<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Philip Frank - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Philip Frank' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank</link>
    <item>
      <title>Berkshire Hathaway Appears Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/66982-berkshire-hathaway-appears-undervalued?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66982</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)</strong> is a core holding in our firm Insight Asset Management’s client
portfolios. BRKB has the same claim on Berkshire Hathaway’s assets as
does <strong>Berkshire Hathaway Class A stock (BRK.A)</strong>, but is worth 1/30th of
BRKA, which makes BRKB more affordable. <!--more--></p>
<p>BRKA recently sold for $140,000
per share. The stock may be under some pressure after its recent
earnings release, showing a quarterly earnings decline. Those who use
PE ratios to value stocks may also focus on the stock selling for 16X
trailing earnings, with the prospect of a tougher insurance climate in
2008. However, PE ratios are the least sophisticated way to value
stocks, and I believe BRKA would be conservatively valued at $152,000
per share. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)</strong> is a core holding in our firm Insight Asset Management’s client
portfolios. BRKB has the same claim on Berkshire Hathaway’s assets as
does <strong>Berkshire Hathaway Class A stock (BRK.A)</strong>, but is worth 1/30th of
BRKA, which makes BRKB more affordable. <!--more--></p>
<p>BRKA recently sold for $140,000
per share. The stock may be under some pressure after its recent
earnings release, showing a quarterly earnings decline. Those who use
PE ratios to value stocks may also focus on the stock selling for 16X
trailing earnings, with the prospect of a tougher insurance climate in
2008. However, PE ratios are the least sophisticated way to value
stocks, and I believe BRKA would be conservatively valued at $152,000
per share. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/66982-berkshire-hathaway-appears-undervalued?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.a">BRK.A</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brk.b">BRK.B</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Reasons Blackstone's Still a Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/63210-6-reasons-blackstone-s-still-a-short?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">63210</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are several reasons for  our bearish view on <strong>Blackstone (BX)</strong>.</p><!--more-->
<p>1) <strong>The GSO deal may be dilutive to book value.</strong>
BX recently announced the purchase of a hedge fund, GSO. We believe
this deal may be dilutive to Blackstone’s book value. In the absence of
public information, the following analysis is theoretical, but we think
worthwhile. Using Och Ziff as a comparable for GSO, Och Ziff’s
price/assets under management was recently about 25%. GSO was bought
for about 10% of assets under management. Och Ziff has a price/ book
value of 12X. Assuming GSO’s book value stands in the same proportion
to its assets under management as do Och Ziff’s that would male BX’s
purchase of GSO at 5X book, though probably the purchase price was more
at Och Ziff’s multiple. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:46:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are several reasons for  our bearish view on <strong>Blackstone (BX)</strong>.</p><!--more-->
<p>1) <strong>The GSO deal may be dilutive to book value.</strong>
BX recently announced the purchase of a hedge fund, GSO. We believe
this deal may be dilutive to Blackstone’s book value. In the absence of
public information, the following analysis is theoretical, but we think
worthwhile. Using Och Ziff as a comparable for GSO, Och Ziff’s
price/assets under management was recently about 25%. GSO was bought
for about 10% of assets under management. Och Ziff has a price/ book
value of 12X. Assuming GSO’s book value stands in the same proportion
to its assets under management as do Och Ziff’s that would male BX’s
purchase of GSO at 5X book, though probably the purchase price was more
at Och Ziff’s multiple. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/63210-6-reasons-blackstone-s-still-a-short?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bx">BX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EchoStar Spinoff Creates A Few M&amp;A Possibilities</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/58662-echostar-spinoff-creates-a-few-m-a-possibilities?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58662</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The telecommunications and media landscape is evolving as mobile
networks and devices assume more and more prominence as firms strive
for control of the underlying software, hardware, content, and networks.<!--more-->
</p>
<p><strong> EchoStar Communications (DISH)</strong> has significant strategic value in this process. <!--more-->A spinoff
entity from EchoStar will become effective 1/1/2008. This entity will
house EchoStar’s infrastructure assets [SATS], while the remaining
entity will be comprised of EchoStar’s pay-TV business (the new Dish). </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:38:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The telecommunications and media landscape is evolving as mobile
networks and devices assume more and more prominence as firms strive
for control of the underlying software, hardware, content, and networks.<!--more-->
</p>
<p><strong> EchoStar Communications (DISH)</strong> has significant strategic value in this process. <!--more-->A spinoff
entity from EchoStar will become effective 1/1/2008. This entity will
house EchoStar’s infrastructure assets [SATS], while the remaining
entity will be comprised of EchoStar’s pay-TV business (the new Dish). </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/58662-echostar-spinoff-creates-a-few-m-a-possibilities?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dish">DISH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dtv">DTV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/t">T</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Closer Look at Google's Valuation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/38005-a-closer-look-at-google-s-valuation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">38005</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The price action in Google (GOOG) has been good lately, no question. In general, there has been a market rotation into technology. <!--more-->

