<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Research 2.0 - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Research 2.0' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0</link>
    <item>
      <title>Actions Semiconductor: A Tough Spot in a Tough Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/171912-actions-semiconductor-a-tough-spot-in-a-tough-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">171912</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&rsquo;ve been looking at a small Chinese semiconductor company called Actions Semiconductor that has some interesting product lines and what appears to be pretty strong operating management.</p><p>It&rsquo;s been an ugly transition. The company has the core market of multimedia system-on-a-chip products and that has left it at a much lower revenue run rate ($40 million-50 million/year) then it has enjoyed in the past.  However, the company has taken steps to dramatically reduce costs, and yet invests a staggering portion of revenue in R&amp;D and has massively increased its capabilities in other areas like higher end multimedia and also new markets like automobiles.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:30:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&rsquo;ve been looking at a small Chinese semiconductor company called Actions Semiconductor that has some interesting product lines and what appears to be pretty strong operating management.</p><p>It&rsquo;s been an ugly transition. The company has the core market of multimedia system-on-a-chip products and that has left it at a much lower revenue run rate ($40 million-50 million/year) then it has enjoyed in the past.  However, the company has taken steps to dramatically reduce costs, and yet invests a staggering portion of revenue in R&amp;D and has massively increased its capabilities in other areas like higher end multimedia and also new markets like automobiles.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/171912-actions-semiconductor-a-tough-spot-in-a-tough-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/acts">ACTS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nvda">NVDA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/play">PLAY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sgtl">SGTL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Home Price Declines Show Signs of Slowing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/92914-home-price-declines-show-signs-of-slowing?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92914</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/8/27/saupload_sp.png" style="text-align: left; float: right;" />US home prices continued to decline in June, though at a slowing pace. The <a target="_blank" href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_Release_082653.pdf">S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices </a>showed continued broad-based declines in the prices of existing single family homes across the country through June.</p> <p>The decline in the National Home Price Index &ndash; which covers all nine census divisions &ndash; remained in double digits, recording a record 15.4% decline in the second quarter of 2008 versus the second quarter of 2007. This is larger than the decline of 14.2% reported in the first quarter of the year. The 10-City and 20-City Composites also set new records, with annual declines of 17.0% and 15.9%, respectively. However, it should be noted that the acceleration in decline was only moderate in June. The May numbers reported annual declines of 16.9% and 15.8%, respectively.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:01:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/8/27/saupload_sp.png" style="text-align: left; float: right;" />US home prices continued to decline in June, though at a slowing pace. The <a target="_blank" href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_Release_082653.pdf">S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices </a>showed continued broad-based declines in the prices of existing single family homes across the country through June.</p> <p>The decline in the National Home Price Index &ndash; which covers all nine census divisions &ndash; remained in double digits, recording a record 15.4% decline in the second quarter of 2008 versus the second quarter of 2007. This is larger than the decline of 14.2% reported in the first quarter of the year. The 10-City and 20-City Composites also set new records, with annual declines of 17.0% and 15.9%, respectively. However, it should be noted that the acceleration in decline was only moderate in June. The May numbers reported annual declines of 16.9% and 15.8%, respectively.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/92914-home-price-declines-show-signs-of-slowing?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Global Markets Still Vulnerable to Systemic Risk - IMF</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/87427-global-markets-still-vulnerable-to-systemic-risk-imf?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87427</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/28/saupload_imf.png" style="text-align: left; float: right;" />Despite recent policy interventions to mitigate the effects of the subrime crisis, global financial markets continue to be fragile and systemic risks remain elevated, the International Monetary Fund says in its latest assessment.</p> <p>&ldquo;Credit quality across many loan classes has begun to deteriorate with declining house prices and slowing economic growth. Although banks have succeeded in raising additional capital, balance sheets are under renewed stress and bank equity prices have fallen sharply,&rdquo; according to the IMF&rsquo;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fmu/eng/2008/02/pdf/0708.pdf">Global Financial Stability Report Market Update.</a></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:05:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/28/saupload_imf.png" style="text-align: left; float: right;" />Despite recent policy interventions to mitigate the effects of the subrime crisis, global financial markets continue to be fragile and systemic risks remain elevated, the International Monetary Fund says in its latest assessment.</p> <p>&ldquo;Credit quality across many loan classes has begun to deteriorate with declining house prices and slowing economic growth. Although banks have succeeded in raising additional capital, balance sheets are under renewed stress and bank equity prices have fallen sharply,&rdquo; according to the IMF&rsquo;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fmu/eng/2008/02/pdf/0708.pdf">Global Financial Stability Report Market Update.