Seeking Alpha

Patent Plays  

View Patent Plays' Comments BY TICKER:
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    @IPobserver

    I spoke to Lisa today and she has no idea who you are.

    I would suggest you refrain from posting the same question as it has already been answered (on multiple blogs) and contributes nothing actionable on the investment spoken of.
    Oct 8, 2014. 09:09 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    @Rick

    The driving issue that came out of Alice v. CLS is the patent technology arts test as mentioned in the Vringo appeal order."technological arts test for patent-eligibility." On the recent I/P Engine(VRINGO) v AOL appeal Judge Mayer insisted that "advances in non-technological disciplines, such as business, are irrelevant." Worlds patents are not Business Methods (such as Vringo and Alice).

    Further, he writes that the Supreme Court did not address the "issue of whether [Alice's] claimed intermediated settlement technique represented an innovative method for improving commercial transactions" because these claims were non-technical in nature.

    But Alice makes it clear that if your patent covers an implementation of an idea there needs to be proof of an inventive concept beyond that idea before you're awarded a patent. You’ve got to add new steps to your patent, if there's no new hardware. Not just computer technology that is generic or functionally described. Worlds patents covering 3 D movement in virtual worlds spells out theses steps, and they are indeed new.

    That's why Alice is a non starter for Worlds, and Judge Caspar has already reviewed this to be sure.

    On the European movement, I think, between Denmark and Brazil, ZTE want its product back on the street. That might be enough for Vringo to get to settlement stage-if they can keep the stop going.
    Oct 8, 2014. 08:58 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    Yes I do.
    Oct 8, 2014. 08:08 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    Pardon my grammar- traveling.
    Oct 8, 2014. 08:06 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    I was referring to the industry comprising the 3 dominant search engines. I think we both can agree that's Google, Yahoo and Bing. In contrast to Worlds which has more than 50 top producers of MMORPG content. I never referenced VRINGO's other patent infringement actions and never implyed VRingo "bashing" as you put it. On the contrary I purchased more stock today in VRingo.

    Check my Twitter feed and you might be surprised of my sentiments toward VRingo.
    Oct 8, 2014. 07:29 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    @Rick

    "Progression; defined the action or process of progressing."

    "Worlds can look forward to the court’s ruling and the scheduling of a trial date. Worlds progression here can not be avoided or stopped, without a settlement from Activision Blizzard."

    I think we both can agree that the Markman will continue and that Activision can not stop it. Beyond that anything is possible
    Oct 6, 2014. 10:06 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    @Rick

    Love the comedy. Cheers
    Oct 6, 2014. 09:47 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    @USER 8331091

    Reprint from above:

    Judge Caspar declined the recording, as is her prerogative, under her authority. Broadcasting the Markman is not out of the norm by previous courts, especially the Tennessee Federal Court, which ran the last Markman that was streamed.

    The previous Worlds hearing that was streamed went thru almost unnoticed by any media reporting. I suspect that was done with little or no requests. The current Markman Hearing had potentially hundreds of requests via the online form. I have spoken with Worlds about this and they did not assert either way, which leads me to believe Ropes (Activision Attorneys) played a hand in requesting the event not be streamed.

    This is very plausible given my last article covering Worlds, and the details I addressed concerning what Ropes lead counsel said. Regardless I submitted this Article on Monday, before the Friday hearing, and had no way to expect Judge Caspar would pull the streaming.

    Again it was her decision and her timing.
    Oct 6, 2014. 11:15 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    Judge Caspar declined the recording, as is her prerogative, under her authority. Broadcasting the Markman is not out of the norm by previous courts, especially the Tennessee Federal Court, which ran the last Markman that was streamed.

    The previous Worlds hearing that was streamed went thru almost unnoticed by any media reporting. I suspect that was done with little or no requests. The current Markman Hearing had potentially hundreds of requests via the online form. I have spoken with Worlds about this and they did not assert either way, which leads me to believe Ropes (Activision Attorneys) played a hand in requesting the event not be streamed.

