Comments on Private Trader's articles RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.com/author/private-trader/articles http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-823638 823638 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:51:22 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-821375 821375 Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:33:04 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-811316 811316 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:41:07 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-808926 808926 Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:39:34 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-792755 792755 Have you looked at VKNG today?]]> Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:05:27 -0500 Garza is a fool who is ruining biomedreports by issuing such contradictory statements. Don't buy IMGG, by the company I own stock in! Duh, both have such statements and Garza and Stockshaven his pump and dumper buddy would lead you to believe otherwise!


On Dec 02 07:23 PM johnny cash wrote:

> Have you looked at VKNG today?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-787355 787355 Did you guys read this: > > The Company has incurred significant losses from operations, and > such losses are expected to continue. The Company's auditors have > included a "Going Concern Qualification" in their report for the > year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company has limited > working capital. The foregoing raises substantial doubt about the > Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans > include seeking additional capital and/or debt financing. There is > no guarantee that additional capital and/or debt financing will be > available when and to the extent required, or that if available, > it will be on terms acceptable to the Company. The financial statements > do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome > of this uncertainty. The "Going Concern Qualification" might make > it substantially more difficult to raise capital. > > investorshub.advfn.com... > > I would encourage all IMGG investors to look closely at VKNG-- which > is also in the imaging business, but already has FDA approval AND > had 9 Million in revenue -vs- IMGG]]> Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:23:34 -0500

On Nov 16 06:45 AM M. E. Garza wrote:

> Did you guys read this:
>
> The Company has incurred significant losses from operations, and
> such losses are expected to continue. The Company's auditors have
> included a "Going Concern Qualification" in their report for the
> year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company has limited
> working capital. The foregoing raises substantial doubt about the
> Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans
> include seeking additional capital and/or debt financing. There is
> no guarantee that additional capital and/or debt financing will be
> available when and to the extent required, or that if available,
> it will be on terms acceptable to the Company. The financial statements
> do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
> of this uncertainty. The "Going Concern Qualification" might make
> it substantially more difficult to raise capital.
>
> investorshub.advfn.com...
>
> I would encourage all IMGG investors to look closely at VKNG-- which
> is also in the imaging business, but already has FDA approval AND
> had 9 Million in revenue -vs- IMGG]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-781485 781485 IMGG is nothing but a pump job. Why else would they sell shares at > 96% below the market price to raise money- no one else will buy at > anywhere near the market price!! Read this for a real analysis: http://seekingalpha.com/user/125578/instablog > .]]> Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:39:15 -0500
On Nov 19 09:43 AM Admiral George Anson wrote:

> IMGG is nothing but a pump job. Why else would they sell shares at
> 96% below the market price to raise money- no one else will buy at
> anywhere near the market price!! Read this for a real analysis: seekingalpha.com/user/...
> .]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-773710 773710 Uh, your joking right? All one has to do is look at your comment > record and yep, it's official, you do know what garbage looks like > as you tout some dog CHI-Com bubble stock that has dragged ass for > years with barely any reliable info available (CHID.OB). > You have got to be about 12 years old, huh? > > Look sonny, you play with the bull sometimes you get the horns, which > you are about to. One filing doesn't always tell the whole story. > Read it and run along to your make believe world Mr. Soros. > > http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42430090 > ]]> Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:55:47 -0500
a) has an author who posed both positives and negatives for all to consider,

b) moved from $0.08 to a high in the mid $0.20's on notable increases in liquidity,

c) currently sits bid at 100% higher than the initial mention, and

d) offered complete transparency both in a "two sided" presentation and with no conflicting disclosures to report, either in the form of a position in the name OR receipt of payment for mentioning the company at all.

In fact, it appears exactly the type of mention that makes SA great; unbiased, non-conflicted and thorough DD done in an under followed name with real fundamentals. Bonddude, you stick to the hype stocks with nothing in them, the educated readers will follow traders who perform.


On Nov 16 04:52 PM bonddude wrote:

> Uh, your joking right? All one has to do is look at your comment
> record and yep, it's official, you do know what garbage looks like
> as you tout some dog CHI-Com bubble stock that has dragged ass for
> years with barely any reliable info available (CHID.OB).
> You have got to be about 12 years old, huh?
>
> Look sonny, you play with the bull sometimes you get the horns, which
> you are about to. One filing doesn't always tell the whole story.
> Read it and run along to your make believe world Mr. Soros.
>
> investorshub.advfn.com...
> ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-767154 767154 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:43:21 -0500 seekingalpha.com/user/... .]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-765282 765282 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:47:15 -0500 IS MORE REALISTIC THAN SOME OF THE CRAP I HAVE HEARD.THE MEDICAL SHOW IS THE END OF THIS MONTH(RSNA) AND WITH FDA APROVAL IN THE FINAL STAGES THE WAT IT IS, I BELIEVE DUMPING MY SHARES RIGHT NOW WOULD JUST BE FOOLISH, I AM NOTSTUPID I KNOW "ANY" STOCK CAN TANK.
THE WORST THING THAT HAPPENS, I GET MY MONEY BACK BUT I THINK THE REWARDS WIL BE MUCH HIGHER....]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-764872 764872 so other where do u get your analysis info from?]]> Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:46 -0500 A) Edgar in the U.S.
edgar.sec.gov/edgar/se...
B) Sedar in Canada
www.sedar.com/search/s...
C) ASIC in Australia
www.search.asic.gov.au...
D) UKLA (FSA) in the U.K.
www.fsa.gov.uk/ukla/of...
E) other:
International Organization of Securities Commissions
www.iosco.org/lists/