</a></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/87427-global-markets-still-vulnerable-to-systemic-risk-imf?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robust Outlook for Investment-Grade Corporate Debt - S&amp;P</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/86511-robust-outlook-for-investment-grade-corporate-debt-s-p?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><img style="text-align: left; float: right;" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/23/saupload_splogo.png" alt="" />Despite tough economic conditions and rising default rates, Standard &amp; Poor&rsquo;s sees a robust outlook for corporate debt issuance, at least in the investment grade sector.</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Amid a stumble in the U.S. economy, unprecedented commodity-price pressure and a lender community still skittish after the turmoil seen throughout the credit markets, it may seem logical to prepare an epitaph for corporate debt issuance. Standard &amp; Poor&rsquo;s Ratings Services&rsquo; review of various industries and sectors suggests otherwise.</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:49:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img style="text-align: left; float: right;" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/7/23/saupload_splogo.png" alt="" />Despite tough economic conditions and rising default rates, Standard &amp; Poor&rsquo;s sees a robust outlook for corporate debt issuance, at least in the investment grade sector.</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p>Amid a stumble in the U.S. economy, unprecedented commodity-price pressure and a lender community still skittish after the turmoil seen throughout the credit markets, it may seem logical to prepare an epitaph for corporate debt issuance. Standard &amp; Poor&rsquo;s Ratings Services&rsquo; review of various industries and sectors suggests otherwise.</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/86511-robust-outlook-for-investment-grade-corporate-debt-s-p?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sun Rains on the Open Source Software IPO Parade</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/60420-sun-rains-on-the-open-source-software-ipo-parade?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60420</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Some open source software [OSS] purists on the blogosphere–and some
outright double-dipping conflicted for-profit OSS company
executives–have been beating the drum for over a year about the
upcoming parade of IPOs that we would see from the OSS movement. But
reality happened, market forces intervened, Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) bought Zimbra, Citrix
(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctxs' title='More opinion and analysis of CTXS'>CTXS</a>) bought Xensource (paying way too much), and the OSS IPO marching band
kept getting smaller and smaller. Wednesday Sun (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java' title='More opinion and analysis of JAVA'>JAVA</a>) <a href="http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-01/sunflash.20080116.1.xml">acquired MySQL</a>, pulling the lead trombone of the OSS IPO parade, out of the line of march. The marching band is about to become a quintet.</p>
<p>Two weeks ago <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/59274-open-source-software-major-software-suppliers-converge/">I wrote</a> about the rapid convergence
of the open source software movement with the enterprise software
world’s leading suppliers. Sun had already begun to open-source many of
its software assets and switch to the subscription accounting that is
the primary way of measuring OSS in the market, so in a way this means
no change to that opinion. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:49:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Some open source software [OSS] purists on the blogosphere–and some
outright double-dipping conflicted for-profit OSS company
executives–have been beating the drum for over a year about the
upcoming parade of IPOs that we would see from the OSS movement. But
reality happened, market forces intervened, Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) bought Zimbra, Citrix
(<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctxs' title='More opinion and analysis of CTXS'>CTXS</a>) bought Xensource (paying way too much), and the OSS IPO marching band
kept getting smaller and smaller. Wednesday Sun (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java' title='More opinion and analysis of JAVA'>JAVA</a>) <a href="http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-01/sunflash.20080116.1.xml">acquired MySQL</a>, pulling the lead trombone of the OSS IPO parade, out of the line of march. The marching band is about to become a quintet.</p>
<p>Two weeks ago <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/59274-open-source-software-major-software-suppliers-converge/">I wrote</a> about the rapid convergence
of the open source software movement with the enterprise software
world’s leading suppliers. Sun had already begun to open-source many of
its software assets and switch to the subscription accounting that is
the primary way of measuring OSS in the market, so in a way this means
no change to that opinion. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/60420-sun-rains-on-the-open-source-software-ipo-parade?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/java">JAVA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NetSuite: Not as Well Positioned as Larger Players</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/57985-netsuite-not-as-well-positioned-as-larger-players?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57985</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/>
<p>This is an excerpt from a research note published and send to clients on December 18th:</p>
<p>NetSuite (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/n' title='More opinion and analysis of N'>N</a>) is adding its name to the mix of public
companies investors will have to choose from in the software as a
service (SaaS) space.  NetSuite is attempting to
position itself as an integrated ERP solution for small to medium sized
businesses [SMB] versus competition that aims more at a specific
application area like accounting (Intuit (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intu' title='More opinion and analysis of INTU'>INTU</a>)), sales (salesforce.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='More opinion and analysis of CRM'>CRM</a>)),
marketing (Vocus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vocs' title='More opinion and analysis of VOCS'>VOCS</a>)) or human resources (Workday). </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/>
