 (part of the Panic of 1893.)  The Panic of 1893 was the end of the first Gilded Age and resulted in a double dip recession with persistent unemployment that did not resolve until banks became solvent again.  Sound familiar for the end of the New Gilded Age?

    The most likely scenario for the stock market is a nasty decline back to previous lows starting in earnest in January 2010.  Old lows will probably be broken if we enter a true double dip recession but even then the liquidity and deficit may keep earnings at a level that prevents Great Depression like lows in the market.

    We’ll see.

    Disclosure:  None for this post 

    Oct 18 11:13 pm | Link | Comment!
  • The Great Depression and Minsky Tells Us This Market has Upside Potential

    I am surprised by the market strength in the face of all the poor fundamentals. The basis for rapid growth is totally non-existent (more on this in a later post) but the market is taking off as if rapid growth is underway. Once you accept that the market is ignoring the possible future problems from weak demand, history and economic theory give light to why this is happening and even project a market top. 

    Here’s the facts: 

    More »
    Oct 15 12:19 pm | Link | 2 Comments
Full index of posts »
Posts by Ticker
F, GOLD, SPY

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.