<p>As interest rates rise, tech is viewed as being less interest rate sensitive, and more removed from a feared economic slowdown which will affect the consumer first. 
</p>
<p>As to Google's valuation, it all comes down to what decision is made about the terminal multiple. In Insight's 30 year discounted cash flow analysis [DCF], a 25% return on invested capital in year 30 has been assumed, as has been a 3% required growth rate. The big question is how to estimate capital expenditures (cap ex) in the terminal year of the DCF. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:50:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The price action in Google (GOOG) has been good lately, no question. In general, there has been a market rotation into technology. <!--more-->

<p>As interest rates rise, tech is viewed as being less interest rate sensitive, and more removed from a feared economic slowdown which will affect the consumer first. 
</p>
<p>As to Google's valuation, it all comes down to what decision is made about the terminal multiple. In Insight's 30 year discounted cash flow analysis [DCF], a 25% return on invested capital in year 30 has been assumed, as has been a 3% required growth rate. The big question is how to estimate capital expenditures (cap ex) in the terminal year of the DCF. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/38005-a-closer-look-at-google-s-valuation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Special Dividends To Get Deals Done: Did Disney and Palm Do Right By Shareholders?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/37779-special-dividends-to-get-deals-done-did-disney-and-palm-do-right-by-shareholders?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37779</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Merger proxies are quite revealing. I have closely read the merger proxy in which ABC Radio Business is to be spun off from Disney (DIS) to Disney shareholders and then merged into Citadel Broadcasting (CDL). This deal was structured as a reverse Morris trust which enabled both the shareholders of Disney and Disney to escape any taxation. <!--more-->
</p>
<p>But to structure a reverse Morris Trust, it is necessary that a larger entity be merged into a smaller entity. Pre-merger Citadel's equity was valued more highly than ABC radio stations. So, how did the companies manage to structure this deal as tax free? A special dividend will be paid to only Citadel shareholders prior to the merger with the ABC Radio Business, thus increasing debt and shrinking Citadel's equity and enabling Disney to have a greater than 50% equity interest in the merged Citadel-ABC entity.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:01:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Merger proxies are quite revealing. I have closely read the merger proxy in which ABC Radio Business is to be spun off from Disney (DIS) to Disney shareholders and then merged into Citadel Broadcasting (CDL). This deal was structured as a reverse Morris trust which enabled both the shareholders of Disney and Disney to escape any taxation. <!--more-->
</p>
<p>But to structure a reverse Morris Trust, it is necessary that a larger entity be merged into a smaller entity. Pre-merger Citadel's equity was valued more highly than ABC radio stations. So, how did the companies manage to structure this deal as tax free? A special dividend will be paid to only Citadel shareholders prior to the merger with the ABC Radio Business, thus increasing debt and shrinking Citadel's equity and enabling Disney to have a greater than 50% equity interest in the merged Citadel-ABC entity.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/37779-special-dividends-to-get-deals-done-did-disney-and-palm-do-right-by-shareholders?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cdl">CDL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dis">DIS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/palm">PALM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aetna: An Attractive Buyout Candidate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/15016-aetna-an-attractive-buyout-candidate?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15016</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We are cautious presently on the equity markets, and while we have been holding cash and shorting stocks, we have not been implementing many long positions. In addition, we don’t usually like to invest on the premise that a company will be bought, but we believe Aetna (AET) is a special case due to its cheap valuation. 