<p>This is an excerpt from a research note published and send to clients on December 18th:</p>
<p>NetSuite (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/n' title='More opinion and analysis of N'>N</a>) is adding its name to the mix of public
companies investors will have to choose from in the software as a
service (SaaS) space.  NetSuite is attempting to
position itself as an integrated ERP solution for small to medium sized
businesses [SMB] versus competition that aims more at a specific
application area like accounting (Intuit (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intu' title='More opinion and analysis of INTU'>INTU</a>)), sales (salesforce.com (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crm' title='More opinion and analysis of CRM'>CRM</a>)),
marketing (Vocus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vocs' title='More opinion and analysis of VOCS'>VOCS</a>)) or human resources (Workday). </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/57985-netsuite-not-as-well-positioned-as-larger-players?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/n">N</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oracle Almost Keeps Pace with Microsoft</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/57981-oracle-almost-keeps-pace-with-microsoft?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>So what kind of year did Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) have? Oracle doesn’t think of it
this way but the year ended for it on Nov 30, 2007. I say that because
IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) and SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) and many other large software suppliers (except the
obvious, the largest) report their annual results on a calendar-year
basis. I may be stating the obvious but it is easier for people who
build investment research models to adjust Oracle’s trailing 12 months
ending Nov 30 to the other leaders than to adjust all the others to
Oracle’s May 31 fiscal year ending. </p>
<p>After backcasting for Oracle’s acquisitions in 2006 and 2007,
Research 2.0 estimates that the database/application software market
leader grew all types of revenue about 16% in the 12 months ending
November 30, 2007 vs. the 12 months ending Nov. 30, 2006. The
difference between our estimate and the higher growth rate reported in
press releases is due to the fact that the press release does not take
into account the timing of such acquisitions as Hyperion, Agile,
Stellent, SPL Worldgroup, MetaSolv and others. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>So what kind of year did Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='More opinion and analysis of ORCL'>ORCL</a>) have? Oracle doesn’t think of it
this way but the year ended for it on Nov 30, 2007. I say that because
IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) and SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) and many other large software suppliers (except the
obvious, the largest) report their annual results on a calendar-year
basis. I may be stating the obvious but it is easier for people who
build investment research models to adjust Oracle’s trailing 12 months
ending Nov 30 to the other leaders than to adjust all the others to
Oracle’s May 31 fiscal year ending. </p>
<p>After backcasting for Oracle’s acquisitions in 2006 and 2007,
Research 2.0 estimates that the database/application software market
leader grew all types of revenue about 16% in the 12 months ending
November 30, 2007 vs. the 12 months ending Nov. 30, 2006. The
difference between our estimate and the higher growth rate reported in
press releases is due to the fact that the press release does not take
into account the timing of such acquisitions as Hyperion, Agile,
Stellent, SPL Worldgroup, MetaSolv and others. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/57981-oracle-almost-keeps-pace-with-microsoft?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap">SAP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nektar: Sometimes Fundamental Analysis Takes Awhile To Work</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/54321-nektar-sometimes-fundamental-analysis-takes-awhile-to-work?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Way back in 2002/2003, one very senior analyst (who will remain
unnamed) was very impressive but just outside of what we could afford to
pay in compensation.&#160; When asked about best ideas, he made a compelling
and high-conviction case for Nektar (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nktr' title='More opinion and analysis of NKTR'>NKTR</a>), which at the time was trading for
around $18. He insisted it would be $30+ inside a year.</p>
<p>Another very different analyst named Richard Yeh was quite young and
inexperienced.&nbsp; But he was smart and hard-working.&nbsp; As was typical for
less-experienced analysts, he was asked to do some research work and
present his findings.&nbsp; We asked him to research Nektar and to look into
the whole Exubera idea and process to see how it might play out.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:18:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Way back in 2002/2003, one very senior analyst (who will remain
unnamed) was very impressive but just outside of what we could afford to
pay in compensation.&#160; When asked about best ideas, he made a compelling
and high-conviction case for Nektar (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nktr' title='More opinion and analysis of NKTR'>NKTR</a>), which at the time was trading for
around $18. He insisted it would be $30+ inside a year.</p>
<p>Another very different analyst named Richard Yeh was quite young and
inexperienced.&nbsp; But he was smart and hard-working.&nbsp; As was typical for
less-experienced analysts, he was asked to do some research work and
present his findings.&nbsp; We asked him to research Nektar and to look into
the whole Exubera idea and process to see how it might play out.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/54321-nektar-sometimes-fundamental-analysis-takes-awhile-to-work?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nktr">NKTR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Playing With the Fire at E*Trade </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/54319-playing-with-the-fire-at-e-trade?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54319</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
We had a small position in E*Trade which we initiated last week, in part due to agreeing with some of the long-term conclusions put forth by Bill Miller at Legg Mason in his <a href='http://www.leggmason.com/funds/knowledge/management/2007MillerCommentaryQ3.pdf'>3Q letter to shareholders (.pdf)</a>. 