2) Company websites and conference calls

3) Industry specific websites and publications

4) Equity conferences

5) Compare thesis with top analysts


On Nov 17 03:24 PM b3rkut wrote:

> so other where do u get your analysis info from?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-764247 764247 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:31:33 -0500
whats the logic in that statement???]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-764236 764236 If you listen to anybody who uses Yahoo! Finance (or Google Finance, > AOL Finance, etc., etc.,) to get data from, well, they are either > trying to spin something or their due-diligence is not worth listening > too. > > I can look at almost any stock on these services, especially small > and mid-caps, and find an error within about 10 minutes or less. > Many of them get their data dump from the same vendors, like Reuters, > so if the data service provider (DSP) enters the wrong number (hasn't > updated) it is wrong on many of these services. > > This statement says it all: > > "I usually do not buy penny stocks due to their vulnerability to > manipulation etc." > > Sounds like somebody is trying to sell their position doesn't it? > > > If you people are willing to buy on this, have I got a deal for you...]]> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:24:02 -0500

On Nov 16 05:59 PM Don-n-ABQ wrote:

> If you listen to anybody who uses Yahoo! Finance (or Google Finance,
> AOL Finance, etc., etc.,) to get data from, well, they are either
> trying to spin something or their due-diligence is not worth listening
> too.
>
> I can look at almost any stock on these services, especially small
> and mid-caps, and find an error within about 10 minutes or less.
> Many of them get their data dump from the same vendors, like Reuters,
> so if the data service provider (DSP) enters the wrong number (hasn't
> updated) it is wrong on many of these services.
>
> This statement says it all:
>
> "I usually do not buy penny stocks due to their vulnerability to
> manipulation etc."
>
> Sounds like somebody is trying to sell their position doesn't it?
>
>
> If you people are willing to buy on this, have I got a deal for you...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-763112 763112 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:41:07 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-762767 762767 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:59:20 -0500
I can look at almost any stock on these services, especially small and mid-caps, and find an error within about 10 minutes or less. Many of them get their data dump from the same vendors, like Reuters, so if the data service provider (DSP) enters the wrong number (hasn't updated) it is wrong on many of these services.

This statement says it all:

"I usually do not buy penny stocks due to their vulnerability to manipulation etc."

Sounds like somebody is trying to sell their position doesn't it?

If you people are willing to buy on this, have I got a deal for you...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-762708 762708 I can't believe that Seeking Alpha allowed for a post to be made > public on a P.O.S. like this company. What a share. > > Fundamentals, what fundamentals? Maybe you're comfortable betting > on deals with roughly $1.5MM in TTM revenue and no major funding > partner, like GE for example - a company that regularly funds technology > partners and innovators, but there's no way any of the remarks made > justify a $330MM market cap. > > Finally, to the uninformed that is bonddude, you likely need to stick > to Bonds, not Equities. You incorrectly state "the stock price was > $ .04 when they did that deal," in reference to the IMGG 107,059,027 > two and a half ($0.025) placement. > > - In fact, as the 8K stated, the money closed on Oct 8, 2009, a > day on which IMGG traded between $0.54 - $0.61. > - Further fact, revealed in the company's Q3 filing (that's September > end 2009 bonddude), the company had NO MONEY BOOKED FROM THE OFFERING > which means, of course, the from Oct 1 through Oct 8 the entire $0.025 > PPM was placed - AT A MERE 95%+ DISCOUNT TO MARKET. > > What a shame this pure pump has now made it's way to SA.]]> Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:52:32 -0500 You have got to be about 12 years old, huh?

Look sonny, you play with the bull sometimes you get the horns, which you are about to. One filing doesn't always tell the whole story. Read it and run along to your make believe world Mr. Soros.

investorshub.advfn.com...