    This is very plausible given my last article covering Worlds, and the details I addressed concerning what Ropes lead counsel said. Regardless I submitted this Article on Monday, before the Friday hearing, and had no way to expect Judge Caspar would pull the streaming.

    Again it was her decision and her timing.
    Oct 6, 2014. 09:08 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    I'm very satisfied with the completion of the Markman Hearing. Looking forward to adding to my position.
    Oct 5, 2014. 11:46 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    *****MARKMAN RESULTS **********************...
    Notes from the Hearing -

    The Markman hearing went well, no incidents of exception. Judge Casper asked questions of both parties on various aspects of the claims and how the suggested words would alter the intent of the claims.

    Activision's Counsel Ropes was prepared on their positions. Susman Godfrey was very organized in case law citations and presumption of validity, based on the issued claims, and pointed out to the judge repeatedly that the Markman was solely intended to focus on the meaning of the words in the claims and not importing new meanings or pointing towards infringement, that’s for trial.

    The perception gleaned from Judge Caspar was poker faced most of the 4 hrs. Now Worlds will have to wait for the for her ruling. No ruling was made from the bench and none was ever expected.

    Susman Godfrey presented a strong, well-reasoned claims construction argument based on the presumption of validity that the patents hold as issued by the USPTO.

    Both parties will agree to submit a trial date to the court for scheduling.

    My thoughts:

    Worlds has now completed an important step in their litigation against Activision with the finalized Markman hearing. Worlds can look forward to the court’s ruling and the scheduling of a trial date. Worlds progression here can not be avoided or stopped, without a settlement from Activision Blizzard.

    Since there was no adverse rulings (that were expected by the sell-off fear that the markman would be stopped), Worlds stock can expect a positive break and begin to develop the momentum it lost last year.
    Oct 5, 2014. 04:32 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    ''3-D Online Multi-Player Patent Holder Worlds Inc won't feel the pinch of trial costs all the way to the US Supreme Court; courtesy of Susman Godfrey''.

    Susman Godfrey has guaranteed to cover all costs associated with this litigation. Rick, do not confuse the Patent Infringement action with Worlds liabilities (less than $2 million). Certainly there are legal costs associated with events beyond the scope of the PI. Rest assured the value of the on-going litigation and the patents themselves, will provide the basis for credit should Worlds require it.

    Your statements on Vringo deserves some qualification. Vringo has an entirely different Contingency Agreement with its law firm(s). Vringo bears more costs associated with the PI case in return for a lower contigency fee. Worlds pays a higher percentage, but unlike Vringo you wont see "Millions" in legal fees on its 10-Q. The last 10-Q had SGA at $71,385 for the quarter, a small amount comprised legal based on the assumed cost's of CPA Audited financials.

    As for the 1 man comment, I think that demonstrates fiscal conservation, after all Susman Godfrey is doing all the work here. Lets not forget David Abrams who has managed to be a 1 man hedge fund for the last 10 years returning 15% per year on avg.

    http://bit.ly/1yEjCO6

    Vringo is filing an En Banc motion with clear expectations that it may be referred by the Appellate to the Supreme Court. There will be more than 1 issue in the filing.
    Oct 4, 2014. 11:58 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    I expect late today or Monday the video will be released.
    Oct 3, 2014. 04:28 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    This downswing was not as a result of any Markman ruling by Judge Caspar. Pure and simple Worlds stockholder base is very small. Exposure with a winning Markman will encourage growth in the base. Until that occurs expect wide swings in the market value.
    Oct 3, 2014. 04:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • With Cameras Rolling, Worlds Inc. Battles Activision Blizzard October 3 [View article]
    Appreciate the information. I'd try to paraphrase next time, if possible.
    Oct 3, 2014. 01:53 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
More on ATVI by Patent Plays
COMMENTS STATS
959 Comments
1,835 Likes