</p>
<p>E*Trade was doing what many were doing in the mortgage business.  Based on a credit score alone you could easily get a mortgage with no documentation, no appraisal (other than a supposed "drive by") and very low fees.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:13:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>
We had a small position in E*Trade which we initiated last week, in part due to agreeing with some of the long-term conclusions put forth by Bill Miller at Legg Mason in his <a href='http://www.leggmason.com/funds/knowledge/management/2007MillerCommentaryQ3.pdf'>3Q letter to shareholders (.pdf)</a>. 
</p>
<p>E*Trade was doing what many were doing in the mortgage business.  Based on a credit score alone you could easily get a mortgage with no documentation, no appraisal (other than a supposed "drive by") and very low fees.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/54319-playing-with-the-fire-at-e-trade?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/etfc">ETFC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What do IBM and Microsoft Do When Oracle has a Captive Audience?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/54105-what-do-ibm-and-microsoft-do-when-oracle-has-a-captive-audience?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54105</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When I did software marketing back in the day, user group meetings
were not major events. The key information-technologist and IT-staff
meetings of the year were the spring and fall ACM/DPMA/IEEE/etc.
“Joint” conferences in the 1960s followed by the annual National
Computer Conference [NCC] in the 1970s and—in the 1980s—the geeky
tradeshow that probably single-handedly drove the mob out of Las Vegas,
Comdex. From a marketing perspective, every IT supplier was on a level
playing field in trying to get the attention of the press and
prospective customers. </p>
<p>Beginning in the 1990s, smarter software marketeers than my
generation’s figured out it would be much better to deal with a captive
audience of already committed customers. Thus IT suppliers began to put
the full court press on their own user conferences and the great
all-comer IT trade shows faded away. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:34:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>When I did software marketing back in the day, user group meetings
were not major events. The key information-technologist and IT-staff
meetings of the year were the spring and fall ACM/DPMA/IEEE/etc.
“Joint” conferences in the 1960s followed by the annual National
Computer Conference [NCC] in the 1970s and—in the 1980s—the geeky
tradeshow that probably single-handedly drove the mob out of Las Vegas,
Comdex. From a marketing perspective, every IT supplier was on a level
playing field in trying to get the attention of the press and
prospective customers. </p>
<p>Beginning in the 1990s, smarter software marketeers than my
generation’s figured out it would be much better to deal with a captive
audience of already committed customers. Thus IT suppliers began to put
the full court press on their own user conferences and the great
all-comer IT trade shows faded away. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/54105-what-do-ibm-and-microsoft-do-when-oracle-has-a-captive-audience?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cogn">COGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft&#8217;s Latest SaaS Message is a Step Backwards</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/48934-microsofts-latest-saas-message-is-a-step-backwards?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48934</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) said September 30 that it had introduced “Online”
services and “Live” services to “deliver connected computing options
for people and businesses.” I found the announcement one of the most
confusing I ever received from a software supplier, from the odd Sunday
timing, to the stark bifurcation the announcement made between “Live”
and “Online,” to the sentence after the explanation of why a hard
difference between Live and Online was important, which used both terms
(“Office Live Workspace is among the first entries in the new wave of
online services”). If Online services are something different than Live
services, which is Workspace?</p>
<p>In the annual <a href="http://research2zero.com/">Research 2.0</a>
review, I gave Microsoft high marks for understanding that people are
people, whether or not they are in their personal or professional roles
at one instant in time. The future for IT-enabled service providers is
one of a single compute structure that supports us all as our roles
change during the day—from looking for directions on the way to work,
to our roles at work (be they individual contributor or manager), to
paying the bills at home, to looking for entertainment before leaving
work, to shopping online (hopefully not while working), and so forth.