On Nov 15 10:48 PM Legacy Investments & Development, LP wrote:

> I can't believe that Seeking Alpha allowed for a post to be made
> public on a P.O.S. like this company. What a share.
>
> Fundamentals, what fundamentals? Maybe you're comfortable betting
> on deals with roughly $1.5MM in TTM revenue and no major funding
> partner, like GE for example - a company that regularly funds technology
> partners and innovators, but there's no way any of the remarks made
> justify a $330MM market cap.
>
> Finally, to the uninformed that is bonddude, you likely need to stick
> to Bonds, not Equities. You incorrectly state "the stock price was
> $ .04 when they did that deal," in reference to the IMGG 107,059,027
> two and a half ($0.025) placement.
>
> - In fact, as the 8K stated, the money closed on Oct 8, 2009, a
> day on which IMGG traded between $0.54 - $0.61.
> - Further fact, revealed in the company's Q3 filing (that's September
> end 2009 bonddude), the company had NO MONEY BOOKED FROM THE OFFERING
> which means, of course, the from Oct 1 through Oct 8 the entire $0.025
> PPM was placed - AT A MERE 95%+ DISCOUNT TO MARKET.
>
> What a shame this pure pump has now made it's way to SA.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-762633 762633 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:59:49 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-761844 761844 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:58:19 -0500
You are clearly biased. First you own VKNG and have not declared that position here. Why are you going on an IMGG board to promote a stock you own, your own $$$ reasons.

You are not a news organization if you were you'd also include the statement VKNG made in their 10Q filed 11.06.09

"Management believes that the Company’s existing cash resources, combined with projected cash flows from operations may not be sufficient to execute its business plan and continue operations for the next twelve months."

Sophisticated investors are aware of these standard statements but, perhaps not that you make a living pumping companies you own stock in. Now you lower yourself, in an attempt to get stockholders to switch to a company you own with similar disqualifying statements.

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-761627 761627 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:45:02 -0500
The Company has incurred significant losses from operations, and such losses are expected to continue. The Company's auditors have included a "Going Concern Qualification" in their report for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company has limited working capital. The foregoing raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans include seeking additional capital and/or debt financing. There is no guarantee that additional capital and/or debt financing will be available when and to the extent required, or that if available, it will be on terms acceptable to the Company. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The "Going Concern Qualification" might make it substantially more difficult to raise capital.

investorshub.advfn.com...

I would encourage all IMGG investors to look closely at VKNG-- which is also in the imaging business, but already has FDA approval AND had 9 Million in revenue -vs- IMGG
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-761483 761483 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:22:39 -0500 400 MILLION is more like it]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-761480 761480 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:19:21 -0500 total-It is around 400 million+ O/S now.
The CEO Dean Janes has said the only remaining questions the FDA had was the labeling/intended use issue.
Now the fact that the FDA is still inquiring to IMGG about how they labeled their intended uses for the Dominion obviously means there are some issues that the FDA was not agreeable in approving this Device under IMGG's prior submission of labeling/intended use.
Dean Janes is now saying that issue is resolved but its not up to him,its up to the FDA to approve this recent resubmission by IMGG.
This FDA approval is NOT a slam dunk yet' as many would have you believe.
There has been hundreds of CEO's that have been confident that their drug or device would be approved,only to have the FDA give them a Black Eye...
The Dominion may get approval,but this overconfidence is a negative..]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-761155 761155 Are you nuts ? They did a private placement on Oct 8th of 107,059,027 > shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.025 per share]]> Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:17:52 -0500 After all, they got a good look under the hood, right?


On Nov 15 10:35 AM dual cit wrote:

> Are you nuts ? They did a private placement on Oct 8th of 107,059,027
> shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.025 per share]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-760851 760851 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:35:29 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/173359-buy-shares-of-imaging3-in-anticipation-of-future-fda-approval?source=feed#comment-760795 760795 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:16:57 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/128017-is-pennantpark-the-best-business-development-company-around?source=feed#comment-691325 691325 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:22:39 -0400
www.easyir.com/easyir/...
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/81477-brazilian-telecom-going-monopolistic?source=feed#comment-688597 688597 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:48:19 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/81477-brazilian-telecom-going-monopolistic?source=feed#comment-688596 688596 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:47:14 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/81477-brazilian-telecom-going-monopolistic?source=feed#comment-512381 512381 Thu, 21 May 2009 02:34:40 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/128017-is-pennantpark-the-best-business-development-company-around?source=feed#comment-494592 494592 Thu, 07 May 2009 17:17:32 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/128017-is-pennantpark-the-best-business-development-company-around?source=feed#comment-447077 447077 Well, thanks for sharing ... and wasting our time. > > > "While I don't have a lot of time to diversify my portfolio ...
> > "I don’t have time to debate politics here..." > > "I applaud the ...even if I do not know if the facts are correct. > " > > "Another question, which I have not been able to answer ..." > > > "I hope that helps. > > NMB" > > Not really. You've been mindlessly pumping this stock and (allegedly) > buying it all the way down.]]> Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:16:15 -0400
NMB

On Mar 31 06:19 AM Edit or perish wrote:

> Well, thanks for sharing ... and wasting our time.
>
>
> "While I don't have a lot of time to diversify my portfolio ...

>
> "I don’t have time to debate politics here..."
>
> "I applaud the ...even if I do not know if the facts are correct.
> "
>
> "Another question, which I have not been able to answer ..."
>
>
> "I hope that helps.
>
> NMB"
>
> Not really. You've been mindlessly pumping this stock and (allegedly)
> buying it all the way down.]]>