<p>We are well aware that Aetna recently reported disappointing earnings, and was also the subject of a recent story in the Wall Street Journal in which the company’s business model drew scrutiny. The basic idea of the story was that health insurance is becoming too expensive for employers to afford. 
</p>
<p>Yet, we do not think the problems in the health insurance sector are any more problematic than those in the hospital sector, which faces such problems as possible cuts in insurance and Medicare payments, and the trend away from hospitalization in general. Any yet HCA, a major hospital operator, has recently been the subject of a leveraged buyout offer [LBO] by a private equity consortium.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:45:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We are cautious presently on the equity markets, and while we have been holding cash and shorting stocks, we have not been implementing many long positions. In addition, we don’t usually like to invest on the premise that a company will be bought, but we believe Aetna (AET) is a special case due to its cheap valuation. 

<p>We are well aware that Aetna recently reported disappointing earnings, and was also the subject of a recent story in the Wall Street Journal in which the company’s business model drew scrutiny. The basic idea of the story was that health insurance is becoming too expensive for employers to afford. 
</p>
<p>Yet, we do not think the problems in the health insurance sector are any more problematic than those in the hospital sector, which faces such problems as possible cuts in insurance and Medicare payments, and the trend away from hospitalization in general. Any yet HCA, a major hospital operator, has recently been the subject of a leveraged buyout offer [LBO] by a private equity consortium.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/15016-aetna-an-attractive-buyout-candidate?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aet">AET</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What To Do With Our Amazon Short Now?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/14381-what-to-do-with-our-amazon-short-now?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We noted in our <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/14380">post on 7/12/06</a> that we were short Amazon (AMZN). This position has been a big winner for us, but the question is where we go from here? We analyzed the stock today in our discounted cash flow model [DCF].<!--more--> Given the company’s lower guidance on operating earnings for 2007, we have lowered our assumptions about EBITDA margins. On that basis, we can see the stock having downside potential to 25 or less. 

<p>One way to understand the stock being down 7 points today is to understand that given the company’s lower guidance, we estimate that ten cents per share in projected earnings for 2006 may be lost. Given that the company traded for about 40X earnings for 2007, if a 40 multiple is put on ten cents that equates to a reduction in price of $4.00, which is in the range of how much the stock has been down today. But even if we amend our earnings estimate to $.75 for fiscal 2007, the stock is still trading for over 30x that number. As we have said in our previous post, that is a rich valuation. 
</p>
<p>If we were to place a 20x multiple on an estimate of fiscal 2007 earnings of $.75, that would imply a price target of $15.00. Our DCF analysis projects a higher price for Amazon than does our PE analysis. Why? As we stated on the 7/12/06 post, when the market gets "nervous", it "believes" less in future cash flows. Cash flows are what drive the DCF model. When the market gets "nervous" it relies more on what "is" the case in the present, that being earnings in the near future. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:09:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We noted in our <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/14380">post on 7/12/06</a> that we were short Amazon (AMZN). This position has been a big winner for us, but the question is where we go from here? We analyzed the stock today in our discounted cash flow model [DCF].<!--more--> Given the company’s lower guidance on operating earnings for 2007, we have lowered our assumptions about EBITDA margins. On that basis, we can see the stock having downside potential to 25 or less. 

<p>One way to understand the stock being down 7 points today is to understand that given the company’s lower guidance, we estimate that ten cents per share in projected earnings for 2006 may be lost. Given that the company traded for about 40X earnings for 2007, if a 40 multiple is put on ten cents that equates to a reduction in price of $4.00, which is in the range of how much the stock has been down today. But even if we amend our earnings estimate to $.75 for fiscal 2007, the stock is still trading for over 30x that number. As we have said in our previous post, that is a rich valuation. 
</p>
<p>If we were to place a 20x multiple on an estimate of fiscal 2007 earnings of $.75, that would imply a price target of $15.00. Our DCF analysis projects a higher price for Amazon than does our PE analysis. Why? As we stated on the 7/12/06 post, when the market gets "nervous", it "believes" less in future cash flows. Cash flows are what drive the DCF model. When the market gets "nervous" it relies more on what "is" the case in the present, that being earnings in the near future. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/14381-what-to-do-with-our-amazon-short-now?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bear Case on Centex Still Appears Compelling</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/14379-the-bear-case-on-centex-still-appears-compelling?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14379</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In a previous post we wrote of our <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/13854">short of Centex</a> (CTX) in Insight’s model portfolio. 