The principle applies over longer time periods as well. Scratch my
favorable analysis. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:45:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) said September 30 that it had introduced “Online”
services and “Live” services to “deliver connected computing options
for people and businesses.” I found the announcement one of the most
confusing I ever received from a software supplier, from the odd Sunday
timing, to the stark bifurcation the announcement made between “Live”
and “Online,” to the sentence after the explanation of why a hard
difference between Live and Online was important, which used both terms
(“Office Live Workspace is among the first entries in the new wave of
online services”). If Online services are something different than Live
services, which is Workspace?</p>
<p>In the annual <a href="http://research2zero.com/">Research 2.0</a>
review, I gave Microsoft high marks for understanding that people are
people, whether or not they are in their personal or professional roles
at one instant in time. The future for IT-enabled service providers is
one of a single compute structure that supports us all as our roles
change during the day—from looking for directions on the way to work,
to our roles at work (be they individual contributor or manager), to
paying the bills at home, to looking for entertainment before leaving
work, to shopping online (hopefully not while working), and so forth.
The principle applies over longer time periods as well. Scratch my
favorable analysis. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/48934-microsofts-latest-saas-message-is-a-step-backwards?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crocs Craziness Continues: Not The Right Time To Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/46234-crocs-craziness-continues-not-the-right-time-to-short?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46234</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
Crox (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crox' title='More opinion and analysis of CROX'>CROX</a>) has been a hot topic among investors and shorts.  The consumer fashion area is far outside of our field, but we watch the shares with greedy anticipation of the day when the music stops, much as it often does with companies like this including LA Gear, Leapfrog (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lf' title='More opinion and analysis of LF'>LF</a>) and so on.
</p>
<p>As we close out the summer with the last weekend of barbeques and beach weather, we note that our anecdotal experience keeps us away from shorting CROX, at least here and now.  Without going into details, it’s clear that kids will pick these ugly, holey shoes against all reason. The important point though is that immediately every close friend who doesn’t have Crocs must immediately have them.   Watching parent after parent put their credit card down, no matter how unenthusiastically, made it clear that the phenomenon is not yet over.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:30:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>
Crox (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crox' title='More opinion and analysis of CROX'>CROX</a>) has been a hot topic among investors and shorts.  The consumer fashion area is far outside of our field, but we watch the shares with greedy anticipation of the day when the music stops, much as it often does with companies like this including LA Gear, Leapfrog (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lf' title='More opinion and analysis of LF'>LF</a>) and so on.
</p>
<p>As we close out the summer with the last weekend of barbeques and beach weather, we note that our anecdotal experience keeps us away from shorting CROX, at least here and now.  Without going into details, it’s clear that kids will pick these ugly, holey shoes against all reason. The important point though is that immediately every close friend who doesn’t have Crocs must immediately have them.   Watching parent after parent put their credit card down, no matter how unenthusiastically, made it clear that the phenomenon is not yet over.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/46234-crocs-craziness-continues-not-the-right-time-to-short?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crox">CROX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skype Usage in Decline</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/46157-skype-usage-in-decline?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46157</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>We published a free report noting our increasing concern that Skype growth is rolling over.  It could be partly due to seasonality but the numbers for the past few months are poor for a company that should be in a secular growth whirlwind - some outages notwithstanding.</p>
<p><img  alt="" src="http://research2zero.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/skypeusagepatterns-200708302.jpg" height="350" width="402"></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:23:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We published a free report noting our increasing concern that Skype growth is rolling over.  It could be partly due to seasonality but the numbers for the past few months are poor for a company that should be in a secular growth whirlwind - some outages notwithstanding.</p>
<p><img  alt="" src="http://research2zero.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/skypeusagepatterns-200708302.jpg" height="350" width="402"></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/46157-skype-usage-in-decline?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ebay">EBAY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Energy Costs Pose Another Negative Catalyst For Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/45966-high-energy-costs-pose-another-negative-catalyst-for-real-estate?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45966</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of good posts out there arguing for weakness in real estate.  The listings we get every week tell the same story.  At least in the Boston area we see numerous price reductions and most sales below offering prices.  </p>
<p>Lately, however, a number of new listings and price reductions made us realize that at least in the North East we might see additional pressure to unload properties that are especially old and inefficient when it comes to energy use.  We’ve seen some listings we might have jumped at two years ago but now won’t even look at them because they would cost a small fortune to heat and power.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:07:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of good posts out there arguing for weakness in real estate.  The listings we get every week tell the same story.  At least in the Boston area we see numerous price reductions and most sales below offering prices.  </p>
<p>Lately, however, a number of new listings and price reductions made us realize that at least in the North East we might see additional pressure to unload properties that are especially old and inefficient when it comes to energy use.  We’ve seen some listings we might have jumped at two years ago but now won’t even look at them because they would cost a small fortune to heat and power.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/45966-high-energy-costs-pose-another-negative-catalyst-for-real-estate?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCO vs. Novell: The Last Word Has Yet To Be Said</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/44660-sco-vs-novell-the-last-word-has-yet-to-be-said?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44660</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you care about open source software [OSS] market trends and investment issues related to OSS for the IT industry’s largest companies, the OSS blogosphere is telling you that you should be excited about a Utah Federal District Court ruling on August 10. The judge ruled against SCO (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scox' title='More opinion and analysis of SCOX'>SCOX</a>) and in favor of Novell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/novl' title='More opinion and analysis of NOVL'>NOVL</a>) on a number of claims in a five-year-old court case over who owns 35-year-old UNIX copyrights related to a 12-year-old asset sale. But IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) and any company that runs Linux is also involved.
</p>
<p>Remember, this ruling came down in Utah, where Novell was formed (although it is now based in Cambridge, Massachusetts), where SCO is located (although it was formed in Santa Cruz, California) and where the court still distributes forms in WordPerfect. Also remember today’s SCO is not the 1995 SCO, and today’s Novell is not the 1995 Novell (but that would take too long to explain). These factoids could all become relevant in any appeal process.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:25:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you care about open source software [OSS] market trends and investment issues related to OSS for the IT industry’s largest companies, the OSS blogosphere is telling you that you should be excited about a Utah Federal District Court ruling on August 10. The judge ruled against SCO (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scox' title='More opinion and analysis of SCOX'>SCOX</a>) and in favor of Novell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/novl' title='More opinion and analysis of NOVL'>NOVL</a>) on a number of claims in a five-year-old court case over who owns 35-year-old UNIX copyrights related to a 12-year-old asset sale. But IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) and any company that runs Linux is also involved.
</p>
<p>Remember, this ruling came down in Utah, where Novell was formed (although it is now based in Cambridge, Massachusetts), where SCO is located (although it was formed in Santa Cruz, California) and where the court still distributes forms in WordPerfect. Also remember today’s SCO is not the 1995 SCO, and today’s Novell is not the 1995 Novell (but that would take too long to explain). These factoids could all become relevant in any appeal process.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/44660-sco-vs-novell-the-last-word-has-yet-to-be-said?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/novl">NOVL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scox">SCOX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawson: &#8220;The&#8221; IBM ERP Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/44658-lawson-the-ibm-erp-play?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44658</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Despite Lawson’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lwsn' title='More opinion and analysis of LWSN'>LWSN</a>) relatively small size in the applications market at under $500M in applications and maintenance revenue in its <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/42615">FY 2007</a>, which ended May 31, 2007, Research 2.0 follows Lawson from time to time because it is basically the last ERP pure play. SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) is now doing over a billion dollars a year in middleware and most of the other name-brand application players sell more standalone applications (HR, CRM, project management, and so forth) than they sell ERP. 

<p>Therefore Lawson is one of the best overall ERP market indicators (Lawson does sell a lot of standalone HR but that functionality works in an ERP suite if users want it that way, so we consider Lawson’s revenue to be all ERP).