<p>We continue to believe that Centex has at least 10-15% downside from current levels. Based on the company’s shrinking operating earnings per unit, we can easily make a case for operating earnings in the $5.50 per share range for Centex’s 2007 year, even with the company’s stock buybacks. This estimate is well below the company’s guidance of $7.00 per share. 
</p>
<p>As reported in its 8K, the company’s buybacks in the last quarter were at average prices well above its current stock price. Thus, those buybacks were not value enhancing to shareholders. It should also be remembered that buybacks serve to increase leverage, and make the company riskier, as bondholders are well aware. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:00:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In a previous post we wrote of our <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/13854">short of Centex</a> (CTX) in Insight’s model portfolio. 

<p>We continue to believe that Centex has at least 10-15% downside from current levels. Based on the company’s shrinking operating earnings per unit, we can easily make a case for operating earnings in the $5.50 per share range for Centex’s 2007 year, even with the company’s stock buybacks. This estimate is well below the company’s guidance of $7.00 per share. 
</p>
<p>As reported in its 8K, the company’s buybacks in the last quarter were at average prices well above its current stock price. Thus, those buybacks were not value enhancing to shareholders. It should also be remembered that buybacks serve to increase leverage, and make the company riskier, as bondholders are well aware. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/14379-the-bear-case-on-centex-still-appears-compelling?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctx">CTX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We're Adding to Our Centex Short </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/13854-why-we-re-adding-to-our-centex-short?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13854</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We have added to our short of Centex (CTX), the homebuilder. This stock has previously traded below book value, and we see no reason why in this environment it should trade above book. 

<p>Centex is also one of the more leveraged of homebuilders which makes its position more precarious, and less a candidate for a leveraged buyout. Leveraged buyouts are the bane of fixed income investors, and also of short sellers, and one does need to assess the potential for a leveraged buyout in shorting stocks. Still, given Centex's leverage, and the instability in homebuilders cash flows, we don't see much of a risk of an LBO currently.
</p>
<p>We think the nasty correction in real estate has far from run its course. When consumer and investor sentiment turns negative on real estate it's very hard to change. It will take something dramatic to turn the tide on real estate, like sustained rate decreases by the Fed, which Insight does not see happening anytime soon. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:40:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We have added to our short of Centex (CTX), the homebuilder. This stock has previously traded below book value, and we see no reason why in this environment it should trade above book. 

<p>Centex is also one of the more leveraged of homebuilders which makes its position more precarious, and less a candidate for a leveraged buyout. Leveraged buyouts are the bane of fixed income investors, and also of short sellers, and one does need to assess the potential for a leveraged buyout in shorting stocks. Still, given Centex's leverage, and the instability in homebuilders cash flows, we don't see much of a risk of an LBO currently.
</p>
<p>We think the nasty correction in real estate has far from run its course. When consumer and investor sentiment turns negative on real estate it's very hard to change. It will take something dramatic to turn the tide on real estate, like sustained rate decreases by the Fed, which Insight does not see happening anytime soon. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/13854-why-we-re-adding-to-our-centex-short?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctx">CTX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We're Short eBay and Amazon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/14380-why-we-re-short-ebay-and-amazon?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14380</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We believe there are a number of themes sweeping the US stock market that make shorts of Amazon and Ebay attractive. 
</p>
<p>As our post of July 6,2006 brings out, we have concerns about the health of the overall US economy. Within that theme, as money managers gravitate to more defensive stocks, cyclical and consumer dependent companies are more at risk. One of the lessons of the stock market decline of 2000-2003 was that technology companies are indeed cyclical in nature, and not immune to the fortunes of the overall economy.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:01:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Frank</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We believe there are a number of themes sweeping the US stock market that make shorts of Amazon and Ebay attractive. 
</p>
<p>As our post of July 6,2006 brings out, we have concerns about the health of the overall US economy. Within that theme, as money managers gravitate to more defensive stocks, cyclical and consumer dependent companies are more at risk. One of the lessons of the stock market decline of 2000-2003 was that technology companies are indeed cyclical in nature, and not immune to the fortunes of the overall economy.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/14380-why-we-re-short-ebay-and-amazon?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/philip-frank">Philip Frank</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