</p>
<p>A little over a year ago, when the Lawson/Intentia merger was formalized I wrote that Lawson was rapidly becoming “the” IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) ERP play. I don’t think IBM would appreciate that characterization because IBM itself does not offer an ERP product and partners with multiple partners, other than Lawson, that do. But Harry Debes, CEO of Lawson, hinted at the concept during his presentation August 8, 2007, to financial analysts. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:16:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Despite Lawson’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lwsn' title='More opinion and analysis of LWSN'>LWSN</a>) relatively small size in the applications market at under $500M in applications and maintenance revenue in its <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/42615">FY 2007</a>, which ended May 31, 2007, Research 2.0 follows Lawson from time to time because it is basically the last ERP pure play. SAP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sap' title='More opinion and analysis of SAP'>SAP</a>) is now doing over a billion dollars a year in middleware and most of the other name-brand application players sell more standalone applications (HR, CRM, project management, and so forth) than they sell ERP. 

<p>Therefore Lawson is one of the best overall ERP market indicators (Lawson does sell a lot of standalone HR but that functionality works in an ERP suite if users want it that way, so we consider Lawson’s revenue to be all ERP).
</p>
<p>A little over a year ago, when the Lawson/Intentia merger was formalized I wrote that Lawson was rapidly becoming “the” IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>) ERP play. I don’t think IBM would appreciate that characterization because IBM itself does not offer an ERP product and partners with multiple partners, other than Lawson, that do. But Harry Debes, CEO of Lawson, hinted at the concept during his presentation August 8, 2007, to financial analysts. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/44658-lawson-the-ibm-erp-play?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lwsn">LWSN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If New York Times Scraps TimesSelect, What Then?!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42815-if-new-york-times-scraps-timesselect-what-then?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42815</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There have been stories recently that the NY Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='More opinion and analysis of NYT'>NYT</a>) might discontinue their subscription-based offering TimesSelect.  Part of the reason is that authors in the paper, especially in the OpEd section, don’t want there to be a gate between their content and the world.  As a writer, you want as many people as possible to read your work, it’s great if they pay but you generally favor readership over dollars. 
</p>
<p>The problem with TimesSelect and similar offerings from other papers is that they are annoying for the readers and subscribers.  Some content is free, others require a login.  I’m a subscriber but sometimes my computer seems to forget how to login automatically and if the article isn’t that important I’m too busy to go through the whole "retrieve password" exercise.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:17:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There have been stories recently that the NY Times (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt' title='More opinion and analysis of NYT'>NYT</a>) might discontinue their subscription-based offering TimesSelect.  Part of the reason is that authors in the paper, especially in the OpEd section, don’t want there to be a gate between their content and the world.  As a writer, you want as many people as possible to read your work, it’s great if they pay but you generally favor readership over dollars. 
</p>
<p>The problem with TimesSelect and similar offerings from other papers is that they are annoying for the readers and subscribers.  Some content is free, others require a login.  I’m a subscriber but sometimes my computer seems to forget how to login automatically and if the article isn’t that important I’m too busy to go through the whole "retrieve password" exercise.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42815-if-new-york-times-scraps-timesselect-what-then?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt">NYT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vonage:  The Trend Certainly Is Not Their Friend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42805-vonage-the-trend-certainly-is-not-their-friend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42805</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In the early days many of us were enthusiastic users of Vonage (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vg' title='More opinion and analysis of VG'>VG</a>) and the company deserves some credit for breaking the ice of stupidly high calling rates, especially internationally, for those smart enough to place our little Vonage boxes around the world.

<p>Of course technology is a tough business and during the past two years we have found more and more utility from Skype.  [Skype has some serious problems too but that’s another story/future post.]
</p>
<p>We finally bit the bullet and called Vonage to cancel our services.  This is the sad part.  Of course, like most subscription based services [including your phone company] you can get a lower price buy just calling and asking these days so they immediately offered to take the $24.95/month to $19.95.  Then there was a $14.99 option.  Still no?  How about $9.99?   Well we also have a $4.99 plan.  Still no?!?
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In the early days many of us were enthusiastic users of Vonage (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vg' title='More opinion and analysis of VG'>VG</a>) and the company deserves some credit for breaking the ice of stupidly high calling rates, especially internationally, for those smart enough to place our little Vonage boxes around the world.

<p>Of course technology is a tough business and during the past two years we have found more and more utility from Skype.  [Skype has some serious problems too but that’s another story/future post.]
</p>
<p>We finally bit the bullet and called Vonage to cancel our services.  This is the sad part.  Of course, like most subscription based services [including your phone company] you can get a lower price buy just calling and asking these days so they immediately offered to take the $24.95/month to $19.95.  Then there was a $14.99 option.  Still no?  How about $9.99?   Well we also have a $4.99 plan.  Still no?!?
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42805-vonage-the-trend-certainly-is-not-their-friend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vg">VG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft Expands On &#8220;Software Plus Service&#8221; Concept </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42802-microsoft-expands-on-software-plus-service-concept?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42802</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I sort of “live blogged” the Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) Financial Analyst Day. I say, “sort of” because I did not actually post it up in real time, and I was in and out of the room with phone calls. And, oh by the way, I was not even there (but attended over the web).

<p>In the afternoon session, we heard more about the Software Plus Service strategy <a href="http://software.seekingalpha.com/article/28389">than we had heard in the spring</a>. More important, we heard less about advertising and devices being of equal importance with software and service than we had heard in the morning sessions from Steve Ballmer (comments on the morning session are <a href="http://research2zero.com/blog/2007/07/26/some-unstructured-live-blogging-from-the-morning-session-at-the-microsoft-financial-analysts-day">here</a>). 
</p>
<p>In the morning Ballmer had talked about the four (software, service, advertising, devices) as if they were the pillars of Corinth (I know, there are only three remaining). But by the time of the Q and A at the end of the day, advertising had returned to being a way to monetize technology, as it is with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>), and I didn’t hear a mention of a Microsoft telephone or Microsoft TV.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:21:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I sort of “live blogged” the Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) Financial Analyst Day. I say, “sort of” because I did not actually post it up in real time, and I was in and out of the room with phone calls. And, oh by the way, I was not even there (but attended over the web).

<p>In the afternoon session, we heard more about the Software Plus Service strategy <a href="http://software.seekingalpha.com/article/28389">than we had heard in the spring</a>. More important, we heard less about advertising and devices being of equal importance with software and service than we had heard in the morning sessions from Steve Ballmer (comments on the morning session are <a href="http://research2zero.com/blog/2007/07/26/some-unstructured-live-blogging-from-the-morning-session-at-the-microsoft-financial-analysts-day">here</a>). 
</p>
<p>In the morning Ballmer had talked about the four (software, service, advertising, devices) as if they were the pillars of Corinth (I know, there are only three remaining). But by the time of the Q and A at the end of the day, advertising had returned to being a way to monetize technology, as it is with Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>), and I didn’t hear a mention of a Microsoft telephone or Microsoft TV.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42802-microsoft-expands-on-software-plus-service-concept?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HP Uses Cash To Cover Up More Bad Business</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42674-hp-uses-cash-to-cover-up-more-bad-business?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42674</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Those of us in the software business joke about HP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) antics.  Like Sun Microsystems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sunw' title='More opinion and analysis of SUNW'>SUNW</a>) before it, it has proven to be one of the worst run companies out there vis-a-vis software.  In contrast to IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), which at least has Steve Mills to generate return on investment, HP has no such person or strategy.
</p>
<p>Back in May we gave <a href="http://www.research2zero.com/reports/CACouncil05152007.pdf">a talk</a> at the CA Council for Technical Excellence that focused on the missing "S" in SOA.  The large technology vendors continue not to really get it from a business perspective.  In fact during our research it became very clear that HP was the poster child for doing things the wrong way and even its OpenView product was going into the tank (CA (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ca' title='More opinion and analysis of CA'>CA</a>) was happy to hear this as is IBM I’m sure).
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Research 2.0</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Those of us in the software business joke about HP (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq' title='More opinion and analysis of HPQ'>HPQ</a>) antics.  Like Sun Microsystems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sunw' title='More opinion and analysis of SUNW'>SUNW</a>) before it, it has proven to be one of the worst run companies out there vis-a-vis software.  In contrast to IBM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='More opinion and analysis of IBM'>IBM</a>), which at least has Steve Mills to generate return on investment, HP has no such person or strategy.
</p>
<p>Back in May we gave <a href="http://www.research2zero.com/reports/CACouncil05152007.pdf">a talk</a> at the CA Council for Technical Excellence that focused on the missing "S" in SOA.  The large technology vendors continue not to really get it from a business perspective.  In fact during our research it became very clear that HP was the poster child for doing things the wrong way and even its OpenView product was going into the tank (CA (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ca' title='More opinion and analysis of CA'>CA</a>) was happy to hear this as is IBM I’m sure).
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42674-hp-uses-cash-to-cover-up-more-bad-business?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/research-2-0">Research 2.0</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
